AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[MoparMiningLLC]

I agree and his use of AI is because he lacks the knowledge and skill to speak knowledgeably on the subjects. He uses them to try and look smart and to make baseless accusations.

That’s an insinuation. I have used it mostly to correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation. As well as some formatting or to create an overview/guideline on a project. I sometimes use it to pull information which I always later review and fact check. I admit when it’s used and for what purpose. I even disclose when information isn’t fully updated or pier reviewed/ in need of revisions.

You should go to Kaz's profile and click on "topics started by" or "last posts by"
When it's for information it's AI vomit word salad that is well over 60% inaccurate.
When it's his posts... he uses it to try and sound smart and or sophisticated.
The user is a joke.  I just recently destroyed ANOTHER one of his tin foil hat theories.

More insinuations. Yawn 🥱

it is very simple to see that many of your posts are mostly AI - like your info thread. it started as 90% AI - I am not the only one pointing it out. it stops bein an insinuation when its simply the truth.

Do I need to quote the disclaimer again. Everything about that informational post is valid (it’s stated in the post that it needs revision, and Grox AI is listed as one of the contributors). Don’t forget that it has over 50 merits and is still a work in progress

it is not valid - for crying out loud you listed Bobby Lee as the founder of Titan Mint. Your thread is causing more misinformation than any good information. your thread should be taken down until all the information is correct.

[Kazkaz27]

I agree and his use of AI is because he lacks the knowledge and skill to speak knowledgeably on the subjects. He uses them to try and look smart and to make baseless accusations.

That’s an insinuation. I have used it mostly to correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation. As well as some formatting or to create an overview/guideline on a project. I sometimes use it to pull information which I always later review and fact check. I admit when it’s used and for what purpose. I even disclose when information isn’t fully updated or pier reviewed/ in need of revisions.

You should go to Kaz's profile and click on "topics started by" or "last posts by"
When it's for information it's AI vomit word salad that is well over 60% inaccurate.
When it's his posts... he uses it to try and sound smart and or sophisticated.
The user is a joke.  I just recently destroyed ANOTHER one of his tin foil hat theories.

More insinuations. Yawn 🥱

it is very simple to see that many of your posts are mostly AI - like your info thread. it started as 90% AI - I am not the only one pointing it out. it stops bein an insinuation when its simply the truth.

Do I need to quote the disclaimer again. Everything about that informational post is valid (it’s stated in the post that it needs revision, and Grox AI is listed as one of the contributors). Don’t forget that it has over 50 merits and is still a work in progress

it is not valid - for crying out loud you listed Bobby Lee as the founder of Titan Mint. Your thread is causing more misinformation than any good information. your thread should be taken down until all the information is correct.

That opinion isn’t supported by those who have merited it

[SatoPrincess]

User: Kalam001

Reintroducing yourself to this great forum should be done with patience, humility, and value-driven participation. Start by reviewing the forum rules and current discussions to understand what has changed. Introduce yourself briefly without overhyping your experience or asking for favors. Focus on contributing thoughtful replies, asking meaningful questions, and sharing verified knowledge rather than chasing ranks or merit. Avoid spam, plagiarism, and low-effort posts, as credibility takes time to rebuild. Be respectful in debates and consistent in activity. Over time, quality contributions will naturally earn trust, recognition, and meaningful connections within the community.

Copy leaks - 100%
Stealth writer - 100%
GPTZero - 100%

[Emikoyumi]

I initially suspected after seeing posts from both of them that they were using AI. so i checked some of their earlier posts and found that both of them were making similar types of posts using AI.

• Solokan
• Kaliandra

Yes, Inter will definitely try to stay at the top of the table because it would be a shame if they couldn't maintain this position. But in my opinion, it won't be easy for Inter to maintain this position because the teams below them will definitely try to knock Inter off the top spot. What Inter needs right now to stay in this position is to be able to win consistently. However, with Inter's busy schedule in many leagues, such as the Champions League, it will certainly not be easy for Inter to win consistently if, for example, the Inter coach cannot come up with a good strategy, unless the Inter coach is always able to come up with good strategies.

We don't know if Inter and Napoli will be competing at the end of the season, as Roma and AC Milan could also be in a tight race. However, regarding the Inter vs. Bologna match, I believe it will be an exciting game because in their last encounter, Bologna defeated Inter. I think the upcoming Inter vs. Bologna match could be the perfect opportunity for Inter to seek revenge.

Originality.ai : 87% Ai Generated
Zerogpt: 70% Ai Generated
Copyleaks AI Content Detector: 100% Ai Generated

Twenty more games is no small number, and Barcelona will certainly have to strive to maintain their winning streak because if they cannot do so, it will be easier for Real Madrid to take Barcelona's position. Villarreal and Real Madrid are indeed improving their performance, and Barcelona must be cautious because after the January transfer window, Real Madrid and Villarreal will undoubtedly be more serious about performing even better. However, Atletico Madrid could also become a major rival for Real Madrid, Barcelona, and Villarreal, as Atletico Madrid also possesses strength that cannot be underestimated. But for now, we can only wait and see what happens, as there could be unexpected surprises after the January transfer window. In the upcoming matches, Real Madrid and Barcelona will face opponents that cannot be taken lightly, as Barcelona will face Espanyol and Real Madrid will face Betis. In my opinion, those matches will be very exciting. We'll have to wait and see whether Real Madrid and Barcelona will be able to defeat their opponents at that time or not.

Originality.ai : 100% Ai Generated
Zerogpt: 70% Ai Generated
Copyleaks AI Content Detector: 100% Ai Generated

It seems that these four teams will continue to compete fiercely, and I would also like to see them compete fiercely until the end of the season. Because it seems that if only one team is ahead, it will be less exciting and surely many people will not be curious about who will win the Scudetto. Milan is currently a team that is not too busy, which is certainly different from other teams that have a busy schedule. But in my opinion, even though Milan does not have a busy schedule, it could still be difficult for them to win the Scudetto because there are certainly many teams that have busy schedules but play well in many leagues and can win many trophies. But for some reason, I have a feeling that Napoli will win the Scudetto again because I think Napoli is currently stronger than AC Milan. I remember when Napoli played against Milan in the semifinals of the Supercoppa Italiana, Napoli defeated Milan, so I think Napoli has the potential to win the Scudetto this season. But of course, we can't predict the future because team performance can fluctuate. It's also possible that Roma could win the Scudetto.

Originality.ai : 87% Ai Generated
Zerogpt: 100% Ai Generated
Copyleaks AI Content Detector: 100% Ai Generated

Manchester United did indeed perform well in the match against Newcastle and ultimately won by a narrow margin of 0-1. Dorgu really made the most of the opportunity and was finally able to score a goal against Newcastle. Newcastle actually has strength that cannot be underestimated, which is why they managed a draw against Chelsea. It's no surprise that some people were shocked by Manchester United's victory, as their recent form has been lackluster. However, it seems that Manchester United's performance has improved again, and any team facing them in upcoming matches will need to be cautious.

