os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
October 31, 2011, 05:51:49 PM |
|
Any chance of having the 'Private 26th row' return to the Hall of Fame, for those of us who want to still see how we measure up, even if we do not make the 'Public' Top 25 ?
And where do those User ID numbers come from? I can't find any reference/correlation between my user name and what my User ID may be. Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
bitlane
Internet detective
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
I heart thebaron
|
|
October 31, 2011, 06:50:34 PM |
|
Any chance of having the 'Private 26th row' return to the Hall of Fame, for those of us who want to still see how we measure up, even if we do not make the 'Public' Top 25 ?
And where do those User ID numbers come from? I can't find any reference/correlation between my user name and what my User ID may be. Sam They used to be highlighted in light yellow (on my crappy monitor anyways....lol). I used to have a user-specific 26th row, because I wasn't fast enough or share count high enough to be top 25. When I was top-25 (beta-PPS), my user ID# rows were still highlighted in light yellow. This should tell you what your user# is Also, the API link will tell you what your current user ID is.....the first part of the first line, mine looking like: {"user":{"user_id":xxxx https://www.btcguild.com/api.php?api_key= {your API key value} Hope that helps, Allan
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
October 31, 2011, 07:30:33 PM |
|
Any chance of having the 'Private 26th row' return to the Hall of Fame, for those of us who want to still see how we measure up, even if we do not make the 'Public' Top 25 ?
And where do those User ID numbers come from? I can't find any reference/correlation between my user name and what my User ID may be. Sam They used to be highlighted in light yellow (on my crappy monitor anyways....lol). I used to have a user-specific 26th row, because I wasn't fast enough or share count high enough to be top 25. When I was top-25 (beta-PPS), my user ID# rows were still highlighted in light yellow. This should tell you what your user# is Also, the API link will tell you what your current user ID is.....the first part of the first line, mine looking like: {"user":{"user_id":xxxx https://www.btcguild.com/api.php?api_key= {your API key value} Hope that helps, Allan Yep, found it. I looked for it yesterday and missed, don't know how. Thanks, Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
October 31, 2011, 07:36:45 PM |
|
Any chance of having the 'Private 26th row' return to the Hall of Fame, for those of us who want to still see how we measure up, even if we do not make the 'Public' Top 25 ?
I'll look into a fix this. It used to show your actual rank at the bottom if you weren't in the top 25. Looks like that broke with the Hall of Fame caching every 5 minutes to avoid re-calculating it everytime it was viewed.
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
November 01, 2011, 02:47:06 PM |
|
The graphs have been fixed and are a bit more fault tolerant if you have miners that turn on/off. It's been changed back to 1 hour intervals for speed averages.
24 Hour rewards will be shown on the My Account page later today, now that the extra logging has had a chance to run for a full day.
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
November 01, 2011, 09:48:03 PM |
|
Fixed a bug in the API: The current difficulty/PPS rate in the API was not properly updated when the difficulty switched (it was using the highest difficulty rather than the most recent difficulty). Also fixed the API to not include commas in the hash rates.
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
bitlane
Internet detective
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
I heart thebaron
|
|
November 01, 2011, 09:58:25 PM |
|
24 Hour rewards will be shown on the My Account page later today, now that the extra logging has had a chance to run for a full day.
Is it possible that there may be a problem with the 24hr Rewards reporting by chance ? I was actually manually monitoring for 24hrs as part of my share/hr testing and I actually made more than what the 24hr Reward was showing. All BTC/Pay was there in the rest of the stats, but the 24hr was reading a bit low, ~4-5% at the time ? Not a big deal though. Also, with the recent batch of repairs, is there still a chance that the Hall of Fame's 'private' 26th row will be reimplimented for those of us that don't officially make the Top 25 ? .....along with account ID# highlighting ?
|
|
|
|
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
November 01, 2011, 10:02:38 PM |
|
24 Hour rewards will be shown on the My Account page later today, now that the extra logging has had a chance to run for a full day.
Is it possible that there may be a problem with the 24hr Rewards reporting by chance ? I was actually manually monitoring for 24hrs as part of my share/hr testing and I actually made more than what the 24hr Reward was showing. All BTC/Pay was there in the rest of the stats, but the 24hr was reading a bit low, ~4-5% at the time ? Not a big deal though. Also, with the recent batch of repairs, is there still a chance that the Hall of Fame's 'private' 26th row will be reimplimented for those of us that don't officially make the Top 25 ? .....along with account ID# highlighting ? 24 hour stat is a slight estimate and also lags behind by 1 hour. ~4-5% is not an unexpected amount of variance. If you look at your performance graphs, you'll see that your miners effective speed varies up/down hour by hour. This can have a net positive or net negative trend in a 24 hour period, the same way that a proportional pool has variances in luck. The difference in personal miners is the number of trials they're running (shares), meaning they tend to average much closer to the "perfect 0" in a 24 hour period. I'll be re-adding the extra row to show your rank if you're not in the top 25, but it will probably not be until Friday.
