Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 04:00:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 [163] 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 »
  Print  
Author Topic: bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy  (Read 355541 times)
creativex
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 09, 2011, 05:53:12 PM
 #3241

I do think we need to put the threshold to 100%
I do think organofcorti was right on that.

but a little over 100% and your shares become cheaper than pps.

BAH...cow joules would never "utter" such blasphemy...dunno who this imposter is.

I've been testing threshold=.75 and don't care for the result much with default slicer, but it doesn't bother me with altslicescheduler and a low min shares.

1710820842
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710820842

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710820842
Reply with quote  #2

1710820842
Report to moderator
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1710820842
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710820842

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710820842
Reply with quote  #2

1710820842
Report to moderator
1710820842
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710820842

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710820842
Reply with quote  #2

1710820842
Report to moderator
MaGNeT
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002


Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na


View Profile WWW
August 09, 2011, 05:53:59 PM
 #3242

I do think we need to put the threshold to 100%
I do think organofcorti was right on that.

but a little over 100% and your shares become cheaper than pps.

I don't want such a big step at once, so I try at 60% for 3 days and see what it does Smiley
One advantage is that it (almost) never needs a backup pool at that setting.

So, you mean you set penalty to .6 for deepbit?

No, I set both --startLP and --threshold=0.60 in the shortcut for Bithopper.py
If you set threshold to 0.10 it will mine a pool until 10%, 0.20 for 20%, etc.
Standard is 0.43
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1004


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
August 09, 2011, 05:54:16 PM
 #3243

I do think we need to put the threshold to 100%
I do think organofcorti was right on that.

but a little over 100% and your shares become cheaper than pps.

I don't want such a big step at once, so I try at 60% for 3 days and see what it does Smiley
One advantage is that it (almost) never needs a backup pool at that setting.

So, you mean you set penalty to .6 for deepbit?

for the sake of hopping science please try standard hops for a day or your results could be ignored in the future

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
MaGNeT
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002


Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na


View Profile WWW
August 09, 2011, 05:56:08 PM
 #3244

I do think we need to put the threshold to 100%
I do think organofcorti was right on that.

but a little over 100% and your shares become cheaper than pps.

I don't want such a big step at once, so I try at 60% for 3 days and see what it does Smiley
One advantage is that it (almost) never needs a backup pool at that setting.

So, you mean you set penalty to .6 for deepbit?

for the sake of hopping science please try standard hops for a day or your results could be ignored in the future

Standard? What's that?  Grin Bitcoin / PC's / bitHopper is a hobby, not my dayjob...
dribbits
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 09, 2011, 06:01:12 PM
 #3245

I doubt your issue is bitHopper.  I am looking at my usage graphs here, and I have around 550 mb  per day going out and 250 per day coming in.  Granted, that would put you over the 20 GB / month, but not in 8 days
now I have done measuring
I have done nothing else on net except forum
since around 2:00 pm to 7:00 pm
340 MB out
270 MB in
from one (the main-)PC (on the second PC is bithopper running too)
thats around 120 MB/h per PC
this is too much for my account...
is there much less if I disable most of the pools?
Or what else can I do to decrease the traffic (I have to do some other things with this PC too...)
TIA

Ive got bitHopper running on my main machine with 2 GPUS, and 10 more miners from other machines that connect to it. Including browsing the internet I have used 61.7MB down and 25.6MB up today. Do you have some other software doing auto updates or something in the background?
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1004


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
August 09, 2011, 06:04:40 PM
 #3246

I do think we need to put the threshold to 100%
I do think organofcorti was right on that.

but a little over 100% and your shares become cheaper than pps.

I don't want such a big step at once, so I try at 60% for 3 days and see what it does Smiley
One advantage is that it (almost) never needs a backup pool at that setting.