In essence, Manchester United's performance is sometimes unpredictable, but that is precisely their trademark. Manchester United has now risen to fifth place, but it seems their position may be overtaken by other teams, such as Liverpool, as other teams have yet to play. Now, Amorim needs to improve Manchester United's performance and avoid defeats in upcoming matches. If Amorim can lead Manchester United to the Champions League, I believe it will make Manchester United fans happy, unlike last season when Manchester United finished in 15th place.

Originality.ai : 100% Ai Generated
Zerogpt: 100% Ai Generated
Copyleaks AI Content Detector: 100% Ai Generated

2nd account:

• Solokan

Yes, I am also impressed with Aston Villa because this season they are performing much better than last season. Last season they only finished in 6th place, whereas this season they are in 3rd place, and it is certainly not impossible that Aston Villa could win the championship this season. It seems that Unai Emery has found the right strategy for his players, so it is no surprise that Aston Villa has been difficult to beat by other teams lately.

In my opinion, the upcoming match between Arsenal and Aston Villa will definitely be a highly anticipated match because Arsenal will definitely want to win in order to stay at the top of the table, while Aston Villa will also try to win because if they can defeat Arsenal, it will increase their chances of achieving their goal of winning the trophy this season. Who do you think will win the match? In my opinion, it's very difficult to predict the outcome of the match.

Originality.ai : 98% Ai Generated
Zerogpt: 100% Ai Generated
Copyleaks AI Content Detector: 100% Ai Generated

The point difference between Real Madrid and Barcelona is only 4 points, which is not a huge gap, and Real Madrid still has a chance to surpass Barcelona's points tally. Barcelona is currently in an uncertain position because Real Madrid will certainly pose a threat to them. However, the season is still long, so if Barcelona fails to win consistently, it will be easy for Real Madrid to overtake them.

However, in my opinion, Barcelona is a difficult team to beat, so I believe it won't be easy for Real Madrid to overtake Barcelona. We'll just have to wait and see what happens. Nevertheless, with the current 4-point gap between Real Madrid and Barcelona, this is certainly more intriguing than if there were a larger point difference between the two teams.

Originality.ai : 80% Ai Generated
Zerogpt: 100% Ai Generated
Copyleaks AI Content Detector: 100% Ai Generated

Yes, lately Ittihad has been playing well and it seems that Ittihad's performance will improve because this season is different from last season. Today, Ittihad must be satisfied with defeating Al Shabab 2-0, and of course, Ittihad's victory over Al Shabab will make them even more enthusiastic for the upcoming matches.

Last season, Ittihad did play well and were a tough team to beat, but now many clubs have bought new players, so the teams Ittihad faces this season are different from last season. Therefore, I think it's only natural that Ittihad is in its current position. However, I still believe Ittihad can be considered a strong team, as they might perform even better in upcoming matches. It’s a shame Benzema didn’t score today, though I really wanted to see him score. In the next match, Ittihad will face Neom. I’m sure it will be an exciting game. Who do you think will win that match?

Originality.ai : 70% Ai Generated
Zerogpt: 100% Ai Generated
Copyleaks AI Content Detector: 100% Ai Generated

Yes, at that time there were several players who were injured and Real Madrid really needed new players, but it was unfortunate that even though Ancelotti advised Perez to buy players, Perez did not grant Ancelotti's request, which ultimately resulted in Real Madrid not winning any trophies and Ancelotti being fired. I also hope Perez can learn from last season's experience and avoid repeating the same mistake. Now we'll just have to wait and see what happens—whether Real Madrid will sign new players in the upcoming transfer window or not.

But sometimes I also understand Real Madrid and Perez's decision to never buy players in the January transfer window because Real Madrid always has good players and always has good first and second-string players. So, in my opinion, there won't be any problems even if Real Madrid doesn't bring in new players because they already have good players. So, of course, the coach must be able to strategize. But we won't know what will happen in the January transfer window—whether new players will come to Real Madrid or not. But yes, in my opinion, there won't be any new players coming because Real Madrid still has good players, and I think Xabi must be able to train the existing players so that Real Madrid can perform even better.

Originality.ai : 98% Ai Generated
Zerogpt: 65% Ai Generated
Copyleaks AI Content Detector: 100% Ai Generated

[HustleZ]

The User jwsutherland is Using Ai to post in technical discussion.

1.

Bitcoin Client Software and Version Number:
Trezor Model T using Trezor Suite (desktop, current version).
Also verified independently using Sparrow Wallet in watch-only mode.

Operating System:
N/A (not a client software bug).

System Hardware Specs:
N/A.

Description of Problem:
I transferred BTC from Newton (Canadian exchange) to a self-custodied address generated by my Trezor Model T.

The BTC exists, is fully confirmed on-chain, and has never moved since the original transaction. However, I cannot currently access the wallet that derived this address.

This strongly indicates that the address was created under a BIP-39 passphrase-protected (hidden) wallet and that I am currently entering an incorrect passphrase.

Important clarifications:

There has only ever been one Trezor device.

The 12-word recovery seed is correct and verified.

Entering an incorrect passphrase opens a valid but unrelated empty wallet (expected behavior).

This is not a transaction failure, theft, or exchange issue.

Any Related Addresses:
bc1qgn5raset2n9m0npn50xnyadmlvdgctgdtum3mv

Any Related Transaction IDs:
(Available if needed — omitted here for brevity, but the address above shows the confirmed balance on mempool.space.)

Screenshot of the Problem:
Not applicable — no client error message; behavior is expected for an incorrect passphrase.

Log Files from the Bitcoin Client:
Not applicable.

What I am asking:
I understand that a forgotten passphrase cannot be “recovered” in the general case. I am looking for expert confirmation on the following points:

Whether there are any remaining derivation-path edge cases (e.g., legacy vs native SegWit) worth ruling out given this setup.

Whether offline passphrase reconstruction (bounded candidate testing using the known seed and funded address) is the only remaining technically sound approach.

Confirmation that no other wallet-level explanation exists beyond an unreproduced passphrase.

I am not asking for hacks, shortcuts, or guarantees — only technical validation and guidance on whether anything remains to be checked.

Thank you for your time and expertise.

Originality Ai: 100% Confident.
Sapling Ai: 77.6% Ai Generated
GPTZero: 100% Ai Generated

2.

Thanks for pointing this out — you’re absolutely right.

This was a transcription error on my part.

The correct address is:

bc1qgn5raset2n9m0npn50xnyadmlvdgctgdtum3mv


The missing q after bc1 in my earlier post made the address invalid when copied.

