Let me address your comments point by point and expose the inconsistencies and deflections in your narrative:
Ok, I genuinely smile reading this... after having my jaw-drop moment for a few second. I smiled. Genuinely. Because I am amused and amazed how someone apparently can be very narrow-minded.
I'll address your points, point-by-point, to expose the
consistency in my narrative and the deflection is only in your mind. Hopefully it'll widen your perspective about how this world worked.
Your Role and Allegiance
You claim to operate selflessly, but who funds your activities? If you’re not paid by players, then it stands to reason that casinos, including Stake, are your backers. This inherent conflict of interest disqualifies you as an unbiased observer.
Fund my activities of what? You mean my daily life? As my activities here literally only need a device [that I'll admit I bought specifically to cater the forum needs and not to get my crypto life and IRL life mixed, so they have to be on separate device] and an internet connection, that I already paid monthly to cater my personal and professional needs, so crypto needs kinda "free-loading" the already existing service that I already paid for the betterment of the other aspect of my life. Since it's an unlimited access, I don't mind it to "free-load".
So yeah, I believe you're referring to my daily life.
Who funds my life if not players or casinos [the assortment of them]? This is where I smiled after my jaw dropped. Because I can't believe someone can be this naive.
Ever heard something called "job"? An activity where you do something and earned something in return, usually in form of money? Yeah, I have that. A good one too.
I believe I've brushed it several times across my posts in the past. I have a job, I live comfortably, and my activities here is my way to repay mother nature for what she gave me.
Proof of it? Easy.
If you scrutinize my post history, you'll see that I am only available on certain time in the day, for a couple of hours, before I disappeared and return for another couple of hours several hours later. Know why? It's
not because I am meeting the leader of KKK or the owner of Stake or BC or Rollbit or Sportsbet or the Secret Society of The New World Order. It's because I am working.
A job.
That is where I get fund to sustain my life.
Honestly, does someone having an IRL job really didn't cross your mind? Like... at all? Normal people would.
Your Ignoring Mechanism
Despite claiming to have me on ignore, you somehow manage to read my posts, respond selectively, and dismiss valid evidence. Either you’re using “ignore” as a hollow excuse, or you’re deliberately attempting to derail discussions that expose the truth about Stake and similar operations.
The proof that I ignore you is there on the screenshot. About how I read your posts despite the ignore, I've covered it here, as part of the burden of the "duty" I take when I created my list [that post, by the way, also contain a proof that I factually put you on ignore].
[...]
We can rest assured that I am still fulfilling my obligation of keeping the status of his cases on my list updated, though, as I frequently click the show/hide his posts to see if there anything that worth changing the status of the cases.[...]
My screenshot above gave a good picture of the patch and ads-on that prominent members of the forum gave that allows me to read posts of people that I put on ignore with ease. See that "show/hide" button on the right-hand side.
About "respond selectively", I've explained on above, it's because you mentioned me and the TG notification bot notify me. Otherwise, I won't respond. So... that's not "respond selectively", that's "reacting". I'll consider to react by completely ignoring any of your mention this point forward if that'll satisfy you, though.
About "
derail discussions that expose the truth about Stake and similar operations" again, hooooowwww? I literally said nothing. How on earth do I derail a discussion when I didn't even say a
word letter? This made me really really curious about the answer for my previous question, about how many times you fell, head-first, while you're an infant.
Your logic and your mind seems to be working... otherworldly.
Omission of Evidence
You failed to include the thread “Stake.com’s Rigged House Games? Unmasking the Flawed Math Behind Their 'Fair'” in the case history despite its thorough statistical analysis. Instead of engaging with the evidence presented, you chose to focus on unrelated threads and dismissed legitimate concerns with condescension.
The reason it's not included already explained on previous post. Their fairness is provable, someone from an independent third party even facilitated a verification by building his own script, and the result was, IIRC, verifiable. That itself [with the lack of supporting evidence] should be enough to mark the thread as invalid according to the predetermined standard I put on my thread. If you deemed that it's not good enough, explanation made by others should give you a very comprehensive understanding that your accusation is not valid.
Your Deflection and Premature Judgments
You accused me of making "invalid" scam claims based on your biased perspective. However, the statistical data, gameplay patterns, and Stake's non-transparent practices speak for themselves. Dismissing detailed analysis as "invalid" without addressing the core issues reflects poorly on your integrity.
Explained above.
Unanswered Questions
If you’re truly neutral, why do you avoid adding critical threads to the case?
Show me one critical thread that I did not add to my case? Certainly you can differentiate between "not adding" and "yet to have time to add"? I update my list weekly, usually by the end of the week, though at times, I can't do this because my weekend stole my entire day.
Unless, you're referring
your case as the "critical threads", which been explained again and again and again and again and again and again.
Why do you consistently downplay legitimate grievances while parroting casino narratives?
I what?
How do you sustain yourself while supposedly offering this service “for free”?
Job. A work. Business.
But why don't I turn the table? Since you're all about "legitimate" and critical and statistical and all, I'll offer you the same question that I gave to others who [endlessly] questions my relation with casinos: prove it. The Blockchain is there, at your service. If I am at their payroll, you'll easily find them.
One thing that I can't help but wonder is what really crossed these people's head, those who think I am in bed with casinos. Just because I have their contacts and they answer to my summon, that does not mean we're friend.
Well, we are "friend" but we are not friend. I mean, for the love of all holy and dark being, what would you feel [I'll ask this to anyone, not just you] if I reach you on daily basis to tell you that you have an issue, and when you did not answer, I kept nudging your TG or through PM until you get it done? What would you feel if whenever you open your phone and got a notification that I messaged you, it means I brought you a problem and criticize you?
On Being Put on Ignore
The evidence of me putting you on ignore is abundance. Can't help but find it funny, though. I think this is the first time I ever read throughout the forum [though there is a good chance I am wrong] that someone doesn't believe they're put on ignore by someone else.
Your response only solidifies my belief that you are yet another entity acting in bad faith, much like Casino Guru or Abhyroose. The mask you wear may be different, but the agenda remains the same—to protect casino interests at the expense of victims.
Wasn't that belief already established in your mind when I first tried to help your case, a case which you omit several crucial keypoints, got it resolved nonetheless, and later on said I twist your words? No? Oh well.
From this point forward, I will treat your involvement as what it is: an effort to derail and dismiss valid concerns for motives that are increasingly suspect. You are now on my ignore list. Don’t expect further engagement.
Again, my bubblegum, how exactly does someone derail and dismiss valid concerns when they literally said nothing?
Me on your ignore list? Oh no, that'll be the end of this world [this said in a flat tone, in case we need a clear setting].
Me to not expect further engagement? Yeah, that's one of the point of putting you on ignore in the first place. To keep me from engaging in a conversation with you, lest I twist your word, remember? Duh. Brain.