So, you mean you set penalty to .6 for deepbit?

for the sake of hopping science please try standard hops for a day or your results could be ignored in the future

Standard? What's that?  Grin Bitcoin / PC's / bitHopper is a hobby, not my dayjob...

standard, it was a form of referring to simple methods hopping (default scheduler or alt scheduler, --startLP) in this case with bH, without changing principles in the middle of testing (like hopping to a higher threshold)

edit: thanks, tomorrow I will be testing different levels too  Wink

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
GenTarkin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1002


View Profile
August 09, 2011, 06:05:20 PM
 #3247

k, Ill go back to standard...I will just use --startLP

GenTarkin's MOD Kncminer Titan custom firmware! v1.0.4! -- !!NO LONGER AVAILABLE!!
Donations: bitcoin- 1Px71mWNQNKW19xuARqrmnbcem1dXqJ3At || litecoin- LYXrLis3ik6TRn8tdvzAyJ264DRvwYVeEw
macboy80
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 102
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 09, 2011, 06:06:35 PM
 #3248

I would like to pose a possibly over-complicated solution to the slice vs. default scheduler question that I'm not even sure is possible. I may be way off, but please give this some thought.

Create a new role called "mine_slice". This would be for the small pools with low hashrate (user selectable). The faster pools would stay "mine".
My idea is to run the slice scheduler inside of the default scheduler. So the behavior would be: If there were "mine" pools below threshold, you would be mining them under OldDefault rules. If there were no acceptable "mine" pools, all of the "mine_slice" pools would be selected running under slice rules as a group, but only if there was one or more below threshold. If all of these options were exhausted, we would then resort to "backup".

Visually, I see it like this.
OldDefaultScheduler[mine; mine_slush; SliceScheduler(mine_slice); backup]

Like I said, I'm not even sure this is possible, and I'm definitely not qualified to try to code it. Just food for thought...

PS: What do you guys think of giving priority to mine_slush to where you always hop in for the first 11% or less, no matter what. I feel like those that are using mine_slush wouldn't mind diverting for the very short time in search of those short rounds?
ewibit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2955
Merit: 1049


View Profile
August 09, 2011, 06:09:31 PM
 #3249

Ive got bitHopper running on my main machine with 2 GPUS, and 10 more miners from other machines that connect to it. Including browsing the internet I have used 61.7MB down and 25.6MB up today. Do you have some other software doing auto updates or something in the background?
ok, I think, the first important step will be the miner on the second PC connect to this PC's bithopper...
(because now it is running here 2 times)
how can I do this (if the ip changes every reboot)?
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1004


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
August 09, 2011, 06:14:18 PM
 #3250

@macboy80 favouring slush when available is on issue list in git and it's already implemented in AltScheduler
ppl in here would surely give you answers about the new role you propose

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
djex
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 09, 2011, 06:16:03 PM
 #3251

I would like to pose a possibly over-complicated solution to the slice vs. default scheduler question that I'm not even sure is possible. I may be way off, but please give this some thought.

Create a new role called "mine_slice". This would be for the small pools with low hashrate (user selectable). The faster pools would stay "mine".
My idea is to run the slice scheduler inside of the default scheduler. So the behavior would be: If there were "mine" pools below threshold, you would be mining them under OldDefault rules. If there were no acceptable "mine" pools, all of the "mine_slice" pools would be selected running under slice rules as a group, but only if there was one or more below threshold. If all of these options were exhausted, we would then resort to "backup".

Visually, I see it like this.
OldDefaultScheduler[mine; mine_slush; SliceScheduler(mine_slice); backup]

Like I said, I'm not even sure this is possible, and I'm definitely not qualified to try to code it. Just food for thought...

I think this is a pretty good idea. It may be a good alternative to slicing based off pool speed. I don't think it would be to hard to code in either. Very nice idea.