This is a native SegWit (bech32) address, and the balance and confirmations can be verified on mempool.space and other explorers.

Apologies for the confusion, and thank you for catching that.

The underlying question remains the same: the address exists on-chain with confirmed BTC, but is not derived by the currently opened wallet, strongly indicating a passphrase-protected (hidden) wallet.

I appreciate any guidance on remaining derivation-path edge cases worth ruling out beyond passphrase reconstruction.

Originality Ai: 100% Confident
Sapling Ai: 100% Ai Generated
GPTZero: 95% Ai Generated
3.

Thanks for the feedback.

To avoid further confusion: this address does exist and does contain ~0.7175 BTC, which can be verified here:
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/bc1qgn5raset2n9m0npn50xnyadmlvdgctgdtum3mv

Some explorers (including mempool.space and blockstream.info) incorrectly reject this address, which is what caused the earlier verification issues.

The underlying issue remains unchanged: the funds are confirmed on-chain but are not derived by the currently opened wallet, consistent with either a passphrase (hidden wallet) or derivation-path mismatch.

I appreciate the guidance so far.

Originality Ai: 100% Confident
Sapling Ai: 100% Ai Generated
GPTZero: 95% Ai Generated

It seems the User has encountered a problem that's why he has Posted, and he has shared on the best place he could but I believe using Ai makes us feel about him a little less genuine and more of a troll. He's Welcome to share his problem but shouldn't  use Ai.

[SatoPrincess]

The User jwsutherland is Using Ai to post in technical discussion.

I believe the owner of the account is not a native English speaker, and is using an AI translator. This case is very different from users trying to generate post with AI.

[Solokan]

I initially suspected after seeing posts from both of them that they were using AI. so i checked some of their earlier posts and found that both of them were making similar types of posts using AI.

• Solokan

Yes, I am also impressed with Aston Villa because this season they are performing much better than last season. Last season they only finished in 6th place, whereas this season they are in 3rd place, and it is certainly not impossible that Aston Villa could win the championship this season. It seems that Unai Emery has found the right strategy for his players, so it is no surprise that Aston Villa has been difficult to beat by other teams lately.

In my opinion, the upcoming match between Arsenal and Aston Villa will definitely be a highly anticipated match because Arsenal will definitely want to win in order to stay at the top of the table, while Aston Villa will also try to win because if they can defeat Arsenal, it will increase their chances of achieving their goal of winning the trophy this season. Who do you think will win the match? In my opinion, it's very difficult to predict the outcome of the match.

Originality.ai : 98% Ai Generated
Zerogpt: 100% Ai Generated
Copyleaks AI Content Detector: 100% Ai Generated

The point difference between Real Madrid and Barcelona is only 4 points, which is not a huge gap, and Real Madrid still has a chance to surpass Barcelona's points tally. Barcelona is currently in an uncertain position because Real Madrid will certainly pose a threat to them. However, the season is still long, so if Barcelona fails to win consistently, it will be easy for Real Madrid to overtake them.

However, in my opinion, Barcelona is a difficult team to beat, so I believe it won't be easy for Real Madrid to overtake Barcelona. We'll just have to wait and see what happens. Nevertheless, with the current 4-point gap between Real Madrid and Barcelona, this is certainly more intriguing than if there were a larger point difference between the two teams.

Originality.ai : 80% Ai Generated
Zerogpt: 100% Ai Generated
Copyleaks AI Content Detector: 100% Ai Generated

Yes, lately Ittihad has been playing well and it seems that Ittihad's performance will improve because this season is different from last season. Today, Ittihad must be satisfied with defeating Al Shabab 2-0, and of course, Ittihad's victory over Al Shabab will make them even more enthusiastic for the upcoming matches.

Last season, Ittihad did play well and were a tough team to beat, but now many clubs have bought new players, so the teams Ittihad faces this season are different from last season. Therefore, I think it's only natural that Ittihad is in its current position. However, I still believe Ittihad can be considered a strong team, as they might perform even better in upcoming matches. It’s a shame Benzema didn’t score today, though I really wanted to see him score. In the next match, Ittihad will face Neom. I’m sure it will be an exciting game. Who do you think will win that match?

Originality.ai : 70% Ai Generated
Zerogpt: 100% Ai Generated
Copyleaks AI Content Detector: 100% Ai Generated

Yes, at that time there were several players who were injured and Real Madrid really needed new players, but it was unfortunate that even though Ancelotti advised Perez to buy players, Perez did not grant Ancelotti's request, which ultimately resulted in Real Madrid not winning any trophies and Ancelotti being fired. I also hope Perez can learn from last season's experience and avoid repeating the same mistake. Now we'll just have to wait and see what happens—whether Real Madrid will sign new players in the upcoming transfer window or not.

But sometimes I also understand Real Madrid and Perez's decision to never buy players in the January transfer window because Real Madrid always has good players and always has good first and second-string players. So, in my opinion, there won't be any problems even if Real Madrid doesn't bring in new players because they already have good players. So, of course, the coach must be able to strategize. But we won't know what will happen in the January transfer window—whether new players will come to Real Madrid or not. But yes, in my opinion, there won't be any new players coming because Real Madrid still has good players, and I think Xabi must be able to train the existing players so that Real Madrid can perform even better.

Originality.ai : 98% Ai Generated
Zerogpt: 65% Ai Generated
Copyleaks AI Content Detector: 100% Ai Generated

I don't use AI to write. However, I use translation tools such as Google Translate and sometimes Deepl. To address some of my language limitations, I hope that's okay. I've also made some adjustments. Sometimes, some of my regional languages ​​aren't translated properly. So, I always double-check and proofread my writing before posting it. This makes it easier for everyone to understand.

I'll try some of the tools the OP provided to double-check my post reported above as AI-related and compare it to other sites the reporter hasn't tested yet.

Result
1.

Yes, I am also impressed with Aston Villa because this season they are performing much better than last season. Last season they only finished in 6th place, whereas this season they are in 3rd place, and it is certainly not impossible that Aston Villa could win the championship this season. It seems that Unai Emery has found the right strategy for his players, so it is no surprise that Aston Villa has been difficult to beat by other teams lately.

In my opinion, the upcoming match between Arsenal and Aston Villa will definitely be a highly anticipated match because Arsenal will definitely want to win in order to stay at the top of the table, while Aston Villa will also try to win because if they can defeat Arsenal, it will increase their chances of achieving their goal of winning the trophy this season. Who do you think will win the match? In my opinion, it's very difficult to predict the outcome of the match.

1. https://app.gptzero.me/: The result is 100% human.
2. https://quillbot.com/ai-content-detector: 0% of text is likely AI
3. https://stealthwriter.ai/: 100% Human-Written

2.

