Casinos not asking for KYC to register and play, but do require it to withdraw

[Dewi Aries]

Yes, this can be done at the beginning of creating an account so that the desired problems do not occur. I don't know whether if the casino faces a problem with large withdrawals from winnings obtained by members who have done KYC, what other schemes will they use to prevent withdrawals.
It would be very funny if members who had done KYC at the beginning experienced withdrawal problems when they won and were asked to do KYC again. and in most complaints, we can see that the data verification process can be carried out by the casino compliance team in quite a long time.

There are so many platforms currently in circulation that we can choose which platform is suitable for us, but of course it's not just by looking at it that we can feel suitable, of course we have to gamble first so we can determine whether the platform is suitable or not. Apart from that, at the beginning of registration, of course we will be asked several things, one of which is KYC, which may be the correct aim of what you said, to avoid unwanted problems, and apart from that, to make withdrawal transactions easier.

It does sound unethical when members have fulfilled requirements such as KYC or others, and when they want to make a withdrawal they are advised to reapply for KYC, which seems ridiculous. But on the other hand, those who act as hosts can of course do whatever they want, including asking members to submit their KYC again. Even though it doesn't make sense to the members, when the host is like that then I think the members won't be able to do anything but follow the host's orders.

[LUCKMCFLY]

It does sound unethical when members have fulfilled requirements such as KYC or others, and when they want to make a withdrawal they are advised to reapply for KYC, which seems ridiculous. But on the other hand, those who act as hosts can of course do whatever they want, including asking members to submit their KYC again. Even though it doesn't make sense to the members, when the host is like that then I think the members won't be able to do anything but follow the host's orders.

In a way they make them bow their heads because it is money that they are going to get, so this can be beneficial from the point of view that it will always lead to a better way of doing things, of course, I am one of the people who does not does everything in case I left my KYC, I always try to have my KYC in the casinos that are 100% trustworthy, like stake.com, bitcasino.io, sportsbet.io, where normally you have to complete the KYC once and not They make so much trouble, I know that when there are larger withdrawals they do have a more rigorous KYC but this is within the casino rules, even so they are reliable casinos and that is what gives more security.

[Hamphser]

It does sound unethical when members have fulfilled requirements such as KYC or others, and when they want to make a withdrawal they are advised to reapply for KYC, which seems ridiculous. But on the other hand, those who act as hosts can of course do whatever they want, including asking members to submit their KYC again. Even though it doesn't make sense to the members, when the host is like that then I think the members won't be able to do anything but follow the host's orders.

In a way they make them bow their heads because it is money that they are going to get, so this can be beneficial from the point of view that it will always lead to a better way of doing things, of course, I am one of the people who does not does everything in case I left my KYC, I always try to have my KYC in the casinos that are 100% trustworthy, like stake.com, bitcasino.io, sportsbet.io, where normally you have to complete the KYC once and not They make so much trouble, I know that when there are larger withdrawals they do have a more rigorous KYC but this is within the casino rules, even so they are reliable casinos and that is what gives more security.

You wont really be having that kind of feeling of being discomfort or having that worry about complying any KYC if you are really that indeed dealing up with a platform on which you do know that they are old timers or someone whose really that being known or reputable into this market on which you would be having that kind of confidence and dont mind much about sending out any documents for verification.
Although there would really be still those people who would really be that skeptical in this regard because there are really indeed doesnt really like for their information to be given out no matter
how legit or reputable a site or platform is. This is why crypto gambling had become so much that becomes bigger due to the essence that people could really be able to play anonymously but well
we do know on how regulation becomes that always a problem where these platforms do make out those kind of integration.

[jijy86861]

I would like to recommend Shuffle cryptocasino to you. Because it looks like a legitimate and popular crypto casino, offering a good selection of original games and a VIP program. During registration, of course, you will have to provide additional personal information, but that's what makes it different from other cryptocasinos, because it shows the level of its security for users. It's a pity that the site doesn't have a sports betting section yet, but the presence of a provably fair system and the promise of future developments indicate that there's more to come.

Overall, if you're looking to get into gambling with crypto, Shuffle is the best option for you.

