Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 11:47:44 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 [681] 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs  (Read 1260008 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
October 31, 2015, 01:01:06 AM
 #13601

From latest SEC filing. Predicting $60M revenue for 2016 and generally SP50s in Q1 2016 as long as they can raise more money. I'd be very surprised if this filing wasn't specifically so they can provide the information to more potential investors.


The Bitcoin software, network, and concept is called "Bitcoin" with a capitalized "B". Bitcoin currency units are called "bitcoins" with a lowercase "b" -- this is often abbreviated BTC.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715125664
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715125664

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715125664
Reply with quote  #2

1715125664
Report to moderator
1715125664
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715125664

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715125664
Reply with quote  #2

1715125664
Report to moderator
notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 31, 2015, 01:06:39 AM
 #13602

From latest SEC filing. Predicting $60M revenue for 2016 and generally SP50s in Q1 2016 as long as they can raise more money. I'd be very surprised if this filing wasn't specifically so they can provide the information to more potential investors.


Thanks for sharing was a interesting read.  I'm surprised in Q1 only 500 SP50 is assumed.  Does not sound like a ton of miners but I guess they are massive in hashrate.

Will be interesting to see how correct they are on the number SP50's during Q1. I really want to see their having expectations.  That is the other numbers I want to see what the big companies assume.
generalt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1096
Merit: 1021


View Profile
October 31, 2015, 01:14:26 AM
 #13603

From latest SEC filing. Predicting $60M revenue for 2016 and generally SP50s in Q1 2016 as long as they can raise more money. I'd be very surprised if this filing wasn't specifically so they can provide the information to more potential investors.



I'd be thrilled to see only a 6% monthly network difficulty increase.

BTC: 1GENERALrtBAjEv2Ps5cmEW1FADnXh1bCZ
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
October 31, 2015, 01:22:17 AM
 #13604

From latest SEC filing. Predicting $60M revenue for 2016 and generally SP50s in Q1 2016 as long as they can raise more money. I'd be very surprised if this filing wasn't specifically so they can provide the information to more potential investors.


Thanks for sharing was a interesting read.  I'm surprised in Q1 only 500 SP50 is assumed.  Does not sound like a ton of miners but I guess they are massive in hashrate.

Will be interesting to see how correct they are on the number SP50's during Q1. I really want to see their having expectations.  That is the other numbers I want to see what the big companies assume.

It could be interpreted in a few ways but my interpretation is:

  • Building 500 SP50s Q1 @ 10k cost each = need $5m funding
  • Selling 500 SP50s Q1 = $14.6m = $29.2k each after any sales taxes
  • Later on in the year.... deploying 500 SP50s = another $14.6m+ revenue
  • Final $14.4m revenue from selling another 500 units.
  • $18M costs for the year, $15m from unit and amortised chip costs, $3m fixed costs.
So from these numbers it appears that even if they could raise $5M, they're only predicting to make 1,500 SP50s over the year (165PH).

Tupsu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003



View Profile
October 31, 2015, 01:40:26 AM
 #13605


Thanks for sharing was a interesting read.  I'm surprised in Q1 only 500 SP50 is assumed.  Does not sound like a ton of miners but I guess they are massive in hashrate.

Will be interesting to see how correct they are on the number SP50's during Q1. I really want to see their having expectations.  That is the other numbers I want to see what the big companies assume.

500 x SP50 = 11 320 x S7 (maximum)

My already shipped 23  x S7 are today more than 1 x Sp50   Grin
Three months earlier than Q1
generalt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1096
Merit: 1021


View Profile
October 31, 2015, 02:38:25 AM
 #13606


500 x SP50 = 11 320 x S7 (maximum)

My already shipped 23  x S7 are today more than 1 x Sp50   Grin
Three months earlier than Q1


It sounds like to me they have a little way to go to secure funding to even start making these units so I'm guessing late Q1 so even more like four to six months.

BTC: 1GENERALrtBAjEv2Ps5cmEW1FADnXh1bCZ
notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 31, 2015, 02:50:37 AM
 #13607


Thanks for sharing was a interesting read.  I'm surprised in Q1 only 500 SP50 is assumed.  Does not sound like a ton of miners but I guess they are massive in hashrate.

