[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[chaeplin]

Will update ASAP

does it explain the sudden rise in the graph?

I don't think so.

Graph does not count/distingish wallet version of pools.
'innmlist' is counted as paid.

nicehash is returned(pool_unknown_237, changed to nicehah).



  

[1714500260]

1714500260

[1714500260]

1714500260

[1714500260]

1714500260

[1714500260]

1714500260

[1714500260]

1714500260

[1714500260]

1714500260

[Pale Phoenix]

end of story

first make it work. Then make it work better.

Sigh. Like so many others whose grand principles only apply when convenient.

[Freckleg]

Heh, the bitcointalk retardfactory production line churning them out again today! 

thanks
you just proofed my point about the bad commuity
(in fact i am surprised it took that long!)

Just stick with your non anonymous, bloating monero and spare us your "advice"

bye!

[bit0x]

Don't worry, be happy. It is a start of great way.

[onemorebtc]

Heh, the bitcointalk retardfactory production line churning them out again today! 

thanks
you just proofed my point about the bad commuity
(in fact i am surprised it took that long!)

Just stick with your non anonymous, bloating monero and spare us your "advice"

bye!

you don't nothing about my preferences...
lets see how bloated darkcoin will get with more transactions (as i understand it after every transfer funds have to get anomized again; please correct me if i am wrong. i read the hole ann thread and many links from here - just dont want to signup at darkcointalk)

anonymity comes with a price. i dont want to compare different coins here as this is the darkcoin ann thread. but i preserve the right to say what i think.

[coins101]

I uploaded this fix to the SVN.  It watches for spent coins and updates your wallet on load and also continuously as blocks come in.  I also put a better error message, but it should never hit it because it always finds spent coins ahead of time, unless you spent the same money at the same time on two computers at once.

If you want to try it, PM or e-mail me your e-mail address where I can send it as an attachment and also what OS (win, linux 32-bit, linux 64-bit).

Yeah.....all devs just release things without making minor tweaks.

[coins101]

I committed a fix for 64-bit compile and some fixes to support wxWidgets 2.9.0.

There was one compile error in serialize.h with min(sizeof()) that I fixed for 64-bit.  The rest of the 64-bit compile errors I was getting were in wxWidgets 2.8.9, so I started working on supporting wxWidgets 2.9.0.

wxWidgets 2.9.0 is UTF-8.  We've been using the ANSI version of wxWidgets 2.8.9 in anticipation of wxWidgets UTF-8 support.

I compiled and ran on 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic.

I think the only bug left is where the status number is mashed up.  I'm not sure why, I have to suspect it's a UTF-8 thing, but no idea how that could happen.  Haven't looked into it.

build-unix.txt is updated and two makefiles on SVN:
makefile.unix.wx2.8
makefile.unix.wx2.9

Unfortunately there's still no debian package for either version of wxWidgets we use.  They only have the wchar ("unicode") version of wxWidgets 2.8, which is a disaster because wchar wxString doesn't convert to std::string.  We use either ANSI wxWidgets 2.8, or wxWidgets 2.9.  So you still have to get it and build it yourself.

Jesus....how the fuck did Bitcoin get so far with so many tweaks.

[coins101]

The recommended ways to do a payment for an order:
1) The merchant has a static IP, the customer sends to it with a comment.
2) The merchant creates a new bitcoin address, gives it to the customer, the customer sends to that address.  This will be the standard way for website software to do it.

RSA vs ECDSA: it's not the size of the executable but the size of the data.  I thought it would be impractical if the block chain, bitcoin addresses, disk space and bandwidth requirements were all an order of magnitude bigger.  Also, even if using RSA for messages, it would still make sense to do all the bitcoin network with ECDSA and use RSA in parallel for only the message part.  In that case, everything that's been implemented up to now would be implemented exactly as it has been.

We can figure out the best way to do this much later.  It could use a separate (maybe existing) e-mail or IM infrastructure to pass messages, and instead of RSA, maybe just put a hash of the message in the transaction to prove that the transaction is for the order described in the message.  The message would have to include a salt so nobody could brute force the hash to reveal a short message.

