actmyname
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
|
|
July 30, 2019, 05:38:57 PM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
Let's not forget, CSW explicitly claims to be a lawyer, while Satoshi explicitly asserted, "I am not a lawyer".
But I'm sure Craig has an excuse for that, too. "I said that in order to obfuscate my identity. I wanted to remain anonymous while I was under the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto." probably something like that, eh?
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3864
Merit: 10932
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
July 30, 2019, 05:50:30 PM |
|
However for someone who claims to be a lawyer you would expect more careful use of language.
Let's not forget, CSW explicitly claims to be a lawyer, while Satoshi explicitly asserted, "I am not a lawyer". But I'm sure Craig has an excuse for that, too. Craigs a person who knows about all things, but when you actually see the vast majority of things that he says, the full-of-shitness tends to emanate, especially the longer that he talks.
|
1) Self-Custody is a right. There is no such thing as "non-custodial" or "un-hosted." 2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized. 3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
|
|
|
Iamtutut
|
|
July 31, 2019, 10:35:26 AM |
|
However for someone who claims to be a lawyer you would expect more careful use of language.
Let's not forget, CSW explicitly claims to be a lawyer, while Satoshi explicitly asserted, "I am not a lawyer". But I'm sure Craig has an excuse for that, too. He has copyright Common Law.
|
|
|
|
nutildah (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 8492
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
|
July 31, 2019, 11:57:05 AM |
|
I really hope, You do not have a degree in math and logic. If you state something false or nonsense, You have to counter with FACTS and arguments that make sense. The fact You dislike the claim, does not mean it is false.
It is clear to me, some like You, do prefer to do politics, public relation to undermine my work or promote their own vision.
You state there are grammatical errors in the tweets @realsatoshin. But You do not quote them. There are a lot of tweets in that account. As there are at moments typo.
Hey, thanks for joining us. I can perfectly understand that perhaps the white paper was professionally edited and proofread by a native English speaker, but its highly doubtful that every single post on this forum and email he ever sent was as well. Even non-public emails sent to the likes of Gavin Andresen contain perfect or near-perfect English. Satoshi never capitalized "you" unless it was the first word in a sentence. He also put 2 spaces in between his sentences: That means a lot coming from you, Hal. Thanks.
I just pulled up this post as an example, his English is flawless, not one error or anything potentially confusing about it: Piling every proof-of-work quorum system in the world into one dataset doesn't scale.
Bitcoin and BitDNS can be used separately. Users shouldn't have to download all of both to use one or the other. BitDNS users may not want to download everything the next several unrelated networks decide to pile in either.
The networks need to have separate fates. BitDNS users might be completely liberal about adding any large data features since relatively few domain registrars are needed, while Bitcoin users might get increasingly tyrannical about limiting the size of the chain so it's easy for lots of users and small devices.
Fears about securely buying domains with Bitcoins are a red herring. It's easy to trade Bitcoins for other non-repudiable commodities.
If you're still worried about it, it's cryptographically possible to make a risk free trade. The two parties would set up transactions on both sides such that when they both sign the transactions, the second signer's signature triggers the release of both. The second signer can't release one without releasing the other.
I don't have to point out all of your errors because they are consistent, speak for themselves, and can be independently verified by anybody. Having said all that, at least we are in agreement that CSW is not Satoshi. And by the way, you have magnificent hair. I have to admit I'm a bit jealous.
|
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
|
July 31, 2019, 12:51:22 PM |
|
However for someone who claims to be a lawyer you would expect more careful use of language.
Let's not forget, CSW explicitly claims to be a lawyer, while Satoshi explicitly asserted, "I am not a lawyer". But I'm sure Craig has an excuse for that, too.CSW: Through the advise of David Kleiman, I sometimes had/have to obfuscate who I was, is, and am going to be.