Will be interesting to see how correct they are on the number SP50's during Q1. I really want to see their having expectations.  That is the other numbers I want to see what the big companies assume.

500 x SP50 = 11 320 x S7 (maximum)

My already shipped 23  x S7 are today more than 1 x Sp50   Grin
Three months earlier than Q1


You have a big advantage on time frame.  Only thing is once this is released if on spec it's "0.14 W/GHs".    That would be a significant amount of power savings

So really depends on when they ship which we don't really know.  Q1 leaves them quite a bit of time in crypto world.
helipotte
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 650
Merit: 500


Pick and place? I need more coffee.


View Profile
October 31, 2015, 03:10:44 AM
 #13608

Curious, has anyone updated cgminer on their SP20E to another version besides 4.7.0 that's in the 2.6.14 firmware?

Interested in this as well.  Installed 2.6.4 on an sp31, no change to cgminer.
padrino
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1000


https://www.bitworks.io


View Profile WWW
October 31, 2015, 03:12:16 AM
 #13609


Thanks for sharing was a interesting read.  I'm surprised in Q1 only 500 SP50 is assumed.  Does not sound like a ton of miners but I guess they are massive in hashrate.

Will be interesting to see how correct they are on the number SP50's during Q1. I really want to see their having expectations.  That is the other numbers I want to see what the big companies assume.

500 x SP50 = 11 320 x S7 (maximum)

My already shipped 23  x S7 are today more than 1 x Sp50   Grin
Three months earlier than Q1


This is a weak point no matter when it's made since we can play that same game from the days of GPU mining, the Jupiter, S1, on and on...

1CPi7VRihoF396gyYYcs2AdTEF8KQG2BCR
https://www.bitworks.io
generalt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1096
Merit: 1021


View Profile
October 31, 2015, 03:15:53 AM
 #13610

Curious, has anyone updated cgminer on their SP20E to another version besides 4.7.0 that's in the 2.6.14 firmware?

Interested in this as well.  Installed 2.6.4 on an sp31, no change to cgminer.

If you change the ExtraFlag setting to 2 for extranone and restart it switches over to cgminer 4.8.0 if that helps at all.

BTC: 1GENERALrtBAjEv2Ps5cmEW1FADnXh1bCZ
dystopian
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 31, 2015, 03:30:37 AM
 #13611

Curious, has anyone updated cgminer on their SP20E to another version besides 4.7.0 that's in the 2.6.14 firmware?

Interested in this as well.  Installed 2.6.4 on an sp31, no change to cgminer.

If you change the ExtraFlag setting to 2 for extranone and restart it switches over to cgminer 4.8.0 if that helps at all.

Thanks for the tip, worked for me!

Kabapka
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 189
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 31, 2015, 04:10:58 AM
 #13612

From latest SEC filing. Predicting $60M revenue for 2016 and generally SP50s in Q1 2016 as long as they can raise more money. I'd be very surprised if this filing wasn't specifically so they can provide the information to more potential investors.


Thanks for sharing was a interesting read.  I'm surprised in Q1 only 500 SP50 is assumed.  Does not sound like a ton of miners but I guess they are massive in hashrate.

Will be interesting to see how correct they are on the number SP50's during Q1. I really want to see their having expectations.  That is the other numbers I want to see what the big companies assume.

It could be interpreted in a few ways but my interpretation is:

  • Building 500 SP50s Q1 @ 10k cost each = need $5m funding
  • Selling 500 SP50s Q1 = $14.6m = $29.2k each after any sales taxes
  • Later on in the year.... deploying 500 SP50s = another $14.6m+ revenue
  • Final $14.4m revenue from selling another 500 units.
  • $18M costs for the year, $15m from unit and amortised chip costs, $3m fixed costs.
So from these numbers it appears that even if they could raise $5M, they're only predicting to make 1,500 SP50s over the year (165PH).
is the 29k$ price just a speculation of your's or it has been publicly released ?
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
October 31, 2015, 04:16:42 AM
 #13613

From latest SEC filing. Predicting $60M revenue for 2016 and generally SP50s in Q1 2016 as long as they can raise more money. I'd be very surprised if this filing wasn't specifically so they can provide the information to more potential investors.