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
bitlane
Internet detective
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
I heart thebaron
|
|
November 01, 2011, 10:09:38 PM |
|
24 hour stat is a slight estimate and also lags behind by 1 hour. ~4-5% is not an unexpected amount of variance. If you look at your performance graphs, you'll see that your miners effective speed varies up/down hour by hour. This can have a net positive or net negative trend in a 24 hour period, the same way that a proportional pool has variances in luck. The difference in personal miners is the number of trials they're running (shares), meaning they tend to average much closer to the "perfect 0" in a 24 hour period.
I figured it might have something to do with the new reporting graphs, or the previous API error. Either way, it's all good. The stats are all perfect. I'll be re-adding the extra row to show your rank if you're not in the top 25, but it will probably not be until Friday.
Awesome. As petty, or minor as it is, it's nice to see how one measures up against the 'Big Boys'....LOL Thanks again. The new Pool/Reporting/Features are all worth the wait. Allan
|
|
|
|
freakfantom
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 0
|
|
November 02, 2011, 07:43:41 AM |
|
Do you have plans to implement merged mining?
|
|
|
|
bulanula
|
|
November 02, 2011, 10:37:50 AM |
|
Do you have plans to implement merged mining?
Now that profit is extremely low and NMC price falling to 0.01 BTC I ask you this "What is the point, considering it is such a pain and may impact on BTC mining ?"
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
November 02, 2011, 01:38:36 PM |
|
24 Hour rewards will be shown on the My Account page later today, now that the extra logging has had a chance to run for a full day.
My 24 hour rewards haven't updated in the last 24 hours. Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
November 02, 2011, 01:51:30 PM |
|
24 Hour rewards will be shown on the My Account page later today, now that the extra logging has had a chance to run for a full day.
My 24 hour rewards haven't updated in the last 24 hours. Sam Should be fixed now, was sorting the log records from earliest to latest instead of latest to earlier when calculating your shares in the last 24 hours.
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
November 02, 2011, 02:09:46 PM |
|
24 Hour rewards will be shown on the My Account page later today, now that the extra logging has had a chance to run for a full day.
My 24 hour rewards haven't updated in the last 24 hours. Sam Should be fixed now, was sorting the log records from earliest to latest instead of latest to earlier when calculating your shares in the last 24 hours. Yep, it changed. I'll check it again in about an hour. Thanks, Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
dmcurser
|
|
November 02, 2011, 04:18:38 PM |
|
Need some help lol I just got a new 5970 so now I have two 6970 and one 5970 and it seems no matter what I try I always seems to have one miner get a connection. Error and I have no idea why just wondering if anyone else is having this issue
|
1Q7TPBHHVmGCvqffYHpXCCBgbcBQ4NwXdW
|
|
|
bitlane
Internet detective
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
I heart thebaron
|
|
November 02, 2011, 07:27:43 PM |
|
Need some help lol I just got a new 5970 so now I have two 6970 and one 5970 and it seems no matter what I try I always seems to have one miner get a connection. Error and I have no idea why just wondering if anyone else is having this issue
All in the same system ? What power supply ? what mining software ? What Operating System ? Extender Cables (powered or not) ? Too many variables....please share more info.
|
|
|
|
dmcurser
|
|
November 02, 2011, 08:40:47 PM |
|
hmm let start yes same system 1100 watt power supply gui miner extender cables not powered tho and its not like its the same miner its just a random one it will get a connection issuse and if i reset it it will work fine for however lone or if i leave it alone it will randomly connect again when it feels like it some=times it can be 15 min or sometimes 3 hours or more
|
1Q7TPBHHVmGCvqffYHpXCCBgbcBQ4NwXdW
|
|
|
bitlane
Internet detective
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
I heart thebaron
|
|
November 02, 2011, 09:42:50 PM |
|
........1100 watt power supply........tho and its not like its the same miner its just a random one it will get a connection issuse and if i reset it it will work fine for however lone or if i leave it alone it will randomly connect again when it feels like it some=times it can be 15 min or sometimes 3 hours or more
At start up, perhaps the last card to get full power suffers ......a weak power supply ? yet if they all connect, fluctuating power might affect a single card later on after the start..... What kind of Power Supply ? Definately smells like a power problem to me, as I had a similar issue
|
|
|
|
dmcurser
|
|
November 02, 2011, 09:57:17 PM |
|
It's a rooswell and its brand new lol I also hooked up my 850 watt on just to the 5970 and still same issue the
|
1Q7TPBHHVmGCvqffYHpXCCBgbcBQ4NwXdW
|
|
|
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
November 02, 2011, 10:51:45 PM |
|
Update: Performance charts now scale based on the amount of history available.
1-24 hours = 1 hour intervals 25-48 hours = 2 hour intervals 49-72 hours = 3 hour intervals 73+ hours = 4 hour intervals
This keeps the charts from becoming too cluttered with data points, and smooths the overall graphs out by providing speed estimates in larger intervals. I'll come in later this weekend and create an option to show the full detail graphs (1-hour intervals) for those would prefer more accuracy at the cost of less responsive graphs (fluid javascript charts for hundreds of datapoints do tend to respond a bit slowly).
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
|