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014
Welt Am Draht
|
|
July 31, 2019, 02:37:19 PM |
|
https://decrypt.co/8155/8155One of his other many cases has been given the boot by a UK court. This one's because Roger Ver called him a fraud. I like this passage - 'Wright had failed to provide sufficient evidence of “the global reputation he enjoys and, more particularly, the extent to which it has been damaged. There is no other evidence as to the extent of the Claimant’s reputation in the UK (or elsewhere),”
|
|
|
|
Iamtutut
|
https://decrypt.co/8155/8155One of his other many cases has been given the boot by a UK court. This one's because Roger Ver called him a fraud. I like this passage - 'Wright had failed to provide sufficient evidence of “the global reputation he enjoys and, more particularly, the extent to which it has been damaged. There is no other evidence as to the extent of the Claimant’s reputation in the UK (or elsewhere),” House of cards falling apart. I just twitted your link to Mc Cormack, he liked it.
|
|
|
|
nutildah (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 8492
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
|
August 01, 2019, 05:51:15 AM Last edit: August 02, 2019, 05:23:38 AM by nutildah |
|
https://decrypt.co/8155/8155One of his other many cases has been given the boot by a UK court. This one's because Roger Ver called him a fraud. I like this passage - 'Wright had failed to provide sufficient evidence of “the global reputation he enjoys and, more particularly, the extent to which it has been damaged. There is no other evidence as to the extent of the Claimant’s reputation in the UK (or elsewhere),” In court documents Wright said: Moreover, no one would reasonably enter into business dealings with someone thought to be a fraud. ... which makes me wonder why anybody would buy BSV; perhaps those who do are simply "unreasonable."
|
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
|
August 01, 2019, 02:27:42 PM |
|
https://decrypt.co/8155/8155One of his other many cases has been given the boot by a UK court. This one's because Roger Ver called him a fraud. I like this passage - 'Wright had failed to provide sufficient evidence of “the global reputation he enjoys and, more particularly, the extent to which it has been damaged. There is no other evidence as to the extent of the Claimant’s reputation in the UK (or elsewhere),” In court documents Wright said: Moreover, no one would reasonably enter into business dealings with someone thought to be a fraud. ... which makes me wonder why anybody would buy BSV; perhaps those who do are simple "unreasonable." "Reason dictates that a fork of a fork is the true Bitcoin. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to patent my wheel invention cuz it goes 'round and 'round on the short bus I take to CoinGeek conventions." Full disclosure: Nobody's the wiser that I edited the above quote five times due to simple grammatical errors, perhaps occurring cuz my first cup of covfefe hadn't kicked in yet or I'm a fuckin idiot on Thursday mornings. Edit: hasn't is now hadn't. Edit: Tuesday is now penned on Thursday. Checking for proper usages of comas now.
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 5379
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
|
August 01, 2019, 05:32:21 PM |
|
Oh fuck, this one killed me! https://decrypt.co/8155/8155One of his other many cases has been given the boot by a UK court. This one's because Roger Ver called him a fraud. I like this passage - 'Wright had failed to provide sufficient evidence of “the global reputation he enjoys and, more particularly, the extent to which it has been damaged. There is no other evidence as to the extent of the Claimant’s reputation in the UK (or elsewhere),” I especially liked this Speaking to Decrypt, Ver hailed victory. “[Wright] had to pay me £60,000 ($73,000) for the legal fees too,” he said. .
|
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
|
|
|
TheNewAnon135246
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1989
฿uy ฿itcoin
|
|
August 01, 2019, 07:07:18 PM |
|
I especially liked this Speaking to Decrypt, Ver hailed victory. “[Wright] had to pay me £60,000 ($73,000) for the legal fees too,” he said. . Welcome to law. I assume the cases against Hodlonaut and Peter McCormack will end the same way.
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014
Welt Am Draht
|
|
August 01, 2019, 07:09:46 PM |
|
I especially liked this Speaking to Decrypt, Ver hailed victory. “[Wright] had to pay me £60,000 ($73,000) for the legal fees too,” he said. . I'm amazed Craigy has $730 to his name. I presume tonight he'll have to polish Calvin's Austin Allegro with extra vigour and mow his lawn with them nice stripes this weekend. Welcome to law.
I assume the cases against Hodlonaut and Peter McCormack will end the same way.
Are they basically of the same premise to this case?
|
|
|
|
TheNewAnon135246
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1989
฿uy ฿itcoin
|
|
August 01, 2019, 07:22:28 PM |
|
I especially liked this Speaking to Decrypt, Ver hailed victory. “[Wright] had to pay me £60,000 ($73,000) for the legal fees too,” he said. . I'm amazed Craigy has $730 to his name. I presume tonight he'll have to polish Calvin's Austin Allegro with extra vigour and mow his lawn with them nice stripes this weekend. Welcome to law.
