Bitcoin Forum
November 03, 2024, 01:57:27 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 ... 295 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][GRS] Groestlcoin | 1st to activate Segwit & Taproot  (Read 558186 times)
Kazimir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011



View Profile
April 23, 2014, 01:32:13 PM
 #1421

The real advantage of Groestl is that it can and is accelerated by the hardware AES support present in most modern Intel CPUs, which helps reduce the efficiency gap between a CPU and other implementations.
Fair point.

Quote
thanks Kazimir. You have helped to teach me self-restraint  Cool
U're welcome Smiley

WOw

my miner in scrypt had 1100W of consumption
my miner in groestl had 500W

ITs amazing!!!
So, exactly what is the use of this?

If it's more than twice as cheap (in terms of energy consumption) to mine groestl, twice as many people will start mining it, difficulty (and thus, energy cost) goes up twice. Advantage: exactly nothing.

Think about it.

There is no "more or less energy efficient". There may be just "more CPU efficient, relatively to GPU or ASIC". Mind the "relatively", it's crucial.

In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Insert coin(s): 1KazimirL9MNcnFnoosGrEkmMsbYLxPPob
child_harold
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 23, 2014, 01:39:14 PM
 #1422

WOw

my miner in scrypt had 1100W of consumption
my miner in groestl had 500W

ITs amazing!!!


Than why to drop "energy efficient"?

Less power does not equal "energy efficient"
since:
2x hashrate = 2x difficulty = staus quo

But i do wonder whether the energy footprint of the network as a whole could be reduced with AES HW implementations Smiley

More importantly Groestlcoin reduces the efficiency gap between different platforms Smiley

guidosuller
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 156
Merit: 100

Guido


View Profile
April 23, 2014, 01:46:45 PM
 #1423

My 3 r9 280x running 765kh/s in scrypt
Core clock 1080
Mem clock 1500
Temps: 70c-74c
Fan RPM: 2800 - 3000 (85%)
1100W

My 3 r9 280x running 765kh/s in groestl
Core clock 1150
Mem clock 1500
Temps: 60c-65c
Fan RPM: 1200-1400 (50%)
500W

Long life to my miner!!!



 
mikk2k2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 23, 2014, 01:47:59 PM
 #1424

Might be a good idea to use these ASIC devices to our advantage - If we set up a MultiPool for script coins that the ASICs can mine then we sell the coins and buy Groestl in turn helping the price then we pay out in Groestl.

Rent My Rig: Lexie       Trust Thread: Here       Cloud Mining: Trade Ghs/BTC Here    LeaseRigs: Here
Kazimir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011



View Profile
April 23, 2014, 02:02:57 PM
 #1425

I believe that the bulk of the miners are directed by whatever coin is the more profitable to mine at the moment X.
Agree.

Quote
Thus, only if the price of GRS were to go up, that is what would determine a surge in net hashpower => greater difficulty => less coins/(k/M)hash.
I think, in the end, only profitability as a percentage is what really counts. The percentage of gains vs costs. X amount of money buys me an amount of energy that allows to perform a number of hashes that result in mining an amount of some particular altcoin that is worth Y amount of money. X and Y are expressed in some unit of money (USD, BTC, the particular coin you're mining, doesn't matter). Now Y/X is the profitability, this is the only number that really matters (and should be larger than 1).

In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Insert coin(s): 1KazimirL9MNcnFnoosGrEkmMsbYLxPPob
FiR3
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 192
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 23, 2014, 02:19:19 PM
 #1426

Kazimir - you're right here, but at the current price, I still don't believe it's the most profitable coin out there.
Haven't done the math, though, so could be wrong..

▒▒▒▒▒ SC ∩ AR = {wonder}  // SC=science, AR=art ▒▒▒▒▒
Pround quantum of the Romanian Bitcoin community.
Xenocyde
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 265
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 23, 2014, 02:36:51 PM
 #1427

Kazimir - you're right here, but at the current price, I still don't believe it's the most profitable coin out there.
Haven't done the math, though, so could be wrong..

According to WhatMine, GRS is the third most profitable coin. First is an X11 coin called Logicoin, second is a scrypt-N called SiliconValleyCoin. As you can see, X11 and Groestl are among the first and scrypt is taking a step back.

For security, your account has been locked. Email acctcomp15@theymos.e4ward.com
FiR3
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 192
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 23, 2014, 02:57:34 PM
 #1428

Thanks for the link, Xenocyde, but I can't seem to find the field for the Grostl algorithm input.
Is there any?

▒▒▒▒▒ SC ∩ AR = {wonder}  // SC=science, AR=art ▒▒▒▒▒
Pround quantum of the Romanian Bitcoin community.
Xenocyde
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 265
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 23, 2014, 03:08:50 PM
 #1429

No there's no field for GRS since it's the sole coin to use that algo for now.

For security, your account has been locked. Email acctcomp15@theymos.e4ward.com
FiR3
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 192
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 23, 2014, 03:14:29 PM
 #1430

In that case, how can you compare results?

For example, inputing 2000 KH/s for scrypt and using "Adapt Hybrid-Scrypt-Hash256 From Sha-256 AND Scrypt-N-Factor Scrypt-Jane and Keccak values from Scrypt input", Groestlcoin is on the bottom of the list.
Pow. Consumption 1000 Watts     Pow. Cost: 0.15 USD kw/h 

Check it.

