[ANN] Lina.Review | Community-Driven Review Platform | TGE Event 15th Jan

[lionjuvs08]

It should some some positive and negative trust like what we have in bitcointalk.org so that people might know that those helpers are legit and not selling their reviews,so that the system wont be that easy to crack,because these greedy people will always find there way to make money.

You may have a point on this one mate, but I think those people that who are greed will no longer be disappear in any form of business, especially in this type of business isn't right? So the better way for us to avoid this things is we must be careful in everything we choose to be involve in any project like this one.

Yes, greedy person will not success in life,though at first they can but at the end they will be down. Lina.Review need to analyze and scan slowly to make sure that those reviewers are not greedy and gave all the effort that they need to make lina.Review be the number one online review especially in terms of using a blockchain.

[xandiel01]

The reviews of the consumers play a significant role in the success of Lina Review.  It says here that the reviews will be coming from the Helpers wHich is also known as Experts.  You will not be called an Expert for no valid reasons.  Therefore, the users upon checking reviews of the products or services will be rest assured that reviews given are qualified and reliable.

How can we make sure that the reviewer can give the total package review of each product? Do they need to analyse first the product before they gave the final review before they post it in there application?

[bitzy1219]

As I've read page 7 of LiNA Whitepaper, there is an App introduced by LiNA.review that is already available on Google Play. But I cannot find it on Google Play. Am I typing the right keyword which is "LiNA Rating"? Can anyone help me with my concern?

Regarding to your question about the page 7, it is explaining and illustrating about the lack of standard criteria of each subject. Meaning, on this page was just an example about it.

[bitrayder]

The project is a great idea, but reading some parts of it, it needs more research to become successful. It's a lot and it's well thought of already, but there's still a lot to be improved.

Well, many projects are like that. The project is obviously still in the developmental stage. Usually it's still mid stage on release.

There are some basics that they missed out, and many stuff that would "depend on configuration" or "could be". They do have an mvp but it wasn't really market attractive.

They can't just focus on that part. They probably need to finish technical stuffs first. They are probably still gathering funds and only finished basic stuff like smart contracts and the tokens. You can't finish the Lina core blockchain or the lina bridge in one day. That mvp is just an example, creating the real interactive one wouldn't be in one day, too.

Well, based on the roadmap yes. The real lina review would be released by the end of the year.

That was according to their plan, which is in accordance to their whitepaper we need to believe for what they are aiming at until the ico project of lina.review end up. Because Lina was aims to create a social review platform built on trust and reputation with the revolutionary blockchain technology and enable users and experts to earn profit based on the quality of their reviews.

[rhomzkie26]

Lina.review will give users transparent and trustful reviews that will avoid companies hide bad reviews. Lina.review will give experts (helpers) a portion of advertising revenue in order for them to be motivated to maintain a quality review. This will help common users before making a decision.

More product selling online has no proper review or they gave not the real quality of the products, what happened next is bad image of the company.The lina.Review will help to gave the real quality of the product that made by the helpers,and we will have a peace of mind in buying a product.

LINA.REVIEW can provide us a good platform where we can find the real deal of the quality of any product that they will feature, but there is a doubt on my mind which is happening all over the world. Yes, it is happening a long time ago until now. This LINA can give such a good and transparent reviews, but those reviews are just made by helpers and i hope this project can be with someone who can provide real quality of any product! what am I telling? Even any good review if there are so much FAKE circulating around, then the review can be true but not for the product we can get. TO MANY FAKE ITEMS NOW, REPLICA!

With so many fake items in every corner, and we cannot stop it because millions of them are being made. And I think that is how Lina.Review will help consumers to specify and verify if a specific item that is being sold by a certain manufacturer is authentic or fake.

If that so, the aim and goal of Lina.review was totally a great things to all of us here isn't? I can't wait to see what will happen to this project once their campaign end up..For sure many users of their platform will be satisfy in it. Due to its utilizing blockchain’s immutability to produce the best possible transparency.

[Agapelove]

There’s quite a long conversation here. I can see you are enjoying talking about this review platform as if it is your first time encountering this kind of system. Well, Its been said review system is not new but powered by blockchain maybe.

Lol! There should also be a review system that should review lina.review too so advertisers and merchants could know which review system to trust. 

Is there any review system like Lina existing right now? Because Lina is the only one I knew. That is why I am amazed at the idea of the project.

no not yet that's why lina will be unmatched when it hit the market a technology that will be superior to others will attract investors and much probably many users because it will be much convenient for them to view reliable reviews to support their choices.

Perhaps, if Lina.review will succeed on this things and there 's a development stage happen when the ico end, it will surely many will ico will rise and replicate some of the idea of Lina.review in a long run which is they will only change something about it.

