Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 06:09:19 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 [646] 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 ... 914 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining)  (Read 1079977 times)
JohnyBigs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 21, 2013, 04:14:29 AM
 #12901

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=125629.msg3199358#msg3199358

This is reply of burnside. I think it's reasonable.

No. Peta-Mine has broke the contract. Why did not they get the warning?

Again alot of companies on there should get a warning, its just burnside over reacting, and for some reason he decided to do it with Labcoin.

Post what you just said in his thread to hear some bullshit response on why he is picking only Labcoin to discriminate against. They didn't reply big deal, probably pretty busy working on trying to get things to work. Or the email got buried in the thousands of emails they probably recieved from concerned people.
1714241359
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714241359

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714241359
Reply with quote  #2

1714241359
Report to moderator
1714241359
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714241359

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714241359
Reply with quote  #2

1714241359
Report to moderator
Every time a block is mined, a certain amount of BTC (called the subsidy) is created out of thin air and given to the miner. The subsidy halves every four years and will reach 0 in about 130 years.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Bitcycle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 21, 2013, 04:20:59 AM
 #12902


If Burnside's warning gets Labcoin to be more forthcoming, the it was all worth it.

JohnyBigs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 21, 2013, 04:23:18 AM
 #12903

Burnside posting that is like posting careful BlackBerry has missed all of its earnings be careful buying their shares. People know what is going on reading the thread here,  since 95% of the investors come here,  but when you go and post that during a FUD induced panic is just reckless.

Hes lucky hes pretty much the only exchange outside of bitfunder. Even though his intentions are probably good it's still a very dumb move to randomly discriminate against one company.
lzr1900
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 21, 2013, 04:24:46 AM
 #12904

I also thought as a exchange,burnside's attitude must be neutral!Why do such unfair to Labcoin compare to PETA-MINE or other irresponsible company?
VolanicEruptor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 21, 2013, 04:26:52 AM
 #12905

This thread is such a disaster that burnside has made a good step of making sure new investors can be warned of what's happening.  I have no problem with this, even if it means a lower share price.  It's called "keeping them honest", and helps take a bite out of manipulation attempts from the issuer.

JohnyBigs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 21, 2013, 04:27:33 AM
 #12906

I also thought as a exchange,burnside's attitude must be neutral!Why do such unfair to Labcoin compare to PETA-MINE or other irresponsible company?

Its called being a dumbass like 99% of people, hence why his shitty exchange will never become a big player, and will most likely die out in the future.
wickedgoodtrader
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 220
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 21, 2013, 04:30:44 AM
 #12907

JESUS FUCKING CHRIST... wtf do you guys want? You ramble on about random bullshit about mining this and mining that... LABCOIN IS A FUCKING FRAUD! Get over it for crying out loud. It's been weeks since you've asked for evidence and still no evidence comes. GET A FUCKING CLUE!

I was called a FUD at .0038 and I am still called a FUD at .0015. Fuck you mother fucking FUD haters, the truth shall speak!
Rulother
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 21, 2013, 04:35:20 AM
 #12908

I also thought as a exchange,burnside's attitude must be neutral!Why do such unfair to Labcoin compare to PETA-MINE or other irresponsible company?

This echos my concerns too

A Member of the LCSH
kingcrimson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1025
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 21, 2013, 04:40:56 AM
 #12909

No one has been able to respond to why they care that the warning is there. The only reason it effects you is if you are trying to be a scummy day trader and take advantage of people who have less info than you. If Labcoin turns out to be legit, all it will have done is given you cheap shares.

So why care??
VolanicEruptor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 21, 2013, 04:43:13 AM
 #12910

I also thought as a exchange,burnside's attitude must be neutral!Why do such unfair to Labcoin compare to PETA-MINE or other irresponsible company?

This echos my concerns too

You guys sound like you need a heads up more than anybody..

VolanicEruptor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 21, 2013, 04:43:39 AM
 #12911

BTW weren't we supposed to get an update today from Sam?

JohnyBigs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 21, 2013, 04:44:49 AM
 #12912

BTW weren't we supposed to get an update today from Sam?

Its still Today depending how West in the world you are.
Bitcycle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 21, 2013, 04:45:30 AM
 #12913

...when you go and post that during a FUD induced panic is just reckless.

The panic didn't come from the FUD, imo. It came from Labcoin's failure to prove their claims of hashing, and their subsequent silence. Everything else was just the icing on the cake.

This is true.  Any angst directed at Burnside is misdirected.

The fault here lies entirely with Labcoin.

If they were forthcoming, none of this would even exist as an issue.
VolanicEruptor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 21, 2013, 04:48:01 AM
 #12914

BTW weren't we supposed to get an update today from Sam?

Its still Today depending how West in the world you are.

I would go grab some popcorn but I can't afford popcorn.   Grin

Ukyo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 21, 2013, 05:08:04 AM
 #12915

Another .2 BTC deposited.
BitThink
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 21, 2013, 05:08:45 AM
 #12916

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=125629.msg3199358#msg3199358

This is reply of burnside. I think it's reasonable.

No. Peta-Mine has broke the contract. Why did not they get the warning?

They've put on a motion and get approved by most investers. Moreover, it is different from lying with public news.
BitThink
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 21, 2013, 05:09:32 AM
 #12917

...when you go and post that during a FUD induced panic is just reckless.

The panic didn't come from the FUD, imo. It came from Labcoin's failure to prove their claims of hashing, and their subsequent silence. Everything else was just the icing on the cake.

Exactly. Second this.
redbeans2012
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 887
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 21, 2013, 05:09:39 AM
 #12918

Another .2 BTC deposited.

Wooo Hoo.
Ytterbium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 21, 2013, 05:14:27 AM
 #12919

That comes out to 397Gh/s according to my calculations, not counting whatever extra is still in the account over 0.2 (which also would have been there before)

Time              Payment           Δt     BTC/h       Gh/s estimate
9/18/2013 23:13   3.26386497         
9/19/2013  5:04   0.12772021       5.86   0.021798358  129.9974778
9/19/2013  6:02   0.1198282        0.97   0.123216658  734.8193429
9/19/2013  7:02   0.11047558       1.00   0.11047558   658.8361861
9/19/2013 17:17   0.37057639      10.24   0.03619401   215.8479125
9/20/2013 14:17   0.53291462      21.00   0.025376215  151.3345206
9/20/2013 17:47   0.10686873       3.50   0.030533923  182.0932127
9/20/2013 23:17   0.2070555        5.50   0.037646455  224.5097653
9/21/2013  2:07   0.20000000       2.84   0.070436314  420.0565625
9/21/2013  5:07   0.20000000       3.00   0.066709905  397.8336127


Looks like they're doing a standard 0.2 minimum payout.

BitThink
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 21, 2013, 05:14:52 AM
 #12920

Another .2 BTC deposited.

So it's 0.2 BTC every 3 hours. 1.6BTC a day. Around 1083 * 1.6 / 3600 = 0.48 TH.
Pages: « 1 ... 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 [646] 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 ... 914 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!