dhenson
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
 |
September 21, 2013, 07:13:32 PM |
|
Is it painfully obvious to anyone else that Labcoin needs to get 7 more involved in their Gen 1 project?
1) He's well respected.
2) He seems to know what he is talking about and isn't afraid to admit when he doesn't.
3) He communicates well.
4) He is already on the payroll... use him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
Puppet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
|
|
September 21, 2013, 07:23:36 PM |
|
Just out of curiosity, do you have any idea what people actually do with these cell libraries? I don't mean "design the chip" but actually how they physically use them? Because it doesn't sound like you actually have any idea. Are you serious? How do you "physically" use libraries? They are not collections of books you know. Sure sounds like you are the one who has no idea what he is talking about. Go here for a primer: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_design_(electronics) See that? synthesis is automated.
Synthesizing is akin to compiling code. And what you are saying is akin to software development being automated because the computer does the compilation Thats great, now if only you can make it write the code Look, believe what you want. Why dont you ask TheSeven if there is a snowballs chance in hell this chip will be deployed this year. Im guessing you already did but didnt feel like posting that part. |
|
|
|
|
|
AngelSky
|
|
September 21, 2013, 07:34:39 PM |
|
Is it painfully obvious to anyone else that Labcoin needs to get 7 more involved in their Gen 1 project?
1) He's well respected.
2) He seems to know what he is talking about and isn't afraid to admit when he doesn't.
3) He communicates well.
4) He is already on the payroll... use him.
Agree. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pompobit
|
|
September 21, 2013, 07:35:08 PM |
|
Why dont you ask TheSeven if there is a snowballs chance in hell this chip will be deployed this year. Im guessing you already did but didnt feel like posting that part.
something similar has been asked to him yesterday: [15:44] <[7]> does that 500th/s plan involve 65nm chips?
[15:44] <[7]> this weird TSMC document suggests they're planning to do 65nm in Q1 2014
...
[15:48] <[7]> I'm confident that the interface circuitry for 65nm will be finalized this year, but I have no idea who's even going to implement the hashing core.
[15:48] <[7]> if they want me to do that, it would take months, and I wouldn't be very confident that it's going to actually work well
[15:48] <[7]> it's a complete redesign from scratch. at least if their plans haven't changed. |
|
|
|
|
Puppet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
|
|
September 21, 2013, 07:37:14 PM
Last edit: September 21, 2013, 08:11:55 PM by Puppet |
|
Why dont you ask TheSeven if there is a snowballs chance in hell this chip will be deployed this year. Im guessing you already did but didnt feel like posting that part.
something similar has been asked to him yesterday: [15:44] <[7]> does that 500th/s plan involve 65nm chips?
[15:44] <[7]> this weird TSMC document suggests they're planning to do 65nm in Q1 2014
...
[15:48] <[7]> I'm confident that the interface circuitry for 65nm will be finalized this year, but I have no idea who's even going to implement the hashing core.
[15:48] <[7]> if they want me to do that, it would take months, and I wouldn't be very confident that it's going to actually work well
[15:48] <[7]> it's a complete redesign from scratch. at least if their plans haven't changed. Gee, who'd have thought? IO might be done this year and thats by far the easiest and least critical part for a bitcoin chip. Sounds like a tape out this year isnt even in the cards and that would make deployment by summer 2014 optimistic. Well good luck labcoin investors! |
|
|
|
|
|
abuelau
|
|
September 21, 2013, 07:39:13 PM |
|
Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.
It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares Okay so from now on we refer to 300gh/s as "Valdemort". |
|
|
|
|
VolanicEruptor
|
|
September 21, 2013, 07:44:11 PM |
|
Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.
It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares Okay so from now on we refer to 300gh/s as "Valdemort". Sorry, I don't watch Teddy Ruxpin so I don't get the joke.. |
|
|
|
|
weaknesswaran
|
|
September 21, 2013, 07:51:02 PM |
|
Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.
It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares Okay so from now on we refer to 300gh/s as "Valdemort". Sorry, I don't watch Teddy Ruxpin so I don't get the joke.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TMAN
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
|
|
September 21, 2013, 08:39:55 PM |
|
So guestimates what are we hashing at?
|
|
|
|
|
radiumsoup
|
|
September 21, 2013, 08:45:34 PM |
|
Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.
It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place. |
PGP fingerprint: 0x85beeabd110803b93d408b502d39b8875b282f86
|
|
|
TMAN
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
|
|
September 21, 2013, 08:59:30 PM |
|
So what's up with these payments?
|
|
|
|
|
VolanicEruptor
|
|
September 21, 2013, 09:02:49 PM |
|
Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.
It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place. A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile. It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess. Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production. So this IS insignificant. |
|
|
|
|
demzie
|
|
September 21, 2013, 09:10:42 PM |
|
Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.
It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place. A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile. It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess. Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production. So this IS insignificant. I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit. Fud |
|
|
|
|
|
VolanicEruptor
|
|
September 21, 2013, 09:13:36 PM |
|
Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.
It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place. A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile. It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess. Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production. So this IS insignificant. I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit. Fud  oh okay.. |
|
|
|
|
redbeans2012
|
|
September 21, 2013, 09:15:32 PM |
|
they sold one of these a couple months back, maybe more but I cant read whatever language he speaks
|
|
|
|
|
|
demzie
|
|
September 21, 2013, 09:16:18 PM |
|
Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.
It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place. A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile. It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess. Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production. So this IS insignificant. I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit. Fud oh okay.. Hahahha shit you believe shit people post? If you believe something.. Read last posts of labcoin or theswede75.. All bullshit fud.. How would a forum member come by their login details to see that; hahaha |
|
|
|
|
damiano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.
|
|
September 21, 2013, 09:19:15 PM |
|
Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.
It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place. A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile. It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess. Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production. So this IS insignificant. I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit. Fud oh okay.. The payouts don't reflect the speed of 3 avalon's though...more likely 4 of them if anything but who really knows at this point. (but I get your point) |
|
|
|
|
BitThink
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 21, 2013, 09:39:25 PM |
|
Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.
It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place. A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile. It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess. Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production. So this IS insignificant. I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit. Fud oh okay.. Hahahha shit you believe shit people post? If you believe something.. Read last posts of labcoin or theswede75.. All bullshit fud.. How would a forum member come by their login details to see that; hahaha So do you believe TheSwede and Sam? Who promised 28 hours ago 'will post an update TODAY'? |
|
|
|
|
BitThink
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 21, 2013, 09:41:31 PM |
|
Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.
It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place. A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile. It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess. Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production. So this IS insignificant. I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit. Fud oh okay.. Hahahha shit you believe shit people post? If you believe something.. Read last posts of labcoin or theswede75.. All bullshit fud.. How would a forum member come by their login details to see that; hahaha So do you believe TheSwede and Sam? Who promised 28 hours ago 'will post an update TODAY'? How long a day could be in their sence? |
|
|
|
|
|
