Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2016, 12:03:13 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 [204] 205 »
  Print  
Author Topic: bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy  (Read 333015 times)
phr33
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 207


View Profile
November 17, 2012, 10:51:35 AM
 #4061

What rendered it useless?

My BTC input: 1GAtPwoTGPQ35y9QugJueum5GzaEzLYjiQ
My GPG ID: B0CCFD4A
1481284993
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481284993

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481284993
Reply with quote  #2

1481284993
Report to moderator
1481284993
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481284993

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481284993
Reply with quote  #2

1481284993
Report to moderator
1481284993
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481284993

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481284993
Reply with quote  #2

1481284993
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481284993
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481284993

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481284993
Reply with quote  #2

1481284993
Report to moderator
1481284993
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481284993

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481284993
Reply with quote  #2

1481284993
Report to moderator
juhakall
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 422



View Profile
November 20, 2012, 11:25:31 AM
 #4062

What rendered it useless?

No support for Stratum or GBT, I believe.
Shadow383
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336


View Profile
November 20, 2012, 11:33:24 AM
 #4063

Ok, on a serious note, I'm willing to contribute some BTC to have a programmer revive and update this project to support ASIC mining.

Any others willing to contribute a bit to find someone with some skills to fix this up ?

Anyone with skills looking to a make a few bucks updating this project ? What are reasonable rates ? How much would it cost to spend a few hours on the code to freshen it up ?
This is something I could get behind, I used to run a fairly successful hopping proxy and would love to do so again if the code could be brought up to scratch.
abracadabra
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 946



View Profile
November 27, 2012, 05:08:46 AM
 #4064


Mobius
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 957



View Profile
November 27, 2012, 06:01:31 AM
 #4065

-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 27, 2012, 12:08:39 PM
 #4066


Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
November 27, 2012, 02:00:16 PM
 #4067


Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
martychubbs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476



View Profile
December 14, 2012, 06:41:34 PM
 #4068

sucks... Cry
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 27, 2012, 09:23:59 AM
 #4069


Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
neiros
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1624



View Profile WWW
December 27, 2012, 11:48:52 AM
 #4070

 Roll Eyes Grin
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=104678.msg1421824#msg1421824 - this is not bitHopper, it's another program and other solutions.

BitcoinOxygen
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336



View Profile WWW
December 29, 2012, 10:45:28 AM
 #4071


BTCOxygen PPS Mining Pool 2% Fee  <<<  Join Now
wknight
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 889


Bitcoin calls me an Orphan


View Profile WWW
January 06, 2013, 06:41:29 PM
 #4072

Roll Eyes Grin
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=104678.msg1421824#msg1421824 - this is not bitHopper, it's another program and other solutions.

Nice but in russian and cant get file even to look at it

Mining Both Bitcoin and Litecoin.
martychubbs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476



View Profile
January 09, 2013, 10:33:19 PM
 #4073

Roll Eyes Grin
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=104678.msg1421824#msg1421824 - this is not bitHopper, it's another program and other solutions.

Nice but in russian and cant get file even to look at it

Google trans:

Quote
While waiting for their Asik wrote in AutoIt small program management cgminer-ohm for a given algorithm and simultaneous work with several pools. How it works: After a certain period of time takes the site selected pool information and on the basis of the data sends commands cgminer-y. The basic algorithm works with pools based on a gradual increase in the number of outgoing solutions traceable to the pool PPLNS or Score mode of payments, which improves the efficiency of ore mining in those cases where long blocks across the pool to the number of ball more in two, three or more times the value of. PoolSwitcher CGMINER + 1.0.2 - http://turbobit.net/2897cm602i70.html (archive cgminer-2.10.3-win32) 1.0.1 - http://turbobit.net/zhmyz57aio7j.html (archive cgminer-2.9. 7-win32) Instructions for the use of these versions appear in the near future.