The point difference between Real Madrid and Barcelona is only 4 points, which is not a huge gap, and Real Madrid still has a chance to surpass Barcelona's points tally. Barcelona is currently in an uncertain position because Real Madrid will certainly pose a threat to them. However, the season is still long, so if Barcelona fails to win consistently, it will be easy for Real Madrid to overtake them.

However, in my opinion, Barcelona is a difficult team to beat, so I believe it won't be easy for Real Madrid to overtake Barcelona. We'll just have to wait and see what happens. Nevertheless, with the current 4-point gap between Real Madrid and Barcelona, this is certainly more intriguing than if there were a larger point difference between the two teams.

1. https://stealthwriter.ai/: 83% Human-Written
2. https://quillbot.com/ai-content-detector: 0% of text is likely AI
3. https://originality.ai/: 55% Confident That's AI


3.

Yes, at that time there were several players who were injured and Real Madrid really needed new players, but it was unfortunate that even though Ancelotti advised Perez to buy players, Perez did not grant Ancelotti's request, which ultimately resulted in Real Madrid not winning any trophies and Ancelotti being fired. I also hope Perez can learn from last season's experience and avoid repeating the same mistake. Now we'll just have to wait and see what happens—whether Real Madrid will sign new players in the upcoming transfer window or not.

But sometimes I also understand Real Madrid and Perez's decision to never buy players in the January transfer window because Real Madrid always has good players and always has good first and second-string players. So, in my opinion, there won't be any problems even if Real Madrid doesn't bring in new players because they already have good players. So, of course, the coach must be able to strategize. But we won't know what will happen in the January transfer window—whether new players will come to Real Madrid or not. But yes, in my opinion, there won't be any new players coming because Real Madrid still has good players, and I think Xabi must be able to train the existing players so that Real Madrid can perform even better.

1. https://stealthwriter.ai/: 88% Human-Written
2. https://www.zerogpt.com/: 61.06% AI GPT*
3. https://quillbot.com/ai-content-detector: 0% text is Likely AI
4. https://app.gptzero.me/: 100% Human

[Vompola]

1. https://stealthwriter.ai/: 88% Human-Written
2. https://www.zerogpt.com/: 61.06% AI GPT*
3. https://quillbot.com/ai-content-detector: 0% text is Likely AI
4. https://app.gptzero.me/: 100% Human

First of all I will tell you to stop lying. Every one of your posts has already been checked and I have checked your posts again and given the screenshots here so that you have no chance to lie anymore.
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/12/31/UzNBjd.jpeg
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/12/31/UzNgD5.jpeg
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/12/31/UzN8nz.jpeg
You should not try to claim innocence because you have already proven yourself to be a fraud and a fool. You have removed the posts that AI has accused you of from your profile. You may not know that even if you post a post on a forum, that post will be deleted, but every post you have made can be easily found through ninjastic.space.

[AuchanX]

User: Sasori17

This is solid advice but way harder to execute than it sounds. When Bitcoin's dumping 30% and your portfolio is bleeding, your brain screams at you to sell. That's when herd mentality really kicks in.

The whales know this. They're counting on retail to panic sell at the bottom and FOMO buy at the top. It's basically a wealth transfer from emotional traders to patient ones.

Honestly though, most people are better off just holding long-term rather than trying to be contrarian traders. Going against the herd sounds easy until you're actually doing it alone while everyone tells you you're an idiot.

Stealthwriter: 86% AI

SUI's been solid for a while, it's just that most people ignored it until the price started moving. Fast, cheap transactions and actual DeFi activity… the fundamentals were always there.

The real test is whether it can sustain growth without relying on hype cycles. Right now it feels like it's in that weird middle ground where it's too established to be "early" but not proven enough to be a top-tier chain yet.

The tech is legit but the token price feels inflated compared to where the ecosystem actually is.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 80% AI

Exactly. The Iranian situation is just the most visible example right now, but inflation is a global issue that's slowly eroding savings everywhere.

What makes Bitcoin powerful here isn't just that it's deflationary by design, but that it gives people financial sovereignty - no government can devalue your BTC holdings through money printing.

The real question is adoption. Even if people understand Bitcoin can protect them, many governments will fight tooth and nail against it because it threatens their monetary control. We've already seen this with China's ban and various regulatory crackdowns. The challenge isn't just educating people about Bitcoin - it's creating resilient infrastructure and peer-to-peer networks that can survive government hostility.

That's why decentralization matters so much. The more distributed the network, the harder it is for any single authority to shut it down.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 86% AI
Originality: 100% AI

[HustleZ]

~snip~

It isn't a Valid excuse. You have written many posts in English Which were quite good and the Grammar was nice. You wrote Well without any translator. So what could be the use of translator now?? It is evident that you are using Ai Generated Text to Fulfill the posts quota for the signature campaigns and you are trying to get away with it By saying you use translator which you clearly don't need.

[MisFoxie]

I don't use AI to write. However, I use translation tools such as Google Translate and sometimes Deepl. To address some of my language limitations, I hope that's okay. I've also made some adjustments. Sometimes, some of my regional languages ​​aren't translated properly. So, I always double-check and proofread my writing before posting it. This makes it easier for everyone to understand.

I'll try some of the tools the OP provided to double-check my post reported above as AI-related and compare it to other sites the reporter hasn't tested yet.

Stop spewing nonsense already, if your content are written by you it won't be AI content even if you translate with "Google translate". If you don't believe me then here is the proof, I translate a Spanish and indonesian topic from local board but the result show human written.

Dentro de lo un poco decepcionante que está resultando el precio este año hay una cosa que no para: la adopción de bitcoin. Recuerdo cuando me registré en el foro que si veías un youtuber hablando de bitcoin era porque se dedicaba a ello exclusivamente, a las criptomonedas. Hoy en día casi todos los youtubers de finanzas en general (salvo alguno como Peter Schiff) tienen exposición a bitcoin. Algunos es un 5%, otros es un 50% pero todos hablan de bitcoin.

Con los canales más tradicionales de noticias pasa lo mismo. En 2017 si veías alguna noticia era por alguna estafa que se había producido o alguien que habían pillado vendiendo material ilícito por internet cobrando en bitcoin. Pero hoy en día se habla de bitcoin en canales como CNBC o Bloomberg con casi la misma normalidad que se habla de las empresas tecnológicas.

After translating Spanish language to English with Google Translate: https://talkimg.com/images/2025/12/31/UzEMvW.jpeg
 the results of AI content from Translated content
Copy leak: 0%
Sapling AI: 0.1% copy
GPTZero: 88% human

Perkembangan Bitcoin dan cryptocurrency lainnya di Indonesia sangatlah pesat dan sejauh yang kita tau untuk saat ini Bappebti telah melegalkan Bitcoin dan cryptocurrency lainnya untuk bisa diperdagangkan di bursa berjangka (Pasar fisik aset Kripto) sebagai produk komoditas.