Oh my fucking good god.

'We can figure out the best way to do this much later....'

What was he fucking upto. Still tweaking over a year after launching Bitcoin. No wonder the price is starting to fall now.

[qwizzie]

I uploaded this fix to the SVN.  It watches for spent coins and updates your wallet on load and also continuously as blocks come in.  I also put a better error message, but it should never hit it because it always finds spent coins ahead of time, unless you spent the same money at the same time on two computers at once.

If you want to try it, PM or e-mail me your e-mail address where I can send it as an attachment and also what OS (win, linux 32-bit, linux 64-bit).

Yeah.....all devs just release things without making minor tweaks.

not to mention this one :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bitcoin

In November 2008, a paper was posted on the internet under the name Satoshi Nakamoto titled Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. This paper detailed methods of using a peer-to-peer network to generate what was described as "a system for electronic transactions without relying on trust".[8][9][10][11] In January 2009, the Bitcoin network came into existence with the release of the first open source Bitcoin client and the issuance of the first bitcoins,[9][12][13][14] with Satoshi Nakamoto mining the first block of bitcoins ever (known as the "genesis block"), which had a reward of 50 bitcoins. The value of the first bitcoin transactions were negotiated by individuals on the bitcointalk forums with one notable transaction of 10,000 BTC used to indirectly purchase two pizzas delivered by Papa John’s.[9]

On 6 August 2010, a major vulnerability in the Bitcoin protocol was spotted. Transactions weren't properly verified before they were included in the transaction log or "block chain" which let users bypass Bitcoin's economic restrictions and create an indefinite number of bitcoins.[15][16] On 15 August, the vulnerability was exploited; over 184 billion bitcoins were generated in a transaction, and sent to two addresses on the network. Within hours, the transaction was spotted and erased from the transaction log after the bug was fixed and the network forked to an updated version of the Bitcoin protocol.[17][18] This was the only major security flaw found and exploited in Bitcoin's history.

[onemorebtc]

I uploaded this fix to the SVN.  It watches for spent coins and updates your wallet on load and also continuously as blocks come in.  I also put a better error message, but it should never hit it because it always finds spent coins ahead of time, unless you spent the same money at the same time on two computers at once.

If you want to try it, PM or e-mail me your e-mail address where I can send it as an attachment and also what OS (win, linux 32-bit, linux 64-bit).

Yeah.....all devs just release things without making minor tweaks.

bad example
a better one would be the fuckup after releasing a new version which used another version of berkeleydb...

any software has bugs.. this is normal
BUT: a forked software with some minor changes which fails for anybody who uses the new feature (it failed for anyone who uses darksend and has set more than 0 rounds.. correct?) is a whole different story..
it just looks like a) never tested or b) made on purpose to gather more fees for his mn-buddies

i tend to b...

edit: short reply window was still filled with text. removed it after my post

[camosoul]

I uploaded this fix to the SVN.  It watches for spent coins and updates your wallet on load and also continuously as blocks come in.  I also put a better error message, but it should never hit it because it always finds spent coins ahead of time, unless you spent the same money at the same time on two computers at once.

If you want to try it, PM or e-mail me your e-mail address where I can send it as an attachment and also what OS (win, linux 32-bit, linux 64-bit).

Yeah.....all devs just release things without making minor tweaks.

Satoshi spent years developing in secrecy, a thing far less complicated than DRK. Still, nobody knows who Satoshi is. Then, he still had years of fixes... It's still v0.9, and serious flaws like completely transparent blockchain are treated as "It's a feature, not a bug." REfusing to make any large changes because of "installed userbase" excuse. And in fairness, that's a 20% valid excuse.

Evan does something insanely more complex out in the open and the unwashed masses can't stop shoving their heads up their butts...

hodl...

[Freckleg]

Heh, the bitcointalk retardfactory production line churning them out again today! 

thanks
you just proofed my point about the bad commuity
(in fact i am surprised it took that long!)

