Bitcoin Forum
March 25, 2019, 08:47:53 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 [582] 583 584 585 586 »
  Print  
Author Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s  (Read 878394 times)
Gleb Gamow
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1118



View Profile
July 08, 2015, 09:13:41 PM
 #11621

Looks like Cockmeier has a new gig: https://www.linkedin.com/in/abramkottmeier

Your Bitcoin transactions
The Ultimate Bitcoin mixer
made truly anonymous.
with an advanced technology.
Mix coins
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1553503673
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553503673

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1553503673
Reply with quote  #2

1553503673
Report to moderator
1553503673
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553503673

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1553503673
Reply with quote  #2

1553503673
Report to moderator
notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1876
Merit: 1013



View Profile
July 08, 2015, 09:55:20 PM
 #11622

Looks like Cockmeier has a new gig: https://www.linkedin.com/in/abramkottmeier



There's an entire thread dedicated to this guy!

Hook-nosed people are evil
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1104953.0
perezoso
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 09, 2015, 01:07:03 AM
 #11623

Hi Icetard and Armyof1Idiot!

I just dropped by to say that this original petitioner remains happy he petitioned!  Sorry your panties are still twirled up about it all.

Now I want to go check out that Cockmeier thread.

Perezoso

armyof1ne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 09, 2015, 10:34:24 AM
 #11624

Hi Icetard and Armyof1Idiot!

I just dropped by to say that this original petitioner remains happy he petitioned!  Sorry your panties are still twirled up about it all.

Now I want to go check out that Cockmeier thread.

Perezoso


Ignorance is bliss they say.
armyof1ne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 20, 2015, 02:30:04 PM
 #11625

I'm just gonna ask this, how much are the petitioners going to have to pay in lawyers fees? i know the court only allowed somewhere in the range of $60,000 to be disbursed to them, but they requested something like $1,250,000, is that going to be billed to the petitioners?  I would assume some of the bigger names like KOI could eat it and use it as a tax write off, or is it going to be distributed evenly?  Just some information i'd like to know.
I know some lawyers have it in a clause they they would eat it and write it off, but i don't think that would apply to many bankruptcy proceedings.
Anyone have this information?
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 1001



View Profile
July 23, 2015, 07:53:53 AM
 #11626

Anyone have this information?
Why don't you go finding this information out in the sea of very special knowledge you must have attained from for every other of your posts?

Cyperdoc feels innocent today:

Quote
i am in a dispute with Hashfast so i can't talk too many details but in this country, one is normally considered innocent until proven guilty and i deny all their allegations and expect to prevail. i've never dealt directly with him in any financial tx yet he's issued a negative rating acting like i have which he will willingly remove contingent on me giving him money i rightfully earned and isn't his.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3e8a4v/jeff_g_throwing_the_hammer_down_today_on_devlist/ctd3x1y

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
armyof1ne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 23, 2015, 12:25:32 PM
 #11627

Anyone have this information?
Why don't you go finding this information out in the sea of very special knowledge you must have attained from for every other of your posts?

Cyperdoc feels innocent today:

Quote
i am in a dispute with Hashfast so i can't talk too many details but in this country, one is normally considered innocent until proven guilty and i deny all their allegations and expect to prevail. i've never dealt directly with him in any financial tx yet he's issued a negative rating acting like i have which he will willingly remove contingent on me giving him money i rightfully earned and isn't his.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3e8a4v/jeff_g_throwing_the_hammer_down_today_on_devlist/ctd3x1y


I know, skirting questions and not actually answering is your motto and all, but it would be nice to know the information i asked above...  if im asking, its obviously not in the information i have posted, but thats just logic... screw logic right?
if you are trying to imply that those 3000 bitcoins would be going to the petitioners possible bill, thats not quite how it works... that money would be going to the fund to pay out the confirmed plan.
Unfortunately thats going to be spit in the bucket.

pmorici
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 480
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 24, 2015, 12:18:50 AM
 #11628

I'm just gonna ask this, how much are the petitioners going to have to pay in lawyers fees? i know the court only allowed somewhere in the range of $60,000 to be disbursed to them, but they requested something like $1,250,000, is that going to be billed to the petitioners?  I would assume some of the bigger names like KOI could eat it and use it as a tax write off, or is it going to be distributed evenly?  Just some information i'd like to know.
I know some lawyers have it in a clause they they would eat it and write it off, but i don't think that would apply to many bankruptcy proceedings.
Anyone have this information?

