Bitcoin Forum
October 18, 2017, 01:35:12 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 [671] 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 ... 914 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining)  (Read 1040366 times)
Ytterbium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238



View Profile WWW
September 22, 2013, 02:52:13 PM
 #13401

I wonder if burnside would ever put a warning on his own security, of course not. Why don't we post a warnings and then post even more severe earnings now that ASIC miner had plumetted.

Its like the dow Jones posting warnings on its companies.

WARNING: Apple didnt provide their usual pre order #s, trade with caution.

Burnside has shown himself to be a clown just like every other person in the BTC community. Our warning feature is new thats why we havent posted on other securities, but it works so perfectly for Labcoin

Wtf are you talking about? Labcoin is being super fucking shady and they deserve MORE then a warning.

So has everyother security including burnsides own, Peta broke its contract where are the warnings? Riiiiight

Talking about BTC-TRADING-PT, bids are currently at 0.561 BTC and shares were selling at 1.126 BTC two weeks ago. With all the trading that Labcoin has seen, dividends should be at an all time high. With BTC-TRADING-PT's share price at a low, that seems to be an incredible bargain at the moment.

So, for those who think Labcoin is too risky, BTC-TRADING-PT seems like a good alternative to invest in.  I'm surprised the FUDsters aren't snapping the shares up. I guess they're just too bust trying to trade Labcoin shares.  Smiley
look at the ROI boy. probably labcoin has bought so many overpriced shares lately from the cash they took from selling their shares that they now sell to give out dividends n stuff and buy their own shares now that they finally were able to buy/assemble miners...
Last page seem to be the real fudsters ...

Your comment is not even remotely relevant to anything I just wrote. I'll break down what I said so even an idiot can understand.

Lots of Labcoin shares have been bought and sold recently.
BTC-TC charges a fee for those trades.
The more trades on BTC-TC, the more money BTC-TC makes.
BTC-TRADING-PT shares are at an incrdibaly low price.
Why aren't FUDsters buying BTC-TRADING-PT shares?
Is it because they're too busy trading Labcoin shares and their FUD is designed to guide the prices in the direction they want?

Now, how did your comment relate to what I just said? Did you just see the word "FUDSters" and jump in to defend yourself?  Cheesy


First of all, it would make more sense to buy LTC-GLOBAL directly and avoid the management fee. Also LTC-GLOBAL also crashed recently.  

Secondly the annual yield is only 3%, to put that into perspective, I'm pretty sure that's actually worse then Labcoin's current annual yield.  i.e. they'd be worth more if they were able to scale their current 700Gh/s to keep up with network difficulty and that's it.

The fees on these trades are extremely low.

1508333712
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508333712

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508333712
Reply with quote  #2

1508333712
Report to moderator
1508333712
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508333712

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508333712
Reply with quote  #2

1508333712
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1508333712
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508333712

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508333712
Reply with quote  #2

1508333712
Report to moderator
1508333712
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508333712

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508333712
Reply with quote  #2

1508333712
Report to moderator
BitCsByBit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


View Profile
September 22, 2013, 02:57:36 PM
 #13402

Someone just dumped 96 ASICMiner shares, bringing the price down to BTC1.611. That is from the all time high of BTC5+ per AM share.

They haven't had an update from friedcat for over a month, while the hash rate has been down and unstable and the dividends are at the ALL time low.

Tipsy jar: 1HgfLMXiJQj9KZ7abLRh9rWuR7dgeSyub4
Ytterbium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238



View Profile WWW
September 22, 2013, 03:02:43 PM
 #13403

Quote
The first run will yeild 1000-1500 chips @ 130nm, 300Mhz, Power 0.8W, 6.5x6.5mm design. With specs of 5 GH at 2.7W/GHash.

From the IPO details.

So what is it with these chips? "Power 0.8W" at 2.7W/GHash would mean the chips have around 300Mhash/s,
which is about that of AM chips.

On the other hand there is the number of 5GHash as "specs". Are those the specs of the finished miners?

Can someone clear that up for me?

Edit: With the 15 chip PCBs that would also mean that 15 chips * 300MHash/s equal about 5GHash/s
so it would be 5GHash/s for a full board. Not for each chip

The chips are only able to run at 1.8Gh/s and they've been having issues with them, but it's possible some of that may be fixable in software.

