|
ineededausername
|
 |
February 01, 2012, 10:02:10 PM |
|
Oops, we just broke a few walls. Time to reevaluate...
|
(BFL)^2 < 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
gewure
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
[#][#][#]
|
|
February 01, 2012, 10:13:02 PM |
|
Oops, we just broke a few walls. Time to reevaluate...
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Digigami
|
|
February 01, 2012, 10:36:10 PM |
|
dang, missed the action!
Did the walls get bought up or were they removed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
ineededausername
|
|
February 01, 2012, 10:42:58 PM |
|
dang, missed the action!
Did the walls get bought up or were they removed?
there is a 19k wall that is moving 0.05 USD up every 5 min or so what will it do when it gets to $6.2  |
(BFL)^2 < 0
|
|
|
|
bb113
|
|
February 02, 2012, 03:22:17 AM |
|
What proportion of those "steps" occur at a multiple of 10 cents? It looks like all of them. Do you round to the nearest $0.1?
|
|
|
|
|
arepo
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
this statement is false
|
|
February 05, 2012, 09:55:50 AM |
|
combined with the recent market resilience to the small correction back to $5.70, i'd say it looks rather bullish
|
this sentence has fifteen words, seventy-four letters, four commas, one hyphen, and a period.
18N9md2G1oA89kdBuiyJFrtJShuL5iDWDz
|
|
|
|
ineededausername
|
|
February 10, 2012, 05:22:04 PM |
|
I see... interesting. So since you're simply correlating time series, what role does the "volume needed to move price" diagram play in your analysis?
|
(BFL)^2 < 0
|
|
|
dree12
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1077
|
|
February 10, 2012, 11:25:26 PM |
|
Interesting charts you have there, chodpada. The Price/$ Volume somewhat scares me: it indicates the dollars pumped into the market since the June 2011 peak is close to 8 times the amount that brought Bitcoin to that peak. Is this interpretation correct, or am I missing something?
|
|
|
|
|
arepo
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
this statement is false
|
|
February 11, 2012, 07:26:14 PM |
|
Seeing that the order book seems to be converging on my support resistance chart I am going to stop feeding information into the market altogether... For now.
Sorry guys, it's for science.
lol i noticed that but didn't say anything because i rely on your analysis so much  |
this sentence has fifteen words, seventy-four letters, four commas, one hyphen, and a period.
18N9md2G1oA89kdBuiyJFrtJShuL5iDWDz
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
February 11, 2012, 07:58:53 PM |
|
Seeing that the order book seems to be converging on my support resistance chart I am going to stop feeding information into the market altogether... For now.
Sorry guys, it's for science.
For Science! |
|
|
|
arepo
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
this statement is false
|
|
February 15, 2012, 12:22:18 AM |
|
Random reinforcement still seems to be the order of the day.
This tells me that profits from trading will remain easy pickings in the foreseeable future.
maybe sharing your charts added stability to the market?  |
this sentence has fifteen words, seventy-four letters, four commas, one hyphen, and a period.
18N9md2G1oA89kdBuiyJFrtJShuL5iDWDz
|
|
|
|
teflone
|
|
February 15, 2012, 12:57:43 AM |
|
Here is a look at the ratio of cumulative $ volume vs cumulative BTC volume over time. So far the highest peak was at $6.65 on September 8, 2011. Linear scale.  Gartner hype cycle.. |
|
|
|
|
teflone
|
|
February 15, 2012, 11:32:27 PM |
|
Here is a look at the ratio of cumulative $ volume vs cumulative BTC volume over time. So far the highest peak was at $6.65 on September 8, 2011. Linear scale. Gartner hype cycle.. Textbook. No textbooks are squarish, this is much more rounded...  lmfao |
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
February 15, 2012, 11:55:40 PM |
|
No textbooks are squarish, this is much more rounded... lmfao As always, thank you for your valuable contribution  . |
|
|
|
|
