Bitcoin Forum
December 05, 2016, 02:30:11 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 [182] 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 »
  Print  
Author Topic: bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy  (Read 332668 times)
Houseonfire
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 129


View Profile
August 16, 2011, 05:11:08 PM
 #3621

Can someone help me add in a complete addition of all the gained BTC on the top of the page up by by speed? And also the current system time. For example:

Code:
bcpool @71MHash | 1.000 BTC Earned  |  10:00PM

And by earned, i dont mean cashed out. I mean the total of what is earned so far.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480905011
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480905011

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480905011
Reply with quote  #2

1480905011
Report to moderator
1480905011
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480905011

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480905011
Reply with quote  #2

1480905011
Report to moderator
deepceleron
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470



View Profile WWW
August 16, 2011, 05:36:01 PM
 #3622

Anyone with problems with Ozco? It doesn´t show me any "est.earnings" and i send about 800 shares!

Edit: wich one of these commands works better or are necessary with the "mine_deepbit" mode? or the three of those at the same time?

--startLP = Seeds the LP module with known pools.

This is now the default, it doesn't need to be specified at the command-line any more.

--noLP = Turns off client side longpolling*
*i don´t understand what this one does..

I believe client-side means that Bithopper doesn't push LPs to your miner with this option, your miners would just request new work when their queue is empty, which would increase stale shares.

--p2pLP = Starts up an IRC bot to validate LP based hopping
I would encourage people to set up pool worker accounts for at least a dozen pools and add them as 'info' before using this option, otherwise the information you will be sharing with others using the IRC LP info-sharing technique would be sub-optimal.


cuqa
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40


View Profile
August 16, 2011, 06:08:11 PM
 #3623

i recommend to remove bitcoinpool from the rotation. its obvious that they fake their shares as decoy and then even demand a fee. also they are so unprofessional in every way.. avoid!
paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2011, 06:57:42 PM
 #3624

i recommend to remove bitcoinpool from the rotation. its obvious that they fake their shares as decoy and then even demand a fee. also they are so unprofessional in every way.. avoid!

you have some screen capt to sustain that ?

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2011, 07:00:55 PM
 #3625

Anyone with problems with Ozco? It doesn´t show me any "est.earnings" and i send about 800 shares!

Edit: wich one of these commands works better or are necessary with the "mine_deepbit" mode? or the three of those at the same time?

--startLP = Seeds the LP module with known pools.

This is now the default, it doesn't need to be specified at the command-line any more.

--noLP = Turns off client side longpolling*
*i don´t understand what this one does..

I believe client-side means that Bithopper doesn't push LPs to your miner with this option, your miners would just request new work when their queue is empty, which would increase stale shares.

--p2pLP = Starts up an IRC bot to validate LP based hopping
I would encourage people to set up pool worker accounts for at least a dozen pools and add them as 'info' before using this option, otherwise the information you will be sharing with others using the IRC LP info-sharing technique would be sub-optimal.



--noLP = Turns off client side longpolling*  is exactly the opposite of startLP, so now it's only function is to disable LP based hopping. Client side (local miner) LP can't be disabled atm and it's not recommended Smiley

edit: lol, I'm definitely not sure about this one, better ask c00w when we see him

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
cuqa
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40


View Profile
August 16, 2011, 07:10:03 PM
 #3626

i recommend to remove bitcoinpool from the rotation. its obvious that they fake their shares as decoy and then even demand a fee. also they are so unprofessional in every way.. avoid!

you have some screen capt to sustain that ?

you dont need a screen capture. just watch their json file for a couple of mins and you will see

http://bitcoinpool.com/pooljson.php
paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2011, 07:18:28 PM
 #3627

i recommend to remove bitcoinpool from the rotation. its obvious that they fake their shares as decoy and then even demand a fee. also they are so unprofessional in every way.. avoid!

you have some screen capt to sustain that ?