[Bobby park]

There are no statements in the wp regarding security of lina core other than there will be a security audit. This should be one of the top priorities for obvious reasons.

 They mentioned Reputation management in their whitepaper meaning that their will be security in their core because they wanted their reputation to be clean and trusted in order for their project to work and be known by every internet user. Maybe their busy highlighting their project in different country that's why they are not here to answers all of the questions here. I still have high hopes for this project to shoot up.

My concern is actually that crypto currencies can be hacked. If lina is creating its own network for the tokens, they should take standard security measures.

I know that lina core is too hard to enter or access by a hacker. Yet we all knows that there is no imposible in the internet but lina team already made it more secured in order to have a difficulties in accessing their system.

Your concern has its basis, but I think that is one aspect that Lina.review team needs to address as well. Ideally blockchain technology can help trace the links of transactions. Unfortunately, it is not enough to prevent hacking. We can only look forward at Lina making its platform secured. I think there is a portion of payment allocated for Bug detection or similar findings in Lina.review. Good luck to us.

Good luck to the hackers. There is a chance that the possible attacks of the hackers will occur in the lina but as long as the lina core is secured and accessible only by few people, hackers can't enter its system otherwise there are inside job. But then, let see on how does lina will protect their clients and firms in possible hack.

[Babyjamz3026]

The project promises to be interesting and new! i hope the usability of the token will improve in the future，I hope will develop further after crowd-sale !

Me too. I hope their token will benefit me also. I already had collected some considerable amount of tokens from different ICOs and most of them are dormant. Some are not even listed in exchanges. 

All ico token project is giving any benefits from their participants after their campaign ended up, however in Lina.review I think there is a big difference from the first ico who had been arise up here before into Lina.review features has. So ti will give us a big benefit for sure in the end, just lets wait and see what's next.

[djmixen]

There are no statements in the wp regarding security of lina core other than there will be a security audit. This should be one of the top priorities for obvious reasons.

 They mentioned Reputation management in their whitepaper meaning that their will be security in their core because they wanted their reputation to be clean and trusted in order for their project to work and be known by every internet user. Maybe their busy highlighting their project in different country that's why they are not here to answers all of the questions here. I still have high hopes for this project to shoot up.

My concern is actually that crypto currencies can be hacked. If lina is creating its own network for the tokens, they should take standard security measures.

I know that lina core is too hard to enter or access by a hacker. Yet we all knows that there is no imposible in the internet but lina team already made it more secured in order to have a difficulties in accessing their system.

Your concern has its basis, but I think that is one aspect that Lina.review team needs to address as well. Ideally blockchain technology can help trace the links of transactions. Unfortunately, it is not enough to prevent hacking. We can only look forward at Lina making its platform secured. I think there is a portion of payment allocated for Bug detection or similar findings in Lina.review. Good luck to us.

Good luck to the hackers. There is a chance that the possible attacks of the hackers will occur in the lina but as long as the lina core is secured and accessible only by few people, hackers can't enter its system otherwise there are inside job. But then, let see on how does lina will protect their clients and firms in possible hack.

Lina.Review will hired an expert in terms of providing them a system where as hackers did not enter to it. for sure they also provide a safety system so that the customer will also secured when they enter at their site.

[Gibreil]

There are no statements in the wp regarding security of lina core other than there will be a security audit. This should be one of the top priorities for obvious reasons.

 They mentioned Reputation management in their whitepaper meaning that their will be security in their core because they wanted their reputation to be clean and trusted in order for their project to work and be known by every internet user. Maybe their busy highlighting their project in different country that's why they are not here to answers all of the questions here. I still have high hopes for this project to shoot up.

My concern is actually that crypto currencies can be hacked. If lina is creating its own network for the tokens, they should take standard security measures.

I know that lina core is too hard to enter or access by a hacker. Yet we all knows that there is no imposible in the internet but lina team already made it more secured in order to have a difficulties in accessing their system.

Your concern has its basis, but I think that is one aspect that Lina.review team needs to address as well. Ideally blockchain technology can help trace the links of transactions. Unfortunately, it is not enough to prevent hacking. We can only look forward at Lina making its platform secured. I think there is a portion of payment allocated for Bug detection or similar findings in Lina.review. Good luck to us.

Good luck to the hackers. There is a chance that the possible attacks of the hackers will occur in the lina but as long as the lina core is secured and accessible only by few people, hackers can't enter its system otherwise there are inside job. But then, let see on how does lina will protect their clients and firms in possible hack.

Even the secured token and exchange can attack by the hackers. In my opinion, there is no impossible in the internet. Hackers can access lina core though it has the hardest system ever. There will be a time that the hackers will make an access for them to enter. Internet is different from reality. The impossible may become possible by the internet.

[FAITHriot]

Configure specific parameters for each reviewer and Helper: Since this is a personal system, there is no mechanism for common users to become Helpers.