Just stick with your non anonymous, bloating monero and spare us your "advice"

bye!

you don't nothing about my preferences...
lets see how bloated darkcoin will get with more transactions (as i understand it after every transfer funds have to get anomized again; please correct me if i am wrong. i read the hole ann thread and many links from here - just dont want to signup at darkcointalk)

anonymity comes with a price. i dont want to compare different coins here as this is the darkcoin ann thread. but i preserve the right to say what i think.

Two words which you would know if you had done some research of your own: summary blocks

now just spend some time studying, reading about coins and their development. We are always avalable to answer intelligent questions

[onemorebtc]

now just spend some time studying, reading about coins and their development. We are always avalable to answer intelligent questions

links please?
its not like darkcoin papers are all over the internet...

[coins101]

I've been thinking about that for a while.  I want to add the backend support for .onion addresses and connecting to them, then go from there.

There aren't many .onion addresses in use for anything because the user has to go through a number of steps to create one.  Configure TOR to generate a .onion address, restart TOR, configure it with the generated address.  Perhaps this is intentional to keep TOR so it can't be integrated into file sharing programs in any sufficiently automated way.

Trying to do anon, but couldn't get around to it. Well, no need to try anymore.

[Freckleg]

now just spend some time studying, reading about coins and their development. We are always avalable to answer intelligent questions

links please?
its not like darkcoin papers are all over the internet...

I said intelligent questions you lazy piece of shit

[Toninho]

The recommended ways to do a payment for an order:
1) The merchant has a static IP, the customer sends to it with a comment.
2) The merchant creates a new bitcoin address, gives it to the customer, the customer sends to that address.  This will be the standard way for website software to do it.

RSA vs ECDSA: it's not the size of the executable but the size of the data.  I thought it would be impractical if the block chain, bitcoin addresses, disk space and bandwidth requirements were all an order of magnitude bigger.  Also, even if using RSA for messages, it would still make sense to do all the bitcoin network with ECDSA and use RSA in parallel for only the message part.  In that case, everything that's been implemented up to now would be implemented exactly as it has been.

We can figure out the best way to do this much later.  It could use a separate (maybe existing) e-mail or IM infrastructure to pass messages, and instead of RSA, maybe just put a hash of the message in the transaction to prove that the transaction is for the order described in the message.  The message would have to include a salt so nobody could brute force the hash to reveal a short message.

Oh my fucking good god.

'We can figure out the best way to do this much later....'

What was he fucking upto. Still tweaking over a year after launching Bitcoin. No wonder the price is starting to fall now.

[qwizzie]

now just spend some time studying, reading about coins and their development. We are always avalable to answer intelligent questions

links please?
its not like darkcoin papers are all over the internet...

See first post on page 1 .. plenty links there.

[shojayxt]

Portfolio upgrade to version 0.10.12.28, but I took some constant -0.001 DARK..I can not understand why! As I can understand, these coins are made only in a transaction, but apparently not. If you leave your wallet tomorrow I'll take all the coins! Anyway.
I want to go back to version 0.9.12.28 and I will not take money from the wallet for some reason! What will happen if I do? Is that possible?
Thank you.

Help, please!  

Er, close 10.12.28, download 9.12.28, open 9.12.28... ?

So people are reverting to previous versions?

[raganius]

bad example
a better one would be the fuckup after releasing a new version which used another version of berkeleydb...

any software has bugs.. this is normal
BUT: a forked software with some minor changes which fails for anybody who uses the new feature (it failed for anyone who uses darksend and has set more than 0 rounds.. correct?) is a whole different story..
it just looks like a) never tested or b) made on purpose to gather more fees for his mn-buddies

i tend to b...

edit: short reply window was still filled with text. removed it after my post

[onemorebtc]

now just spend some time studying, reading about coins and their development. We are always avalable to answer intelligent questions

links please?
its not like darkcoin papers are all over the internet...

I said intelligent questions you lazy piece of shit

and another reason to never buy darkcoin again
asking for a link to a paper which describes a behavior you obviously know about but dont want to share? this is a stupid question?

you guys are really funny!

but ok you won.. i'll leave you alone