FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC⭐Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest

[TheQuin]

Also, his replacement is the site owner.

I was enjoying the lolz on my new found status there. I knew someone would ruin it. 

[1713985785]

1713985785

[1713985785]

1713985785

[1713985785]

1713985785

[broke_tradah]

I've been playing freebitco.in for almost a year now and I feel bad about the redemption of bonuses. I hope the discretion will be remove because those bonuses really helps me to earn from faucet claims.

The best bonuses are available to those customers that deposit, play,  and lose their entire deposit along with any bonuses they earned

*FIXED*  Stop leaving out the important details you damn snake.

[babygun]

I've been playing freebitco.in for almost a year now and I feel bad about the redemption of bonuses. I hope the discretion will be remove because those bonuses really helps me to earn from faucet claims.

The best bonuses are available to those customers that deposit, play,  and lose their entire deposit along with any bonuses they earned

*FIXED*  Stop leaving out the important details you damn snake.

On a different note,  I've come to realize that Freebitco's ponzi scheme has lost it's most important asset,  the referrers.  I think Trevon James dropping them has really put a massive dent in the roll over department.  Im STILL in the top 10 and I have maybe 3 people actively rolling under my referrer ID currently as I type this.  Thats NOT a good thing,  with the amount of referrers I have,  I shouldnt even be in the top 100 let alone top 10.

When I watched Trevon play his stupid freebitco rolling thing on his live streams,  you could literally watch his balance climb while he was sitting there doing nothing (from the referrals, which is what turned me on to freebitco in the first place,  I learned about it from his live streams long ago).  It's not a good sign when even the scammers such as Trevon James drop your scam lmao.  I think if you increase the referral amount to 0.4 rather than 0.04,  he just might return.  Or better yet,  1.0  Upping it ot 0.04 isnt going to incentivize anyone to come back.

Maybe if you ask him nicely,  he'll come back.  Have you tried that yet?  Or did you piss him off beyond repair (AKA: burned that bridge already).

Maybe you should change your scam to something like bitconnect where there were Tiers of referrals.  1 through 7 or whatever it was.  The more referrals you had,  the more you get in % I think.  That way you can run a much better ponzi scheme than what you have right now (we all know this is a ponzi anyway,  this site only lives on if it has new money coming in,  the current 'contest' is proof of that).  It'll last longer.  It might crash harder than it is right now,  but at least it'll give you a year or two more before shit really hits the fan.

I think if my ID continues to be in the top 10,  I'm actually going to drop freebitco because I want nothing to do with it if I'm considered one of the main referrers of it.  Being a big fish in a ponzi scheme is not a good plan.  I'd rather be hidden down in the 100s of non-consequential fries than be in the top 10 big fish.

Yes please drop freebitco.in and leave the site and this forum for good. Would be a win-win situation for everyone lol 
Selling referrals is anice idea, but you will get indeed lots and lots of complaints, so I wouldn't put it in place.

[jackg]

Also, his replacement is the site owner.

I was enjoying the lolz on my new found status there. I knew someone would ruin it. 

You'll thank me if wetsuit ever decides to exit-scam .
@broken record, that's pretty much right (TheQuin's quote). It's justified to reward your customers for their continued gambling.

[TheQuin]

Yes please drop freebitco.in and leave the site and this forum for good. Would be a win-win situation for everyone lol 
Selling referrals is anice idea, but you will get indeed lots and lots of complaints, so I wouldn't put it in place.

When I started doing this wetsuit asked me to pass on any ideas that I think are good. The selling referrals idea is one that I'm not passing on.

As for the imbecile troll, wetsuit has put him on his ignore list and you might want to do the same. He's already edited that post you quoted at least 3 times. Currently, most of the blatant lies and shit are deleted, but he'll probably edit more lies in again later. There's really no point talking to someone that moronic.

[jackg]

Yes please drop freebitco.in and leave the site and this forum for good. Would be a win-win situation for everyone lol 
Selling referrals is anice idea, but you will get indeed lots and lots of complaints, so I wouldn't put it in place.

When I started doing this wetsuit asked me to pass on any ideas that I think are good. The selling referrals idea is one that I'm not passing on.

As for the imbecile troll, wetsuit has put him on his ignore list and you might want to do the same. He's already edited that post you quoted at least 3 times. Currently, most of the blatant lies and shit are deleted, but he'll probably edit more lies in again later. There's really no point talking to someone that moronic.

I just read the first line and get the general gist.
I also think selling refs is a bad idea. Unless you pay more than 1rp, 1000rp or more might be better but still not great. This just means that people who buy ad space to advertise their affiliate link would just give up.

