bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy

[c00w]

What version are you using?

[1714243460]

1714243460

[1714243460]

1714243460

[1714243460]

1714243460

[1714243460]

1714243460

[leveer]

Both .2.4.9 and .2.4.8 yield that error. Running on Windows 7 with the recommended python install...

[MaGNeT]

Did you guys read this?  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=43669.0

[c00w]

leever: There was a bug with the error output display. Can you update to the latest version and see what error appears?

[paraipan]

Did you guys read this?  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=43669.0

thanks MaGNeT, nice to know we have ppl working on protocol security

[r2edu]

I´m with version 0.2.4.9-32 and getting a LOTS of : (with v.0.2.4.9-27 too)

· [blockexplorer] Error ´´

and

· [poolblock] [bitp] ERROR (´pident.artefact2´,´xxxxxx´) and hash NONE

And I got bitp disable...

****

Edit: I think something is wrong with the p2pLP votes, BCLC doesn´t mine any block since a few days, GUILD is mining others blocks that doesn´t belong to it because i count the number of shares that i send in every round there and in long rounds i send the double or more than in rounds that last less than 43.5%... and if I multiply those shares to 0,000028483126 (ARS-PPS), I´ll get a lot more bitcoins there.

 

[leveer]

From logfile-errors.txt

  File "bitHopper.py", line 294, in <module>
    main()
  File "bitHopper.py", line 290, in main
    eventlet.sleep(60)
  File "C:\bithopper\c00w-bitHopper-559b772\eventlet\greenthread.py", line 30, in sleep
    hub.switch()
  File "C:\bithopper\c00w-bitHopper-559b772\eventlet\hubs\hub.py", line 177, in switch
    return self.greenlet.switch()
  File "C:\bithopper\c00w-bitHopper-559b772\eventlet\hubs\hub.py", line 226, in run
    self.wait(sleep_time)
  File "C:\bithopper\c00w-bitHopper-559b772\eventlet\hubs\selects.py", line 35, in wait
    r, w, er = select.select(readers.keys(), writers.keys(), readers.keys() + writers.keys(), seconds)
ValueError: too many file descriptors in select()

From logfile.txt

[01:41:27] Exception in wsgi server loop, restarting wsgi in 60 seconds
too many file descriptors in select()

[c00w]

Shoot. Did it come back alive after that? Or was it just dead.

And what version?
If you are unsure git describe will tell you.

[c00w]

Oh and mine_lp_force is added and mine_lp is now in place of mine_deepbit.

[Big Time Coin]

got this on 2.4.9 when one of the pools started to lag, happened to see it happen so I post it:

[21:42:27] Lagging. :triple
[21:42:28] RPC request [getwork] submitted to mtred
[21:42:28] RPC request [3e02d000] submitted to mtred
[21:42:30] Lagging. :triple
[21:42:30] Lagging. :triple
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\bitHopper\eventlet\hubs\hub.py", line 336, in fire_timers
    timer()
  File "c:\bitHopper\eventlet\hubs\timer.py", line 56, in __call__
    cb(*args, **kw)
  File "c:\bitHopper\work.py", line 211, in handle_store
    merkle_root = work["data"][72:136]
TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
[21:42:31] RPC request [0735e000] submitted to triple
[21:42:31] Lagging. :triple
[21:42:33] Lagging. :triple
[21:42:35] RPC request [getwork] submitted to mtred
[21:42:35] RPC request [3f2da000] submitted to triple
[21:42:36] Lagging. :triple
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\bitHopper\eventlet\hubs\hub.py", line 336, in fire_timers
    timer()
  File "c:\bitHopper\eventlet\hubs\timer.py", line 56, in __call__
    cb(*args, **kw)
  File "c:\bitHopper\work.py", line 211, in handle_store
    merkle_root = work["data"][72:136]
TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
[21:42:37] RPC request [getwork] submitted to mtred
[21:42:41] RPC request [7b3ea000] submitted to mtred
[21:42:42] RPC request [fe888000] submitted to triple
[21:42:42] RPC request [5f7bd000] submitted to mtred
[21:42:43] RPC request [ac1d3000] submitted to mtred

[r2edu]

Oh and mine_lp_force is added and mine_lp is now in place of mine_deepbit.

What´s the difference between those?
And do we still have to enable p2pLP for those new roles?

thx

ps: I wasn´t able to made v0.2.4.9-48 run... I read the readme and check out the user, bh and pool.cfg but i didn´t find any difference with mines :?

[leveer]

Shoot. Did it come back alive after that? Or was it just dead.

And what version?
If you are unsure git describe will tell you.

It just died, and stayed dead. Should I reduce the amount of hashing that goes through that proxy, and install it on another mining rig?

It was the most up to date as of the time I started running it, at least if installing via Git cloning would have that result...

[c00w]

Type git pull to update to the latest version.

@Those errors with lagging:
That should be fixed.

mine_force makes the scheduler mine that pool.

mine_lp_force makes the scheduler mine that pool until it recieves a new lp than it changes the role until the default role.

[amazingrando]

New 'how to hop' blog post - How to hop 3: the 50-50 tax

This week I take a break from exponentially scored pools to look at how to hop this new type of scored pool. Then I  show you the best way to determine when to hop from one type of pool to another (and it's not always the pool with the least shares). Read it and reap!

Has this been implemented in BH?  I see that it has made its way into Cherry Picking.

[organofcorti]

New 'how to hop' blog post - How to hop 3: the 50-50 tax

This week I take a break from exponentially scored pools to look at how to hop this new type of scored pool. Then I  show you the best way to determine when to hop from one type of pool to another (and it's not always the pool with the least shares). Read it and reap!

Has this been implemented in BH?  I see that it has made its way into Cherry Picking.

I wouldn't just yet. New How to hop soon, it covers a general function that allows for changes in hashrate which change the hop point and efficiency. Atm with slushes pool hashrate down by 20%, the hop point is closer to 13%.

The new function will work without changes to regex. The only input will be the 'c' value for the pool.

[Transisto]

Haven't yet been able to find a version of bithopp that don't crash one way or another

Still, totally love the product

Code:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Users\M7\Desktop\c00w-bitHopper-559b772\eventlet\hubs\hub.py", line 336, in fire_timers
    timer()
  File "C:\Users\M7\Desktop\c00w-bitHopper-559b772\eventlet\hubs\timer.py", line 56, in __call__
    cb(*args, **kw)
  File "C:\Users\M7\Desktop\c00w-bitHopper-559b772\work.py", line 211, in handle_store
    merkle_root = work["data"][72:136]
TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable

[c00w]

@transisto
Are you using the latest version? That looks like a bug that was fixed at least ~20 commits ago.

[organofcorti]

New How to hop out now!

'How to hop' - now with even more chart porn.

[organofcorti]

chart porn.

chart pr0n is the best pr0n
i <3 pie charts

And what kind of 'pie' would that be, 'myself'?

[Transisto]

@transisto
Are you using the latest version? That looks like a bug that was fixed at least ~20 commits ago.

yes I am, now this :

Code:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Users\M7\Desktop\lasty  w-bitHopper-40a58b2\lp.py", line 168, in receive
    if self.blocks[block]['_owner'] == None or self.blocks[block][server] < self.blocks[block][self.blocks[block]['_owner']]:
KeyError: u'nmcbit'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Users\M7\Desktop\lasty  w-bitHopper-40a58b2\lp.py", line 168, in receive
    if self.blocks[block]['_owner'] == None or self.blocks[block][server] < self.blocks[block][self.blocks[block]['_owner']]:
KeyError: u'digi0c'

I had both nmcbit and digi0c in "info" mode