The quoted statement was from #3 of the Use-case entitled as "Building individual review systems" on page 10 of the Whitepaper.

I just want to clarify the underlined statement, since this is under LiNA.review system and common users become Helpers, why there seems an exemption on this one?

[TrainDING]

A single negative review can damage the company's prestige and profitability. So how could Lina.Review can tell if a certain review is not bias?

I guess these reviews can only be posted by helpers, and these helpers undergo qualifications before they can be appointed being a helper, so let us call that filtering process, and saying negative review as long as they have proof about it will never be biased and will help customers a lot and at the same time making the product owner to enhance their service and make more quality products.

So it means reviews written by common users to a certain business company are being filtered and approved first before it appears on their profile?

And after the filtering what are they going to do with the negative ones, hide or dispose?

Why would they need to hide a negative review? If this is the case the transparency is useless. LINA review is not about positive reviews. It is about using blockchain technology, qualifying the reviewers and giving the most reliable review on the market. Only when companies learn to accept criticism that they can grow. As for the common users review this may also be reflected but I think the helpers review will be used in rating the product being reviewed. Again, blockchain technology helps us trace the source of the reviews but the main thing here is hiring qualified reviewers, HELPERS, based on their qualification.

I agree that they are lack on transparency. if they keep hiding negative reviews then is useless. Blockchain is build for transparency,reliable and cability. I'm reviewing their whitepaper devs should update on this.

What could be the main purpose of Helpers? I mean are they are the one moderating the Lina.Review's website?

Helpers (a.k.a as Experts) main responsibility is to review products and services on the system. They also submit a certain number of reviews with acceptable quality every month. Another task of Helper is to vote for submitted user reviews

[PostNPlay]

What's amazing about this project is it can cater to clients and users on a global scale. Like cryptocurrencies, the platform reaches worldwide. With that ability, and it's ability/advantage to monetize compared to its competitors, AND the ability to create review systems globally(LINA and standards and individually(for users and businesses), who can say no?

Yes! I agree with you. Who can say no to this project? Though we can really say that this project is not perfect, whose project is perfect anyway? We should be thankful that LiNA team came up with this amazing project. I am sure that the dev on this project has read our concerns on how to improve it.

[GhostBooster]

A single negative review can damage the company's prestige and profitability. So how could Lina.Review can tell if a certain review is not bias?

I guess these reviews can only be posted by helpers, and these helpers undergo qualifications before they can be appointed being a helper, so let us call that filtering process, and saying negative review as long as they have proof about it will never be biased and will help customers a lot and at the same time making the product owner to enhance their service and make more quality products.

So it means reviews written by common users to a certain business company are being filtered and approved first before it appears on their profile?

And after the filtering what are they going to do with the negative ones, hide or dispose?

Why would they need to hide a negative review? If this is the case the transparency is useless. LINA review is not about positive reviews. It is about using blockchain technology, qualifying the reviewers and giving the most reliable review on the market. Only when companies learn to accept criticism that they can grow. As for the common users review this may also be reflected but I think the helpers review will be used in rating the product being reviewed. Again, blockchain technology helps us trace the source of the reviews but the main thing here is hiring qualified reviewers, HELPERS, based on their qualification.

I agree that they are lack on transparency. if they keep hiding negative reviews then is useless. Blockchain is build for transparency,reliable and cability. I'm reviewing their whitepaper devs should update on this.

What could be the main purpose of Helpers? I mean are they are the one moderating the Lina.Review's website?

Yes the helpers are moderator of every review. But the main purpose of the helper is to make an original post about the criticism, suggestion and comment wether good or bad in goods and services offered by a firm.
Moderation is a helpful way to enhance the reliability of the lina review. It can ease the review fraud.

For the moderating part, that would be the community: helpers, users, the helper board and the devs/bug fixers. The system is community based, user based, exact review system will depend on user configuration. They already said there will be a like/agree button, I believe there will be more.

Anybody can be a helper actually, now its up to the individuals of how they are gonna do it or apply in actual. It can be for a good or bad purposes, but in the end they are both moderating the topic in the thread. However if we are going to base it in the whitepaper explanation,  the reviewer can become a Helper if the the help board approve it but if the helpers fail to comply their responsibility they will be demoted into a common users.

it is true that users may register themselves as helper but through very strict selection with fairly difficult requirements after which it will be assessed by the helper board , if failing to fulfill the responsibility for two months will be reduced to common users.

I agree that anybody can be a helper But ONLY IF he/she qualifies for the requirement given by the Helper Board or have posts tons of quality reviews. As to its main purpose, I think moderating a review platform is not their main responsibility. They are part of evaluating quality reviews of users but their main tasks as an expert are to create quality reviews based on their own experiences. That way, users will have a reliable source of information from an expert's perspective.