you dont need a screen capture. just watch their json file for a couple of mins and you will see

http://bitcoinpool.com/pooljson.php

yep, you're right about that Sad

@cirz8 yep seems like it was updated when I was out

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
cirz8
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
August 16, 2011, 07:23:21 PM
 #3628

i recommend to remove bitcoinpool from the rotation. its obvious that they fake their shares as decoy and then even demand a fee. also they are so unprofessional in every way.. avoid!
Don't use json on them, that is why it changed to grabbing their webpage instead, update your pools.cfg

Mandatory?  123ABCcirz8CcieVh9UwThEX2vkoJF33Te
r2edu
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68


View Profile
August 16, 2011, 07:40:53 PM
 #3629

There´s something wrong with that pool anyway.. I have submited 1576 shares and have an estimated of 0.03683698, so making simple maths the total shares at the moment must be something near 2139154 shares.... and BH is showing 1524666 84,44%, is a lot of difference

Edit: I´am getting a lots of "unknown work" in the bh console? is that bad?
c00w
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
August 17, 2011, 02:41:01 AM
 #3630

@--nolp
Old option for when client side LP was broken for some people. I think I removed it.

1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
spiccioli
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1376

nec sine labore


View Profile
August 17, 2011, 08:35:17 AM
 #3631

Hi all,

I set up bitHopper yesterday, to see what I can gain from its use, but then, looking inside user.cfg I saw that a lot of proportional pools ( I looked at three or four of them in the hoppable section ), apart from mtRed, are very small pools, so I fear that variance could kill in that pools.

Apart from mtRed, what pool has at least 100Gh of hashing capacity? Or, are you using such small pools without being affected by variance, maybe because you're hopping?

spiccioli
wtfman
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 118

BTCServ Operator


View Profile WWW
August 17, 2011, 08:39:07 AM
 #3632

Hi all,

I set up bitHopper yesterday, to see what I can gain from its use, but then, looking inside user.cfg I saw that a lot of proportional pools ( I looked at three or four of them in the hoppable section ), apart from mtRed, are very small pools, so I fear that variance could kill in that pools.

Apart from mtRed, what pool has at least 100Gh of hashing capacity? Or, are you using such small pools without being affected by variance, maybe because you're hopping?

spiccioli


they are so empty because of pool hopping. you cant pool hop and expect to have no downside ..

# BTCServ - EU based Mining Pool
# 0% PPS - 0.0000399757 - Hopping Proof
# Official Thread
spiccioli
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1376

nec sine labore


View Profile
August 17, 2011, 08:45:06 AM
 #3633

they are so empty because of pool hopping. you cant pool hop and expect to have no downside ..

wtfman,

it is a big downside.

hopping promises me a few % more in gains but then I have to hop pools that find a block in a month or more... well, maybe I'd better be going solo than hopping. Smiley

spiccioli.
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
August 17, 2011, 09:22:17 AM
 #3634

Hi all,

I set up bitHopper yesterday, to see what I can gain from its use, but then, looking inside user.cfg I saw that a lot of proportional pools ( I looked at three or four of them in the hoppable section ), apart from mtRed, are very small pools, so I fear that variance could kill in that pools.

Apart from mtRed, what pool has at least 100Gh of hashing capacity? Or, are you using such small pools without being affected by variance, maybe because you're hopping?

spiccioli


quick reply - go to pools section of forum, check off the available pools against hashrate.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
spiccioli
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1376

nec sine labore


View Profile
August 17, 2011, 10:35:48 AM
 #3635

Hi all,

I set up bitHopper yesterday, to see what I can gain from its use, but then, looking inside user.cfg I saw that a lot of proportional pools ( I looked at three or four of them in the hoppable section ), apart from mtRed, are very small pools, so I fear that variance could kill in that pools.

Apart from mtRed, what pool has at least 100Gh of hashing capacity? Or, are you using such small pools without being affected by variance, maybe because you're hopping?

spiccioli


quick reply - go to pools section of forum, check off the available pools against hashrate.

organofcorti,

I did even better, I went to their home page were I found out about the speed, now, to be clear, I have nothing against slow pools and even fast ones were slow when they started.