It would be nice if they gave us a more detailed schedule for when they're going to bring hashpower online.  Right now it's "Two WeeksTM" before they are supposed have 25x their current hashpower.

If they achieve that it should certainly boost the price. If they don't, it will tank.

237
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 264



View Profile
September 22, 2013, 03:08:12 PM
 #13404

Quote
The first run will yeild 1000-1500 chips @ 130nm, 300Mhz, Power 0.8W, 6.5x6.5mm design. With specs of 5 GH at 2.7W/GHash.

The chips are only able to run at 1.8Gh/s and they've been having issues with them, but it's possible some of that may be fixable in software.

It would be nice if they gave us a more detailed schedule for when they're going to bring hashpower online.  Right now it's "Two WeeksTM" before they are supposed have 25x their current hashpower.

If they achieve that it should certainly boost the price. If they don't, it will tank.

Hmm ok the chips are underperforming, but what means the "Power 0.8W"?
If it's there it has to mean something. But what? Smiley

Donatioins always welcome Wink
BTC: 148nRwhghr9Abnpp9vShYxSPDbyMFQzjhr
LTC: LL2UDTbQNx9UiP37ZzJ4CLQDWm6JPgZG8t
BitCsByBit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


View Profile
September 22, 2013, 03:09:11 PM
 #13405

Quote
The first run will yeild 1000-1500 chips @ 130nm, 300Mhz, Power 0.8W, 6.5x6.5mm design. With specs of 5 GH at 2.7W/GHash.

From the IPO details.

So what is it with these chips? "Power 0.8W" at 2.7W/GHash would mean the chips have around 300Mhash/s,
which is about that of AM chips.

On the other hand there is the number of 5GHash as "specs". Are those the specs of the finished miners?

Can someone clear that up for me?

Edit: With the 15 chip PCBs that would also mean that 15 chips * 300MHash/s equal about 5GHash/s
so it would be 5GHash/s for a full board. Not for each chip

The chips are only able to run at 1.8Gh/s and they've been having issues with them, but it's possible some of that may be fixable in software.

It would be nice if they gave us a more detailed schedule for when they're going to bring hashpower online.  Right now it's "Two WeeksTM" before they are supposed have 25x their current hashpower.

If they achieve that it should certainly boost the price. If they don't, it will tank.

FYI,

Bitfury's "5G" chips was designed to run at 5GH/s, but they were only able to get about 2GH/s out of them.
However, burnin is building a new PCB, BitBurner Fury, and has achieved 4GH/s per chip, which is higher than what Bitfury themselves achieved.

Tipsy jar: 1HgfLMXiJQj9KZ7abLRh9rWuR7dgeSyub4
Ytterbium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238



View Profile WWW
September 22, 2013, 03:11:43 PM
 #13406

Quote
The first run will yeild 1000-1500 chips @ 130nm, 300Mhz, Power 0.8W, 6.5x6.5mm design. With specs of 5 GH at 2.7W/GHash.

The chips are only able to run at 1.8Gh/s and they've been having issues with them, but it's possible some of that may be fixable in software.

It would be nice if they gave us a more detailed schedule for when they're going to bring hashpower online.  Right now it's "Two WeeksTM" before they are supposed have 25x their current hashpower.

If they achieve that it should certainly boost the price. If they don't, it will tank.

Hmm ok the chips are underperforming, but what means the "Power 0.8W"?
If it's there it has to mean something. But what? Smiley

That's a good question, you should ask them that.  Oh wait no one can get ahold of them.

I'm sure their stock would go up considerably if they just got someone who knew what the fuck was going on to answer questions.

Zakryze
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308



View Profile WWW
September 22, 2013, 03:12:56 PM
 #13407

I wonder if burnside would ever put a warning on his own security, of course not. Why don't we post a warnings and then post even more severe earnings now that ASIC miner had plumetted.

Its like the dow Jones posting warnings on its companies.

WARNING: Apple didnt provide their usual pre order #s, trade with caution.

Burnside has shown himself to be a clown just like every other person in the BTC community. Our warning feature is new thats why we havent posted on other securities, but it works so perfectly for Labcoin

Wtf are you talking about? Labcoin is being super fucking shady and they deserve MORE then a warning.