[Yooshijin]

Lina.review is an all in one review system. A website that can have reviews of movies, restaurants, hotels and travel services, gadgets, and other things that a merchant wants to enroll in Lina's platform.

[Wylie330]

There’s quite a long conversation here. I can see you are enjoying talking about this review platform as if it is your first time encountering this kind of system. Well, Its been said review system is not new but powered by blockchain maybe.

Lol! There should also be a review system that should review lina.review too so advertisers and merchants could know which review system to trust. 

Is there any review system like Lina existing right now? Because Lina is the only one I knew. That is why I am amazed at the idea of the project.

no not yet that's why lina will be unmatched when it hit the market a technology that will be superior to others will attract investors and much probably many users because it will be much convenient for them to view reliable reviews to support their choices.

Perhaps, if Lina.review will succeed on this things and there 's a development stage happen when the ico end, it will surely many will ico will rise and replicate some of the idea of Lina.review in a long run which is they will only change something about it.

That's for sure. That's how tough competition in the business industry. Just like what many people did when Bitcoin arises. They all created an improved and added more features coin on their own. But of course, Lina wouldn't let its platform be left behind because of that.

[bravetalkcoin]

Lina.review is an all in one review system. A website that can have reviews of movies, restaurants, hotels and travel services, gadgets, and other things that a merchant wants to enroll in Lina's platform.

You are absolutely right! LiNA review is like an ONE-STOP-SHOP which can be the source of all quality reviews of EVERYTHING the world can offer. All reviews are globally connected so it will be hassle-free if you need reviews for a certain product based on categories you like.

[xamil]

What's amazing about this project is it can cater to clients and users on a global scale. Like cryptocurrencies, the platform reaches worldwide. With that ability, and it's ability/advantage to monetize compared to its competitors, AND the ability to create review systems globally(LINA and standards and individually(for users and businesses), who can say no?

Yes! I agree with you. Who can say no to this project? Though we can really say that this project is not perfect, whose project is perfect anyway? We should be thankful that LiNA team came up with this amazing project. I am sure that the dev on this project has read our concerns on how to improve it.

Lina.Review want to make the users be have a good feedback about their project, they will do all the best that they can as long as they gave the transparency of each product i am sure that it will use by many people if they already know that lina review is nice reviewer online.

[BooTheGreat]

What's amazing about this project is it can cater to clients and users on a global scale. Like cryptocurrencies, the platform reaches worldwide. With that ability, and it's ability/advantage to monetize compared to its competitors, AND the ability to create review systems globally(LINA and standards and individually(for users and businesses), who can say no?

I do agree with you. Do take note that Lina.review will still be going into development stage. The concept is good, what most of us are asking are on the manipulation of reviews, this will be depend on the contribution of helpers and users as well as quality assurance team of Lina.review. Lina.review will evolve since It will be catering more industries, products and services in the future. People might also question on who set the standards for review right? What I do like about Lina is it is geared towards improving itself and I do hope that they are also open for suggestions and criticism. Looking forward to this project.

There is 48% budget allocation for the development of this project and I think it is enough to make every enhancement needed for its improvement. On a certain project, even it is a well-thought one, there is still some bugs to be fixed and problems to be resolved. It is a good thing that they have created this forum for us to evaluate its strengths and weaknesses. I am also looking forward to this project's success.  

[DASHers]

I do believe that Lina Review will succeed. Why? because the life of the said project is on reviews perse. And those reviews are being screened, that only credible and reliable reviews will be posted whether it will be a positive or negative review. This will benefit the consumers in deciding to chose which products or services will serve them best according to their needs.

In addition to what you just said, it is already given than Lina.review will really become successful in the end. If all the supporters or investors of this project will continue to spread out the good they have, as long as Users can become Helpers if they have many high-quality reviews or else Helper may lose their position if there are many poor-quality.

In connection with "Helpers"-for the procedure for common users to become one, I wonder was it after reaching the specific level of quality reviews they made can they sign-up with Lina Review to get promoted?

The wp has a lot of holes right now, questions that would only be answered once the platform has been launched. Since the website is very "user-oriented", there is a possibility that that part would depend on the "user-configuration".

Exactly, all plans that we saw in the whitepaper will only be fulfill if the platform is will be launch. But in the meantime, everything was a speculation even there is a lot of people believe in this project as well. Besides, this is not disagreeing on what others saying but just saying the reality things happen so far.

This will be a successful project if they can execute it well and with standard. Reviews nowadays is prerequsite before any purchase. Big or small purchase they consult the review first just like what I always do.

True enough that reviews are vital in making a decision before we buy a certain product or avail services. Most of the time, I look for quality reviews if I want to travel or buy some stuff on the internet. The success of every project was based on needs so I agree that this will be a successful one.