Bitcoin Forum
October 31, 2024, 11:32:59 AM *
News: Bitcoin Pumpkin Carving Contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 [85] 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 ... 294 »
  Print  
Author Topic: HoboNickels - HBN - High Fast Stake - Version 2.0! More Secure, Less Intensive  (Read 478818 times)
David Latapie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 503


Monero Core Team


View Profile WWW
May 12, 2014, 01:34:33 PM
 #1681

Yo, guys do You know witch coin got  the fastest confirms in cryptoworld.?

I know that HBN is very fast;)
Ultracoin, I think. It was its selling point - not that I understand the need for fast confirmation.
I heard that fastcoin is the fastest with very low block time. 12 sec.
What's  the point of such fast time, BTW?

Monero: the first crytocurrency to bring bank secrecy and net neutrality to the blockchain.HyperStake: pushing the limits of staking.
Reputation threadFree bitcoins: reviews, hints…: freebitco.in, freedoge.co.in, qoinpro
ElTomeko27
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 371
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 12, 2014, 01:39:58 PM
 #1682

Yo, guys do You know witch coin got  the fastest confirms in cryptoworld.?

I know that HBN is very fast;)
Ultracoin, I think. It was its selling point - not that I understand the need for fast confirmation.
I heard that fastcoin is the fastest with very low block time. 12 sec.
What's  the point of such fast time, BTW?


Fast transactions?
David Latapie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 503


Monero Core Team


View Profile WWW
May 12, 2014, 01:40:53 PM
Last edit: May 12, 2014, 01:54:12 PM by David Latapie
 #1683

Fast transactions?
Except for Bitcoin, every transaction is fast enough, no?

Monero: the first crytocurrency to bring bank secrecy and net neutrality to the blockchain.HyperStake: pushing the limits of staking.
Reputation threadFree bitcoins: reviews, hints…: freebitco.in, freedoge.co.in, qoinpro
ElTomeko27
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 371
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 12, 2014, 01:50:24 PM
 #1684

Not only BTC also NMC and PPC...I was just curious which one is the fastest...
Kergekoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 12, 2014, 01:52:37 PM
 #1685

I guess the speed of transaction is quick enough for all coins with 60s or faster block time. Besides, PoW/PoS coins have generally faster blocks than stated, because PoS difficulty being independent from PoW difficulty.
If i am not mistaken, then Fastcoin has had many problems because of its 12s block time?

I have not seen any faster coin than Fastcoin tho.

******  NB! The links below are affiliate - friend type links, which bring additional benefits both, to you and me  ******
Binance - Best Crypto Trading Platform          CoinBase - Fastest way from FIAT to Crypto
Windscribe - The quickest and easyest way to secure and anonymize your internet traffic
gentacomp
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 211
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 12, 2014, 07:34:34 PM
Last edit: May 12, 2014, 07:45:43 PM by gentacomp
 #1686

Helo Sir,
I got this when open my wallet :



Can anyone help please...

YinCoin YangCoin ☯☯First Ever POS/POW Alternator! Multipool! ☯ ☯ http://yinyangpool.com/  Free Distribution! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623937
Freebiescoin- 100% Free Distribution
Coffeecoin- 100% FREE Distribution:CC8zeK5Mq19W2yUdmhMXbLCmRqEkG7axTW
Let's color the MOON: YCtgk5JaBEt1WT7js29sh6W5my8dgcP2Sp
sandpaper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 373
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 12, 2014, 08:43:42 PM
 #1687

I get that when I close out HBN wallet and try to reopen before it seems to have fully closed. Just restart your computer and opem it again, should work. If it doesn't then I don't know =(

PS. Except psych, I just looked more closely at your error. I don't know what that means, but I would suggest if you have no HBN in your wallet delete and re-download.
Tranz (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1060


May the force bit with you.


View Profile
May 12, 2014, 08:45:52 PM
 #1688

Helo Sir,
I got this when open my wallet :

Can anyone help please...

This must be the first time you opened version 1.4.0.1. Please remove the directory %appdata%/HoboNickels/txleveldb. Then start up the client again. It will re-sync and remake the index from peers.

if you want want to speed up the process, see this page.   http://wiki.hobonickels.info/index.php?title=Replace_Blockchain

HBN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=303749.0 hobonickels.info
Personal Donations: F1TranzWqFGZyFeTMu6iLbtTQgdXuJPsiL
Donations to the HBN Fund: EhbNfund4PrRFLHMxsnbGLhP25hizJGHEE or 1LVFtCX4a83dMLjd8S7imKKKC58QaG83kw
presstab
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


Blockchain Developer


View Profile
May 12, 2014, 10:30:49 PM
 #1689

I guess the speed of transaction is quick enough for all coins with 60s or faster block time. Besides, PoW/PoS coins have generally faster blocks than stated, because PoS difficulty being independent from PoW difficulty.
If i am not mistaken, then Fastcoin has had many problems because of its 12s block time?

