Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2016, 02:23:28 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 [196] 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 »
  Print  
Author Topic: bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy  (Read 332862 times)
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


moOo


View Profile
September 07, 2011, 11:37:42 PM
 #3901

cool. I was actually posting in the forums right when it retired me. had it waited for half a second, it wouldnt have. LOL.
anyways yeah I'll do that


edit: I dont have permission to post to the wiki, that seems to make it hard to post to the wiki to get permission to post tot he wiki. Tongue

i think there is a bug.

mooo for rent
1481120608
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481120608

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481120608
Reply with quote  #2

1481120608
Report to moderator
1481120608
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481120608

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481120608
Reply with quote  #2

1481120608
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481120608
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481120608

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481120608
Reply with quote  #2

1481120608
Report to moderator
Starlightbreaker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204


★Nitrogensports.eu★


View Profile
September 08, 2011, 02:36:56 AM
 #3902

damnit, i just realized i got retired too lol.


           █████████████████     ████████
          █████████████████     ████████
         █████████████████     ████████
        █████████████████     ████████
       ████████              ████████
      ████████              ████████
     ████████     ███████  ████████     ████████
    ████████     █████████████████     ████████
   ████████     █████████████████     ████████
  ████████     █████████████████     ████████
 ████████     █████████████████     ████████
████████     ████████  ███████     ████████
            ████████              ████████
           ████████              ████████
          ████████     █████████████████
         ████████     █████████████████
        ████████     █████████████████
       ████████     █████████████████
▄▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██     
██
██
▬▬ THE LARGEST & MOST TRUSTED ▬▬
      BITCOIN SPORTSBOOK     
   ▄▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██     
██
██
             ▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▄
     ▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀        ▀▄▄▄▄           
▄▀▀▀▀                 █   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄
█                    ▀▄          █
 █   ▀▌     ██▄        █          █               
 ▀▄        ▐████▄       █        █
  █        ███████▄     ▀▄       █
   █      ▐████▄█████████████████████▄
   ▀▄     ███████▀                  ▀██
    █      ▀█████    ▄▄        ▄▄    ██
     █       ▀███   ████      ████   ██
     ▀▄        ██    ▀▀        ▀▀    ██
      █        ██        ▄██▄        ██
       █       ██        ▀██▀        ██
       ▀▄      ██    ▄▄        ▄▄    ██
        █      ██   ████      ████   ██
         █▄▄▄▄▀██    ▀▀        ▀▀    ██
               ██▄                  ▄██
                ▀████████████████████▀




  CASINO  ●  DICE  ●  POKER   
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
   24 hour Customer Support   

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
HolodeckJizzmopper
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106


View Profile
September 08, 2011, 05:56:29 AM
 #3903

It certainly is interesting watching the stats page of bitHopper at the moment, switching between BitClockers, mtred, and OzCoin, and all being so close to 33% CDF at the same time.

I'm trying to think of something useful and productive to add, about what to do in cases like this with bitHopper, but, well... It's late and I can't think very clearly at the moment.

Trippy.

* HolodeckJizzmopper passes the pipe

Love your software, dude. Rather than try to get Python working properly under MacOS, VirtualBox + Ubuntu 11 VM FTW.
3phase
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 313


Third score


View Profile
September 08, 2011, 06:43:44 AM
 #3904

Been running Bh for a couple of days, had great results, and having read the LP delay analysis a few pages back by deepceleron et al. I had some thoughts:

It's obvious to me that LP announcement delays are and will always be different for every user. The reason for that will primarily be the network delay between pool server and user agent. They will also be different for the same user on different days. This could be explained by the fact that LP announcements are happening in a programmatic loop construct iterating over the active connections. The position in this queue obviously is different day to day and hour to hour. But normally it would average out over a longer period, whilst the network delay will remain relatively the same.

So, I was thinking that it would be good to get a log table with Time, BlockNumber and BlockOwner fields from the output of Bh, and compare it every day with Pident so that a user can determine and try possible LP_penalty values for their user agent.

Does anybody have any ideas of how I could do it with the current Bh output?

Also, does LP_penalty accept decimals or does it only take the integer part of the parameter?




