bulanula
|
|
April 18, 2012, 11:05:33 PM |
|
Can anybody help me out here ? I am getting this error on Mac OS X 10.5.8 : Dyld Error Message: Symbol not found: __ZNKSt13bad_exception4whatEv Referenced from: /Applications/Litecoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/Litecoin-Qt Expected in: /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib Also related thread without solution : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55105No. Help yourself =) If you don't have anything constructive to say then please abstain from posting it. I really am banging my head against the wall here ... I googled and there seems to be no solution at all. Where can I try older versions of litecoind for Mac ? I am not even trying to run the GUI just the litecoind headless daemon. Also is there such thing like a bitcoin-mining-proxy but for Litecoin getworks ? Thank you !
|
|
|
|
Cosbycoin
|
|
April 19, 2012, 06:53:32 PM |
|
Can anybody help me out here ? I am getting this error on Mac OS X 10.5.8 : Dyld Error Message: Symbol not found: __ZNKSt13bad_exception4whatEv Referenced from: /Applications/Litecoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/Litecoin-Qt Expected in: /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib Also related thread without solution : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55105No. Help yourself =) If you don't have anything constructive to say then please abstain from posting it. I really am banging my head against the wall here ... I googled and there seems to be no solution at all. Where can I try older versions of litecoind for Mac ? I am not even trying to run the GUI just the litecoind headless daemon. Also is there such thing like a bitcoin-mining-proxy but for Litecoin getworks ? Thank you ! As much as you've trolled this forum I think you need some help on your own bro!
|
|
|
|
EskimoBob
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank
|
|
April 26, 2012, 06:42:10 PM |
|
I pulled today the latest version. Code compiles fine but now I get:
EXCEPTION: NSt8ios_base7failureE CAutoFile::read : end of file litecoin in Runaway exception
I did clean up the ./litecoin directory but I still get the same exception.
|
While reading what I wrote, use the most friendliest and relaxing voice in your head. BTW, Things in BTC bubble universes are getting ugly....
|
|
|
pooler
|
|
April 26, 2012, 09:28:10 PM Last edit: May 21, 2012, 10:08:45 AM by pooler |
|
I pulled today the latest version. Code compiles fine but now I get:
EXCEPTION: NSt8ios_base7failureE CAutoFile::read : end of file litecoin in Runaway exception
I did clean up the ./litecoin directory but I still get the same exception.
I got the same error after upgrading. I even tried clearing the .litecoin folder and re-downloading the blockchain, but kept getting the same error. I had to go back to commit 2170487 and restore the wallet from a backup. Unfortunately I haven't had the time to investigate the issue, but the problem seems to lie in one of the April 24/25 commits. EDIT: ali1234 fixed this bug today in commit dda31c7. It should now be safe to use the latest version from the GitHub repository. Note that if you have run the buggy code you will have to redownload the blockchain.
|
BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
|
|
|
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064
Bitcoin is antisemitic
|
|
May 01, 2012, 07:10:35 AM |
|
Hi, I found an old litecoin wallet of mine and trying to use it. The problem is that I see that is loaded with about 100 ltc, but all transactions are unconfirmed. I tried to delete everything but the wallet in the roaming folder and downloaded the blockchain again, but the balance and transactions remain with zero confirmations, so I cannot use it. Any idea?
|
|
|
|
Tachikoma
|
|
May 01, 2012, 09:24:14 AM |
|
So I started mining some litecoins to test it out yesterday and used a pool to get started. The pool send 30LC to my specified address but somehow the transactions are not showing up in my client (while the chain is synchronized). This is the address in question. Does anybody have any idea why my client won't register it? EditAnd of course a minute after I create a post the transactions somehow come in. Nevermind!
|
|
|
|
pooler
|
|
May 01, 2012, 10:17:45 AM |
|
The pool send 30LC to my specified address but somehow the transactions are not showing up in my client (while the chain is synchronized). [...] EditAnd of course a minute after I create a post the transactions somehow come in. Nevermind! The reason for the delay is that it can take a few minutes before a transaction is included in a block (i.e. before the transaction gets 1 confirmation).
|
BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
|
|
|
Tachikoma
|
|
May 01, 2012, 10:39:59 AM |
|
The pool send 30LC to my specified address but somehow the transactions are not showing up in my client (while the chain is synchronized). [...] EditAnd of course a minute after I create a post the transactions somehow come in. Nevermind! The reason for the delay is that it can take a few minutes before a transaction is included in a block (i.e. before the transaction gets 1 confirmation). Good suggestion, however the first transaction was send 8 hours ago at the time of my post, that should have been long enough to get one confirmation
|
|
|
|
Scott J
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 01, 2012, 12:02:27 PM |
|
I'm struggling to see any downsides to Litecoin when compared to Bitcoin.
The extra coins I see as a positive, as it allows more people to get involved.
The faster block speed is a great advantage IMO.