I have not seen any faster coin than Fastcoin tho.

Remember that there is a trade off between block speed and block chain size. I think HBN has the perfect balance between the two.

Projects I Contribute To: libzerocoin | Veil | PIVX | HyperStake | Crown | SaluS
gentacomp
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 211
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 13, 2014, 02:30:24 AM
 #1690

Helo Sir,
I got this when open my wallet :

Can anyone help please...

This must be the first time you opened version 1.4.0.1. Please remove the directory %appdata%/HoboNickels/txleveldb. Then start up the client again. It will re-sync and remake the index from peers.

if you want want to speed up the process, see this page.   http://wiki.hobonickels.info/index.php?title=Replace_Blockchain

Yay it works !!!
Thank you Sir, coin saved Cheesy

YinCoin YangCoin ☯☯First Ever POS/POW Alternator! Multipool! ☯ ☯ http://yinyangpool.com/  Free Distribution! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623937
Freebiescoin- 100% Free Distribution
Coffeecoin- 100% FREE Distribution:CC8zeK5Mq19W2yUdmhMXbLCmRqEkG7axTW
Let's color the MOON: YCtgk5JaBEt1WT7js29sh6W5my8dgcP2Sp
ElTomeko27
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 371
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 13, 2014, 04:50:36 AM
 #1691

I guess the speed of transaction is quick enough for all coins with 60s or faster block time. Besides, PoW/PoS coins have generally faster blocks than stated, because PoS difficulty being independent from PoW difficulty.
If i am not mistaken, then Fastcoin has had many problems because of its 12s block time?

I have not seen any faster coin than Fastcoin tho.

Remember that there is a trade off between block speed and block chain size. I think HBN has the perfect balance between the two.

Ok so what if the HBN block chain will be much bigger than now??
presstab
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


Blockchain Developer


View Profile
May 13, 2014, 04:58:59 PM
 #1692

Ok so what if the HBN block chain will be much bigger than now??

When the chain grows larger it just means it takes longer to sync and takes up more storage. Right now the HBN chain is something like 700mb (at least that is the size of my appdata HBN folder), which is not bad at all. It will be somewhere around 1 gb per year.

Projects I Contribute To: libzerocoin | Veil | PIVX | HyperStake | Crown | SaluS
carloss
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 64
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 13, 2014, 05:12:47 PM
 #1693

Unfortunately it is doing that all the time  Sad I have libboost 1.54...do you think it is worth to try upgrading to 1.55?

Perfect tutorial here for libboost 1.55

https://coderwall.com/p/0atfug



Thank you, superresistant. I was curious about this as well.

I have updated to libboost 1.55 (luckily in Ubuntu 14.04 is already in repo) and it seems to work better. There were few situations where hobonickelsd took 100% CPU, but not that long/often anymore.

But today it crashed again (different cause)?:
Code:
05/13/14 10:46:31 ProcessSyncCheckpoint: pending for sync-checkpoint 0000000014c891e8153bff84e187217e53bf0123ef5215f5c79b6fafb1349a55
05/13/14 10:46:31 sending: getblocks (1029 bytes)
05/13/14 10:46:31 askfor block 716d8fba33600c93fa69   1402087979000000 (20:52:59)
05/13/14 10:46:32 received: checkpoint (108 bytes)
05/13/14 10:46:32 ProcessSyncCheckpoint: pending for sync-checkpoint 000000000b4a5a70483a2c1069559be9ff1259f49e6f94e0e14ad1d60fcd28d9
05/13/14 10:46:32 sending: getblocks (1029 bytes)
05/13/14 10:46:32 askfor block 716d8fba33600c93fa69   1402088099000000 (20:54:59)
05/13/14 10:46:32 received: inv (37 bytes)
05/13/14 10:46:32   got inventory: block 000000000b4a5a70483a  have
05/13/14 10:46:32 sending: getblocks (1029 bytes)
05/13/14 10:46:33 received: inv (37 bytes)
05/13/14 10:46:33   got inventory: block ffd1e77b6676ca93358e  have
05/13/14 10:46:35 ERROR: CTransaction::ReadFromDisk() : OpenBlockFile failed
05/13/14 10:46:35 ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ElTomeko27
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 371
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 13, 2014, 07:34:19 PM
 #1694

Ok so what if the HBN block chain will be much bigger than now??

