azadbitcoin
Member
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
|
|
April 08, 2014, 05:46:42 PM |
|
Hi; problems involved Help Me;;
|
|
|
|
byt411
|
|
April 08, 2014, 06:29:10 PM |
|
Hi; problems involved Help Me;; Antminers can only mine Bitcoin or SHA-256 coins. This is a scrypt pool.
|
|
|
|
edonkey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1150
Merit: 1004
|
|
April 08, 2014, 06:34:30 PM |
|
My guess is that the whale moved to WafflePool, since they're at 30.42 GH/s now. Looks like WafflePool's stats have been steadily improving. Their 10 day average is now better than Clever, although not by that much. Props to suchmoon for his profit comparison: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=514242.0Apparently also a new gnash.io multipool in beta. Competition is a good thing... 4ish horus ago about 10 Gh/s left the pool - anyone know who it was or where it went? That's "the whale" ( sfire on these forums). He has about 10-12 GH of GPUs and Gridseed miners and he jumps around the multipools according to what's trending higher. You usually seem on Clever, Waffle and a few others, but he got his start on Middlecoin.
|
Was I helpful? BTC: 3G1Ubof5u8K9iJkM8We2f3amYZgGVdvpHr
|
|
|
Gazza1
|
|
April 08, 2014, 06:56:46 PM |
|
No multipools should be mining LTC, at all.
And what other coins does this pool mine? Where is the list?
I'm sick of repeating this. Terk will not disclose what coins we mine on CleverMining. Period. Well then I won't be mining here
|
Impossible is a word found only in the dictionary of fools.
|
|
|
Gazza1
|
|
April 08, 2014, 06:58:05 PM |
|
Why mine multicoins if pool barely reaches 100% LTC?
Current results are pathetic.
agreed
|
Impossible is a word found only in the dictionary of fools.
|
|
|
Terk (OP)
|
|
April 08, 2014, 07:29:41 PM |
|
We had some very bad luck with LTC mining today - we found only 70% of number of blocks which we expected to find based on amount of hashrate pointed at LTC. With lower hashrate today than in recent days, variance has more impact. As it always is with variance, our luck will change and we will probably get more than average luck very soon.
Also, I am working today on some changes allowing us for smarter splitting of hashrate, so that we will go back to mining some very small coins which we stopped mining few weeks ago. These small coins were totally unprofitable during this time, but some of them started to be profitable in recent days so it's worth to include them again - we just need to be very careful with amount of hashpower sent their way as they can't handle much. With improved hashrate splitting algorithm which will go live tonight, we will be able to do this and it will boost our profitability a bit. I'm testing it on a dev server and will deploy it to production tonight.
|
|
|
|
JHammer
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
April 08, 2014, 11:36:02 PM |
|
We had some very bad luck with LTC mining today - we found only 70% of number of blocks which we expected to find based on amount of hashrate pointed at LTC. With lower hashrate today than in recent days, variance has more impact. As it always is with variance, our luck will change and we will probably get more than average luck very soon.
Also, I am working today on some changes allowing us for smarter splitting of hashrate, so that we will go back to mining some very small coins which we stopped mining few weeks ago. These small coins were totally unprofitable during this time, but some of them started to be profitable in recent days so it's worth to include them again - we just need to be very careful with amount of hashpower sent their way as they can't handle much. With improved hashrate splitting algorithm which will go live tonight, we will be able to do this and it will boost our profitability a bit. I'm testing it on a dev server and will deploy it to production tonight.
Thank you Terk for the detailed update on whats going on and what your doing.. I know you dont list what coins but I am sure you have looked at Pot Coin...
|
|
|
|
ryancpwalsh
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
April 09, 2014, 12:52:06 AM |
|
We had some very bad luck with LTC mining today - we found only 70% of number of blocks which we expected to find based on amount of hashrate pointed at LTC. With lower hashrate today than in recent days, variance has more impact. As it always is with variance, our luck will change and we will probably get more than average luck very soon.
