Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘

[aysg76]

I would rather play in Casino that requires KYC but highly recommended and Legit than sites that does not ask for KYC but may have a chance of being scam.

If you don't want to be anonymous then KYC is fine and but choosing a legit casino is the main point because you needs to deposit funds and withdraw them and there are tons of scam project running and finding victims so be sure to choose the legit casino's only.Above them if you are small gambler you could comply with KYC level 1 which is not too much risky as no indentity proof or bank details are being given and you can compromise on them.But play on good ones.

[Furious 7]

I would rather play in Casino that requires KYC but highly recommended and Legit than sites that does not ask for KYC but may have a chance of being scam.

If you don't want to be anonymous then KYC is fine and but choosing a legit casino is the main point because you needs to deposit funds and withdraw them and there are tons of scam project running and finding victims so be sure to choose the legit casino's only.Above them if you are small gambler you could comply with KYC level 1 which is not too much risky as no indentity proof or bank details are being given and you can compromise on them.But play on good ones.

Some, of course, there are those who want to remain anonymous in gambling even when they feel they are required to do KYC, there are indeed some who charge but I'm honest only at roobet who do KYC level 1 of all platforms that ask for KYC I never do it because roobet has been tested by just so I don't hesitate in this matter when I provide data, my heart is still comfortable and doesn't feel worried.

[Stalker22]

Yes, I think it's good that gamblers have a choice and can choose the casino that meets their needs.
As a KYC casino, Roobet complies with all laws and regulations, and that's okay. On the other hand, there are casinos on the market that don't ask for KYC at all, and that is also fine. However, I don't like the allusions some members have made that they would rather pick a casino that requires KYC than one that does not and could be a scam. It's important to remember that Roobet gained its reputation long before KYC became mandatory, so one should not be confused with the other. KYC has nothing to do with the legitimacy of a casino, since there may be casinos that ask for personal information and scam people, as well as there may be legitimate casinos that don't ask for it.

The main reason I enjoy playing at Roobet is that it's been proven to be a good casino, but I first became a fan of it because it offered players anonymity back in the day. For me, the introduction of the mandatory KYC was a bump on the road that I simply had to cross to continue using the platform. Fortunately, the Level 1 KYC only requires basic personal data.

[DoublerHunter]

There is a benefit on us for those who choose gambling sites that required KYC, We are safe from hackers and fraud users, they also afraid to join a casino the heavily required KYC for some reason.

What the heck are you talking about? Providing your KYC implies that your information could get leaked online of hackers manage to hack the site in question successfully.

This means that your information isn't safe at all. Roobet's security is top-class, but this doesn't imply that it's impossible for it to get hacked. Way bigger sites like Binance(Top-class security) etc got hacked in the past.

^ Is that not clear of what I am talking about? Your opinion is yours and my opinion is mine, if you don't like KYC that is your problem. Everything online could be leaked and compromised even your social media, don't tell me you don't have social media account which contains more information. I know that every one of us really hates KYC, but this is the fact and there is nothing we can do or else find another gambling site that dont impose KYC verification and as I said, we had different opinions and I dont care about yours.

[RapTarX]

Some, of course, there are those who want to remain anonymous in gambling

When it comes to gambling with cryptocurrency, the number gets increased significantly from "some" only. Most people gambling with cryptocurrency would barely be interested gambling with KYC. Besides, gambler like me who has never taken it as addiction would never be bothered to play in a KYC required house. I guess mandatory KYC is a loss for the house. They will lose some good amount of gamblers.

[aysg76]

Some, of course, there are those who want to remain anonymous in gambling

When it comes to gambling with cryptocurrency, the number gets increased significantly from "some" only. Most people gambling with cryptocurrency would barely be interested gambling with KYC. Besides, gambler like me who has never taken it as addiction would never be bothered to play in a KYC required house. I guess mandatory KYC is a loss for the house. They will lose some good amount of gamblers.

Yes they can surely lose those gamblers who completely wants to remain anonymous and the casino don't allow it and needs KYC as there are many casinos who still have not put up such limitations and they can freely gamble over such casinos easily.

[Taskford]

Some, of course, there are those who want to remain anonymous in gambling

When it comes to gambling with cryptocurrency, the number gets increased significantly from "some" only. Most people gambling with cryptocurrency would barely be interested gambling with KYC. Besides, gambler like me who has never taken it as addiction would never be bothered to play in a KYC required house. I guess mandatory KYC is a loss for the house. They will lose some good amount of gamblers.

