[ANN]BANKERA – Building the Bank for the Blockchain Era

[mig6r]

The BNK token is not liquid and widespread/established yet to generally serve as collateral. So it seems quite normal that the native token is not supported yet to act as collateral.

It is not liquid because the project attracts no interest ( beyond the ICO )... Other lending projects stuck to their own coin (but not exclusively ) right after their ICOs and allowed it to be used.

Now how about the Top 20 exchange IDCM ( as claimed by Bankera's team, which we have established by now that it wasn't a top 20 at all ) and supposed massive increase in trading volume. Today it traded 0.8 BTC.. Ha ha ha, yep that's compared to a total volume of 69845 BTC total for the same period at IDCM. Zero interest there too.

As for IDAX, 3 BTC volume.... Out of 123000. To give you an idea, IDAX shows 93 coins listed and BNK is ranking at 71 for volume on that exchange. Out of 93, 8 have no volume recorded so that really makes it 71 out of 81. A 130 Million ICO to end up there ?

Ok this is true but it is also the case for a lot of the other projects. There is only so much total liquidity in the market and if that is spread among thousands of projects, only the best ones will win.

[mosprognoz]

Bullshit

Is this a dog barking who is supporting the biggest scam called Bitcoin SV ? I guess you are involved in all major scams here on bitconitalk. Here you can clearly see our friend Morkolta in opposition for the flag created on Bitcoin SV scam. (Do not try to delete it) because it is archived.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=60

Also you joined a lot of scam bounty campaigns and get paid in scam tokens.

 It seems to me that you are just an immoral motherfucker and a beggar, who will shill for any scam that is paying out.

[mosprognoz]

The BNK token is not liquid and widespread/established yet to generally serve as collateral. So it seems quite normal that the native token is not supported yet to act as collateral.

It is not liquid because the project attracts no interest ( beyond the ICO )... Other lending projects stuck to their own coin (but not exclusively ) right after their ICOs and allowed it to be used.

Now how about the Top 20 exchange IDCM ( as claimed by Bankera's team, which we have established by now that it wasn't a top 20 at all ) and supposed massive increase in trading volume. Today it traded 0.8 BTC.. Ha ha ha, yep that's compared to a total volume of 69845 BTC total for the same period at IDCM. Zero interest there too.

As for IDAX, 3 BTC volume.... Out of 123000. To give you an idea, IDAX shows 93 coins listed and BNK is ranking at 71 for volume on that exchange. Out of 93, 8 have no volume recorded so that really makes it 71 out of 81. A 130 Million ICO to end up there ?

Soon it will be 0 trading volume because nobody is buying this shit. And yes the scam is over. Now vytautas scamlevičius karalevičius and friends are slowly exitscamming.  

[SP!]

The BNK token is not liquid and widespread/established yet to generally serve as collateral. So it seems quite normal that the native token is not supported yet to act as collateral.

It is not liquid because the project attracts no interest ( beyond the ICO )... Other lending projects stuck to their own coin (but not exclusively ) right after their ICOs and allowed it to be used.

Now how about the Top 20 exchange IDCM ( as claimed by Bankera's team, which we have established by now that it wasn't a top 20 at all ) and supposed massive increase in trading volume. Today it traded 0.8 BTC.. Ha ha ha, yep that's compared to a total volume of 69845 BTC total for the same period at IDCM. Zero interest there too.

As for IDAX, 3 BTC volume.... Out of 123000. To give you an idea, IDAX shows 93 coins listed and BNK is ranking at 71 for volume on that exchange. Out of 93, 8 have no volume recorded so that really makes it 71 out of 81. A 130 Million ICO to end up there ?

Soon it will be 0 trading volume because nobody is buying this shit. And yes the scam is over. Now vytautas scamlevičius karalevičius and friends are slowly exitscamming.  

Look, obviously I dont know your personal journey with Bankera, but I do think you are being unfair.  You are making allegations that have no basis.  We have all been hit hard with this journey so I can understand why you may be angry, but personally attacking people is really not the smartest way to go about it.  If this truly is a scam, then the market will eventually find them out and the authorities will deal with them (not you).  However, if you can allow yourself to be a little more open minded, what if this is a genuine business that needs time to release its projects as per their road map?  You really will look foolish if this starts to perform as expected when they deliver as per their road map.  You need to give them a chance!

[MirkoIta]

Bullshit

Is this a dog barking who is supporting the biggest scam called Bitcoin SV ? I guess you are involved in all major scams here on bitconitalk. Here you can clearly see our friend Morkolta in opposition for the flag created on Bitcoin SV scam. (Do not try to delete it) because it is archived.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=60

Also you joined a lot of scam bounty campaigns and get paid in scam tokens.

 It seems to me that you are just an immoral motherfucker and a beggar, who will shill for any scam that is paying out.

Post us the Europol email retarded.