Fiat no more.
Δοκιμάστε το http://multibit.org - Bitcoin client τώρα και στα Ελληνικά
amazingrando
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546



View Profile
September 08, 2011, 07:02:53 AM
 #3905

FYI, BTCSERV:

I have decided to stop offering Proportional Rewards after the next found block because it does not work parallelly to PPS without affecting it negatively. Even worse, it would cause losses if I would not severely cut one of the reward schemes, and thus offer significantly lower value than other pools, what is not what I want to do.

Currently I am calculating the rewards like this:

Code:
PROP: [user prop shares] / [total prop shares and pps shares] * 50
PPS: [user pps shares] * 0.000028125

Problem with both reward schemes parrallelly running is that the PPS Queue does not even out after a long round and a short round. In short rounds, which have a higher percentage of prop shares, you save only a bit with what you can feed the queue, but in long rounds, which have way higher share of pps shares, the queue is getting quite big very fast.

I have tried some different calculations but did not get an acceptable result. I dont know how other pools with PPS and PROP calculate the rewards. Maybe they experience the same flaw, maybe not. If someone has a solution for this I would be glad to hear it.

Btw, I have decided to stick to PPS since I am convinced it is the fairest of all reward schemes available. It's not in my interest to lose the hashing boost of pool hoppers, but I want to achieve a steadily increasing hash rate from regular users and not short term 150 GH/s and as soon as a round is near 43% see everyone leave.

Bitbond - 105% PPS mining bond - mining payouts without buying hardware
c00w
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
September 08, 2011, 03:42:30 PM
 #3906

Getwork issues should/may be fixed. Also we should reuse connections properly now.

1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
Ali
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84


View Profile
September 08, 2011, 11:24:49 PM
 #3907

It still requests work like mad (and therefore hangs) after a while on Eligius.
amazingrando
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546



View Profile
September 09, 2011, 02:14:41 AM
 #3908

According to Coinotron, it looks like solidcoins are 20% more profitable than BTC atm.  Thus, I've added a couple of sc pools.  Currently sc difficulty is around 8000.  In the Bh stats, it shows the percentage for sc pools with respect to BTC bifficulty (1.77MM).  Does this mean that Bh will always stay on sc pools?  Should it be 43.5% of 8000?  Huh

Bitbond - 105% PPS mining bond - mining payouts without buying hardware
johnj
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
September 09, 2011, 04:21:00 AM
 #3909

According to Coinotron, it looks like solidcoins are 20% more profitable than BTC atm.  Thus, I've added a couple of sc pools.  Currently sc difficulty is around 8000.  In the Bh stats, it shows the percentage for sc pools with respect to BTC bifficulty (1.77MM).  Does this mean that Bh will always stay on sc pools?  Should it be 43.5% of 8000?  Huh

I think it's been updated


v0.2.4.8.zip — Oodles of bugfixes. Getwork Flooding should be gone. Miner Starvation should be reduced. Solidcoins have the correct diff and have a bunch of fixes.

1AeW7QK59HvEJwiyMztFH1ubWPSLLKx5ym
TradeHill Referral TH-R120549
amazingrando
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546



View Profile
September 09, 2011, 06:20:53 AM
 #3910

According to Coinotron, it looks like solidcoins are 20% more profitable than BTC atm.  Thus, I've added a couple of sc pools.  Currently sc difficulty is around 8000.  In the Bh stats, it shows the percentage for sc pools with respect to BTC bifficulty (1.77MM).  Does this mean that Bh will always stay on sc pools?  Should it be 43.5% of 8000?  Huh

I think it's been updated


v0.2.4.8.zip — Oodles of bugfixes. Getwork Flooding should be gone. Miner Starvation should be reduced. Solidcoins have the correct diff and have a bunch of fixes.


I am getting BH from github by cloning or pulling (I'm running Linux if that matters). Is the v0.2.4.8.zip version newer?  Where can I download it from?

