|
RickJamesBTC
|
 |
February 07, 2014, 04:59:42 AM |
|
Yeah, I'm gone until this gets up and running again. Last hour I'm showing half my hash rate on the stats feed, compared to what I push normally. If you can't handle the volume H20, stop accepting new accounts, kill off some smaller ones, whatever.
To be frank you want the highest hash rates as possible from the most people; I agree if possible load between systems need to be split up but the more people mining means better profitability overall (you can set up different groups of miners to mine different coins). Of course, the payouts should be evened out but the possibilities are really good to get profitability above ~ 0.015 MH/s if that happened. No, I want the pool to be 100% stable. It's plenty big enough to work now, adding tons of little miners who don't have 50MH each just causes a lot of server traffic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int
somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll
change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ckoeber
Member
 Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 10
|
|
February 07, 2014, 05:47:01 AM |
|
No, I want the pool to be 100% stable. It's plenty big enough to work now, adding tons of little miners who don't have 50MH each just causes a lot of server traffic.
We are not disagreeing; I wouldn't want tons of miners on one small subset of systems. If it were possible it would be nice to see some tiered auto-switching services where smaller hash-rates get ported to one set of servers and larger hash-rates get put on another set. I don't want the pool to suffer but I also believe it is unfair to say well some people only can manage 1~2 MH/s so they can't use a profitable pool and bump them off. There are far more people out there pushing only 1~2 MH/s and collectively they not only out-mine the folks with beefier setups they help the pool as a whole with cranking out more alt-coins. |
|
|
|
|
avidwriter
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
February 07, 2014, 06:03:59 AM |
|
Check the Twitter feed, half hash rate was due to display bug with new coin type. Fixing soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
a1binos
|
|
February 07, 2014, 06:18:41 AM |
|
Oh. shit. but whats the bug with payout???
I got 45 MH/s and today payout is... 0.389 BTC = 0.0086 BTC/MHs
LOL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
a1binos
|
|
February 07, 2014, 06:21:08 AM |
|
No, I want the pool to be 100% stable. It's plenty big enough to work now, adding tons of little miners who don't have 50MH each just causes a lot of server traffic.
HAHAHA. you with 50MH doing same traffic as 50 people with 1 MH/s. LoL. |
|
|
|
|
ckoeber
Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 10
|
|
February 07, 2014, 06:30:02 AM |
|
No, I want the pool to be 100% stable. It's plenty big enough to work now, adding tons of little miners who don't have 50MH each just causes a lot of server traffic.
HAHAHA. you with 50MH doing same traffic as 50 people with 1 MH/s. LoL. Not necessarily; there is overhead associated with every connection beyond hash rate. RickJamesBTC is correct. 50 MH/s on a few miners will generate less overall traffic than 50-100 miners doing 0.5~1 MH/s each. You need to think about EACH of those smaller miners needing a separate connection to the stratum mining software to submit their shares and the overhead involved with that. |
|
|
|
|
ckoeber
Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 10
|
|
February 07, 2014, 06:30:37 AM |
|
Oh. shit. but whats the bug with payout???
I got 45 MH/s and today payout is... 0.389 BTC = 0.0086 BTC/MHs
LOL.
Send a link to your chart. |
|
|
|
|
|
RickJamesBTC
|
|
February 07, 2014, 06:44:30 AM |
|
No, I want the pool to be 100% stable. It's plenty big enough to work now, adding tons of little miners who don't have 50MH each just causes a lot of server traffic.
HAHAHA. you with 50MH doing same traffic as 50 people with 1 MH/s. LoL. Haha? You say you have the same hash power. Trust me, all the little miners with one or two cards are filling up the databases and making the entire system slower or broken. This isn't scaling well, and the pool op doesn't seem to be the guy to fix it. Not sure if he will be hiring someone to get things working better or just taking time with it, but big nasty crashes like today where the system is just losing customer hash power really doesn't look good. |
|
|
|
|
sgsdebruijn
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
February 07, 2014, 06:51:59 AM |
|
I am going to another pool till everything is stable, sick of the instabillity.
0,008btc / 1mH on useast
Or, 0,006 btc / 280x card last night
|
|
|
|
|
kalus
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 263
let's make a deal.
|
|
February 07, 2014, 07:01:22 AM |
|
The crypto market, as well as US stock market are both on a downswing right now.