Tentunya langkah yang ditempuh beserta segala aturannya mendapat respon dari berbagai kalangan Kripto yang ada di Indonesia ini baik itu dari kalangan para trader kripto maupun pihak-pihak penyelenggara market Kripto. Bahkan ada beberapa pihak yang menganggap aturan-aturan (Peraturan No.5 Tahun 2019) yang dikeluarkan oleh Bappebti dianggap terlalu memberatkan buat para penyelenggara bursa Kripto (Exchanges), hal-hal yang dianggap memberatkan antara lain :

After translating Indonesian language to English with Google translate: https://talkimg.com/images/2025/12/31/UzEz2H.jpeg
The results of AI content:
Undetectable Ai: 98% likely human
Gptzero: 100% human
SaplingAi: 0% fake
Copyleak: 0% AI


While your many content are genarated by AI, I also found some.

Yes, Real Madrid must now forget this defeat and use it as a lesson for the future so they don't repeat the same mistakes. But actually, if Real Madrid's players hadn't committed the foul that led to Manchester City's penalty kick, there was a chance the match could have ended in a draw. But in that match, both teams fought seriously, and I found the game very entertaining. However, I didn't expect Rodrygo to play so well and score a goal in that match because I thought Vinicius would be the one to score, but unfortunately, Vini didn't score.

It seems that Manchester City must be very happy now that they have defeated Real Madrid, and their mentality will certainly improve. I believe Manchester City will be more motivated in their upcoming matches in the Champions League and the English Premier League because defeating Real Madrid must feel different. Manchester City will next face Bodo/Glimt, while Real Madrid will face Monaco. They must now prepare themselves because, of course, the teams in the Champions League are strong and cannot be underestimated. Sometimes, teams that are not considered strong can surprise everyone by becoming strong.

Copyleak: 100% AI
SaplingAi: 100% fake
OriginalityAI: 100% AI

After being defeated by Chelsea with a score of 3-0, Barcelona has now managed to defeat Alaves with a score of 3-1. Of course, in that match, the Barcelona players can be said to have performed well because they won the match. Dani Olmo performed very well in that match because he scored 2 goals, and Yamal also performed well in that match because he scored 1 goal. However, what I regret about that match is why Barcelona still conceded a goal, even though Alaves and Barcelona have different squads. It's clear that Barcelona has the best squad, so in my opinion, Barcelona shouldn't have conceded any goals to Alaves at all. I think Barcelona still has a weak defense, and I hope Flick can improve that because if Barcelona faces a team stronger than Alaves, they could potentially draw or lose.

But fortunately, in that match, I bet on Barcelona to win, which ultimately earned me a profit. Barcelona is now in first place, and the competition between Real Madrid and Barcelona is becoming increasingly fierce because Real Madrid will certainly try to knock Barcelona off the top spot in the standings. We don't know what will happen at the end of the season because both Barcelona and Real Madrid have a great chance of winning the trophy. The team that remains consistent, avoids defeats and draws, will deserve to be champions. The outcome of the upcoming El Clasico match will also determine which team deserves to be champions. We'll just have to wait and see what happens.

Zerogpt: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% fake
Copyleak: 100% AI

Sometimes written by human can also show AI content but not all time. I think in your case you genarate your content with AI in your regional language then translate with Google translate am i right?

[HustleZ]

A renowned Ai Shitposter has woken up and started his/her mighty goal of Shitposting Again.
He is Previously tagged by @Nutildah, @memehunter and@_act but when he posted in The WO thread he was caught by Nutildah where he Didn't accept him using Ai and left The forum using The words

I tried to contribute but fuck y'all

But he has started posting Again and should be Red tagged because of using foul language, trolling and Ai use.

For the Ref.

User: Shawheer Khan

1

Now that we are in 2026, some of the big unknowns from past years are becoming clearer, while new risks and opportunities are emerging. Bitcoin is no longer a niche experiment, but it is still very sensitive to macro, regulatory, and structural changes. Below are some events and themes in 2026 that could meaningfully affect the Bitcoin market.

1. Life After the 2024 Halving
We are now deep into the post-2024 halving era. Miner rewards are lower, and weaker or inefficient miners have likely already been flushed out. This puts more focus on transaction fees and miner efficiency. Any stress in the mining sector—energy costs, regulations, or hashrate shifts—can still cause short-term volatility, even if the long-term supply shock is already priced in.

2. Global Monetary Policy and Debt Pressure
Many countries continue to struggle with high debt levels. Any return to aggressive money printing, bailouts, or currency devaluation strengthens Bitcoin’s store-of-value narrative. At the same time, if interest rates remain high for longer than expected, risk assets can face pressure. Bitcoin often reacts sharply to shifts in liquidity, even when its fundamentals remain unchanged.

3. Regulation Is No Longer Just “Coming”
By 2026, regulation is not a future threat—it is an active reality. Some regions have moved toward clearer frameworks, which helps institutions and larger investors feel more comfortable. Others are pushing tighter controls on exchanges, KYC, and even self-custody. Markets tend to dislike uncertainty, so sudden regulatory announcements can still cause sharp price reactions.

4. Institutional Behavior and ETF Flows
Institutional involvement is now more visible than ever. ETFs, custodians, and corporate treasuries play a bigger role in market structure. Large inflows or outflows can move price quickly, and this can amplify both rallies and corrections. Retail investors should understand that Bitcoin is increasingly influenced by players with much deeper pockets.

5. Geopolitical Instability and Capital Controls
Ongoing geopolitical tensions, sanctions, and capital restrictions continue to highlight Bitcoin’s censorship-resistant properties. In regions facing currency instability or restricted access to banking, Bitcoin adoption often increases organically. These developments rarely move price overnight, but they contribute to long-term demand.

6. Self-Custody and Exchange Risk Awareness
Even in 2026, exchange failures, freezes, or policy changes remain a risk. More users are learning—sometimes the hard way—that “not your keys, not your coins” is not just a slogan. Any major custody-related incident can shake confidence in the short term while reinforcing the importance of Bitcoin’s core principles in the long term.

Conclusion
Bitcoin in 2026 sits at an interesting crossroads. It is more mature, more regulated, and more widely held—but still volatile and misunderstood. Short-term price movements will continue to react to macro events, regulation, and liquidity, while long-term value remains tied to scarcity, security, and adoption. For investors, patience and risk management matter just as much now as they ever did.
As always, nothing is guaranteed—but ignoring these factors would be a mistake

Originality Ai: 100% Confident
Sapling Ai: 100% Ai Generated
GPTZero: 100% Ai Generated

2.