When the chain grows larger it just means it takes longer to sync and takes up more storage. Right now the HBN chain is something like 700mb (at least that is the size of my appdata HBN folder), which is not bad at all. It will be somewhere around 1 gb per year.

Ok understood:)
unick
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 254


View Profile
May 13, 2014, 08:31:03 PM
 #1695

Ok so what if the HBN block chain will be much bigger than now??

When the chain grows larger it just means it takes longer to sync and takes up more storage. Right now the HBN chain is something like 700mb (at least that is the size of my appdata HBN folder), which is not bad at all. It will be somewhere around 1 gb per year.

Ok understood:)

and when it gets a lot much bigger, we can use an hosted version or electrum/multibit type of solution for people wanting to jumpstart the inital load or don't want to host the whole block chain.

With every problem there is a solution, right now this is not an issue.  But it is a valid concern!

Awesome Explorers for Awesome Coins | Show some BTC love here: 1AAYAZgaz2me7hyumexUZzcyGRZEYtCx5C
HoboNickels: hbn.blockx.info | BottleCaps: cap.blockx.info | GrowthCoin: grw.blockx.info
z0rr0
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 303
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 13, 2014, 10:05:43 PM
 #1696

Ok so what if the HBN block chain will be much bigger than now??

When the chain grows larger it just means it takes longer to sync and takes up more storage. Right now the HBN chain is something like 700mb (at least that is the size of my appdata HBN folder), which is not bad at all. It will be somewhere around 1 gb per year.

Ok understood:)

and when it gets a lot much bigger, we can use an hosted version or electrum/multibit type of solution for people wanting to jumpstart the inital load or don't want to host the whole block chain.

With every problem there is a solution, right now this is not an issue.  But it is a valid concern!
Do you think staking will be working with such a "hosted version or electrum/multibit type" wallet?
Looks doubtful to me.
Tranz (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1060


May the force bit with you.


View Profile
May 13, 2014, 11:45:22 PM
 #1697

Unfortunately it is doing that all the time  Sad I have libboost 1.54...do you think it is worth to try upgrading to 1.55?

Perfect tutorial here for libboost 1.55

https://coderwall.com/p/0atfug



Thank you, superresistant. I was curious about this as well.

I have updated to libboost 1.55 (luckily in Ubuntu 14.04 is already in repo) and it seems to work better. There were few situations where hobonickelsd took 100% CPU, but not that long/often anymore.

But today it crashed again (different cause)?:
Code:
05/13/14 10:46:31 ProcessSyncCheckpoint: pending for sync-checkpoint 0000000014c891e8153bff84e187217e53bf0123ef5215f5c79b6fafb1349a55
05/13/14 10:46:31 sending: getblocks (1029 bytes)
05/13/14 10:46:31 askfor block 716d8fba33600c93fa69   1402087979000000 (20:52:59)
05/13/14 10:46:32 received: checkpoint (108 bytes)
05/13/14 10:46:32 ProcessSyncCheckpoint: pending for sync-checkpoint 000000000b4a5a70483a2c1069559be9ff1259f49e6f94e0e14ad1d60fcd28d9
05/13/14 10:46:32 sending: getblocks (1029 bytes)
05/13/14 10:46:32 askfor block 716d8fba33600c93fa69   1402088099000000 (20:54:59)
05/13/14 10:46:32 received: inv (37 bytes)
05/13/14 10:46:32   got inventory: block 000000000b4a5a70483a  have
05/13/14 10:46:32 sending: getblocks (1029 bytes)
05/13/14 10:46:33 received: inv (37 bytes)
05/13/14 10:46:33   got inventory: block ffd1e77b6676ca93358e  have
05/13/14 10:46:35 ERROR: CTransaction::ReadFromDisk() : OpenBlockFile failed
05/13/14 10:46:35 ERROR: mempool transaction missing input

It can take CPU when it is getting a new block, or the client is working on a stake, it is normal for it is use 1 core, and on my quad sometimes it uses 2 full cores. That is the most I have seen.

Not sure I have seen that error before.  Your debug looks complely different then any I have seen before. From Ubuntu to win xp.