RickJamesBTC is not the first person to point out db inefficiencies and scaling issues with middlecoin. This pool may be a victim of their own success.
I encourage people to vote with their hashrates. the main reason i am here is because of the stability, and there may be more stable alternatives on offer right now.
|
DC2ngEGbd1ZUKyj8aSzrP1W5TXs5WmPuiR wow need noms
|
|
|
sgsdebruijn
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
February 07, 2014, 07:45:47 AM |
|
Thanks for the tip, i'm on it, looking good, bye Middlecoin for some time back when probs are over. |
|
|
|
|
quakefiend420
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 07, 2014, 08:39:57 AM |
|
Take a look at the combined graph on middlecoin.com
Total hash rate is at around 16000mh/s. BIG drop!!
It's probably mining Vertcoin which uses a different scrypt memory function and thus lower hashrate. Don't worry guys. Not possible, you have to use a modded cgminer to do that. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pfool
|
|
February 07, 2014, 08:43:54 AM |
|
New version available on http://stratehm.net : -Added the twitter timeline of middlecoinpool -Added pages about the Bitcoin value in old currencies -Some other minor improvements |
Thanx  BTC: 19wv8FQKv3NkwTdzBCQn1AGsb9ghqBPWXi |
|
|
|
gtraah
|
|
February 07, 2014, 08:47:44 AM |
|
When is there going to be a stop ? You can just let 100000000 People in... I think this needs some control where is H20? if he cannot keep up with the server load and adding new servers then make away to LOCK out new users until it can be handled
|
|
|
|
|
|
linked67
|
|
February 07, 2014, 09:00:40 AM |
|
I have a question about servers.
We now have multiple servers mining different coins (or maybe the same sometimes).
Let's say uswest and useast server mine DOGE on the same time and uswest has more hash power that useast.
Then uswest has more chance to find a block and useast has done some work for nothing.
Since we have different payout because shares are not mixed, are we not fighting server VS server for the same pool ?
|
|
|
|
ckoeber
Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 10
|
|
February 07, 2014, 09:02:01 AM |
|
New version available on http://stratehm.net : -Added the twitter timeline of middlecoinpool -Added pages about the Bitcoin value in old currencies -Some other minor improvements Nice. If possible what will make this really nice is a calculation of middlecoin's profitability. Perhaps somewhere on the sidebar? Thanks again. |
|
|
|
|
ckoeber
Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 10
|
|
February 07, 2014, 09:10:33 AM |
|
I have a question about servers.
We now have multiple servers mining different coins (or maybe the same sometimes).
Let's say uswest and useast server mine DOGE on the same time and uswest has more hash power that useast.
Then uswest has more chance to find a block and useast has done some work for nothing.
Since we have different payout because shares are not mixed, are we not fighting server VS server for the same pool ?
It's possible; depends on how H20 has the different pools set up. From folks who have been doing the calculations on the different pools I would say profitability is really close (minus the outages). So I wouldn't say that is the main issue right now. As for folks saying lock out the pools; if that were to be done I would hope it is done on new folks just coming in versus folks with 1-2 MH/s hashrates. I don't see why folks with 1-2 MH/s hash-rates should be thrown under the bus because folks with huge farms are unhappy. If anyone were to be locked out it should be new-comers not the people who have been mining for the longest. |
|
|
|
|
justmwa
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
February 07, 2014, 10:12:39 AM |
|
IMO with 3% h2o can afford to conduct business properly, hiring DBA if needed to fix the daily stats issues and eventually adding an aging value to the unexchanged stock so one can tweak agressiveness of btc trading. My 0.002DOG  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
has2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
February 07, 2014, 11:38:07 AM |
|
I am having a weird issue at http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/1FvPws2odJLcu7sDCrMPoNbe7zcjkYGVYs.html For some reason my balance stopped updating and is stuck at 0.0, this issue has resulted in no payouts on that address, i have since switched to a new address(except for 1 300kh/s miner which i still have to switch) and things are working fine on that new address. You can see immature and unexchanged growing but balance has been at 0.0 for over 2 days now, very weird. |
|
|
|
|
|