I'm not sure I understand your question.  If you are asking who determines how much the lawyers ultimately get paid it's the judge.  If you are asking if creditors would some how be responsible for covering any difference between what the judge allows in legal fees and what is available the answer is no.  If their isn't enough recovered to pay the lawyers they eat the cost.  If the judge decides not to allow their full fee they eat that cost too.
armyof1ne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 24, 2015, 07:34:13 PM
 #11629

I'm just gonna ask this, how much are the petitioners going to have to pay in lawyers fees? i know the court only allowed somewhere in the range of $60,000 to be disbursed to them, but they requested something like $1,250,000, is that going to be billed to the petitioners?  I would assume some of the bigger names like KOI could eat it and use it as a tax write off, or is it going to be distributed evenly?  Just some information i'd like to know.
I know some lawyers have it in a clause they they would eat it and write it off, but i don't think that would apply to many bankruptcy proceedings.
Anyone have this information?

I'm not sure I understand your question.  If you are asking who determines how much the lawyers ultimately get paid it's the judge.  If you are asking if creditors would some how be responsible for covering any difference between what the judge allows in legal fees and what is available the answer is no.  If their isn't enough recovered to pay the lawyers they eat the cost.  If the judge decides not to allow their full fee they eat that cost too.
The confirmed plan was decided by the judge, they seem to be eating a very large amount is all.
The creditors are completely different from petitioners, they are the group that actually got the lawyers involved. as far as i understood there was a chance the petitioners would have to pay the unpaid bills, not the creditors.
I mean, $1mil + is alot to eat and use as a write off.

The difference in what you posted and what i asked is you are talking about petitioners are creditors(as a whole) which they are not... ... yes i understand they get a small chunk of what they are owed from the court ruling, but the left over is not the responsibility of the petitioners? that seems a little backwards to me, thats why i was asking if there was a clause or two protecting the petitioners or not.
*hope that clears up any misinterpretation*
pmorici
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 480
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 24, 2015, 10:31:05 PM
Last edit: July 25, 2015, 04:00:14 PM by pmorici
 #11630

I'm just gonna ask this, how much are the petitioners going to have to pay in lawyers fees? i know the court only allowed somewhere in the range of $60,000 to be disbursed to them, but they requested something like $1,250,000, is that going to be billed to the petitioners?  I would assume some of the bigger names like KOI could eat it and use it as a tax write off, or is it going to be distributed evenly?  Just some information i'd like to know.
I know some lawyers have it in a clause they they would eat it and write it off, but i don't think that would apply to many bankruptcy proceedings.
Anyone have this information?

I'm not sure I understand your question.  If you are asking who determines how much the lawyers ultimately get paid it's the judge.  If you are asking if creditors would some how be responsible for covering any difference between what the judge allows in legal fees and what is available the answer is no.  If their isn't enough recovered to pay the lawyers they eat the cost.  If the judge decides not to allow their full fee they eat that cost too.
The confirmed plan was decided by the judge, they seem to be eating a very large amount is all.
The creditors are completely different from petitioners, they are the group that actually got the lawyers involved. as far as i understood there was a chance the petitioners would have to pay the unpaid bills, not the creditors.
I mean, $1mil + is alot to eat and use as a write off.