[broke_tradah]

WTF.  Who edited my post.  I didnt edit that out.  O wellz,  someone quoted it anyway lmfao.  Point is,  you know things are in dire straights when I'm in the top 10 of any referral list for this site lol.  TheQuack himself has said I have shit for referralz lmao (which I agree with,  I dont promote it at all other than a simple link in the description of a 24x7 live stream that shows the bot in use and raping ,  the rest is word of mouth by the users themselves).

IDK about the whole stealing of referrals idea.  Seems kinda pointless to me since most users referred to the site leave within the first 6hrs and never come back anyway.  Now,  stealing of QUALITY referral users,  now that would be interesting.  All the good referral accounts (AKA idiots) would end up with whoever had the biggest bankroll.  AKA:  The rich get richer.  I'd be all for that if it werent in RP and were in BTC instead,  I have phat stakz.

[jackg]

WTF.  Who edited my post.  I didnt edit that out.  O wellz,  someone quoted it anyway lmfao.  Point is,  you know things are in dire straights when I'm in the top 10 of any referral list for this site lol.  TheQuack himself has said I have shit for referralz lmao (which I agree with,  I dont promote it at all other than a simple link in the description of a 24x7 live stream that shows the bot in use and raping ,  the rest is word of mouth by the users themselves).

IDK about the whole stealing of referrals idea.  Seems kinda pointless to me since most users referred to the site leave within the first 6hrs and never come back anyway.  Now,  stealing of QUALITY referral users,  now that would be interesting.  All the good referral accounts (AKA idiots) would end up with whoever had the biggest bankroll.  AKA:  The rich get richer.  I'd be all for that,  I have phat stakz.

YOU'RE STILL EDITING POSTS AFTER POSTING THEM WITHOUT LEAVING A SIGN OF IT.
There's an extra paragraph now.
Are you sure you're on this list even though yo're supposedly completely against this site (apparently) - I would like proof of this.

[broke_tradah]

Are you sure you're on this list even though yo're supposedly completely against this site (apparently) - I would like proof of this.

Erm,  just look yourself.  My referral ID is public knowledge,  it's right on my live stream for anyone to see.  When one of you're top salesman is complaining,  you should usually take note.  But thats not the case here.  Besides, I dont WANT to be a top sales person for this crap site.  The fact that I am just says volumes about how bad its doing atm.

And to make things absolutely CRYSTAL clear,  probably the largest reason I dislike this site is because of how TheQuack treated me right from the very beginning,  like literally his first post to me was utter shit, rude as fuck, and a sign of his personality which I dont approve of.  I've dealt with his kind many times and it's actually fun to fuck with his type.  Until he's shitcanned I'll continue to point out all the bad shit about him and the site.

[BayAreaCoins]

In my opinion...

I think if FreeBitco.in offered anything over .6% that they would be the #1 website we would promote right now on FreeBitcoins.com.

LuckyGames.co offers 60% and their shit works wonderfully.

Players are going to lose faster on a 5% house edge game vs 1%, but a single 1 BTC roll is going to pay more even with the large house edge compared to the higher % commission.

Good call on raising the commission! <3

[broke_tradah]

but a single 1 BTC roll is going to pay more even with the large house edge compared to the higher % commission.

True,  but what retard is going to put 1BTC on the line with a 5% house edge.  I sure as shit wouldnt.  The commission here is really not that great even after the small bump.  I'd go for a 0.4 commission all day though (40%),  promote the shit out of it regardless of how high the edge was.  They could have a 95% house edge,  I'd still promote it lmao.  And I wouldnt be hear bagging on it either hahaha.  I took a look at LuckyGames.co and it seems to offer a 10% affiliate percentage.  Is 60% something you need to work up a ladder for?

[BayAreaCoins]

but a single 1 BTC roll is going to pay more even with the large house edge compared to the higher % commission.

True,  but what retard is going to put 1BTC on the line with a 5% house edge.  I sure as shit wouldnt.  The commission here is really not that great even after the small bump.  I'd go for a 0.4 commission all day though (40%),  promote the shit out of it regardless of how high the edge was.  They could have a 95% house edge,  I'd still promote it lmao.  And I wouldnt be hear bagging on it either hahaha.

40% commission on a 5% house edge... *loads up the train to boner town* 

American roulette is over 5% and lots of retards play it.

[stingers]

In my opinion...

I think if FreeBitco.in offered anything over .6% that they would be the #1 website we would promote right now on FreeBitcoins.com.

