Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 06:15:36 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 3344 3345 3346 3347 3348 3349 3350 3351 3352 3353 3354 3355 3356 3357 3358 3359 3360 3361 3362 3363 3364 3365 3366 3367 3368 3369 3370 3371 3372 3373 3374 3375 3376 3377 3378 3379 3380 3381 3382 3383 3384 3385 3386 3387 3388 3389 3390 3391 3392 3393 [3394] 3395 3396 3397 3398 3399 3400 3401 3402 3403 3404 3405 3406 3407 3408 3409 3410 3411 3412 3413 3414 3415 3416 3417 3418 3419 3420 3421 3422 3423 3424 3425 3426 3427 3428 3429 3430 3431 3432 3433 3434 3435 3436 3437 3438 3439 3440 3441 3442 3443 3444 ... 7012 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency  (Read 9722503 times)
maxpowerzz92
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:27:05 PM
 #67861


What about the people that have SDC that don't want to buy DRK?

You can't start having "Special Arrangements"  and then be considered "Decentralized".  

They either convert SDC to DRK at the fixed rate per the proposal, or just go on an exchange and convert it to BTC or some other altcoin.  If they hold onto SDC longterm, the markets will probably keep the exchange rate near to the SDC/DRK fixed rate.

My question is why would anyone still apply processing power to support the SDC blockchain after a merger, so moving out of SDC seems like the only possible outcome.

1714673736
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714673736

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714673736
Reply with quote  #2

1714673736
Report to moderator
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714673736
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714673736

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714673736
Reply with quote  #2

1714673736
Report to moderator
1714673736
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714673736

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714673736
Reply with quote  #2

1714673736
Report to moderator
Kai Proctor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


01100100 01100001 01110011 01101000


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:28:19 PM
 #67862

I'm discovering the existence of ShadowCoin ...  Roll Eyes
Propulsion
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


The Buck Stops Here.


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:30:29 PM
 #67863

I just compiled the SDC QT wallet and am not seeing any of this alleged eyecandy? I see a bog standard bitcoin wallet with a dark theme and a chat tab.

I made an encrypted p2p chat app in python in under a day a few months ago. Don't speak c++ so can't add it to the DRK QT wallet but it would be simple for anyone that could code in c++

I'm struggling to share the optimism here, or see much value in the proposition as it stands.

This is what the wallet looks like for me.

eduffield (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1036


Dash Developer


View Profile WWW
November 06, 2014, 08:30:57 PM
 #67864

It's a shame the ShadowCash merger came out, but I'm going to go ahead and call it off completely. If we got approval from the ShadowCash team, the plan was to bring this to the community. I was never intending to act unilaterally to merge the two coins.  However, it appears that a majority of the community is against this idea, so we'll find other ways to acquire talent. Thanks for your input everyone.  

Dash - Digital Cash | dash.org | dashfoundation.io | dashgo.io
oblox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:31:50 PM
 #67865

This is beyond preposterous for two reasons:

a) You're going to dilute my DRK holdings to merge us with some shitcoin nobody has ever heard of?

b) You have the power to do so? Isn't crypto all about decentralization and math-based consensus to a (relatively) immutable basic protocol? I realize we are still in the development stages of DRK and consequently Evan has an unusual amount of power (e.g. enforcement), but this is a real reach. One person creating more coins in direct contravention of the basic protocol? If Evan can create more coins any time he wishes, how is he any different than the Federal Reserve?

c) This *WILL* fork DRK. Guaranteed. Look at the massive amount of opposition so far...I haven't counted but it looks about 2:1 against. Even if you reverse those numbers, you will have a significant number of DRK owners who *WILL* fork DRK into another coin. And then what do you have? The exact brain-drain you were hoping to avoid, plus market ambiguity, plus a massive loss of investor confidence.

P.S. Even with the reward structure of future blocks being altered to prevent inflation, the creation of a superblock by the DRK devs *after implementation* will rock our coin onto its heels. If one person (Evan) can create more DRK for a good reason, what's to prevent him from creating more DRK for a bad reason (at some point down the road)?

I have been one of DRK's biggest supporters, and everybody here knows this. But hearing that the dev team is even considering something like this makes me almost want to sell my coins. It's that bad of an idea.