The difference in what you posted and what i asked is you are talking about petitioners are creditors(as a whole) which they are not... ... yes i understand they get a small chunk of what they are owed from the court ruling, but the left over is not the responsibility of the petitioners? that seems a little backwards to me, thats why i was asking if there was a clause or two protecting the petitioners or not.
*hope that clears up any misinterpretation*

I see what you're asking.  The answer is no, the petitioners aren't on the hook for any of the lawyer fees that you are asking about.  The petitioners paid their lawyer out of their own pocket upfront to file the petition but the cost of the bankruptcy process that ensues after a company is in bankruptcy is not their responsibility.  Bankruptcy lawyers know there is a chance that they won't get paid the full amount they claim it is routine part of their business.
dsattler
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 21, 2015, 06:41:04 AM
 #11631

http://www.coindesk.com/judge-approves-fraud-claims-against-bitcoin-mining-firm-hashfast/

Bitcointalk member since 2013! Smiley
vokain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 21, 2015, 07:54:36 AM
 #11632

Good job Pete!!

         ▄█▄  ▄▄▄▄
          ▀ ▄██████▄
    ▄▄▄   ▄███▀▀███
  ▄█████▄ ▀█▀ ███▄ ▀▀
 ███▀  ▀██▄    ████▄   
 █▀ ▄██▄ ▀█▀ ▄██▀ ▀█▀ ▄██
  ▄██▀     ▄██▀     ▄██▀
 ██▀ ▄█▄ ▄██▀ ▄█▄  ██▀ ▄▄
      ▀███▀    ▀██▄  ▄██▀
     ▄▄ ▀██▄ ▄█▄ ▀█████▀
     ███▄▄██▀   ▀▀
      ▀██████▀
        ▀▀▀▀   ██▀

  █
  █
  █
████
  █
████
  █
████
  █
  █
  █


▄███▄    ▄███▄
███  ██▄ █▀▀▄
████████  ███▀
██▀ ▄███      
████████▄▄  ▄█▀
 ██████▀▀██▀▀
  ▀███▀▄▄   ▄
   ▀██▄██ ▄█▀
     ▀▀██▀▀
FULLY
ANONYMOUS

━━━━━
/

    ██▄▄              ▄▄██
   █▀  ▀█▄ ▄▄▄▄████▄██▀  ▀█
  █▀   ▄███▀▀▀       █▄   ▀█
 █▀   ▄███▄ ▄▄█▄▄     █▄   ▀█
██▄  ▄████████████▄▄  █▄  ▄██
  ▀▀██▀███████████████▄███▀▀
      ▀█▄█▀███████████▀▀
        ▀███▀███████▀
           ▀▀▀▀██▀▀
INSTANT
TRANSFER

━━━━
/

     ▄████▄
 ▄▄▄████████▄▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▀██▀ ▀█  ▀█ ███▀
 ██ ▀ █ ▀▄█ ███
▄██▄█▄█▄███▄███▄
▀██████████████▀
 ▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
     ▀████▀
API FOR YOUR
PROJECTS

━━━━

  █
  █
  █
████
  █
████
  █
████
  █
  █
  █
PARTNER PROGRAM
TOR MIRROR
MIX WALLET
.FAQ
ANN THREAD
TELEGRAM
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 1001



View Profile
August 21, 2015, 08:59:26 AM
 #11633

For the lazies:

http://www.courthousenews.com/2015/08/17/bitcoin.pdf

Quote
These negotiations resulted in a Statement of Work (“SOW”) agreement, executed on July 1, 2013. Id. at ¶ 26. According to that agreement, the design for the G1 chip was not scheduled to “tape-out,” or be completed, until September 15, 2013, at the earliest. Id. Barber and deCastro were also informed by Uniquify that the time between “tape-out” of the G1 chip and a finished product would exceed two months, even under an expedited production schedule. Id. Based on that timeline, the HashFast Entities were aware they would not be able to provide Baby Jets to customers until mid- November, 2013. Id. at ¶ 27.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=262052.msg3037517#msg3037517

Quote
HashFast's Golden Nonce GN ASIC successfully taped-out yesterday, Wednesday the 28th, and has been released for 28nm fabrication to a well-known, leading-edge foundry.  More details will follow in next week's joint press release.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002


