[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[noah tall]

...legitimacy...

[Sub-Ether]

I am none of these things! 

Please add your personality trait? the list is not exhaustive

[DrkLvr_]

 I never ever suggested or convinced anyone into buying Dash. I've never heard of a single case of anyone claiming to have been scammed by Dash. I just believe in it and make my own investment, as well as working daily on it as much as I possibly can.

 

You've already made this claim, and i've already refuted it with proof. Thanks for proving you're just another systematic liar and scam promoter involved in Darkcoin/Dash.






Congratulations on successfully scamming this guy. You must be real proud of yourselves

[TanteStefana2]

I'm definitely in camp #2, as I can't do anything else    

[GhostPlayer]

Congratulations on successfully scamming this guy. You must be real proud of yourselves

 That is not a scam!

That is a known historical unfortunate explained at nauseum happening and the guy is just bitching because he missed out on it!

 No one ever got scammed!  Hell, I damn wished I got a piece of that instamine! There was no pump and dump! Ever!

 It's been explained over and over and over and over and over... But sure, hang on to that hat if keep your ears warm.

Look at our distribution chart since day one! It's a thing of beauty! It's like the most beautiful blockchain-heart pumping hashes to the masses!

 Analyse the facts, don't mumble over the dead-beat propaganda!



 

[DrkLvr_]

Congratulations on successfully scamming this guy. You must be real proud of yourselves

Propaganda.
 

Those addresses shown moving coins could easily be the same person moving coins between their own addresses. Your propaganda proves nothing and no one believes your lies.

You've already proven yourselves as untrustworthy by advertising 0.0000000% premine and no mention of the instamine "bug" you intentionally planted in the code. Disgusting group of scammers you are.

[Honest Tim]

Adam   

[GhostPlayer]

 Wow... such profound insight.

 

[volyova]

Congratulations on successfully scamming this guy. You must be real proud of yourselves

Propaganda.
 

Those addresses shown moving coins could easily be the same person moving coins between their own addresses. Your propaganda proves nothing and no one believes your lies.

You've already proven yourselves as untrustworthy by advertising 0.0000000% premine and no mention of the instamine "bug" you intentionally planted in the code. Disgusting group of scammers you are.

You sound bitter...do you enjoy being like that? Anyway, to feel better, you should just buy some Dash!

Join the #[R]EVOLUTION

[podizzle]

anyone within dash would be smart to remove volyova from all associations with the coin. this person is a known scam artist from btc-e. fair warning.

[UdjinM6]

@all "whitepaper first" people:

> Sorry about all the questions, but as I said this does seem to be a
> very promising and original idea, and I am looking forward to seeing
> how the concept is further developed. It would be helpful to see a more
> process oriented description of the idea, with concrete details of the
> data structures for the various objects (coins, blocks, transactions),
> the data which is included in messages, and algorithmic descriptions
> of the procedures for handling the various events which would occur in
> this system. You mentioned that you are working on an implementation,
> but I think a more formal, text description of the system would be a
> helpful next step.

I appreciate your questions.  I actually did this kind of backwards.  I had to
write all the code before I could convince myself that I could solve every
problem, then I wrote the paper.  I think I will be able to release the code
sooner than I could write a detailed spec.  You're already right about most of
your assumptions where you filled in the blanks.

Satoshi Nakamoto

http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography%40metzdowd.com/msg09980.html


PS. Btw, I'm not saying that that's the one and only right way to do things. But sometimes it works quite well as you might already know 

[fernando]

@all "whitepaper first" people:

> Sorry about all the questions, but as I said this does seem to be a
> very promising and original idea, and I am looking forward to seeing
> how the concept is further developed. It would be helpful to see a more
> process oriented description of the idea, with concrete details of the
> data structures for the various objects (coins, blocks, transactions),
> the data which is included in messages, and algorithmic descriptions
> of the procedures for handling the various events which would occur in
> this system. You mentioned that you are working on an implementation,
> but I think a more formal, text description of the system would be a
> helpful next step.

I appreciate your questions.  I actually did this kind of backwards.  I had to
write all the code before I could convince myself that I could solve every
problem, then I wrote the paper.  I think I will be able to release the code
sooner than I could write a detailed spec.  You're already right about most of
your assumptions where you filled in the blanks.

Satoshi Nakamoto

http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography%40metzdowd.com/msg09980.html


PS. Btw, I'm not saying that that's the one and only right way to do things. But sometimes it works quite well as you might already know 

Great point

Kinda related. For those who don't want to dig too much into forums, this collection of Satoshi's writings is great (it includes the one supra):
http://www.amazon.com/Book-Satoshi-Collected-Writings-Nakamoto-ebook/dp/B00M6KGJ2K/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1448391585&sr=8-1

[qwizzie]

I'm not kidding here.
A few years back I did volunteer work at a nun's psychiatric institution for two straight weeks, dealing with a few dozen schizophrenics, and boy were they saner than our beloved trolleros...