Thank you, this is exactly it. This very idea was what made me on the brink of selling my coins when the airdrop idea was floated.
thelonecrouton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:33:30 PM
 #67866

This is beyond preposterous for two reasons:

a) You're going to dilute my DRK holdings to merge us with some shitcoin nobody has ever heard of?

b) You have the power to do so? Isn't crypto all about decentralization and math-based consensus to a (relatively) immutable basic protocol? I realize we are still in the development stages of DRK and consequently Evan has an unusual amount of power (e.g. enforcement), but this is a real reach. One person creating more coins in direct contravention of the basic protocol? If Evan can create more coins any time he wishes, how is he any different than the Federal Reserve?

c) This *WILL* fork DRK. Guaranteed. Look at the massive amount of opposition so far...I haven't counted but it looks about 2:1 against. Even if you reverse those numbers, you will have a significant number of DRK owners who *WILL* fork DRK into another coin. And then what do you have? The exact brain-drain you were hoping to avoid, plus market ambiguity, plus a massive loss of investor confidence.

P.S. Even with the reward structure of future blocks being altered to prevent inflation, the creation of a superblock by the DRK devs *after implementation* will rock our coin onto its heels. If one person (Evan) can create more DRK for a good reason, what's to prevent him from creating more DRK for a bad reason (at some point down the road)?

I have been one of DRK's biggest supporters, and everybody here knows this. But hearing that the dev team is even considering something like this makes me almost want to sell my coins. It's that bad of an idea.

Yeah I'm not buying the 'unite and conquer' line either.

Even assuming a complete wealth transfer from SDC to DRK, that's about the same as a single good day on Bitfinex currently... it's not exactly going to rock the world.

oblox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:33:41 PM
 #67867

It's a shame the ShadowCash merger came out, but I'm going to go ahead and call it off completely. If we got approval from the ShadowCash team, the plan was to bring this to the community. I was never intending to act unilaterally to merge the two coins.  However, it appears that a majority of the community is against this idea, so we'll find other ways to acquire talent. Thanks for your input everyone. 

Good call. There is no reason why you won't be able to find devs. The fact that this was leaked before you could even negotiate it says a lot anyway. I'm glad it's off.
shojayxt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1001



View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:34:47 PM
 #67868

It's a shame the ShadowCash merger came out, but I'm going to go ahead and call it off completely. If we got approval from the ShadowCash team, the plan was to bring this to the community. I was never intending to act unilaterally to merge the two coins.  However, it appears that a majority of the community is against this idea, so we'll find other ways to acquire talent. Thanks for your input everyone.  

Good call
thelonecrouton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:34:57 PM
 #67869

I just compiled the SDC QT wallet and am not seeing any of this alleged eyecandy? I see a bog standard bitcoin wallet with a dark theme and a chat tab.

I made an encrypted p2p chat app in python in under a day a few months ago. Don't speak c++ so can't add it to the DRK QT wallet but it would be simple for anyone that could code in c++

I'm struggling to share the optimism here, or see much value in the proposition as it stands.

This is what the wallet looks like for me.



Yep, a bog standard bitcoin qt wallet with a dark theme and a chat tab. Are you disagreeing with me Huh
Propulsion
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


The Buck Stops Here.


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:35:29 PM
 #67870

It's a shame the ShadowCash merger came out, but I'm going to go ahead and call it off completely. If we got approval from the ShadowCash team, the plan was to bring this to the community. I was never intending to act unilaterally to merge the two coins.  However, it appears that a majority of the community is against this idea, so we'll find other ways to acquire talent. Thanks for your input everyone.  

Good call. There is no reason why you won't be able to find devs. The fact that this was leaked before you could even negotiate it says a lot anyway. I'm glad it's off.

100% agree.

Yep, a bog standard bitcoin qt wallet with a dark theme and a chat tab. Are you disagreeing with me Huh
Nope.
Kai Proctor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


01100100 01100001 01110011 01101000


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:36:13 PM
 #67871

It's a shame the ShadowCash merger came out, but I'm going to go ahead and call it off completely. If we got approval from the ShadowCash team, the plan was to bring this to the community. I was never intending to act unilaterally to merge the two coins.  However, it appears that a majority of the community is against this idea, so we'll find other ways to acquire talent. Thanks for your input everyone. 

Good call. There is no reason why you won't be able to find devs. The fact that this was leaked before you could even negotiate it says a lot anyway. I'm glad it's off.

IMO it came out to boost the demand for that coin.
maxpowerzz92
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:37:27 PM
 #67872

It's a shame the ShadowCash merger came out, but I'm going to go ahead and call it off completely. If we got approval from the ShadowCash team, the plan was to bring this to the community. I was never intending to act unilaterally to merge the two coins.  However, it appears that a majority of the community is against this idea, so we'll find other ways to acquire talent. Thanks for your input everyone.  