It will be a lose for the house if the site is untrusted but for a casino who's been here provide a good service to there gamblers and we can't see any problem occur as they are solving the issue when they see someone got compromise well for sure the whales will not bother to submit what the casino required to them. And I believe Roobet will not lose those whales because once they tried that the casino is good in terms of dealing a huge amount of money for sure they stay, but for those low ballers maybe some of them will go out and play to another risky casino who doesn't require them to submit their KYC.

[kotajikikox]

I would rather play in Casino that requires KYC but highly recommended and Legit than sites that does not ask for KYC but may have a chance of being scam.

If you don't want to be anonymous then KYC is fine and but choosing a legit casino is the main point because you needs to deposit funds and withdraw them and there are tons of scam project running and finding victims so be sure to choose the legit casino's only.Above them if you are small gambler you could comply with KYC level 1 which is not too much risky as no indentity proof or bank details are being given and you can compromise on them.But play on good ones.

yes and the most important part(that is why we are playing casino in crypto is our anonymity) is our Personal details that will be at stake if we provide KYC in non legit site.
this same problem facing by many people who does not know about the Sites selling their profile in 3rd party users.
This is why i will stick in Roobet in which i have known for years now than others in which i dont.

[Peanutswar]

It's been a while that I visited the Roobet board and the website itself because of their campaign I saw they already adopted the sportsbook which is a good thing it will add another option for me/us to play, I'm starting to try their new features right now.

Some, of course, there are those who want to remain anonymous in gambling

When it comes to gambling with cryptocurrency, the number gets increased significantly from "some" only. Most people gambling with cryptocurrency would barely be interested gambling with KYC. Besides, gambler like me who has never taken it as addiction would never be bothered to play in a KYC required house. I guess mandatory KYC is a loss for the house. They will lose some good amount of gamblers.

Yes they can surely lose those gamblers who completely wants to remain anonymous and the casino don't allow it and needs KYC as there are many casinos who still have not put up such limitations and they can freely gamble over such casinos easily.

Some of the gamblers want to become anonymous but again their platform has their rules if you don't want to adopt their changes and new feature like the KYC you have a free will to leave if you don't want their new features. But I think it's another layer of security for them also there are tons of large wager playing roobet right now.

[ultrloa]

It's been a while that I visited the Roobet board and the website itself because of their campaign I saw they already adopted the sportsbook which is a good thing it will add another option for me/us to play, I'm starting to try their new features right now.

Some, of course, there are those who want to remain anonymous in gambling

When it comes to gambling with cryptocurrency, the number gets increased significantly from "some" only. Most people gambling with cryptocurrency would barely be interested gambling with KYC. Besides, gambler like me who has never taken it as addiction would never be bothered to play in a KYC required house. I guess mandatory KYC is a loss for the house. They will lose some good amount of gamblers.

Yes they can surely lose those gamblers who completely wants to remain anonymous and the casino don't allow it and needs KYC as there are many casinos who still have not put up such limitations and they can freely gamble over such casinos easily.

Some of the gamblers want to become anonymous but again their platform has their rules if you don't want to adopt their changes and new feature like the KYC you have a free will to leave if you don't want their new features. But I think it's another layer of security for them also there are tons of large wager playing roobet right now.

I'm occasional gambler on this casino but if I am old player and Roobet decides to implement this one then I will be happy especially if they are complying with the rule of the law and implement it to their costumer since as you said it adds the layer of protection since we can say that for doing this we can rely that roobet will stay for long years and also they are successful already so we can expect to see or have this changes since they will not do this for no reason so better to comply than risking the huge capital of whales. And for sure its hard to find another trusted casino since there are so many scams listed around.

[Lakai01]

Some of the gamblers want to become anonymous but again their platform has their rules if you don't want to adopt their changes and new feature like the KYC you have a free will to leave if you don't want their new features. But I think it's another layer of security for them also there are tons of large wager playing roobet right now.

Currently, there are a lot of other casinos that do not require KYC. Roobet is certainly one of the pioneers.

But I guess this will change in the foreseeable future, not only because of stricter regulations, but also simply because exchanges are already starting to no longer accept coins from (anonymous) gambling platforms. Of course, this is out of self-protection, since the exchange would have to prove that it has secured the origin of the coins in case of a case ...

[$crypto$]

Some of the gamblers want to become anonymous but again their platform has their rules if you don't want to adopt their changes and new feature like the KYC you have a free will to leave if you don't want their new features. But I think it's another layer of security for them also there are tons of large wager playing roobet right now.

Currently, there are a lot of other casinos that do not require KYC. Roobet is certainly one of the pioneers.

But I guess this will change in the foreseeable future, not only because of stricter regulations, but also simply because exchanges are already starting to no longer accept coins from (anonymous) gambling platforms. Of course, this is out of self-protection, since the exchange would have to prove that it has secured the origin of the coins in case of a case ...