0.4.2 - http://turbobit.net/ehx2jhq39evf.html (archive cgminer-2.8.7-win32) Work with two pools (2p) in the interval to double difficulties - of ~ 150% Working with three pools (3p) the interval up to triple difficulties - of ~ 130% Working with four pools (4p) for up to four times the range of difficulties - of ~ 120% efficiency can both increase and decrease, changing the parameter kD in one direction or another. For example, when kD = 0.5 and the work of the four pools (4p), which corresponds to work with two pools (2p) for kD = 1, the effectiveness of the gap of the double will be higher than the 2p, and in the worst of circumstances, close to a complete stop operation of the main pool - his death, the overall efficiency will tend to 75%, not 50% as in the (2p) or 66.6% as at (3p). If kD = 1.5 and (4p), which corresponds to an interval of six times , which is extremely rare, little work is interesting because in these parameters the overall efficiency will be slightly higher than 100% Older versions: 0.1.0 - http://turbobit.net/2a0z5q91vtg6.html 0.1.1 - http://turbobit.net / mnpqlkmhzqrg.html 0.1.2 - http://turbobit.net/xsnipxthaqep.html have only one mode (2p) with two pools: one pool - PPLNS or Score, the second one can be any other pool, preferably PPS. Sgminer working with these two pools mode LOAD BALANCE / BALANCE sending a roughly equal number of solutions for each pool ball before reaching the current round of magnitude. If the number is greater than the current ball complexity sgminer is put FAILOVER, thus all decisions are sent to the pool until the number of the ball will not exceed the double of the current round, or if not completed earlier. Then again sgminer is put LOAD BALANCE / BALANCE. effectiveness of this scheme is approximately the sum of the three variables. The first of which - the work in the time interval to the value of less than the current one, the second - from a single to a double of the third - from double to triple the complexity and more. Not hard to guess that the first value is about 150% since the average kolichestro ball found the blocks for this period of time, about half of. (PPS gives 50%, Score 2 times) The second value is approximately the same size of the first, as a two-fold increase posted solutions or 200% in this time period compensates half lost a decision in the first period. On the third of a few difficult as it may consist of three or more, the complexity of multiple, time periods, and the overall efficiency is still committed to 100%. But here, according kommulyativnoy distribution function, if anyone knows what it is (do not ask me, I do not know)), or on the basis of the known data from the pool https://bitminter.com/blocks probability that this third period is about 14%, based on exactly the double of time without updating the round in PS. For quite a long period of time the value of time spent on the job in this period, less than the first and second periods, which determines the effectiveness of more than 100%. So, by this you can add a few tenths of a% relative to the real situation when using only one pool, as sgminer working on several pools will not be idle in the case of one of them unusable. Plus, the existence pulhopperov can add, I think, is about the same percentage. couple of examples on some randomly limited time: When kD = 1 and pool finds blocks smaller than / equal to / slightly more than twice the complexity, efficiency ~ 150% If the pool Each unit comes eight more than twice the complexity, efficiency> 100% if the pool comes every 7 block more than twice the complexity, efficiency <100% If kD = 1,5 and pool finds blocks smaller than / equal to / slightly more triple difficulties - of ~ 125% if pool comes every 20 triple block more complexity, efficiency> 100% If you come across a pool of more than 19 blocks, each of the triple, efficiency <100% even in the case where the number of long blocks more, more small raise the overall efficiency of> 100% in the program has a function donate, receive less than 1% vorkeru creator program. For more support - BTC: 1Grt8FNEJYawuVWLzBm3Z6ux6yNwK92ASk I would be happy to see any comments, suggestions, and assistance to increase the quality and functionality of the program.

Hopping PPLNS?
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
January 09, 2013, 11:26:50 PM
 #4074

Roll Eyes Grin
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=104678.msg1421824#msg1421824 - this is not bitHopper, it's another program and other solutions.

Nice but in russian and cant get file even to look at it

Google trans:

Quote
While waiting for their Asik wrote in AutoIt small program management cgminer-ohm for a given algorithm and simultaneous work with several pools. How it works: After a certain period of time takes the site selected pool information and on the basis of the data sends commands cgminer-y. The basic algorithm works with pools based on a gradual increase in the number of outgoing solutions traceable to the pool PPLNS or Score mode of payments, which improves the efficiency of ore mining in those cases where long blocks across the pool to the number of ball more in two, three or more times the value of. PoolSwitcher CGMINER + 1.0.2 - http://turbobit.net/2897cm602i70.html (archive cgminer-2.10.3-win32) 1.0.1 - http://turbobit.net/zhmyz57aio7j.html (archive cgminer-2.9. 7-win32) Instructions for the use of these versions appear in the near future.

