Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[Quas09]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Yes, i believe in ICO ratings, because they will rate the ICO fairly and all the information about the ICO is in the ratings, so i believe in ratings and it is a legit rate coming from that websites.

[arbk04]

I am not looking ico ratings just I check their project and their team if this two are solid and if hype is high after that is good for inestment.

[Pajdo]

I dont believe in ICO ratings. I have seen too many shitty project getting great ratings. Probably those "experts" are later paid with that same tokens.

[terible.hunter]

Definitely not, I also think that rating agencies completely manipulate the opinion of people and they very often pretend that people really do not make the right choice, because they get money from projects.

[Maveric99]

I think the website as you mentioned as one of the reference factors when we are going to invest in a back-end project decision in your hands of course the best for you to choose as ICO invested.
I think the experience that makes you mature to make decisions, if you already understand and believe then you avoid the loss in the future.

[Pemburu dollar]

Don't fully believe with that. Just make it as consideration when you will choose ICO. And you must research again that ICO before choose it. For me I just use ICO rating site as ICO list site.

I think ico rank is just a guide and I do not really believe how they rate some icons. But it still depends on the investor how they will trust this ranking.
Most people check the ico rank as one of their references where they will choose to invest

[Cocoincos]

I believe just in ratings on ICObench - because they ask team to pass the Kyc, and it could be very effective to fight with scam!

[phm]

I believe just in ratings on ICObench - because they ask team to pass the Kyc, and it could be very effective to fight with scam!

I believe in the some ratings (for example from ICOdrops). But I don't ICObench. This rating site repeatedly seen in the paid review and paid experts. Nothing personal only business. Since on the ICObench I watch metrics and description only

[Old Bindu]

I do not believe rating agencies on the fact that I'm sure that they are selling their ratings to the one who pays the most. This is not a very reliable source of information for me.

[PetrovichCoinMaster]

Those who trust rating sites, open your eyes! This is selling resources, where for money you will write any feedback. Recently, I read the article with the exposure of one major site-rating. I trust these articles more than these sites.

[nasekguring]

very believe because one way to get a good ico with meilhat rating ico it

[DeMoloR]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I'm not sure, but I do not trust the rating of the ICObench.com project, lately I notice that companies agree on buying a fake rating, thereby fooling users and misleading them.

[JGreg96]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

ICObench isn't good to find the x15 ICO, in fact for example Quarkchain has a rating og 3.1/5. I usually use those services only to find new projects, and following the thought that in this world the marketing is the 90% of success, I see "sponsored" ICOs and study if the project is good or not

[ashame]

I believe just in ratings on ICObench - because they ask team to pass the Kyc, and it could be very effective to fight with scam!

I believe in the some ratings (for example from ICOdrops). But I don't ICObench. This rating site repeatedly seen in the paid review and paid experts. Nothing personal only business. Since on the ICObench I watch metrics and description only

Yes I will probably agree to that at some point, I dont believe in ICO ratings in a sense that there are some business that are in crypto and investing their resources in a right way of introducing products to the public, ratings is just a prediction must research everything before believing simply on ratings.

[pwndyu]

I don't trusted their website even it has a good way of entertaining some investors just like the ICO I use to read last year and participated. Because it is really disgusting they almost run their ICO and their spreadsheet didn't even update then almost 2 months of participating I ask their manager on the telegram they said paused it without a announcement on thread but in the emails of their website are still ongoing.

[nick_2017]

I think you always should check ICO after getting rating on any website. Check website, coin, team. whitepaper and roadmap.

[Swati Kapoor]

 For me ico ratings is just a guide and I am not really believing on how they rate some icos. But is still depends with the investors how they will believe this ratings. On rating , i think scitoken (scidex) is the best choice for investment.

[Neerce]

To be honest, I do not really believe in ICO-rating, as the place in the rating can be bought and everyone will think that the project is promising. I believe that it is worth analyzing the project and making a final conclusion

[IrenNTA]

I don't trust most of ICO ratings as most of them are sponsored. Most of ICO rating websites earn money for listing and rating ICO projects, so such ratings can't be unprejudiced. So I usually check telegram chats where users discuss the most interesting projects and they make their own investigations and analysis.

[4ernuy]

I think icobench and icodrops can be trusted. These time-tested resources and ratings there correspond to reality.