I mostly agree. If the 4-year cycle really is fading, Bitcoin will have to respond more to macro conditions than internal narratives. It doesn’t have earnings, executives, or product news like stocks, so it naturally behaves more like gold or other scarce commodities, where liquidity, real rates, and confidence in fiat systems matter most.

I also agree that attention will increasingly shift to who controls supply—large miners, institutions, governments, and long-term holders effectively removing coins from circulation. That supply concentration can matter more than day-to-day “news.”
Where I’d slightly push back is calling the cycle completely dead. It may be weaker or distorted by macro forces, but supply shocks and human behavior still exist.

Happy New Year to all—wishing everyone a healthy, peaceful, and prosperous 2026.

Originality Ai: 100% Confident
Sapling Ai: 100% Ai Generated
GPTZero: 100% Ai Generated

3.

I agree with the general idea that consistent, long-term accumulation of bitcoin has historically paid off, and that dollar-cost averaging helps people avoid emotional decision-making. The discipline of putting in a fixed amount over time, even something as small as $10 per week, can be more important than the size of the investment itself. Bitcoin’s fixed supply and its continued adoption do give it a stronger long-term thesis than most fiat currencies.

That said, I don’t fully agree with the implication that small weekly buys are inherently impractical or fee-prohibitive. In many regions, people already batch purchases, use low-fee platforms, or buy monthly instead of weekly to manage fees. While fees do matter—especially for lower-income investors—they are not an unsolvable problem, and they don’t necessarily undermine the strategy if handled intelligently.

I also agree that self-custody becomes increasingly important over time, particularly once the stack grows into something meaningful. Many newcomers underestimate this aspect, and learning about private keys, backups, and secure storage is just as critical as learning how to buy. However, I’d disagree with the idea that keeping coins on exchanges early on is always a major risk. For very small amounts, the practical risk is often lower than the risk of users losing their own keys due to inexperience. Self-custody is a responsibility, not just a virtue.

Where I’d push back a bit is the assumption that bitcoin will “surely” outperform fiat over the next 10 years. While I personally find the thesis compelling, it’s still an investment, not a guarantee. Overconfidence can be just as dangerous as fear, especially for people new to
investing. Managing expectations matters as much as believing in the asset.

Overall, I think the strongest takeaway is this: slow accumulation, education, and gradual improvement in security practices tend to work better than trying to optimize everything from day one. Bitcoin rewards patience and learning, but it doesn’t eliminate risk—and understanding that balance is what separates sustainable investors from disappointed ones.

Originality Ai: 100% Confident
Sapling Ai: 100% Ai Generated
GPTZero: 100% Ai Generated

[HustleZ]

A renowned Ai Shitposter has woken up and started his/her mighty goal of Shitposting Again.
He is Previously tagged by @Nutildah, @memehunter and@_act but when he posted in The WO thread he was caught by Nutildah where he Didn't accept him using Ai and left The forum using The words

I tried to contribute but fuck y'all

But he has started posting Again and should be Red tagged because of using foul language, trolling and Ai use.

For the Ref.

User: Shawheer Khan

This is pure fiction, not “proof.”
You’re repeating a made-up storyline and dressing it up as facts. Nutildah’s accusation came first, and the rest simply echoed it without independent thinking or verification. That’s not evidence—that’s influence and bandwagoning
.
Nothing you posted actually proves anything. No side-by-side analysis, no consistency checks, no objective standard—just assumptions stacked on assumptions. Leaving a thread is not an admission of guilt, and claiming otherwise is intellectually dishonest.

What you’re doing here isn’t exposing anything, it’s inventing intent and motives after the fact to fit a narrative you already decided on. If this is your bar for “catching” someone, then you’re not investigating—you’re fabricating.

Next time, bring actual evidence instead of recycling DT opinions and pretending they magically become facts

I dont know what's a clearer evidence than this but Interestingly this is also Ai generated Shit 💩

[HustleZ]

~snip~

I'm sorry man but it hurts to see how dumb you are 

[Lucius]

User : DonaldCryptoTalk1

Bitcoin adoption continues to grow globally. More people now own Bitcoin through exchanges, ETFs, mobile wallets, and payment apps than ever before. From an adoption perspective, this looks like success. Bitcoin is no longer a niche idea, and its presence in mainstream finance keeps expanding.

At the same time, self-custody appears to be declining. A large portion of users prefer custodial platforms because they are simple, familiar, and require little technical knowledge. Private keys, backups, and personal responsibility are often seen as obstacles rather than essential features. For many users, convenience now outweighs sovereignty.

This shift raises an important concern. Bitcoin was designed to remove the need for trusted intermediaries, yet most users still rely on third parties to hold their funds. Custodial services reintroduce risks such as censorship, account freezes, data leaks, and single points of failure. While these services improve accessibility, they also move Bitcoin closer to the traditional financial model it was meant to challenge.

On the other hand, full self-custody is not easy for everyone. Mistakes can be costly, and many people lack the time or confidence to manage their own keys securely. For some, custodial solutions act as a gateway into Bitcoin, lowering the barrier to entry. The question is whether users eventually move toward self-custody or remain permanently dependent on intermediaries.

This situation presents a trade-off between growth and principles. Wider adoption increases Bitcoin’s reach and legitimacy, but declining self-custody may weaken its core values over time. Should the priority be making Bitcoin easier to use, even if that means sacrificing some sovereignty? Or should more effort be placed on education and tools that empower users to control their own funds?

Is the current trend a temporary phase in adoption, or a long-term shift away from Bitcoin’s original purpose?

Copyleaks -> AI Content Found 100 - AI Phrases Detected 23
Stealthwriter -> The vast majority of content is likely AI-generated (81%), with only a small portion (19%) human-written.
GPTZero  -> We are highly confident this text was AI generated 100%

I think a lot of people here will quietly recognize themselves in your post. Most of us didn’t start with big money, perfect timing, or perfect decisions. A lot of long-time users began exactly like you: small savings, some early mistakes, and the hope that slow progress would eventually matter.

What you’re doing now, saving a steady amount, avoiding hype, and thinking long-term  is actually the part that most newcomers never manage to do. They chase shortcuts, get burned, get bitter, and leave. You didn’t. That already puts you ahead.

$100 a month might look insignificant today, but Bitcoin has this strange way of making small, boring decisions look smart in hindsight. The people who stuck with modest DCA for years usually ended up in far better shape than the ones who tried to “get rich fast”.

You’re asking an honest question:
“Will Bitcoin change my life, or will it mostly help me much later?”

The honest answer is: it can do both, depending mostly on your patience and consistency. Maybe it becomes a meaningful cushion in your 40s or 50s. Maybe the next cycle ends up giving you a boost earlier. Nobody can time that. But if you stop now because it feels too small, then you guarantee that nothing will change.