0.4.2 - http://turbobit.net/ehx2jhq39evf.html (archive cgminer-2.8.7-win32) Work with two pools (2p) in the interval to double difficulties - of ~ 150% Working with three pools (3p) the interval up to triple difficulties - of ~ 130% Working with four pools (4p) for up to four times the range of difficulties - of ~ 120% efficiency can both increase and decrease, changing the parameter kD in one direction or another. For example, when kD = 0.5 and the work of the four pools (4p), which corresponds to work with two pools (2p) for kD = 1, the effectiveness of the gap of the double will be higher than the 2p, and in the worst of circumstances, close to a complete stop operation of the main pool - his death, the overall efficiency will tend to 75%, not 50% as in the (2p) or 66.6% as at (3p). If kD = 1.5 and (4p), which corresponds to an interval of six times , which is extremely rare, little work is interesting because in these parameters the overall efficiency will be slightly higher than 100% Older versions: 0.1.0 - http://turbobit.net/2a0z5q91vtg6.html 0.1.1 - http://turbobit.net / mnpqlkmhzqrg.html 0.1.2 - http://turbobit.net/xsnipxthaqep.html have only one mode (2p) with two pools: one pool - PPLNS or Score, the second one can be any other pool, preferably PPS. Sgminer working with these two pools mode LOAD BALANCE / BALANCE sending a roughly equal number of solutions for each pool ball before reaching the current round of magnitude. If the number is greater than the current ball complexity sgminer is put FAILOVER, thus all decisions are sent to the pool until the number of the ball will not exceed the double of the current round, or if not completed earlier. Then again sgminer is put LOAD BALANCE / BALANCE. effectiveness of this scheme is approximately the sum of the three variables. The first of which - the work in the time interval to the value of less than the current one, the second - from a single to a double of the third - from double to triple the complexity and more. Not hard to guess that the first value is about 150% since the average kolichestro ball found the blocks for this period of time, about half of. (PPS gives 50%, Score 2 times) The second value is approximately the same size of the first, as a two-fold increase posted solutions or 200% in this time period compensates half lost a decision in the first period. On the third of a few difficult as it may consist of three or more, the complexity of multiple, time periods, and the overall efficiency is still committed to 100%. But here, according kommulyativnoy distribution function, if anyone knows what it is (do not ask me, I do not know)), or on the basis of the known data from the pool https://bitminter.com/blocks probability that this third period is about 14%, based on exactly the double of time without updating the round in PS. For quite a long period of time the value of time spent on the job in this period, less than the first and second periods, which determines the effectiveness of more than 100%. So, by this you can add a few tenths of a% relative to the real situation when using only one pool, as sgminer working on several pools will not be idle in the case of one of them unusable. Plus, the existence pulhopperov can add, I think, is about the same percentage. couple of examples on some randomly limited time: When kD = 1 and pool finds blocks smaller than / equal to / slightly more than twice the complexity, efficiency ~ 150% If the pool Each unit comes eight more than twice the complexity, efficiency> 100% if the pool comes every 7 block more than twice the complexity, efficiency <100% If kD = 1,5 and pool finds blocks smaller than / equal to / slightly more triple difficulties - of ~ 125% if pool comes every 20 triple block more complexity, efficiency> 100% If you come across a pool of more than 19 blocks, each of the triple, efficiency <100% even in the case where the number of long blocks more, more small raise the overall efficiency of> 100% in the program has a function donate, receive less than 1% vorkeru creator program. For more support - BTC: 1Grt8FNEJYawuVWLzBm3Z6ux6yNwK92ASk I would be happy to see any comments, suggestions, and assistance to increase the quality and functionality of the program.

Hopping PPLNS?

I really have no idea if they think they can obtain any benefit from hopping PPLNS. I'm not really sure what I'm reading, tbh. We need some input from a Russian speaker.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
wknight
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 889


Bitcoin calls me an Orphan


View Profile WWW
January 10, 2013, 03:18:36 PM
 #4075

Well Windows stuff worries me enough as it is. I will stick with Linux scripts Smiley

Mining Both Bitcoin and Litecoin.
martychubbs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476



View Profile
January 10, 2013, 08:24:33 PM
 #4076

Ok, on a serious note, I'm willing to contribute some BTC to have a programmer revive and update this project to support ASIC mining.

Any others willing to contribute a bit to find someone with some skills to fix this up ?

Anyone with skills looking to a make a few bucks updating this project ? What are reasonable rates ? How much would it cost to spend a few hours on the code to freshen it up ?
This is something I could get behind, I used to run a fairly successful hopping proxy and would love to do so again if the code could be brought up to scratch.


me too
macboy80
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 102


View Profile
January 30, 2013, 08:19:53 AM
 #4077

-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
January 30, 2013, 08:40:12 AM
 #4078


Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
January 30, 2013, 02:44:17 PM
 #4079


BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
abracadabra
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 946



View Profile
January 30, 2013, 05:29:44 PM
 #4080


Pages: « 1 ... 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 [204] 205 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!