Here is a how mine look.
Code:
7372
05/13/14 23:40:41 SetBestChain: new best=000000000319a40e64a4  height=844485  trust=2876684406729  date=05/13/14 23:40:21
05/13/14 23:40:41 AcceptPendingSyncCheckpoint : sync-checkpoint at 000000000319a40e64a48a459d9fad24d8fd3a1b714879acb9d202906ca2e446
05/13/14 23:40:41 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
05/13/14 23:40:42 ProcessSyncCheckpoint: pending for sync-checkpoint 000000000c4610b528c49b8fc6d9a5a4453f298fa9891bf74c1742563bed0e7c
05/13/14 23:40:42 received block 000000000c4610b528c4 sent from 31.16.103.210:7372
05/13/14 23:40:42 SetBestChain: new best=000000000c4610b528c4  height=844486  trust=2876684440261  date=05/13/14 23:40:29
05/13/14 23:40:42 AcceptPendingSyncCheckpoint : sync-checkpoint at 000000000c4610b528c49b8fc6d9a5a4453f298fa9891bf74c1742563bed0e7c
05/13/14 23:40:42 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
05/13/14 23:40:44 getblocks 844482 to 0000000010fa5a846f4c limit 500
05/13/14 23:40:44   getblocks stopping at 844482 0000000010fa5a846f4c
05/13/14 23:40:44 getblocks 844482 to 000000001c32d30250a1 limit 500
05/13/14 23:40:44   getblocks stopping at 844483 000000001c32d30250a1
05/13/14 23:40:44 getblocks 844482 to 0000000011ec95f00024 limit 500
05/13/14 23:40:44   getblocks stopping at 844484 0000000011ec95f00024
05/13/14 23:40:44 getblocks 844482 to 000000000319a40e64a4 limit 500
05/13/14 23:40:44   getblocks stopping at 844485 000000000319a40e64a4
05/13/14 23:40:44 getblocks 844482 to 000000000c4610b528c4 limit 500
05/13/14 23:40:44   getblocks stopping at 844486 000000000c4610b528c4
05/13/14 23:40:44 getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
05/13/14 23:40:45 Flushing wallet.dat

I don't see any indication of height or getting or receiving blocks in your log. Very odd..  Is your client fully up to sync with the block explorer? http://hbn.blockx.info/get/chain/HoboNickels

Was this during the init download.   Something seems off, you seem to have been caught up in an orphan loop check..



HBN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=303749.0 hobonickels.info
Personal Donations: F1TranzWqFGZyFeTMu6iLbtTQgdXuJPsiL
Donations to the HBN Fund: EhbNfund4PrRFLHMxsnbGLhP25hizJGHEE or 1LVFtCX4a83dMLjd8S7imKKKC58QaG83kw
unick
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 254


View Profile
May 14, 2014, 01:23:23 AM
 #1698

Ok so what if the HBN block chain will be much bigger than now??

When the chain grows larger it just means it takes longer to sync and takes up more storage. Right now the HBN chain is something like 700mb (at least that is the size of my appdata HBN folder), which is not bad at all. It will be somewhere around 1 gb per year.

Ok understood:)

and when it gets a lot much bigger, we can use an hosted version or electrum/multibit type of solution for people wanting to jumpstart the inital load or don't want to host the whole block chain.

With every problem there is a solution, right now this is not an issue.  But it is a valid concern!
Do you think staking will be working with such a "hosted version or electrum/multibit type" wallet?
Looks doubtful to me.

as I understand it, I wouldn't see any reason why it shouldn't work.  

The staking process takes into consideration what is held in an address.  It doesn't care if you have the block chain on your computer or not. Once the client finds a block, it need to broadcast that block to the network like it would do for any other transaction.  So with an electrum/multibit type wallet, you already almost all you need in your wallet (meaning your public/private key pair and transaction ability).  What those current implementation lack is the ability of mining PoS blocks.  But I would imagine that feature being easily added to those wallets.


Awesome Explorers for Awesome Coins | Show some BTC love here: 1AAYAZgaz2me7hyumexUZzcyGRZEYtCx5C
HoboNickels: hbn.blockx.info | BottleCaps: cap.blockx.info | GrowthCoin: grw.blockx.info
TillKoeln
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2282
Merit: 1051

unnamed.Exchange, join the Cool Kids!!!


View Profile WWW
May 14, 2014, 06:20:47 AM
 #1699

i like the new wallet

carloss
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 64
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 14, 2014, 07:52:37 AM
 #1700

I don't see any indication of height or getting or receiving blocks in your log. Very odd..  Is your client fully up to sync with the block explorer? http://hbn.blockx.info/get/chain/HoboNickels

Was this during the init download.   Something seems off, you seem to have been caught up in an orphan loop check..

I was not able to check it, because the hobonickelsd process already exited, so there was no RPC working. Probably it panicked after these lines in the log:
Code:
05/13/14 10:46:35 ERROR: CTransaction::ReadFromDisk() : OpenBlockFile failed
05/13/14 10:46:35 ERROR: mempool transaction missing input

So I have to restarted it again. Running with -debug flag.

This was not during the initial load, the process was running for many hours before already.
Pages: « 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 [85] 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 ... 294 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!