Everyone seems to expect some long storyline already written out about this event. I don't have this, nor does anyone else. Every theory can have holes punched through it right now due to lack of *physical* evidence.
Even with a electrical fire theory, I am not sure how the plane made a 2nd turn during this mechanical fire to start heading into the ocean... maybe programmed?... but I am also not sure why the plane didn't burn up and crash much sooner then 6+ hours of flight. Looking at past incidents with commercial aircraft, almost everyone I looked at that involved a fire ended up crashing shortly after takeoff.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accidents_and_incidents_involving_commercial_aircraftSure, it's a simple solution and easy to accept if your a sheep, but it doesn't make any sense to me that a plane with this type of fire could have flown for that long into the ocean without burning up or crashing sooner. This fire would have been so vicious that it would have had to engulf the other 12 staff members (to stop them from notifying the pilot to any signs of a fire, smoke, etc.) AND would have had to take out multiple communication systems. ALL of this before the pilots even realized it was going on and didn't have time to send a distress call before the communication systems failed, and just turned the plane out of a reaction. A matter of minutes?
Sounds like a pretty extreme fire... again, I wouldn't rule this out, because there is still a chance that somehow this fire did all of this, and the pilot was climbing to 45,000 feet to try and extinguish the fire (remove oxygen), but ultimately died and the plane managed to keep flying for that long. But I don't see this as any more plausible then some of the other theories out there. Some are definitely *out there*, but most of the stories typically point out pieces of evidence or facts that have inconsistencies, don't make sense, or make you question it.
It confuses me when I see a report from the Maldive islands on 3/18 stating things like "several" eyewitness (wish I knew how many) visually spotted a white aircraft with red stripes across it flying very low.
"I've never seen a jet flying so low over our island before. We've seen seaplanes, but I'm sure that this was not one of those. I could even make out the doors on the plane clearly,"
"It's not just me either, several other residents have reported seeing the exact same thing. Some people got out of their houses to see what was causing the tremendous noise too.
http://www.haveeru.com.mv/news/54062Malaysian officials response:
“Regarding reports that a plane was sighted in the Maldives, I can confirm Malaysia’s chief of the defense force has contacted his counterparts in the Maldives who has confirmed that these reports are not true,”
Then I see the 'explanation' as to why this was a 'false alarm' as being "nothing was present on military radar" as being the 'evidence'. Oh really? Well if it wasn't on radar, those residents must be coo coo for cocoa puffs. Must be the seclusion of island life?... they just want to talk to someone? Why would these residents lie??
They didn't even include Maldives as a country in the search, even after eyewitness reports... all dismissed based on "it wasn't seen on radar"?
As a theory, Diego Garcia could be a destination. It could also provide them the easy capability of dismantling parts of the craft and dropping it off their waters, and allowing the current to just pull debris over to the current search area to naturally find 'parts of the craft'. Still won't be easy finding it. Maybe a destination for an attack? maybe the plane was ultimately shot down in that area.
Oddly enough, the Maldives seem to be the only country capable of providing potential aircraft debris from their shores which appears to be a fire suppression bottle from an aircraft and looks similar to the one used in a boeing 777 (at least, it looks similar to me... but I do not build airplanes... going off of what I am seeing on google images), although, found on the north side of their island... whereas I might expect it on the south side... if debris was "planted".
http://www.maldivesfinest.com/mh370-evidence... can't wait to see where this goes.
You know, some actual evidence. It's very rare that governments get away with cover ups, especially on this scale, but people just like to assume everything is one. What exactly do the Malaysian government (or whoever you think is behind this) have to gain or lose from covering it up?
I really don't KNOW why anyone would take this plane... I could draw up numerous theories about every country and could pull all kinds of stories out of my ass about why a particular country or group would want to steal a plane, but I don't like doing that.
I, too, need more evidence. I am just seeing a lot of inconsistencies in the story everywhere, which raises red flags with me and a possible cover-up.
There just isn't enough questioning by people and a lot of people are just accepting what they are told, as they always do.
Damn Humans!
EDIT: Holy long posts Batman!