Also, I am working today on some changes allowing us for smarter splitting of hashrate, so that we will go back to mining some very small coins which we stopped mining few weeks ago. These small coins were totally unprofitable during this time, but some of them started to be profitable in recent days so it's worth to include them again - we just need to be very careful with amount of hashpower sent their way as they can't handle much. With improved hashrate splitting algorithm which will go live tonight, we will be able to do this and it will boost our profitability a bit. I'm testing it on a dev server and will deploy it to production tonight.
Appreciated Terk. This is the way to do it. We had a bad day - and you communicated why head on.
|
|
|
|
jpchrist
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
16Q3R8NAfK63DvkTUGgLdPScyMU8uSAJUH
|
|
April 09, 2014, 01:07:16 AM |
|
We had some very bad luck with LTC mining today - we found only 70% of number of blocks which we expected to find based on amount of hashrate pointed at LTC. With lower hashrate today than in recent days, variance has more impact. As it always is with variance, our luck will change and we will probably get more than average luck very soon.
Also, I am working today on some changes allowing us for smarter splitting of hashrate, so that we will go back to mining some very small coins which we stopped mining few weeks ago. These small coins were totally unprofitable during this time, but some of them started to be profitable in recent days so it's worth to include them again - we just need to be very careful with amount of hashpower sent their way as they can't handle much. With improved hashrate splitting algorithm which will go live tonight, we will be able to do this and it will boost our profitability a bit. I'm testing it on a dev server and will deploy it to production tonight.
If you guys believe that, I have a bridge for sale. Will accept cash or bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
lajz99
|
|
April 09, 2014, 01:08:22 AM |
|
I too mine with Gridseeds (on a rasp pi) and get over 14% rejects on this pool where as I get no rejects on others. If there's any information you need just shoot me a PM and I'd be happy to help.
|
|
|
|
JHammer
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
April 09, 2014, 01:15:39 AM |
|
We had some very bad luck with LTC mining today - we found only 70% of number of blocks which we expected to find based on amount of hashrate pointed at LTC. With lower hashrate today than in recent days, variance has more impact. As it always is with variance, our luck will change and we will probably get more than average luck very soon.
Also, I am working today on some changes allowing us for smarter splitting of hashrate, so that we will go back to mining some very small coins which we stopped mining few weeks ago. These small coins were totally unprofitable during this time, but some of them started to be profitable in recent days so it's worth to include them again - we just need to be very careful with amount of hashpower sent their way as they can't handle much. With improved hashrate splitting algorithm which will go live tonight, we will be able to do this and it will boost our profitability a bit. I'm testing it on a dev server and will deploy it to production tonight.
If you guys believe that, I have a bridge for sale. Will accept cash or bitcoin. And what happened last week when WP did this? ?? Apr 04, 2014 51.36639942 14.70 GH/s 0.00349549 81% Go away TwatTroll
|
|
|
|
jpchrist
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
16Q3R8NAfK63DvkTUGgLdPScyMU8uSAJUH
|
|
April 09, 2014, 01:20:44 AM |
|
We had some very bad luck with LTC mining today - we found only 70% of number of blocks which we expected to find based on amount of hashrate pointed at LTC. With lower hashrate today than in recent days, variance has more impact. As it always is with variance, our luck will change and we will probably get more than average luck very soon.
Also, I am working today on some changes allowing us for smarter splitting of hashrate, so that we will go back to mining some very small coins which we stopped mining few weeks ago. These small coins were totally unprofitable during this time, but some of them started to be profitable in recent days so it's worth to include them again - we just need to be very careful with amount of hashpower sent their way as they can't handle much. With improved hashrate splitting algorithm which will go live tonight, we will be able to do this and it will boost our profitability a bit. I'm testing it on a dev server and will deploy it to production tonight.