So has everyother security including burnsides own, Peta broke its contract where are the warnings? Riiiiight

Talking about BTC-TRADING-PT, bids are currently at 0.561 BTC and shares were selling at 1.126 BTC two weeks ago. With all the trading that Labcoin has seen, dividends should be at an all time high. With BTC-TRADING-PT's share price at a low, that seems to be an incredible bargain at the moment.

So, for those who think Labcoin is too risky, BTC-TRADING-PT seems like a good alternative to invest in.  I'm surprised the FUDsters aren't snapping the shares up. I guess they're just too bust trying to trade Labcoin shares.  Smiley
look at the ROI boy. probably labcoin has bought so many overpriced shares lately from the cash they took from selling their shares that they now sell to give out dividends n stuff and buy their own shares now that they finally were able to buy/assemble miners...
Last page seem to be the real fudsters ...

Your comment is not even remotely relevant to anything I just wrote. I'll break down what I said so even an idiot can understand.

Lots of Labcoin shares have been bought and sold recently.
BTC-TC charges a fee for those trades.
The more trades on BTC-TC, the more money BTC-TC makes.
BTC-TRADING-PT shares are at an incrdibaly low price.
Why aren't FUDsters buying BTC-TRADING-PT shares?
Is it because they're too busy trading Labcoin shares and their FUD is designed to guide the prices in the direction they want?

Now, how did your comment relate to what I just said? Did you just see the word "FUDSters" and jump in to defend yourself?  Cheesy

Because it was adressed at mabsark you attention whore....learn 2 read and buy a brain.

▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
PRIMEDICE
The Premier Bitcoin Gambling Experience @PrimeDice
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

SNttx1hwtpf8TQEK7ZBojcvQrDmBaz9QPK SFC Addy
ThePeshMod
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46


View Profile
September 22, 2013, 03:28:54 PM
 #13408

You seem to be all about betting. Confident investors have their money in shares, not in silly bets. "Only way to put your money where your mouth is" is to buy, or sell, or hold shares depending on one's own decision. Betting a troll like you is not part of an investment strategy.

P.S.
I don't even know why I'm feeding the trolls, I just get fed up with your constant mumbling.

no, buy,sell or hold shares isn't putting your money where your mouth is really, you're taking a gamble in a particular direction and can get out at any point ahead, behind or at the same point you started..it's almost inevitable there will be points where you have the position to exit ahead, regardless of whether you take it.. you can sit here writing page after page about how you are 100% sure labcoin will deliver 500th in 2 months, then when they don't you can sell off., and just forget anyone saw you type that. with a bet you can't do that, you would have lost everything

betting is not affected by market sentiment and outcome cannot be swayed..You cannot back down so betting only suitable for those that have 100% confidence in their word that they will deliver, or have 100% confidence they won't, that's why it's putting your money where your mouth is..you're literally saying you are so sure of your opinion you'll throw away everything if you're wrong

Ah, that's where expectancies fall apart. There is no 100% assurance - it simply doesn't exist, even big government bonds have risks associated with them (albeit small ones). I get what you mean, but there isn't an investor that is 100% sure of anything - we manage risk-reward ratios all the time. And that's why you will not get your bets called.
boyohi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182


View Profile
September 22, 2013, 03:33:27 PM
 #13409

A response to ROI: I already got my ROI, kthx.

I'm holding and will check this thread weekly. Good luck day traders.
demzie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266



View Profile
September 22, 2013, 03:47:10 PM
 #13410

A response to ROI: I already got my ROI, kthx.

I'm holding and will check this thread weekly. Good luck day traders.

i Should do that also weekly, but this thread / IPO is some how better than heroine... Smiley
dopamine
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 486



View Profile
September 22, 2013, 03:57:35 PM
 #13411

wont take long before labcoin shows BTC address and that they are still holding shares...

Bitcoinica still has not given me 50% of my claim of 600 BTC
INTERSANGO can go down with bitcoinica for abandoning customers
Alberto Armandi is a SCAMMER
TMAN
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574


View Profile
September 22, 2013, 03:58:19 PM
 #13412

wont take long before labcoin shows BTC address and that they are still holding shares...

https://blockchain.info/address/17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm

that's the address.
dopamine
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 486



View Profile
September 22, 2013, 04:02:12 PM
 #13413

wont take long before labcoin shows BTC address and that they are still holding shares...

https://blockchain.info/address/17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm

that's the address.