▒▒▒▒▒ SC ∩ AR = {wonder}  // SC=science, AR=art ▒▒▒▒▒
Pround quantum of the Romanian Bitcoin community.
Xenocyde
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 265
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 23, 2014, 03:24:18 PM
 #1431

In that case, how can you compare results?

For example, inputing 2000 KH/s for scrypt and using "Adapt Hybrid-Scrypt-Hash256 From Sha-256 AND Scrypt-N-Factor Scrypt-Jane and Keccak values from Scrypt input", Groestlcoin is on the bottom of the list.
Pow. Consumption 1000 Watts     Pow. Cost: 0.15 USD kw/h  

Check it.

I don't calculate consumption and power costs since I have free electricity.

For security, your account has been locked. Email acctcomp15@theymos.e4ward.com
FiR3
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 192
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 23, 2014, 03:29:19 PM
 #1432

That was not my point.

Enter any desired value in that form for scrypt with auto calc for other algos and see that Groestl is still at the bottom of the list.
At least, that's the results that I get.


Also, I don't believe the results to be accurate and have different values than the one their engine comes up with, but that's another discussion.
Even more, different algos suck up different power, which is not taken into account, I believe.

▒▒▒▒▒ SC ∩ AR = {wonder}  // SC=science, AR=art ▒▒▒▒▒
Pround quantum of the Romanian Bitcoin community.
Xenocyde
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 265
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 23, 2014, 03:40:37 PM
 #1433

Here's how I calculate.

=8&hashRates[12]=350&hashRates[14]=5600&algoAdapter=on&hashRates[1]=3.2&hashRates[2]=1400&hashRates[4]=700&hashRates[5]=245&hashRates[3]=812&power_consumption=0&power_cost=0&oreDiff=21600&volumeType=total&volumeMin_BTC=-1&wm_currency=USD&exchangers[]=4&exchangers[]=6&exchangers[]=7&exchangers[]=1&exchangers[]=8&orderBy=0]http://whatmine.com/?search=1&hashRates[13]=8&hashRates[12]=350&hashRates[14]=5600&algoAdapter=on&hashRates[1]=3.2&hashRates[2]=1400&hashRates[4]=700&hashRates[5]=245&hashRates[3]=812&power_consumption=0&power_cost=0&oreDiff=21600&volumeType=total&volumeMin_BTC=-1&wm_currency=USD&exchangers[]=4&exchangers[]=6&exchangers[]=7&exchangers[]=1&exchangers[]=8&orderBy=0

For security, your account has been locked. Email acctcomp15@theymos.e4ward.com
allcrypt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
April 23, 2014, 03:56:31 PM
 #1434

GroestlCoin has been added to AllCrypt.com!

AllCrypt.com - Your new CryptoCurrency Exchange Now Open! www.AllCrypt.com
child_harold
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 23, 2014, 10:20:42 PM
 #1435


http://www.cafepress.com/mf/69818347/scrabble-like-tile-letter-g_baseball-jersey?pro

Well the merchandising part is easy Cheesy

neutraLTC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1492
Merit: 1021



View Profile WWW
April 24, 2014, 12:28:51 AM
 #1436

i like the slogan

Democratizing Mining

DEMAND STRATUMV2 MINING POOL: DMND.WORK
guidosuller
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 156
Merit: 100

Guido


View Profile
April 24, 2014, 02:26:05 AM
 #1437

Intel Core i7 3930k stock = 1875kh/s
Dhamon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 24, 2014, 07:51:38 AM
 #1438

Intel Core i7 3930k stock = 1875kh/s
Could you please post your settings?
child_harold
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 24, 2014, 08:06:20 AM
 #1439

i like the slogan

Democratizing Mining

Thanks. I like it too Cheesy

FiR3
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 192
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 24, 2014, 08:07:17 AM
Last edit: April 24, 2014, 12:38:25 PM by FiR3
 #1440

Hey everyone,

I would like to kindly ask the miners out there to please switch from dwarfpool to one of the smaller pools.
The reason for this is to avoid monopolization problems such as a 51% attack.

By no means am I accusing dwarfpool owners of anything. I have had a good experience with it myself.
It's just a reminder that, for the network to be healthy, we should go with the way of the precautionary principle.


Here are the best options, in a subjective order:
1. CryptoHunger - pool admined by the coin's dev, srcxxx. https just added / multi core server, DDOS protected / 0.8% proportional fee - fees and donations go to GroestlCoin promotion (!!).
2. CoinMine.pl - the smallest pool, but, from what I understood, with a friendly staff. Give these guys a hand!
4. grs.5limi.com - Chinese pool admined by whyyk7.
3. grs.suprnova.cc - one of the "oldest 3" pools. I have used them without any problems until changing to cryptohunger.
4. CPU-Pool.net - another big player, part of the "oldest 3". Did not test, but reckon that the ~300 miners currently on the pool are satisfied. They have the second hashrate overall, so they would not need any extra miners.

Happy hashing! Cheesy

▒▒▒▒▒ SC ∩ AR = {wonder}  // SC=science, AR=art ▒▒▒▒▒
Pround quantum of the Romanian Bitcoin community.
Pages: « 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 ... 295 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!