View Profile
August 21, 2015, 10:18:40 AM
 #11634

For the lazies:

http://www.courthousenews.com/2015/08/17/bitcoin.pdf

Quote
These negotiations resulted in a Statement of Work (“SOW”) agreement, executed on July 1, 2013. Id. at ¶ 26. According to that agreement, the design for the G1 chip was not scheduled to “tape-out,” or be completed, until September 15, 2013, at the earliest. Id. Barber and deCastro were also informed by Uniquify that the time between “tape-out” of the G1 chip and a finished product would exceed two months, even under an expedited production schedule. Id. Based on that timeline, the HashFast Entities were aware they would not be able to provide Baby Jets to customers until mid- November, 2013. Id. at ¶ 27.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=262052.msg3037517#msg3037517

Quote
HashFast's Golden Nonce GN ASIC successfully taped-out yesterday, Wednesday the 28th, and has been released for 28nm fabrication to a well-known, leading-edge foundry.  More details will follow in next week's joint press release.


Also

Quote
Judge Edward Davila [...] approving the claim that HashFast violated the Unfair Competition Law (UCL) – which prohibits "acts or practices which are unlawful, or unfair or fraudulent" – and additional allegations of fraud.

A big FU towards Icetard!

H/w Hosting Directory & Reputation - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=622998.0
vokain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 02, 2015, 08:58:40 PM
 #11635

If anyone is able, would they please do us the courtesy of sharing any updates or news, if any? Thanks!

         ▄█▄  ▄▄▄▄
          ▀ ▄██████▄
    ▄▄▄   ▄███▀▀███
  ▄█████▄ ▀█▀ ███▄ ▀▀
 ███▀  ▀██▄    ████▄   
 █▀ ▄██▄ ▀█▀ ▄██▀ ▀█▀ ▄██
  ▄██▀     ▄██▀     ▄██▀
 ██▀ ▄█▄ ▄██▀ ▄█▄  ██▀ ▄▄
      ▀███▀    ▀██▄  ▄██▀
     ▄▄ ▀██▄ ▄█▄ ▀█████▀
     ███▄▄██▀   ▀▀
      ▀██████▀
        ▀▀▀▀   ██▀

  █
  █
  █
████
  █
████
  █
████
  █
  █
  █


▄███▄    ▄███▄
███  ██▄ █▀▀▄
████████  ███▀
██▀ ▄███      
████████▄▄  ▄█▀
 ██████▀▀██▀▀
  ▀███▀▄▄   ▄
   ▀██▄██ ▄█▀
     ▀▀██▀▀
FULLY
ANONYMOUS

━━━━━
/

    ██▄▄              ▄▄██
   █▀  ▀█▄ ▄▄▄▄████▄██▀  ▀█
  █▀   ▄███▀▀▀       █▄   ▀█
 █▀   ▄███▄ ▄▄█▄▄     █▄   ▀█
██▄  ▄████████████▄▄  █▄  ▄██
  ▀▀██▀███████████████▄███▀▀
      ▀█▄█▀███████████▀▀
        ▀███▀███████▀
           ▀▀▀▀██▀▀
INSTANT
TRANSFER

━━━━
/

     ▄████▄
 ▄▄▄████████▄▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▀██▀ ▀█  ▀█ ███▀
 ██ ▀ █ ▀▄█ ███
▄██▄█▄█▄███▄███▄
▀██████████████▀
 ▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
     ▀████▀
API FOR YOUR
PROJECTS

━━━━

  █
  █
  █
████
  █
████
  █
████
  █
  █
  █
PARTNER PROGRAM
TOR MIRROR
MIX WALLET
.FAQ
ANN THREAD
TELEGRAM
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 1001



View Profile
November 23, 2015, 06:18:46 PM
 #11636

If anyone is able, would they please do us the courtesy of sharing any updates or news, if any? Thanks!

I would also like to know.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3tv7v8/deprecating_bitcoin_core_visualizing_the/cx9naxt?context=3

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
armyof1ne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 07, 2015, 05:29:11 PM
 #11637

For right now, many objections are being filed, If you are a creditor and are part of the liquidation, i would suggest making sure you have all materials gathered up that give proof to purchase, and that you are owed money.  they are trying to get peoples claims completely disallowed, basically offering more available money to the lawyers and bigger buyers to increase their approved claim.
I have seen people discussing objections to claims on this, and you only have a short time to respond. Its a chance of you basically giving up your right to any available funds and handing them over to other people like lawyers.