[huup]

Bullshit

Look at your trust page dude.  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2425032

Two positive sent feedbacks, one to bankera and another to vytautas scamlevičius karalevičius. I will collect all your profiles (Paid shills) and post them in a scam accusation thread with request of a permanent ban due to shilling and shitposting. Get a real job dude. Shitposting and shilling for a worthless BNK tokens is not a good idea.

P.S. And here are your posts since registration. All of them about bankera scam

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2425032;sa=showPosts;start=60

Quite similar to this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2091093.msg51481313#msg51481313 and dozens of others.

jamolo https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2228349

EA001 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2589739

huup https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2425032

jubeis_coffee https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=917738

Platonicus https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1221014

alpey https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1014090

qbeststar https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1025313

henke1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1388816

gumshed https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1157422

Jfdalhus https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1109925

Mokka223 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=562075

THIS IS JUST A VERY SHORT LIST OF BANKERA PAID SHILLS

HAHAHAHAHAHA!

ok Sherlock i went thru your list. As I wanted to see if there is any piece off evidence. Nothing! There is nothing to be found. I wanted to make a whole counter post, but one example will prove to be enough. You just took out persons who have a low post rate and point them out to being Shillers. Your false accusation are getting serious now and i cannot wait for you to make that post so we can finally ask for you to get banned.
If someone would take the time. Please do go thru all those peoples post. But i have one example for you.

Mister qbeststar which is a big shiller and needed to be pointed out by you? LOL he has exactly 3 posts. And you know what? They aren't even about Bankera :-)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1025313;sa=showPosts

Please go and waste someone else their time.

[mig6r]

The BNK token is not liquid and widespread/established yet to generally serve as collateral. So it seems quite normal that the native token is not supported yet to act as collateral.

It is not liquid because the project attracts no interest ( beyond the ICO )... Other lending projects stuck to their own coin (but not exclusively ) right after their ICOs and allowed it to be used.

Now how about the Top 20 exchange IDCM ( as claimed by Bankera's team, which we have established by now that it wasn't a top 20 at all ) and supposed massive increase in trading volume. Today it traded 0.8 BTC.. Ha ha ha, yep that's compared to a total volume of 69845 BTC total for the same period at IDCM. Zero interest there too.

As for IDAX, 3 BTC volume.... Out of 123000. To give you an idea, IDAX shows 93 coins listed and BNK is ranking at 71 for volume on that exchange. Out of 93, 8 have no volume recorded so that really makes it 71 out of 81. A 130 Million ICO to end up there ?

Soon it will be 0 trading volume because nobody is buying this shit. And yes the scam is over. Now vytautas scamlevičius karalevičius and friends are slowly exitscamming.  

It is what it is. A lot of us had to take losses on many projects and regrettably this might not be an exception. We will find out soon.

[Syndrome]

The BNK token is not liquid and widespread/established yet to generally serve as collateral. So it seems quite normal that the native token is not supported yet to act as collateral.

It is not liquid because the project attracts no interest ( beyond the ICO )... Other lending projects stuck to their own coin (but not exclusively ) right after their ICOs and allowed it to be used.

Now how about the Top 20 exchange IDCM ( as claimed by Bankera's team, which we have established by now that it wasn't a top 20 at all ) and supposed massive increase in trading volume. Today it traded 0.8 BTC.. Ha ha ha, yep that's compared to a total volume of 69845 BTC total for the same period at IDCM. Zero interest there too.

As for IDAX, 3 BTC volume.... Out of 123000. To give you an idea, IDAX shows 93 coins listed and BNK is ranking at 71 for volume on that exchange. Out of 93, 8 have no volume recorded so that really makes it 71 out of 81. A 130 Million ICO to end up there ?

Soon it will be 0 trading volume because nobody is buying this shit. And yes the scam is over. Now vytautas scamlevičius karalevičius and friends are slowly exitscamming.  

The team only spent the money without developing anything for all this time.
Actually, what they did at the moment could be done for a couple of hundred thousand dollars.
Another scam from eastern europe to the collection.

[SP!]

The BNK token is not liquid and widespread/established yet to generally serve as collateral. So it seems quite normal that the native token is not supported yet to act as collateral.

It is not liquid because the project attracts no interest ( beyond the ICO )... Other lending projects stuck to their own coin (but not exclusively ) right after their ICOs and allowed it to be used.

Now how about the Top 20 exchange IDCM ( as claimed by Bankera's team, which we have established by now that it wasn't a top 20 at all ) and supposed massive increase in trading volume. Today it traded 0.8 BTC.. Ha ha ha, yep that's compared to a total volume of 69845 BTC total for the same period at IDCM. Zero interest there too.

As for IDAX, 3 BTC volume.... Out of 123000. To give you an idea, IDAX shows 93 coins listed and BNK is ranking at 71 for volume on that exchange. Out of 93, 8 have no volume recorded so that really makes it 71 out of 81. A 130 Million ICO to end up there ?

Soon it will be 0 trading volume because nobody is buying this shit. And yes the scam is over. Now vytautas scamlevičius karalevičius and friends are slowly exitscamming.  

The team only spent the money without developing anything for all this time.
Actually, what they did at the moment could be done for a couple of hundred thousand dollars.
Another scam from eastern europe to the collection.