LuckyGames.co offers 60% and their shit works wonderfully.

Players are going to lose faster on a 5% house edge game vs 1%, but a single 1 BTC roll is going to pay more even with the large house edge compared to the higher % commission.

Good call on raising the commission! <3

Do people who are into referring others pay much attention to the percentage of the share they are getting from the net profit of the website?
So if I start a dice site with giving out 80% of the 1% house edge profit to the referrers do you really believe that people will actually advertise my site on their own (given that I built up some trust on my site for an year or so)?

[Kakmakr]

We have increased the MULTIPLY BTC commissions from 0.25% to 0.40% of the amount that your referral wagers! Refer more users to play MULTIPLY BTC and start earning big!

Interesting for those who have referred big players

I dont think there are much big players on the site. How ever I agree that there are a "lot" of small players.

So a person needs to invite more in quantity as compared to quality in order to generate profit as no whales will be interested to come here with 5% house edge because they can already find much lower house edge in other gambling sites.

5% isn't really that huge though. I mean it is quite rediculously high and 0.5% is better but all the sites with 0.5% house edges take investors and they don't give out stable commision, sometimes you earn, sometimes you lose it's just the luck of the draw.
Some people would probably play this site because they're less likely to win so when they do win it is worth more because the chance of them winnng is so much lower.

I disagree. it is not about the number. it may as well be 2% or 1.5% or even possibly be 1.1% and doesn't make a difference. when people want to choose where to go they compare these services (in this case a dice site for gambling) and it is a competition. when one site offers 1% and the other 0.5% and the other 5% people will choose the one with lowest house edge not the highest.

there are good incentives on this site in my opinion such as the lottery (both free tickets and ability to buy), rewards you get which you can use in many ways, profit from your investment which is 100% guaranteed not like investment in gambling sites that depends on players losing/wining, free rolls, .... but these are good for a different kind of user, in the end if you want to attract gamblers you need lower house edge.

This is like catching a double edged knife. You get cut, no matter what you do.  If they offer a lower house edge, then something else must be sacrificed. We might have to give up some cross-funded features, like the Lottery system or the FREE faucet etc.

So let's just accept the fact that there are no perfect solution for this and just enjoy the features that are on offer, because of this high house edge.  In future they might come up with a better way to fund this and the house edge might be lowered.

[stingers]

We have increased the MULTIPLY BTC commissions from 0.25% to 0.40% of the amount that your referral wagers! Refer more users to play MULTIPLY BTC and start earning big!

Interesting for those who have referred big players

I dont think there are much big players on the site. How ever I agree that there are a "lot" of small players.

So a person needs to invite more in quantity as compared to quality in order to generate profit as no whales will be interested to come here with 5% house edge because they can already find much lower house edge in other gambling sites.

5% isn't really that huge though. I mean it is quite rediculously high and 0.5% is better but all the sites with 0.5% house edges take investors and they don't give out stable commision, sometimes you earn, sometimes you lose it's just the luck of the draw.
Some people would probably play this site because they're less likely to win so when they do win it is worth more because the chance of them winnng is so much lower.

I disagree. it is not about the number. it may as well be 2% or 1.5% or even possibly be 1.1% and doesn't make a difference. when people want to choose where to go they compare these services (in this case a dice site for gambling) and it is a competition. when one site offers 1% and the other 0.5% and the other 5% people will choose the one with lowest house edge not the highest.

there are good incentives on this site in my opinion such as the lottery (both free tickets and ability to buy), rewards you get which you can use in many ways, profit from your investment which is 100% guaranteed not like investment in gambling sites that depends on players losing/wining, free rolls, .... but these are good for a different kind of user, in the end if you want to attract gamblers you need lower house edge.

This is like catching a double edged knife. You get cut, no matter what you do.  If they offer a lower house edge, then something else must be sacrificed. We might have to give up some cross-funded features, like the Lottery system or the FREE faucet etc.

So let's just accept the fact that there are no perfect solution for this and just enjoy the features that are on offer, because of this high house edge.  In future they might come up with a better way to fund this and the house edge might be lowered.

Well one cannot really complain about a particular house edge because its a free fair world and they are not hiding something from you, if you want to play then you are free to do so, if you want to go somewhere else then also you are free to do it.

[TheQuin]

Well one cannot really complain about a particular house edge because its a free fair world and they are not hiding something from you, if you want to play then you are free to do so, if you want to go somewhere else then also you are free to do it.