It's true this could happen in the near future with the statement, the exchange could at any time make a policy about where the coin came from it would be even more difficult if the recipient was anonymous, it's just that we can now enjoy before any changes but for sure with any casino the chosen one is a good choice for you therefore anonymous casino or nothing makes no difference even now I can still send coins from the exchange to gambling.

[dezoel]

There is a benefit on us for those who choose gambling sites that required KYC, We are safe from hackers and fraud users, they also afraid to join a casino the heavily required KYC for some reason.

What the heck are you talking about? Providing your KYC implies that your information could get leaked online of hackers manage to hack the site in question successfully.

This means that your information isn't safe at all. Roobet's security is top-class, but this doesn't imply that it's impossible for it to get hacked. Way bigger sites like Binance(Top-class security) etc got hacked in the past.

This is the primary reason why majority of crypto investors including me hate providing KYC unless absolutely necessary.

THIS!! THIS IS IT!! This is exactly what I have been saying all the time and nobody cares. If I share my KYC with anywhere, it could be roobet, it could be binance, it could be even my own nation that already has all the information, it could always get leaked. My nations health database got hacked a decade ago, and it shared everyone's information, and I mean literally everyone in the whole nation. So, you could go to darknet, and search with their ID number and get whoever you want, celebs, sports figures, politicians everyone's ID got leaked, we know more about them then most of our friends.

So, it is really a horrible situation to give your KYC to any place because we have no proof that it will not be leaked, if a whole nations health database can be leaked then why wouldn't roobets KYC database get leaked neither? It could totally happen and I am not comfortable with that.

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

No, you should check on the F.A.Q

CASINO always needs "KYC" while they are needed! If you just a user with a small fund, most of the casino doesn't give any shit about it they will accept some transaction without any KYC for small TX. But while you're playing with the big fund or a whale, while the transaction withdraws is really big maybe passed their manual withdrawal amount sometimes your request withdrawal will be flag by the system needed manual TX to make sure the transaction.

I already seen so many issue case, even the casino have anonymous-feature they still need to ask "KYC". Try to search about CLOUDBET issue a few years ago maybe 2-3 years, I read there has been some story user win over 330 BTC but they denied the "TX" and ask him several documents like (ID and everything) even a lawyer document. He needs several months to get back his money with the help from the forum it self.

One things I learn from issue on the forum:
- KYC always ask for big winner/big fund transaction
- Shady activity on your account

So, always check the F.A.Q and don't trust any service who give you even anoynmous-feature ~XD

[Quidat]

There is a benefit on us for those who choose gambling sites that required KYC, We are safe from hackers and fraud users, they also afraid to join a casino the heavily required KYC for some reason.

What the heck are you talking about? Providing your KYC implies that your information could get leaked online of hackers manage to hack the site in question successfully.

This means that your information isn't safe at all. Roobet's security is top-class, but this doesn't imply that it's impossible for it to get hacked. Way bigger sites like Binance(Top-class security) etc got hacked in the past.

This is the primary reason why majority of crypto investors including me hate providing KYC unless absolutely necessary.

THIS!! THIS IS IT!! This is exactly what I have been saying all the time and nobody cares. If I share my KYC with anywhere, it could be roobet, it could be binance, it could be even my own nation that already has all the information, it could always get leaked. My nations health database got hacked a decade ago, and it shared everyone's information, and I mean literally everyone in the whole nation. So, you could go to darknet, and search with their ID number and get whoever you want, celebs, sports figures, politicians everyone's ID got leaked, we know more about them then most of our friends.

So, it is really a horrible situation to give your KYC to any place because we have no proof that it will not be leaked, if a whole nations health database can be leaked then why wouldn't roobets KYC database get leaked neither? It could totally happen and I am not comfortable with that.

There are people who are really that paranoid when it comes to the safety of their identity and thats why they are really reacting or minding that much even it turns out to be a bit exaggerated already.
Its up to someone if they would really be dealing or just fine with the current set-up in roobets in talks of KYC as there are still other options or places which you can deal with.
Thing here is that they've hadnt been forced to comply and could leave anytime as they like.

[FatFork]

There are people who are really that paranoid when it comes to the safety of their identity and thats why they are really reacting or minding that much even it turns out to be a bit exaggerated already.
Its up to someone if they would really be dealing or just fine with the current set-up in roobets in talks of KYC as there are still other options or places which you can deal with.

What are you saying? That's not paranoia, that's rational. The truth is that there is nothing you or anyone else can do to prevent high-level breaches, and they can and do happen all the time. I don't know what's being exaggerated here. The only thing you can control is how much and with whom you share your personal information.

Thing here is that they've hadnt been forced to comply and could leave anytime as they like.