This is exactly what I am talking about.  We cannot prove/verify anything, so we can only work with the facts we have in front of us.  They probably have only spent Eur 200k so far, but that is fine by me.  As already stated, the money raised during the ICO will be mainly used for their loans service.  We will appreciate the power of these funds when the loans business is operational!  It's not rocket science … The more money they have, they more money they can deploy … Or put another way, the less money they spend, the more money they can deploy!

[Milky86]

How will Facebook’s Libra affect Bankera?

[frcat]

How will Facebook’s Libra affect Bankera?

How this could be affect? Facebook is developing a stable coin. And Bankera is probably developing just platform for issuing security tokens offering... But they even dont have no one launched project yet on platform.

[SP!]

How will Facebook’s Libra affect Bankera?

How this could be affect? Facebook is developing a stable coin. And Bankera is probably developing just platform for issuing security tokens offering... But they even dont have no one launched project yet on platform.

Stable coin my arse!  These fools are building an info harvesting coin … I would never trust them.  They have enough information about you from Facebook alone and this will literally complete the puzzle.  They will have EVERY spending habit of yours to the penny which is useful information to sell on to others … Fuck them!

[Piston Honda]

they are BOTH shit LOL

[mig6r]

How will Facebook’s Libra affect Bankera?

How this could be affect? Facebook is developing a stable coin. And Bankera is probably developing just platform for issuing security tokens offering... But they even dont have no one launched project yet on platform.

You never know, maybe on top of what Facebook is building more is to come in the future, also about security tokens.

[holdtodie1993]

1 satoshi soon.

[flashtr0n]

Bankera. Why for almost a month now there is no reward for keeping coins on SpectroCoin and Exchange?
This is a disgusting attitude to your investors - the norm for Balts (ex. USSR)?

[gumshed]

Bankera. Why for almost a month now there is no reward for keeping coins on SpectroCoin and Exchange?
This is a disgusting attitude to your investors - the norm for Balts (ex. USSR)?

yeah

[Bankera]

Bankera. Why for almost a month now there is no reward for keeping coins on SpectroCoin and Exchange?

Hi, we apologize for the delay. The delayed payments will be paid out in the near future.

[mosprognoz]

Bankera. Why for almost a month now there is no reward for keeping coins on SpectroCoin and Exchange?

Hi, we apologize for the delay. The delayed payments will be paid out in the near future.

Sure... "IN NEAR FUTURE" This scam is coming to the end. Vytautas scamralevičius karalevičius & Co are slowly exitscamming. Let's bring some facts together.

ICO collected over 120 million dollars.

1. Promised a bank of blockchain era - Delivered scammy exchange with no trading volumes

2. Promised  to pay transactional revenue share to BNK holders. - Delivered shitty payouts (Investor will need at least 25 years to return his invested capital only)

3. Promised reward for keeping coins on SpectroCoin and Exchange - Delivered promises to pay in near future.

4. There is no physical office where investors can visit bankera. (You can buy a whole building, for just a small amount out from 120 millions)

Now promising some bullshit service called bankera loans which is absolutely unnecessary and scammy because you have to use "Major cryptos for collateral"  There are dozens of that services on bitcointalk https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1596878.0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1339521.0 Also there are other companies that are offering that service https://nexo.io/instant-crypto-loans/bitcoin-loan https://coinloan.io/?ref=02127846 and many others.

CONCLUSION:

ALL BANKERA INVESTORS ARE RIPPED OFF.

[SP!]

Bankera. Why for almost a month now there is no reward for keeping coins on SpectroCoin and Exchange?

Hi, we apologize for the delay. The delayed payments will be paid out in the near future.

Sure... "IN NEAR FUTURE" This scam is coming to the end. Vytautas scamralevičius karalevičius & Co are slowly exitscamming. Let's bring some facts together.

ICO collected over 120 million dollars.

1. Promised a bank of blockchain era - Delivered scammy exchange with no trading volumes

2. Promised  to pay transactional revenue share to BNK holders. - Delivered shitty payouts (Investor will need at least 25 years to return his invested capital only)

3. Promised reward for keeping coins on SpectroCoin and Exchange - Delivered promises to pay in near future.

4. There is no physical office where investors can visit bankera. (You can buy a whole building, for just a small amount out from 120 millions)

Now promising some bullshit service called bankera loans which is absolutely unnecessary and scammy because you have to use "Major cryptos for collateral"  There are dozens of that services on bitcointalk https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1596878.0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1339521.0 Also there are other companies that are offering that service https://nexo.io/instant-crypto-loans/bitcoin-loan https://coinloan.io/?ref=02127846 and many others.

CONCLUSION:

ALL BANKERA INVESTORS ARE RIPPED OFF.

Mate, just some friendly advice.  By all means, air your views, but do you really think it's smart to publish explicit threats like that in todays day and age?  If I were you, I would remove this.  Of course I understand your anger, as we are all in the same boat, but this is childish and potentially dangerous.