Bitbond - 105% PPS mining bond - mining payouts without buying hardware
johnj
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
September 09, 2011, 06:43:26 AM
 #3911

I am getting BH from github by cloning or pulling (I'm running Linux if that matters). Is the v0.2.4.8.zip version newer?  Where can I download it from?

https://github.com/c00w/bitHopper/downloads

1AeW7QK59HvEJwiyMztFH1ubWPSLLKx5ym
TradeHill Referral TH-R120549
amazingrando
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546



View Profile
September 09, 2011, 07:09:53 AM
 #3912

According to Coinotron, it looks like solidcoins are 20% more profitable than BTC atm.  Thus, I've added a couple of sc pools.  Currently sc difficulty is around 8000.  In the Bh stats, it shows the percentage for sc pools with respect to BTC bifficulty (1.77MM).  Does this mean that Bh will always stay on sc pools?  Should it be 43.5% of 8000?  Huh

I think it's been updated


v0.2.4.8.zip — Oodles of bugfixes. Getwork Flooding should be gone. Miner Starvation should be reduced. Solidcoins have the correct diff and have a bunch of fixes.


Downloaded the v0.2.4.8 zip file.  Seems like it switched from solidcoins when it should, but the stats display is a bit confusing:

s0DigBTC.net (scc)   2,981  0.17%

Should be showing 36.15% if sc difficulty is 8,246.


EDIT:

I take back my earlier statement about switching working right.  For example, I've been stuck on mine4us even though it should have switched (the pool is at about 64% presently, when there are several other pools <43.5%)

mine-for.us (scc)   5,289 0.30%

EDIT:

I'm an idiot.  I in user.cfg I used mine, when I should have used mine_scc.  grrr  Sad  Everything appears to be working correctly

Bitbond - 105% PPS mining bond - mining payouts without buying hardware
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
September 09, 2011, 07:34:29 AM
 #3913

Anyone have any up to date info on Polmine? Did they end up doing the bcp-like taxing hoppers thing they were going to do, and do they still delay stats? I'm hopping them on mine_deepbit atm, and things look ok from my side, but if I can optimise the hop-point I'd like to. And I'm sure you'd all like me to, too.  Wink

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
iopq
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644


View Profile
September 09, 2011, 09:10:43 AM
 #3914

Anyone have any up to date info on Polmine? Did they end up doing the bcp-like taxing hoppers thing they were going to do, and do they still delay stats? I'm hopping them on mine_deepbit atm, and things look ok from my side, but if I can optimise the hop-point I'd like to. And I'm sure you'd all like me to, too.  Wink
wait, what? I'm using just mine on it, am I behind the times?

organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
September 09, 2011, 09:15:00 AM
 #3915

Anyone have any up to date info on Polmine? Did they end up doing the bcp-like taxing hoppers thing they were going to do, and do they still delay stats? I'm hopping them on mine_deepbit atm, and things look ok from my side, but if I can optimise the hop-point I'd like to. And I'm sure you'd all like me to, too.  Wink
wait, what? I'm using just mine on it, am I behind the times?

Ah, I could be - I've been busy on other related projects lately.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
HolodeckJizzmopper
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106


View Profile
September 09, 2011, 04:05:46 PM
 #3916

I would like to add my voice to issues hopping with 2.4.8. Last night, it refused to hop between BitClockers and MTRed despite both being <43%

EDIT: .. and just watched it ping-pong between Eligius and MTRed with MTRed being >49%, and Eligius as my backup pool, so something is... odd...
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


moOo


View Profile
September 09, 2011, 05:18:59 PM
 #3917

if you have the hopper scrolling with rpc requests... are you using cgminer? cgminer above 1.61 has been causing thisw.

mooo for rent
phase
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49



View Profile
September 11, 2011, 08:47:18 AM
 #3918

if you have the hopper scrolling with rpc requests... are you using cgminer? cgminer above 1.61 has been causing thisw.

I also had this problem about a week ago when I tried it out, it would run fine for a couple of hours, then it would start flooding the screen with mumbo-jumbo and stop doing useful work. Does the problem still persist with cgminer 2.0? Any chance of this getting fixed?
Rino
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38


View Profile
September 11, 2011, 04:50:53 PM
 #3919

I just had getwork spam again on current version  Embarrassed only using phoenix miners
leveer
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
September 11, 2011, 07:11:15 PM
 #3920

Proxy shuts down periodically, with this coming at the end of both log files:

[21:55:06] Exception in wsgi server loop, restarting wsgi in 60 seconds

Any advice?
Pages: « 1 ... 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 [196] 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!