Thanks for sharing was a interesting read.  I'm surprised in Q1 only 500 SP50 is assumed.  Does not sound like a ton of miners but I guess they are massive in hashrate.

Will be interesting to see how correct they are on the number SP50's during Q1. I really want to see their having expectations.  That is the other numbers I want to see what the big companies assume.

It could be interpreted in a few ways but my interpretation is:

  • Building 500 SP50s Q1 @ 10k cost each = need $5m funding
  • Selling 500 SP50s Q1 = $14.6m = $29.2k each after any sales taxes
  • Later on in the year.... deploying 500 SP50s = another $14.6m+ revenue
  • Final $14.4m revenue from selling another 500 units.
  • $18M costs for the year, $15m from unit and amortised chip costs, $3m fixed costs.
So from these numbers it appears that even if they could raise $5M, they're only predicting to make 1,500 SP50s over the year (165PH).
is the 29k$ price just a speculation of your's or it has been publicly released ?

Speculation based on their slides, the other 'leak' suggested a higher price.

Kabapka
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 189
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 31, 2015, 04:24:49 AM
 #13614

From latest SEC filing. Predicting $60M revenue for 2016 and generally SP50s in Q1 2016 as long as they can raise more money. I'd be very surprised if this filing wasn't specifically so they can provide the information to more potential investors.


Thanks for sharing was a interesting read.  I'm surprised in Q1 only 500 SP50 is assumed.  Does not sound like a ton of miners but I guess they are massive in hashrate.

Will be interesting to see how correct they are on the number SP50's during Q1. I really want to see their having expectations.  That is the other numbers I want to see what the big companies assume.

It could be interpreted in a few ways but my interpretation is:

  • Building 500 SP50s Q1 @ 10k cost each = need $5m funding
  • Selling 500 SP50s Q1 = $14.6m = $29.2k each after any sales taxes
  • Later on in the year.... deploying 500 SP50s = another $14.6m+ revenue
  • Final $14.4m revenue from selling another 500 units.
  • $18M costs for the year, $15m from unit and amortised chip costs, $3m fixed costs.
So from these numbers it appears that even if they could raise $5M, they're only predicting to make 1,500 SP50s over the year (165PH).
is the 29k$ price just a speculation of your's or it has been publicly released ?

Speculation based on their slides, the other 'leak' suggested a higher price.
yeah its likely to get in the market after the halving , but still 100 btc price is quite ROiable
fullzero
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1009



View Profile
November 01, 2015, 09:40:13 PM
 #13615

Even though these are overpriced;

I can't deny wanting a death star class miner.  Smiley
mavericklm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 09:50:07 PM
 #13616

Quote
Beginning upgrade null. Please wait, this can take up to 1 minute.

Guys, please!!! Smiley
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3752
Merit: 3869



View Profile
November 01, 2015, 10:36:42 PM
 #13617

Even though these are overpriced;

I can't deny wanting a death star class miner.  Smiley

what do you think KIC 8462852 is? 
and you can't have it...Tongue
dunand
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 637
Merit: 502



View Profile
November 01, 2015, 11:31:52 PM
 #13618

what do you think KIC 8462852 is?  
and you can't have it...Tongue

Builting a giant mining farm that far from earth is useless. Even if you have the power to solve a block in a fraction of a second the signal takes 2960 light years to go there and return.
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3752
Merit: 3869



View Profile
November 01, 2015, 11:41:05 PM
 #13619

what do you think KIC 8462852 is?  
and you can't have it...Tongue

Builting a giant mining farm that far from earth is useless. Even if you have the power to solve a block in a fraction of a second the signal takes 2960 light years to go there and return.

they are not mining bitcoin, of course, but kiccoin or e-gold-pressed latinum (KIC8462852 local currency)
that's obvious   Grin
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 11:58:05 PM
 #13620

what do you think KIC 8462852 is?  
and you can't have it...Tongue

Builting a giant mining farm that far from earth is useless. Even if you have the power to solve a block in a fraction of a second the signal takes 2960 light years to go there and return.

Just pick an ISP who has cracked the code on quantum entangled particles.

"I predict the Internet will soon go spectacularly supernova and in 1996 catastrophically collapse." - Robert Metcalfe, 1995
Pages: « 1 ... 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 [681] 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!