Makes for an interesting psychological study for a student's final year thesis.
Can do some amateur FBI profiling, you could classify people in catagories such as:

0) worker (creates original things, selfless and often works for nothing, a rare breed)
1) helpful (knows some bits and bobs, likes to help)
2) dedicated and passionate (enjoys the ride, cheerleaders)
3) mostly harmless
4) annoying but harmless
5) lurker
6) housebound nerd (pale skined/spotty/bad diet, usually friendly but lacks people skills stays in mum's basement too much)
7) delusions of grandeur (thinks can code)
Eight) deliberately annoying and hurtful (hates themselves, no self love/no girlfriend)
9) hidden agendas for profit (Cui Bono?)
10) bot (terzo?)
11) sociopathic, potentially dangerous (bullied at school, lacks people skills, has been wronged and wants to get the world back for what they have done to him)
12) psychopathic. The most dangerous type-no empathy for others and often is a split personality. Has good memory but repeats things and gets in stuck in confirmation bias loops, does not like to be questioned and often misses the point and violent to their partner.

thats a great list, although i'm not totally getting classification number 7

[qwizzie]

I'm not kidding here.
A few years back I did volunteer work at a nun's psychiatric institution for two straight weeks, dealing with a few dozen schizophrenics, and boy were they saner than our beloved trolleros...

Makes for an interesting psychological study for a student's final year thesis.
Can do some amateur FBI profiling, you could classify people in catagories such as:

0) worker (creates original things, selfless and often works for nothing, a rare breed)
1) helpful (knows some bits and bobs, likes to help)
2) dedicated and passionate (enjoys the ride, cheerleaders)
3) mostly harmless
4) annoying but harmless
5) lurker
6) housebound nerd (pale skined/spotty/bad diet, usually friendly but lacks people skills stays in mum's basement too much)
7) delusions of grandeur (thinks can code)
Eight) deliberately annoying and hurtful (hates themselves, no self love/no girlfriend)
9) hidden agendas for profit (Cui Bono?)
10) bot (terzo?)
11) sociopathic, potentially dangerous (bullied at school, lacks people skills, has been wronged and wants to get the world back for what they have done to him)
12) psychopathic. The most dangerous type-no empathy for others and often is a split personality. Has good memory but repeats things and gets in stuck in confirmation bias loops, does not like to be questioned and often misses the point and violent to their partner.

thats a great list, although i'm not totally getting classification number 7

never mind, i got it now ...

[ddink7]

Can't we all just get along? I would really like that.

I agree with this.

Wolf0, i'd like to say your a great example of the behavior of someone WHOS NOT a fan of our coin, of someone who's openly supporting another coin project, but still conducts himself in a respectful manner.  I applaud that sir.  Your on here drilling and grilling people about our tech in a manner that is not demeaning.   Bravo!  Your development team and supporters of your coin community could learn much from your conduct.  

Rich

Thank you. People get too emotional about it - that clouds their judgement.

I'd like to ask some questions regarding Evolution itself, but I doubt I'll get answers as I'm not supposed to have read the whitepaper yet.

Forgive my skepticism, but Evan says the whitepaper won't even exist until after the implementation is written. How have you read something that hasn't yet been written?

[Sub-Ether]

7) delusions of grandeur (thinks can code)

thats a great list, although i'm not totally getting classification number 7

7 represents the egotistical know it all, one that has done a little bit of code work and then presumes to know everything there is to know about all other coin projects. An example of where a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing, typically arrogant and blinded to new ideas

[qwizzie]

Can't we all just get along? I would really like that.

I agree with this.

Wolf0, i'd like to say your a great example of the behavior of someone WHOS NOT a fan of our coin, of someone who's openly supporting another coin project, but still conducts himself in a respectful manner.  I applaud that sir.  Your on here drilling and grilling people about our tech in a manner that is not demeaning.   Bravo!  Your development team and supporters of your coin community could learn much from your conduct.  

Rich

Thank you. People get too emotional about it - that clouds their judgement.

I'd like to ask some questions regarding Evolution itself, but I doubt I'll get answers as I'm not supposed to have read the whitepaper yet.

Forgive my skepticism, but Evan says the whitepaper won't even exist until after the implementation is written. How have you read something that hasn't yet been written?

and if you have read something "classified", can we offer you a drink ? or several drinks ? 
(eh yeah, thats towards Wolf0)

[hetecon]

Does Dash ever have the plans to add proof of stake?

[Limx Dev]

Does Dash ever have the plans to add proof of stake?

Masternode is POS... 

[bigrcanada]

Ok...another quick question....coin control...how does it function in a wallet.  As I mentioned earlier...I have a wallet address showing up twice in my wallet apparently because I sent to rounds of funds to that same wallet address.  Now I can't use that for my 14th MN as the address is not showing one 1000MN amount...but 2 separate amounts though belonging to the same wallet address...how the hell that works i'm not sure...advise?