One thing I can say from experience: being in your early 30s is not “late”. It’s actually a perfect position for building something meaningful over the next couple decades. And if you ever have kids, having a savings base in an asset that can’t be printed into dust is a bigger gift than you probably realize right now.

Bitcoin won’t replace working, but it can reward discipline. And discipline is exactly what you’re already practicing. Keep stacking what you can, keep improving yourself outside Bitcoin, and don’t discount the future you’re building just because the amounts feel small today.

Small steps only look small in the moment. Years later, they’re the part you’re grateful you didn’t skip.

Copyleaks -> AI Content Found 100 - AI Phrases Detected 3
Stealthwriter -> The vast majority of content is likely AI-generated (90%), with only a small portion (10%) human-written.
GPTZero  -> We are highly confident this text was AI generated 100%


This is already a well-known AI spammer, but as we can see, it still doesn't give up. Let's hope that some of the mods will release the water and flush the garbage from the forum permanently.

[xmrhopium]

Is being a Legendary user now just only a rank on the forum?

new year, new trick, mucho laziness this "Legendary" rank user Ayers spamming the forum with AI contents.

also tagging @Little Mouse here as a side note to take a look.

I agree with the view that we need to treat them with respect, and should not insult or use harsh language towards them. But I don't think it's necessary to pay them high salaries or become too close to them. We need to maintain a certain distance, because being too lenient or too friendly can easily lead to being looked down on instead. In the workplace, establishing clear boundaries between superiors and subordinates, as well as between employers and employees, to avoid unnecessary troubles.

We don't need to pay them high salaries, we just need to pay them a salary that is commensurate with their dedication and effort. There is no guarantee that paying high salaries will secure their loyalty. Sometimes, this can even lead to them becoming complacent or having an inflated sense of their own abilities.

copyleaks:100% AI detected
Sapling AI:100% AI
zerogpt:97% AI

I don't want to disappoint you, but here's another fact, Bitcoin reached $69k in 2021, and compared to the 2025 ATH of $126k. Bitcoin has only increased by about 82% over the past four years, and this is not an attractive return for a risky asset. This shows that Bitcoin is very volatile and our profits will depend on the entry price. Additionally, don't forget the four-year cycle of the market, and if history repeats itself, next year will be a bear market.

Therefore, we shouldn't be overconfident and assume that simply buying Bitcoin at the beginning of the year will double our profits by year’s end. Bitcoin tends to appreciate in the long term, but its short and medium term movements are unpredictable.

copyleaks:100% AI detected
Sapling AI:100% AI
zerogpt:78% AI

More specifically, Bitcoin only increased by about 82% during this cycle, and compared to previous cycles, this is one of the worst growth cycles. Similarly, historically, 2025 was projected to be a year of strong growth, similar to 2017 and 2021. However, ironically, it ended with a negative growth rate of 6.33%.
I also find it confusing that many people say 2025 will be a great year.

organility ai: 98% Ai replaced copyleaks with organilityai
sapling Ai: 92% Ai
zerogpt: 69%

(add: some more posts of their seems written with the help of ai and text spinner has been used mostly!)

[HustleZ]

I have Spotted 2 users using Ai and they are probably alts of eachother As the 1 sMerit hbqchjy had he sent it to bits86 on an Ai Generated Post.

User 1:  hbqchjy
User 2: bits86

For the Ref.

User 1:

Post 1:

Thanks @Don Pedro Dinero for the merit and the reply!
You're right—this topic has been discussed many times before. I'm just trying to bring it up again to catch the attention of more newcomers.
I totally agree that media loves big numbers. "Bitcoin hits $89,000!" grabs way more headlines than "1 sat = $0.00089". That's why sats won't become mainstream anytime soon.
Still, I'm optimistic: Bitcoin reaching $1 million per coin won't take as long as people think. Ten years ago, almost no one imagined it going from a few hundred dollars to $10k—yet it smashed through $60k, $70k, $80k... Things often move much faster than we expect. When 1 BTC is truly worth millions, pricing daily items with tons of decimals will feel ridiculous, and the shift to sats will happen naturally.
Hope we all live to see that day!

Originality Ai: 100% Confident
Sapling Ai: 99.99% Ai Generated
GPTZero: 100% Mixed

Post 2:

Many people look at the price of 1 BTC and think, "I can't afford that." This is a classic Unit Bias illusion.

Imagine if Gold could only be traded by the "Ton." Most people would think Gold is unattainable. But because we trade Gold in ounces and grams, everyone knows they can own a piece of it.

Bitcoin needs this same shift. We need to normalize pricing in "Bits" or "Sats" instead of full coins.

1 BTC = 100,000,000 Bits (Sats)

Here is why this shift is crucial for Gen Z and mass adoption:

1. Psychological Wealth Owning 0.001 BTC feels insignificant and scarce. Owning 100,000 Bits feels substantial and achievable. It’s not just math; it’s psychology. People want to own whole numbers, not decimals.

2. Usability for Payments Pricing a coffee at 0.00015 BTC is confusing and anti-human. Pricing it at 15,000 Bits makes sense. It brings Bitcoin back to being a currency, not just a museum exhibit.

3. The "Too Expensive" Myth Smaller units destroy the myth that you have to be rich to enter. You don't need to buy the whole bar; you just need to start stacking your first gram.

It’s time to change the denomination.

#Bitcoin #Sats #UnitBias #MassAdoption

Sapling Ai: 99.9% Ai Generated
GPTZero: 100% Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident

Post 3:

I've heard these arguments for 10 years. Here is why you are missing the bigger picture:

1. Volatility is the Price of Performance You are confusing "volatility" with "risk." Volatility is simply price discovery in action as Bitcoin monetizes from zero to trillions. Stability is for fiat currencies that slowly lose purchasing power. Volatility is the admission fee you pay for the best-performing asset of the decade. If you can't handle the heat, you don't deserve the kitchen.


2. Scarcity IS the Utility Comparing Bitcoin to Apple is a category error. You are applying industrial logic to monetary assets. Gold isn't valuable because of jewelry; it's valuable because of its monetary premium. Bitcoin’s "demand" comes from people who want an asset that cannot be diluted, seized, or censored. In a world of infinite money printing, absolute scarcity is the ultimate utility.


3. Early HODLing Was Not "Easy" This is a massive misconception. Early adopters faced Existential Risk—the risk that Bitcoin would actually go to zero, get banned, or the code would fail. We held through Mt. Gox and total market collapses. Today, you only face price volatility. It is infinitely easier to HODL now with BlackRock involved than it was when it was just "magic internet money."


4. Zoom Out on Correlation In a liquidity crisis (when the economy tanks), correlations go to 1 because people sell everything to get cash. That doesn't mean Bitcoin failed. Look at the 4-year timeframe. Bitcoin is the only lifeboat that consistently outperforms the sinking ship of the fiat economy.