Thanks for your quick response, and listening to the community.  I liked how you were thinking outside the box, and trying to join different communities with the same longterm vision.  

Artoodeetoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:37:53 PM
 #67873

SDC guys prob feel like its christmas...Despite a lock in they can still now get access to 500,000k of liquid asset as opposed to just another coin, that if you dumped 50k worth it would probably wipe it out...

DRK does not need SDC

Getting DRK for SDC = uber attractive... Therefore if there is a "deal" to be done.. It needs to be much more in DRK's favour.. IE a much lower dilution... Say 1%.

Otherwise I would say let them go and do their own thing.

EDIT

Just read above - thank god for that

Evan - give it another 6 months and you will have your pick of coin devs as DRK will still be here and the sh1t coins will be gone... So then come back and look at how to fund a recruitment drive... You are in a very strong position... Make use of it...

DASH #DashDC #DashIntoDigitalCash
stealth923
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:39:01 PM
 #67874

As the core idea of the merger was to acquire more developers. Let's start drumming up ideas how we can onboard new talent to the darkcoin team. There needs to be some sort of incentive or clever marketing to weed out some of the good devs

Edit.  Any devs that are official drk team must be made public. I don't want any anonymous devs.
qwizzie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2548
Merit: 1245



View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:39:12 PM
 #67875

its a shame that we as community cant take the time to discuss this properly with more details and more time
now we have talked it over in like 10 minutes and brushed it away. I'm not saying i'm for or against the proposal
but i would have liked more time to discuss it.
 


Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
rentahash
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 201
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:41:37 PM
 #67876

its a shame that we as community cant take the time to discuss this properly with more details and more time
now we have talked it over in like 10 minutes and brushed it away.

agree with you...
I still find merging was a brilliant idea...
oblox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:42:38 PM
 #67877

its a shame that we as community cant take the time to discuss this properly with more details and more time
now we have talked it over in like 10 minutes and brushed it away. I'm not saying i'm for or against the proposal
but i would have liked more time to discuss it.
 



There was nothing to discuss. The second you talk about implementing a superblock, the discussion is off. Crypto isn't that. Period.
Freckleg
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 508
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:42:54 PM
 #67878

It's a shame the ShadowCash merger came out, but I'm going to go ahead and call it off completely. If we got approval from the ShadowCash team, the plan was to bring this to the community. I was never intending to act unilaterally to merge the two coins.  However, it appears that a majority of the community is against this idea, so we'll find other ways to acquire talent. Thanks for your input everyone. 

Good call. There is no reason why you won't be able to find devs. The fact that this was leaked before you could even negotiate it says a lot anyway. I'm glad it's off.

Good Call for the first time ever I was considering selling my darkcoins. I invested in the dev and solid natural growth. Dark is a clean community, no scams, no fights, solid. Bringing in other groups can change this. SDC is rumoured to be linked to scamming community members and printing DarkCoin is a terrible idea.
thelonecrouton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:43:01 PM
 #67879

As the core idea of the merger was to acquire more developers. Let's start drumming up ideas how we can onboard new talent to the darkcoin team. There needs to be some sort of incentive or clever marketing to weed out some of the good devs



I'll happily donate half my MN earnings to a developer fund if devs are needed, and I think they are. As long as it goes to professional devs hired/contracted who have real names and real experience, not some faceless cryptognat clown.
maxpowerzz92
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 08:43:58 PM
 #67880

its a shame that we as community cant take the time to discuss this properly with more details and more time
now we have talked it over in like 10 minutes and brushed it away.

agree with you...
I still find merging was a brilliant idea...

The balls in the SDC dev team's court now.  Evan said he will no longer pursue it, but they know that the DRK team did consider it.

Pages: « 1 ... 3344 3345 3346 3347 3348 3349 3350 3351 3352 3353 3354 3355 3356 3357 3358 3359 3360 3361 3362 3363 3364 3365 3366 3367 3368 3369 3370 3371 3372 3373 3374 3375 3376 3377 3378 3379 3380 3381 3382 3383 3384 3385 3386 3387 3388 3389 3390 3391 3392 3393 [3394] 3395 3396 3397 3398 3399 3400 3401 3402 3403 3404 3405 3406 3407 3408 3409 3410 3411 3412 3413 3414 3415 3416 3417 3418 3419 3420 3421 3422 3423 3424 3425 3426 3427 3428 3429 3430 3431 3432 3433 3434 3435 3436 3437 3438 3439 3440 3441 3442 3443 3444 ... 7012 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!