I guess my question is, what makes Bitcoin better than Litecoin other than being the first of the two to get acceptance?
|
|
|
|
Gavin Andresen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 2300
Chief Scientist
|
|
May 01, 2012, 01:02:41 PM |
|
I guess my question is, what makes Bitcoin better than Litecoin other than being the first of the two to get acceptance?
Network effect. More developers are working on Bitcoin, there are more interesting projects, more useful tools, more documentation at places like bitcoin.stackexchange.com, etc. And that all builds on itself.
|
How often do you get the chance to work on a potentially world-changing project?
|
|
|
Etlase2
|
|
May 01, 2012, 01:43:28 PM |
|
I'm struggling to see any downsides to Litecoin when compared to Bitcoin.
The extra coins I see as a positive, as it allows more people to get involved.
The faster block speed is a great advantage IMO. 4x the coins doesn't allow more people to get involved, it allows people to have 4x the coins. The faster block speed isn't any real advantage, you just have to wait for 4x the confirmations. Two and a half minutes is still way too long for a POS transaction. I guess my question is, what makes Bitcoin better than Litecoin other than being the first of the two to get acceptance?
I suppose that Litecoin changed virtually nothing of import from Bitcoin and expected something to happen.
|
|
|
|
tacotime
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005
|
|
May 01, 2012, 03:12:46 PM |
|
the number of confirmations is the same as for bitcoin.
|
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
|
|
|
Etlase2
|
|
May 01, 2012, 06:31:06 PM |
|
The number of confirmations to accept a transaction is up to the user. Assuming an identical hashrate, it would take 24 confirmations in litecoin to equal 6 confirmations in bitcoin. And one confirmation in litecoin is 4 times easier to reverse than one confirmation in bitcoin. There is no advantage here.
|
|
|
|
Scott J
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 01, 2012, 06:33:59 PM |
|
Thanks for clearing that up - I thought the Bitcoin/Litecoin confirmations were just as strong.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
May 01, 2012, 07:05:50 PM |
|
The number of confirmations to accept a transaction is up to the user. Assuming an identical hashrate, it would take 24 confirmations in litecoin to equal 6 confirmations in bitcoin. And one confirmation in litecoin is 4 times easier to reverse than one confirmation in bitcoin. There is no advantage here.
Have a read - some of the later comments about confirms etc. may help enlighten you https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51504.0
|
|
|
|
Etlase2
|
|
May 01, 2012, 07:39:08 PM |
|
There is no advantage here. Most transactions in the block-chain are small and having to wait for an hour or more for a small transaction to be accepted is definitely one of the issues that makes wider adoption of Bitcoin difficult. How does waiting 10 minutes vs. an hour make any difference to a small transaction? Are you going to sit around waiting at McDonald's for 10 minutes before they let you have your food? No. This can be solved outside of the protocol, and has already been. You assume your conclusion is true without any evidence ("begging the question"). However, it WILL reduce variance. So will 30 second blocks. Reality: online bitcoin transaction are too slow. Reality Opinion
|
|
|
|
Cosbycoin
|
|
May 01, 2012, 08:24:43 PM |
|
The number of confirmations to accept a transaction is up to the user. Assuming an identical hashrate, it would take 24 confirmations in litecoin to equal 6 confirmations in bitcoin. And one confirmation in litecoin is 4 times easier to reverse than one confirmation in bitcoin. There is no advantage here.
This all depends upon the current total network hash rate. I believe this is true given how young litecoin is in comparison to bitcoin. =) gotta start somewhere!
|
|
|
|
Etlase2
|
|
May 01, 2012, 08:33:33 PM |
|
That's why I said "assuming an identical hashrate"... It is true if the hash rates are (qualitatively) identical. As it is now, you probably need 100+ confirmations in litecoin to equal 6 bitcoin confirmations. Possibly way more, I don't know.
|
|
|
|
Cosbycoin
|
|
May 01, 2012, 08:35:24 PM |
|
That's why I said "assuming an identical hashrate"... It is true if the hash rates are (qualitatively) identical. As it is now, you probably need 100+ confirmations in litecoin to equal 6 bitcoin confirmations. Possibly way more, I don't know.
Yup and each litecoin is worth about 1200 times less than bitcoin. So I'd say based on those ratios it is secure for its tiny market value in comparison to BITCOIN
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
May 01, 2012, 08:55:16 PM |
|
There is no advantage here. Most transactions in the block-chain are small and having to wait for an hour or more for a small transaction to be accepted is definitely one of the issues that makes wider adoption of Bitcoin difficult. How does waiting 10 minutes vs. an hour make any difference to a small transaction? Are you going to sit around waiting at McDonald's for 10 minutes before they let you have your food? No. This can be solved outside of the protocol, and has already been. You assume your conclusion is true without any evidence ("begging the question"). Well, if you had bothered to read "later comments about confirms" ... However, it WILL reduce variance. So will 30 second blocks. Again - read the thread - it's all discussed there - the first post is how I started it ... The aim was to enlighten you on what you clearly missed with your comments, I'm not gonna spoon feeding that thread to you. Reality: online bitcoin transaction are too slow. Reality OpinionWhatever
|
|
|
|
|