I was questioning pool-hopping if the only hoppable pools are slow ones.

I was asking myself and this forum, is hopping very slow pools ( there is a pool which has 2 GH of capacity, so it is slower than my three righs together ) still giving some real advantage? Isn't it, in the end, like going solo?

best regards.

spiccioli.

Keninishna
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 551



View Profile WWW
August 17, 2011, 11:42:51 AM
 #3636

lol a pool with 2 gh/s is more like a puddle. That is too slow for me to considering hopping.
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
August 17, 2011, 12:04:53 PM
 #3637

Hi all,

I set up bitHopper yesterday, to see what I can gain from its use, but then, looking inside user.cfg I saw that a lot of proportional pools ( I looked at three or four of them in the hoppable section ), apart from mtRed, are very small pools, so I fear that variance could kill in that pools.

Apart from mtRed, what pool has at least 100Gh of hashing capacity? Or, are you using such small pools without being affected by variance, maybe because you're hopping?

spiccioli


quick reply - go to pools section of forum, check off the available pools against hashrate.

organofcorti,

I did even better, I went to their home page were I found out about the speed, now, to be clear, I have nothing against slow pools and even fast ones were slow when they started.

I was questioning pool-hopping if the only hoppable pools are slow ones.

I was asking myself and this forum, is hopping very slow pools ( there is a pool which has 2 GH of capacity, so it is slower than my three righs together ) still giving some real advantage? Isn't it, in the end, like going solo?

best regards.

spiccioli.


There are real problems with only hopping slow pools but you will still get increased efficiency from hopping. The problems I can think of are:

  • hugely increased variance
  • With long solve times you have to wait quite a while for the pay off
  • you have to have a very large number of small pools to hop to so you can stay below your hop point
  • new pools have changed payout schemes mid round to make hopping non-viable
  • new pools could be a scam

However pool hopping still works and can bring in significant dividends if you're patient and can deal with the variance somehow (eg slicing).

Edit: After rereading your post and giving it a bit more thought, I realise I missed your point - if your hashrate makes a significant portion of the pool hashrate then it would seem to approach mining solo. Interesting point and I had to give it some thought, but I still think a tiny pool is hoppable because after you leave it still keeps looking for the block. That doesn't happen when you go solo.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
r2edu
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68


View Profile
August 17, 2011, 12:47:44 PM
 #3638

I can´t make it work neither of the two latest versions of bh I download (0.1.7.2-65 / 81). Both starts ok but then my miner, guiminer, doesn´t connect... I don´t get any getwork

I go back with the 0.1.7.2-53 and works fine... any suggestions?
paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
August 17, 2011, 01:13:03 PM
 #3639

Hi all,

I set up bitHopper yesterday, to see what I can gain from its use, but then, looking inside user.cfg I saw that a lot of proportional pools ( I looked at three or four of them in the hoppable section ), apart from mtRed, are very small pools, so I fear that variance could kill in that pools.

Apart from mtRed, what pool has at least 100Gh of hashing capacity? Or, are you using such small pools without being affected by variance, maybe because you're hopping?

spiccioli


quick reply - go to pools section of forum, check off the available pools against hashrate.

to complement organofcorti quick answer you could visit the wiki page to make an idea of pools speeds

edit: @r2edu try using same auth for your miner as in --auth user,pass param of bH, if your using that of course

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
floeti
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30



View Profile
August 17, 2011, 01:46:00 PM
 #3640

In the latest version (ca5def9fb22871680d562d8e75eb4b6650f36321) I have some problems with connecting my miners. They seem to not find the proxy anymore and in the bh-log I can see, that the miner is answered with status code 401. Apparently the miners have to connect now to "<bh_host>:8337/LP" or do I understand the code wrong? But even then it takes very long until the miner (phoenix 1.50) actually starts to do something.

Pages: « 1 ... 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 [182] 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!