Higher cap = better dev support, better hash, better pool support
We're at a point where higher price means also higher value (at least for a notch).
----
Been calculating costs per txs (last 24h to 48h):
Cost for a Bitcoin tx: approx 8$ (and that's a low for btc)
Cost for a LTC tx approx: 13,20$
Cost for a VTC tx: approx 12,26$ (at yesterdays' cap)
Cost for a DASH tx approx: 8,37$
Costs for a PPC tx approx: 1,82$
Costs for a FTC tx approx: 1,53$
Cost for a UNO tx aprox: 0,40$
It's calculated: "costs daily inflation devided by number of tx occured".
The more txs occure the lower the price for a individual tx. Inflation and price are the other factors in that metric. So costs per tx actually is a real good metric to show use vs inflation vs marketcap. I think it's a helpful metric to decide if i coin is over or undervalued.
Uno has a lot room for txs growth so in the future the cost per tx in Uno will likely be minimal compared to other coins even on higher cap. So it's highly competitive in that very important area and will be a very interesting coin in case btc blocksize increase goes wrong or doesn't happen at all (odds are 90% of these two possibilities imo).
Really a smart coin, that Unobtanium.
When looking at above tx costs it appears that Uno isn't even overly speculated on as txs are in a very sane range. Tx costs will drop in half with the next halving in case use stays the same. If actual use goes up in the future tx costs will be reduced further.
Thought i'd share some numbers and theory with you.
Getting users up means getting the theoretical tx costs down for the individual tx.