Once the objections are done, and plan fully confirmed, liquidation will take effect, and then dispersal of any funds if i understand correctly.

vokain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 07, 2015, 11:47:09 PM
Last edit: January 15, 2016, 07:14:08 AM by vokain
 #11638

Armyof1ne, do you know where we can find these objections?

         ▄█▄  ▄▄▄▄
          ▀ ▄██████▄
    ▄▄▄   ▄███▀▀███
  ▄█████▄ ▀█▀ ███▄ ▀▀
 ███▀  ▀██▄    ████▄   
 █▀ ▄██▄ ▀█▀ ▄██▀ ▀█▀ ▄██
  ▄██▀     ▄██▀     ▄██▀
 ██▀ ▄█▄ ▄██▀ ▄█▄  ██▀ ▄▄
      ▀███▀    ▀██▄  ▄██▀
     ▄▄ ▀██▄ ▄█▄ ▀█████▀
     ███▄▄██▀   ▀▀
      ▀██████▀
        ▀▀▀▀   ██▀

  █
  █
  █
████
  █
████
  █
████
  █
  █
  █


▄███▄    ▄███▄
███  ██▄ █▀▀▄
████████  ███▀
██▀ ▄███      
████████▄▄  ▄█▀
 ██████▀▀██▀▀
  ▀███▀▄▄   ▄
   ▀██▄██ ▄█▀
     ▀▀██▀▀
FULLY
ANONYMOUS

━━━━━
/

    ██▄▄              ▄▄██
   █▀  ▀█▄ ▄▄▄▄████▄██▀  ▀█
  █▀   ▄███▀▀▀       █▄   ▀█
 █▀   ▄███▄ ▄▄█▄▄     █▄   ▀█
██▄  ▄████████████▄▄  █▄  ▄██
  ▀▀██▀███████████████▄███▀▀
      ▀█▄█▀███████████▀▀
        ▀███▀███████▀
           ▀▀▀▀██▀▀
INSTANT
TRANSFER

━━━━
/

     ▄████▄
 ▄▄▄████████▄▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▀██▀ ▀█  ▀█ ███▀
 ██ ▀ █ ▀▄█ ███
▄██▄█▄█▄███▄███▄
▀██████████████▀
 ▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
     ▀████▀
API FOR YOUR
PROJECTS

━━━━

  █
  █
  █
████
  █
████
  █
████
  █
  █
  █
PARTNER PROGRAM
TOR MIRROR
MIX WALLET
.FAQ
ANN THREAD
TELEGRAM
armyof1ne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 08, 2015, 11:54:02 AM
Last edit: December 08, 2015, 12:06:26 PM by armyof1ne
 #11639

This is my second attempt at posting, i'm not sure why it was deleted.

A fairly extensive list of people have had objections levied against them. If you have a pacer account, you can view all the documents put in on the 30th.
the bad thing about "mail servicing" is sometimes it takes time for it to get to the person, giving them only a few days to respond.  which is why i am posting here. after responding, maybe seek legal fees and time wasted on this.

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/3491312/Hashfast_Technologies_LLC
If you don't have a pacer account, this can give you a view of what is up.
Don't take anything i say as legal advice, hit your lawyer up, hopefully they can do stuff pro bono being this case has been nothing but a circus.
armyof1ne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 08, 2015, 03:22:03 PM
 #11640

For those that have pacer
https://ecf.canb.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/login.pl  search for 3:14-bk-30725

https://archive.org/details/gov.uscourts.canb.522575_201512

Here you go if you want to take a look, this is the free version of court documents i donated to the internet archive, there is a large group of people on the list, including the original petitioners.

Our friend Cedivad is on the list too.
Pages: « 1 ... 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 [582] 583 584 585 586 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!