Smiley  : 1LbvSEJwtQZKLSQQVYxQJes8YneQk2yhE3
bitcoindaddy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 481
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 09, 2011, 06:16:50 PM
 #3252

I suspect, but can't prove that deepbit isn't working with the alternate scheduler. I mined quite a while on the newest build and it didn't go over, even though others here said their's were mining deepbit. When I switched back to the default scheduler, it started mining deepbit.
gnaget
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 102


View Profile
August 09, 2011, 06:17:41 PM
 #3253

I just updated this morning, and now when a pool lags out, the slice goes empty, and it doesn't mine anymore until I mark something info and then back
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


moOo


View Profile
August 09, 2011, 06:25:20 PM
 #3254

Quote
since around 2:00 pm to 7:00 pm
340 MB out
270 MB in


that seems more than high to me.. we are only sending small strings of text back and forth.. even blocks are normally in the kb range.

chek to see if you got a virus.. make sure wifi is secure

I am going to monitor the miner and hopper and see what I come up with.. but there is no way it is that much i wouldnt think.

mooo for rent
MaGNeT
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002


Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na


View Profile WWW
August 09, 2011, 06:27:30 PM
 #3255

Deepbit:

09.08 18:21:52 0h 20m   203 1586080   0.00620744

That's for 2950Mhash/s, Default scheduler and threshold at 60% (.6)
EskimoBob
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank


View Profile
August 09, 2011, 06:29:39 PM
 #3256

I suspect, but can't prove that deepbit isn't working with the alternate scheduler. I mined quite a while on the newest build and it didn't go over, even though others here said their's were mining deepbit. When I switched back to the default scheduler, it started mining deepbit.

Deepbit is evil!  Smiley Help the small guys to grow and take something away from those top 3 pools!
Do I really have to say: "Fuck globalisation, fuck central an all controlling [ADD YOUR PICK]  and blaa blaa blaa? Do I?
 Kiss

While reading what I wrote, use the most friendliest and relaxing voice in your head.
BTW, Things in BTC bubble universes are getting ugly....
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1004


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
August 09, 2011, 06:39:11 PM
 #3257

Ref: original Raulo paper on pool hopping - link

edit: detailed analysis of pooled mining reward system

edit2:
just happened to see this table in Meni's paper, it just reinforces my thoughts on amplification factor (m = number of pools)
Code:
Table B.1: Ampli cation factor of pool-hopping, as a function of the number of proportional
pools.
m|with fallback|without fallback
1 1.28149 |1
2 1.5159 |1.38629
3 1.71404 |1.64792
4 1.88393 |1.84839
5 2.03152 |2.0118
6 2.16131 |2.15011
7 2.27669 |2.27023
8 2.38028 |2.3765
9 2.4741 |2.47188
10 2.55975 |2.55843
15 2.90159 |2.90148
20 3.15341 |3.1534
25 3.353 |3.353



BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
GenTarkin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1002


View Profile
August 09, 2011, 06:41:56 PM
 #3258

Deepbit:

09.08 18:21:52 0h 20m   203 1586080   0.00620744

That's for 2950Mhash/s, Default scheduler and threshold at 60% (.6)

hrm....WTF?!?!? my stats on deepbit say 000 shares for me on that exact round! Although, I know I hopped over to deepbit more than an hour ago. I am just using default scheduler, default threshold.
Deepbit was confirming I submitted shares during that time period ( I watched my worker on their site)
I mine at about 366mh/s
ideas?


EDIT: couple mins later, just saw another LP hit and went over to deepbit...mining there again. Is there a bug thats causing deepbit to get mined on every LP? ... it seems thats the behaviour even when the LP says someone else owns the block.

GenTarkin's MOD Kncminer Titan custom firmware! v1.0.4! -- !!NO LONGER AVAILABLE!!
Donations: bitcoin- 1Px71mWNQNKW19xuARqrmnbcem1dXqJ3At || litecoin- LYXrLis3ik6TRn8tdvzAyJ264DRvwYVeEw
bb
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 09, 2011, 06:43:49 PM
 #3259

Is slush's website down for everyone?
djex
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 09, 2011, 06:44:19 PM
 #3260

Ugh finally mining on deepbit.

Feels good man. feels good.

Smiley  : 1LbvSEJwtQZKLSQQVYxQJes8YneQk2yhE3
Pages: « 1 ... 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 [163] 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!