If you guys believe that, I have a bridge for sale. Will accept cash or bitcoin. And what happened last week when WP did this? ?? Apr 04, 2014 51.36639942 14.70 GH/s 0.00349549 81% Go away TwatTroll Haha what?!?
|
|
|
|
Buddy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
April 09, 2014, 06:13:41 AM |
|
Any update when API will be released?
|
|
|
|
Xenocyde
|
|
April 09, 2014, 08:05:47 AM |
|
I too mine with Gridseeds (on a rasp pi) and get over 14% rejects on this pool where as I get no rejects on others. If there's any information you need just shoot me a PM and I'd be happy to help.
Guys, Terk specifically said that the REJECTS RATE is much lower than the miner program reports on the upper line and that is caused by a communication issue between the stratum and the miner. Untracked rejects are accounted for by the pool, only JOB NOT FOUND rejects are real rejects and these last ones are around 1-2% max. Somebody needs to put this in the OP and in the FAQs on the pool site so people understand what's going on. Also, Terk said he's working on a new stratum server and this rejects display error won't be featured there.
|
|
|
|
patlaka2000
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
April 09, 2014, 10:24:19 AM |
|
I think that it's high time to introduce scrypt-n and X11 coins to clever mining. These currencies show some good profits. Scrypt only coins start to struggle already.
|
|
|
|
pieran
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
April 09, 2014, 12:00:01 PM |
|
I think that it's high time to introduce scrypt-n and X11 coins to clever mining. These currencies show some good profits. Scrypt only coins start to struggle already.
I like the idea of adding SCRYPT-N and/or X11!
|
|
|
|
Xenocyde
|
|
April 09, 2014, 12:15:11 PM |
|
I support the X11 introduction as well.
|
|
|
|
KSGuy
|
|
April 09, 2014, 12:58:40 PM |
|
scrypt-n would bring me back making .003 per MH isn't paying the bills to keep the miner running
|
|
|
|
byt411
|
|
April 09, 2014, 01:02:11 PM |
|
I think that it's high time to introduce scrypt-n and X11 coins to clever mining. These currencies show some good profits. Scrypt only coins start to struggle already.
I like the idea of adding SCRYPT-N and/or X11! I support the X11 introduction as well.
A lot of people have been saying that. What you must understand, is that you can't simply "add coins" of another algorithm into a scrypt pool. CleverMining would have to have seperate pools: CleverMining Scrypt, CleverMining Scrypt-N, and CleverMining X11. You simply cannot switch between different algorithms using the same miner. If you are mining Scrypt and a X11 coin is the most profitable, CleverMining cannot make your miner switch algorithm. Terk hasn't even properly finished programming the current pool.
|
|
|
|
pieran
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
April 09, 2014, 01:43:19 PM |
|
I think that it's high time to introduce scrypt-n and X11 coins to clever mining. These currencies show some good profits. Scrypt only coins start to struggle already.
I like the idea of adding SCRYPT-N and/or X11! I support the X11 introduction as well.
A lot of people have been saying that. What you must understand, is that you can't simply "add coins" of another algorithm into a scrypt pool. CleverMining would have to have seperate pools: CleverMining Scrypt, CleverMining Scrypt-N, and CleverMining X11. You simply cannot switch between different algorithms using the same miner. If you are mining Scrypt and a X11 coin is the most profitable, CleverMining cannot make your miner switch algorithm. Terk hasn't even properly finished programming the current pool. You are absolutely correct! I have no idea how difficult it is to set up a second pool for lets say SCRYPT-N in parallel to the existing Pool. Maybe the program code for determining the most profitable coin at the moment could be re-used for SCRYPT-N? I kind of like the idea to mine Vertcoin for example and get auto-paid in BTC. As far as I know no pool offers this at the moment.... this would be a unique feature @Terk: I am fairly new to mining (around 1 month) and would like to take the opportunity to say thank you for your pool! I tried a lot pools during the last month but I most enjoy mining here!
|
|
|
|
|