I assume the cases against Hodlonaut and Peter McCormack will end the same way.
Are they basically of the same premise to this case? Yeah, similar cases. Hodlonaut isn't located in the UK, Peter McCormack is.
|
|
|
|
Iamtutut
|
|
August 01, 2019, 08:33:42 PM Last edit: August 01, 2019, 08:53:21 PM by Iamtutut |
|
I especially liked this Speaking to Decrypt, Ver hailed victory. “[Wright] had to pay me £60,000 ($73,000) for the legal fees too,” he said. . I'm amazed Craigy has $730 to his name. I presume tonight he'll have to polish Calvin's Austin Allegro with extra vigour and mow his lawn with them nice stripes this weekend. Welcome to law.
I assume the cases against Hodlonaut and Peter McCormack will end the same way.
Are they basically of the same premise to this case? Yeah, similar cases. Hodlonaut isn't located in the UK, Peter McCormack is. He has no reputation to sustain in his residence country (according to what he said this time because in his BS copyright claim he's a resident in NY), so he has even less reputation to be damaged elsewhere. He's a clown, only he doesn't know it.
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 5379
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
|
August 01, 2019, 08:48:24 PM |
|
I especially liked this Speaking to Decrypt, Ver hailed victory. “[Wright] had to pay me £60,000 ($73,000) for the legal fees too,” he said. . I'm amazed Craigy has $730 to his name. I presume tonight he'll have to polish Calvin's Austin Allegro with extra vigour and mow his lawn with them nice stripes this weekend. Welcome to law.
I assume the cases against Hodlonaut and Peter McCormack will end the same way.
Are they basically of the same premise to this case? Yeah, similar cases. Hodlonaut isn't located in the UK, Peter McCormack is. So Peter McCormack can use this as precedent and the no harm to rep should stand up for Hodlonaut as CSW cannot prove he has any rep worthy of defense.
|
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
|
|
|
BitcoinNewsMagazine
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1164
|
|
August 02, 2019, 09:41:39 PM |
|
Arthur van Pelt (@MyLegacyKit) posts today that CSW claims to be able and plans to crash BCH and BTC in 2021:
|
|
|
|
tippytoes
|
|
August 02, 2019, 09:44:57 PM |
|
I especially liked this Speaking to Decrypt, Ver hailed victory. “[Wright] had to pay me £60,000 ($73,000) for the legal fees too,” he said. . I'm amazed Craigy has $730 to his name. I presume tonight he'll have to polish Calvin's Austin Allegro with extra vigour and mow his lawn with them nice stripes this weekend. Welcome to law.
I assume the cases against Hodlonaut and Peter McCormack will end the same way.
Are they basically of the same premise to this case? Yeah, similar cases. Hodlonaut isn't located in the UK, Peter McCormack is. He has no reputation to sustain in his residence country (according to what he said this time because in his BS copyright claim he's a resident in NY), so he has even less reputation to be damaged elsewhere. He's a clown, only he doesn't know it. Or maybe he knows it but pretend not knowing it for the sake of publicity. He is like banking on his media's presence to get value for this coin but in reality, there's nothing in it. I wonder how long naive people will support this project.
|
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
|
August 03, 2019, 04:45:29 PM |
|
This fucker needs to exit the gene pool before his wife, Ramona Watts, starts getting ideas in her head that she wants to hear the pitter-patter of little Satoshis around her home.
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014
Welt Am Draht
|
|
August 03, 2019, 05:23:08 PM |
|
This fucker needs to exit the gene pool before his wife, Ramona Watts, starts getting ideas in her head that she wants to hear the pitter-patter of little Satoshis around her home.
I am truly staggered that anyone would want to let him line their uterus with his filthy, teeming sperm let alone get hitched in a legally binding manner. Just goes to show there's someone for everyone, even him. In other news his wee hobby appears to be forking in all sorts of directions - https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1157684825572151298A 210mb block messed with those non $20,000 nodes.
|
|
|
|
TheNewAnon135246
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1989
฿uy ฿itcoin
|
|
August 03, 2019, 07:59:29 PM |
|
Arthur van Pelt (@MyLegacyKit) posts today that CSW claims to be able and plans to crash BCH and BTC in 2021: Craig Wright truely is a fucking idiot.
|
|
|
|
|