I was referring to "WARNING -- This asset has been flagged for potential violation of their Stockholder Agreement. Please place your orders accordingly."

I wasn't able to trade unless I provided a BTC address and that does not mean labcoin members cant sell shares but they did say they wouldn't till 1 year, so far too much FUD.

But transparency is what is needed for Labcoin to be a success

Bitcoinica still has not given me 50% of my claim of 600 BTC
INTERSANGO can go down with bitcoinica for abandoning customers
Alberto Armandi is a SCAMMER
ThePeshMod
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46


View Profile
September 22, 2013, 04:08:54 PM
 #13414

wont take long before labcoin shows BTC address and that they are still holding shares...

https://blockchain.info/address/17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm

that's the address.

I was referring to "WARNING -- This asset has been flagged for potential violation of their Stockholder Agreement. Please place your orders accordingly."

I wasn't able to trade unless I provided a BTC address and that does not mean labcoin members cant sell shares but they did say they wouldn't till 1 year, so far too much FUD.

But transparency is what is needed for Labcoin to be a success

Uhmm, that means you have to provide your own address, which would be visible to the security issuers in case something happens to BTCT. That has nothing to do with Labcoin, it's just a security precaution from BTCT.

TL;DR: that address is only visible to security issuers.
jeffhuys
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252



View Profile
September 22, 2013, 04:20:45 PM
 #13415

Another transaction by the way Smiley

dopamine
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 486



View Profile
September 22, 2013, 04:25:12 PM
 #13416

wont take long before labcoin shows BTC address and that they are still holding shares...

https://blockchain.info/address/17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm

that's the address.

I was referring to "WARNING -- This asset has been flagged for potential violation of their Stockholder Agreement. Please place your orders accordingly."

I wasn't able to trade unless I provided a BTC address and that does not mean labcoin members cant sell shares but they did say they wouldn't till 1 year, so far too much FUD.

But transparency is what is needed for Labcoin to be a success

Uhmm, that means you have to provide your own address, which would be visible to the security issuers in case something happens to BTCT. That has nothing to do with Labcoin, it's just a security precaution from BTCT.

TL;DR: that address is only visible to security issuers.

Only problem with your notion is that I was able to buy sell various stocks and now they ask for it?

Bitcoinica still has not given me 50% of my claim of 600 BTC
INTERSANGO can go down with bitcoinica for abandoning customers
Alberto Armandi is a SCAMMER
Rannasha
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728


View Profile
September 22, 2013, 04:28:11 PM
 #13417

wont take long before labcoin shows BTC address and that they are still holding shares...

https://blockchain.info/address/17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm

that's the address.

I was referring to "WARNING -- This asset has been flagged for potential violation of their Stockholder Agreement. Please place your orders accordingly."

I wasn't able to trade unless I provided a BTC address and that does not mean labcoin members cant sell shares but they did say they wouldn't till 1 year, so far too much FUD.

But transparency is what is needed for Labcoin to be a success

Uhmm, that means you have to provide your own address, which would be visible to the security issuers in case something happens to BTCT. That has nothing to do with Labcoin, it's just a security precaution from BTCT.

TL;DR: that address is only visible to security issuers.

Only problem with your notion is that I was able to buy sell various stocks and now they ask for it?

It (the required BTC address) was added very recently (a few days ago, if I recall correctly).
well.attenuated
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41


View Profile
September 22, 2013, 04:37:02 PM
 #13418

42ft waves from Usagi..
guitarplinker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526



View Profile WWW
September 22, 2013, 04:37:23 PM
 #13419

Well it looks like that address is getting ~0.11BTC every hour, which is equal to around 600GH/s. That's if they're mining.

Well 600GH/s is better than nothing but it's definitely not 2TH/s or 4TH/s.
Zubilica
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 836



View Profile
September 22, 2013, 04:41:14 PM
 #13420

http://www.btcguild.com/index.php?page=rankings&section=teams

Labcoin 780-840GH/s ~=800Gh/s

Pages: « 1 ... 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 [671] 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 ... 914 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!