You are completely mistaken. If you are familiar with the events of a few months ago, you would know that KYC was imposed on all Roobet users without warning. In other words, every account owner with money in it was literally forced to give out their personal information to withdraw the money, no matter how small the amount was. I should point out that Roobet proudly advertised itself from the very start as the anonymous casino and probably attracted quite a few users from the cryptosphere as a result.

[jrrsparkles]

-snip-

No, you should check on the F.A.Q

CASINO always needs "KYC" while they are needed! If you just a user with a small fund, most of the casino doesn't give any shit about it they will accept some transaction without any KYC for small TX. But while you're playing with the big fund or a whale, while the transaction withdraws is really big maybe passed their manual withdrawal amount sometimes your request withdrawal will be flag by the system needed manual TX to make sure the transaction.

I already seen so many issue case, even the casino have anonymous-feature they still need to ask "KYC". Try to search about CLOUDBET issue a few years ago maybe 2-3 years, I read there has been some story user win over 330 BTC but they denied the "TX" and ask him several documents like (ID and everything) even a lawyer document. He needs several months to get back his money with the help from the forum it self.

One things I learn from issue on the forum:
- KYC always ask for big winner/big fund transaction
- Shady activity on your account

So, always check the F.A.Q and don't trust any service who give you even anoynmous-feature ~XD

Exactly, even a casino with no KYC restriction may ask you to comply KYC to satisfy AML policy and that's happen only when a user won huge amount and also many people commented that these KYC has been used as a tool to stop people from withdrawing their rewards on many occasions.

[Raflesia]

-snip-

No, you should check on the F.A.Q

CASINO always needs "KYC" while they are needed! If you just a user with a small fund, most of the casino doesn't give any shit about it they will accept some transaction without any KYC for small TX. But while you're playing with the big fund or a whale, while the transaction withdraws is really big maybe passed their manual withdrawal amount sometimes your request withdrawal will be flag by the system needed manual TX to make sure the transaction.

I already seen so many issue case, even the casino have anonymous-feature they still need to ask "KYC". Try to search about CLOUDBET issue a few years ago maybe 2-3 years, I read there has been some story user win over 330 BTC but they denied the "TX" and ask him several documents like (ID and everything) even a lawyer document. He needs several months to get back his money with the help from the forum it self.

One things I learn from issue on the forum:
- KYC always ask for big winner/big fund transaction
- Shady activity on your account

So, always check the F.A.Q and don't trust any service who give you even anoynmous-feature ~XD

Exactly, even a casino with no KYC restriction may ask you to comply KYC to satisfy AML policy and that's happen only when a user won huge amount and also many people commented that these KYC has been used as a tool to stop people from withdrawing their rewards on many occasions.

The FAQ is very important to read if it says "the team will ask KYC users if needed" so it is clear that even though the site is anonymous when it is needed then it must be implemented if it is true that we really need the tx, and big withdrawals I think that something that must be mandatory because it does not want to be abused, and obviously a pope would definitely do it.
Even on every platform when big KYC AML transactions are needed.

[Lakai01]

No, you should check on the F.A.Q

CASINO always needs "KYC" while they are needed! If you just a user with a small fund, most of the casino doesn't give any shit about it they will accept some transaction without any KYC for small TX. But while you're playing with the big fund or a whale, while the transaction withdraws is really big maybe passed their manual withdrawal amount sometimes your request withdrawal will be flag by the system needed manual TX to make sure the transaction.

First of all, thank you for the answer!
I think this applies more to newer casinos. Classic online gambling platforms such as Bustadice or Bustabit do not require KYC. They didn't demand KYC from me even with larger withdrawals.

It probably also depends on where the casino is located and whether it is registered or not.

[dezoel]

There are people who are really that paranoid when it comes to the safety of their identity and thats why they are really reacting or minding that much even it turns out to be a bit exaggerated already.
Its up to someone if they would really be dealing or just fine with the current set-up in roobets in talks of KYC as there are still other options or places which you can deal with.
Thing here is that they've hadnt been forced to comply and could leave anytime as they like.

When the options are "either give us your kyc or leave" then it is not an option at all. Sure you could leave, but then roobet is only left with people who are forced to give KYC and everyone else is gone, which leaves them with a forced people and the others are gone already, so if they are already gone then they are not in the calculation, only the people who still are here should be calculated and they were forced to give their KYC to stay.

I am not mad at Roobet for this, they are fine and I get that, however the reality is that if this was another place I would have left long time ago and would never come back, I have to say the only thing that I am fine with right now is the fact that I trust roobet more than most other places and that is why I was capable of giving my KYC to them, in any other less than amazing place, I wouldn't do this.