There are already plenty of sites competing in the low house edge market. We offer something different and that's been very successful for us. There are plenty of players out there that prefer all the bonuses and free lotto tickets. If we took all that away and lowered the house edge we would be just another dice site competing in a very competitive space.

[Victorycoin]

Well one cannot really complain about a particular house edge because its a free fair world and they are not hiding something from you, if you want to play then you are free to do so, if you want to go somewhere else then also you are free to do it.

There are already plenty of sites competing in the low house edge market. We offer something different and that's been very successful for us. There are plenty of players out there that prefer all the bonuses and free lotto tickets. If we took all that away and lowered the house edge we would be just another dice site competing in a very competitive space.

If you listened to yourself, you'd have heard a voice asking, how far can you get with playing the Ostrich? The fund for the bonuses and free lotto tickets comes from the very 5% house edge and now a huge chunk of your so called " plenty players," are at the site not for the game, but for the bonuses. You don't have to hold a degree in Math to know, it won't be long before the loot dries off! If there's any move worth taking by this site to make it genuinely competitive, it's to do away with the obnoxious house edge for something within the industry standard.

[TheQuin]

If you listened to yourself, you'd have heard a voice asking, how far can you get with playing the Ostrich? The fund for the bonuses and free lotto tickets comes from the very 5% house edge and now a huge chunk of your so called " plenty players," are at the site not for the game, but for the bonuses. You don't have to hold a degree in Math to know, it won't be long before the loot dries off! If there's any move worth taking by this site to make it genuinely competitive, it's to do away with the obnoxious house edge for something within the industry standard.

We've been doing this for nearly 5 years now and it has been very successful. There has never been any sign of anything drying up. Again there is no point in going and competing in an already saturated market. Have a look at the fiat casinos and their house edges and you'll see how successful our approach is.

Also, take a look at https://dicesites.com/ and compare turnover on those sites in the last 7 days to our 891.758 BTC. It looks like Bustadice had an exceptional week but we're happy with where we stand.

[broke_tradah]

If you listened to yourself, you'd have heard a voice asking, how far can you get with playing the Ostrich? The fund for the bonuses and free lotto tickets comes from the very 5% house edge and now a huge chunk of your so called " plenty players," are at the site not for the game, but for the bonuses. You don't have to hold a degree in Math to know, it won't be long before the loot dries off! If there's any move worth taking by this site to make it genuinely competitive, it's to do away with the obnoxious house edge for something within the industry standard.

We've been doing this for nearly 5 years now and it has been very successful. There has never been any sign of anything drying up. Again there is no point in going and competing in an already saturated market. Have a look at the fiat casinos and their house edges and you'll see how successful our approach is.

Also, take a look at https://dicesites.com/ and compare turnover on those sites in the last 7 days to our 891.758 BTC. It looks like Bustadice had an exceptional week but we're happy with where we stand.

Riiiiiight and thats why you are running a desperation promotion for referrals.  I already covered why you are doing this and the fact that im one of the top referrers just goes to prove how bad things truly are for the site because i shouldnt even be in the top 10p or 1000 in the referrals dept.  Yet there it is.  The house edge according to your own words is "in line with all other online casinos" yet we all know thats a blatant lie.  Now you are trying to back peddle on that when others bring it up.  Even the site you just posted yourself proves the simple fact that freebitco runs a retardedly high house edge with very few features more than the other sites to show for it.

It must be killing you inside to see one of your biggest critics climbing the ladder in your own contest.  Might be time to put down the ego bag and listen for a little while.  The cash flowing in isnt justifying the far to small of features flowing out.  The site lacks all of the important statistics that other sites do as well (which is one of the reasons its not listed on statistics sites such as the one u listed).

It also checks far to many of the scam flag boxes from the  blacklist site and the biggest example of that is the current contest.

[BayAreaCoins]

Do people who are into referring others pay much attention to the percentage of the share they are getting from the net profit of the website?

Absolutely.

A player only has $10,000 to lose per say... we want as much of that lose as possible.

In my opinion... most losses happen fast (in one big best mostly).

So if I start a dice site with giving out 80% of the 1% house edge profit to the referrers do you really believe that people will actually advertise my site on their own (given that I built up some trust on my site for an year or so)?

Depends on what your max bet is.

I'd rather advertise company ABC 5% house edge with 20% commission on the edge rather than company CBA with 1% house edge @ 60% commission on the edge because I'm looking for someone that loses a single 20BTC roll.

On a single 20 BTC roll with company ABC vs CBA:
ABC would pay .2 BTC
CBA would pay .12 BTC