Bitcoin doesn't need you to believe in it. It will just continue to verify blocks.

Zoom out.

Sapling Ai: 88.6% Ai generated
Originality Ai: 98% confident
GPTZero: 100% Ai Generated

User: 2

Post 1:

Today marks 17 years since Bitcoin officially began operating.

No CEO. No employees. Permissionless. Censorship-resistant. Unforgeable. Zero security breaches. 100% Open Source. Your keys, your coins. 24/7 Uptime.

People say Bitcoin is being "tamed" by governments and institutions. They are wrong.

Bitcoin hasn't changed. The supply is still fixed. The consensus is still math. The halving is still code.

Instead, the world had to change to fit Bitcoin:

FASB changed accounting rules.

Nations changed legal frameworks.

Wall Street changed ETF approval paths.

They realized they cannot change Bitcoin. They can only change themselves to become part of it.

The asset that could not be changed is now changing the world.

Originality Ai: 100% Confident
Sapling Ai: 99.9% Ai Generated
GPTZero: 100% Ai Generated

Post 2:

"You make a valid point—people often find excuses regardless of the price.

However, I respectfully disagree when it comes to newcomers. We can't ignore simple human psychology. There's a reason companies do stock splits: people prefer owning whole numbers over decimals.

For a beginner, buying '0.001 BTC' feels insignificant (like 'crumbs'), whereas stacking '100,000 Sats' feels like real progress. Smaller units remove that mental barrier and are essential for mass adoption."

Originality Ai: 100% Confident
Sapling Ai: 99.9% Ai Generated
GPTZero: 100% Ai Generated

[AuchanX]

This person is spreading fake information generated by AI on the technical board.

User: jwlcore

This is an experimental effort based on a Bitcoin-derived codebase.

The goal is not to replace Bitcoin or alter its existing cryptographic rules,
but to introduce an additional post-quantum signature verification path at the
consensus level.

The approach is modular:

- Legacy ECDSA/secp256k1 remains untouched and continues to validate historical
  data and legacy outputs.
- A new script opcode introduces post-quantum signature verification (currently
  Dilithium-based) as a separate consensus path.
- The scriptPubKey explicitly determines which verification path is used, so
  there is no ambiguity for nodes.

Post-quantum signatures are intended to become the default for newly created
outputs over time, while legacy cryptography remains only for compatibility.
No hard cutoff, no forced migration.

At the current stage:
- The post-quantum opcode is integrated into the script engine.
- Deterministic consensus tests are passing.
- There is no mining, no release, and no economic activity yet.

This post is not an announcement and not a proposal for deployment.
It is shared to explain the design and to invite technical discussion
around consensus safety, script semantics, and long-term maintainability.

Copyleaks: 100% AI detected
Sapling: 15% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI
Originality: 100% AI

Interesting experiment, but it’s important to separate script-level constructions from actual post-quantum authorization.

The approach described here still relies on ECDSA as the authorizing primitive. The hash preimage only adds an extra condition, but does not remove ECDSA as a single point of failure. Once a valid signature is visible in the mempool, a quantum adversary can extract the private key and attempt a higher-fee double spend.

This is why such constructions don’t meaningfully change the threat model they wrap ECDSA instead of replacing it.

A real post-quantum design requires:
   removing ECDSA from the authorization path
   introducing a new signature primitive verified by all nodes
   enforcing it at the consensus level, not as a P2SH policy trick

In our work we’re addressing exactly these issues by adding a native post-quantum signature opcode and a separate consensus validation path, with full negative testing (invalid sigs, invalid sighash, size limits, script errors). https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5569815.0

This avoids mempool race attacks, fee-bumping games, and “quantum double-spend auctions”, because authorization no longer depends on ECDSA at all.

Script-level experiments are useful for exploration, but post-quantum security ultimately requires protocol-level changes.

copyleaks:100% AI detected
Sapling: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI
Originality: 98% AI

Thanks that’s exactly the class of issues I’m focusing on next.

The current goal was to make the verification path explicit and deterministic first, without touching legacy secp256k1, precisely to avoid cross-path confusion.

DoS surface from large PQ objects is well understood. The plan is to enforce strict size and format validation before PQ_Verify is ever reached, so malformed or borderline inputs are rejected in constant time.

In addition, explicit limits are being introduced at both consensus and policy level (max sig size, max pubkey size, script element limits), so verification cost is bounded and predictable.

Optimizing representation and moving heavy data out of the base path is intentionally deferred to a dedicated witness-style upgrade, once the base PQ consensus rules are fully hardened.

Appreciate the insight this is exactly the direction the design is heading.

copyleaks:100% AI detected
Sapling: 100% AI
Originality: 99% AI
Stealthwriter: 71% AI

[Ayers]

Is being a Legendary user now just only a rank on the forum?

new year, new trick, mucho laziness this "Legendary" rank user Ayers spamming the forum with AI contents.

also tagging @Little Mouse here as a side note to take a look.

Mate, you will find most accurate result in
Gptzero and stealthwriter

I have some auto correction tools installed in my browser, like Grammarly and a few other extension. That could be why the tools you used are flagging some of my posts as AI generated

You selected a few specific posts and relied on particular tools to support your claim. If you check my other posts or analyze everything using the core GPTZero tool, you will see that my posts are Not AI.

Post1-

Post2-

Post3-

[lovesmayfamilis]

Is being a Legendary user now just only a rank on the forum?

new year, new trick, mucho laziness this "Legendary" rank user Ayers spamming the forum with AI contents.

also tagging @Little Mouse here as a side note to take a look.

Mate, you will find most accurate result in
Gptzero and stealthwriter

I have some auto correction tools installed in my browser, like Grammarly and a few other extension. That could be why the tools you used are flagging some of my posts as AI generated

You selected a few specific posts and relied on particular tools to support your claim. If you check my other posts or analyze everything using the core GPTZero tool, you will see that my posts are Not AI.

Lately, there have been a lot of new detectives in this section, but their testimony sometimes doesn't correspond to reality. Testimonies from sites like https://sapling.ai/ have long been discussed in this thread as evidence that shouldn't be relied upon. Likewise, one should not always judge those who claim and believe Copyleaks evidence, as online translators have indeed started using AI to correct spelling errors. However, for some reason, today's new detectives don't provide evidence from sites like QuillBot and, in some cases, GPTZero, carefully excluding them, as they likely understand that they are deliberately accusing people for merit or other personal gain.

I would try to review the text itself from the start to understand whether the person is capable of responding that way, whether his speech is alive, or, on the contrary, whether it sounds mechanical, like the answers of a robot. Moderators most often delete posts after a full accusation confirmed by QuillBot, but I checked several previously posted accusations, and their assessment is far from accusing people of using AI. Moreover, the probability must be higher than 70 percent, which is not the case in the posts of today's new detectives.