Link - https://shuffleq.com

[bettercrypto]

If KYC is must, I think they mustn't allow users play/use their casino until they fill their details and get accepted rather than let them deposit and play from the very beginning. It may be somewhere in TOS but letting them play/deposit but deny withdrawal asking KYC is totally unfair and somewhat scam/cheating. Then it will be like one way door. One can enter but can't exit.

We will need to understand their own side of view as well because all that matters here is just a business strategy and nothing more, the gambling platforms will prefer seeing that they allow gamblers have the first encounter with their platform and finds it easy to bet without having challenges in doing that, then to later request for kyc in which can be the only reason they can use to hold customers down to their platform for the sake of those that wont be able to provide the requirements for it.

You are right in what you say; it is the right of any casino to require KYC from their users. Even if we say that in the beginning they didn't say that there was anything, that doesn't mean they can't require it. Of course, it's not like that because they make the rules.

Any business like a casino, especially if the casino is regulated here in the crypto gambling business, that's normal. The bad thing is that if the casino is not regulated and still requires to get the KYC of their players, it's not really right but really wrong.

[ultrloa]

If KYC is must, I think they mustn't allow users play/use their casino until they fill their details and get accepted rather than let them deposit and play from the very beginning. It may be somewhere in TOS but letting them play/deposit but deny withdrawal asking KYC is totally unfair and somewhat scam/cheating. Then it will be like one way door. One can enter but can't exit.

We will need to understand their own side of view as well because all that matters here is just a business strategy and nothing more, the gambling platforms will prefer seeing that they allow gamblers have the first encounter with their platform and finds it easy to bet without having challenges in doing that, then to later request for kyc in which can be the only reason they can use to hold customers down to their platform for the sake of those that wont be able to provide the requirements for it.

You are right in what you say; it is the right of any casino to require KYC from their users. Even if we say that in the beginning they didn't say that there was anything, that doesn't mean they can't require it. Of course, it's not like that because they make the rules.

Any business like a casino, especially if the casino is regulated here in the crypto gambling business, that's normal. The bad thing is that if the casino is not regulated and still requires to get the KYC of their players, it's not really right but really wrong.

Its their right to demand that if they are transparent on their KYC verification to people. But if they are claiming to be a non-KYC compliant casino then this is different story since its like they are deceiving people and just that word only for marketing. They know that there's a lot of people doesn't like KYC and they cheat them for telling that they don't ask KYC but later on they surprised them with this documentation which is bad action they made. We know that casino will be regulated that's why they should not use that No KYC compliant or needed word so that there will be no lying factor will happen there since if I see a casino telling it but require me to do that then I will think about that they are a scam casino.

[Shamm]

If KYC is must, I think they mustn't allow users play/use their casino until they fill their details and get accepted rather than let them deposit and play from the very beginning. It may be somewhere in TOS but letting them play/deposit but deny withdrawal asking KYC is totally unfair and somewhat scam/cheating. Then it will be like one way door. One can enter but can't exit.

We will need to understand their own side of view as well because all that matters here is just a business strategy and nothing more, the gambling platforms will prefer seeing that they allow gamblers have the first encounter with their platform and finds it easy to bet without having challenges in doing that, then to later request for kyc in which can be the only reason they can use to hold customers down to their platform for the sake of those that wont be able to provide the requirements for it.

You are right in what you say; it is the right of any casino to require KYC from their users. Even if we say that in the beginning they didn't say that there was anything, that doesn't mean they can't require it. Of course, it's not like that because they make the rules.

Any business like a casino, especially if the casino is regulated here in the crypto gambling business, that's normal. The bad thing is that if the casino is not regulated and still requires to get the KYC of their players, it's not really right but really wrong.

Its their right to demand that if they are transparent on their KYC verification to people. But if they are claiming to be a non-KYC compliant casino then this is different story since its like they are deceiving people and just that word only for marketing. They know that there's a lot of people doesn't like KYC and they cheat them for telling that they don't ask KYC but later on they surprised them with this documentation which is bad action they made. We know that casino will be regulated that's why they should not use that No KYC compliant or needed word so that there will be no lying factor will happen there since if I see a casino telling it but require me to do that then I will think about that they are a scam casino.

Some casino didn't tell at first that they have KYC and not  all casino like that is a scam casino but some are not . The best example of that is those casino who actually have doubt or they are suspected that their customers break the rules and regulations. So that's their reason that they are hold the payment and ask for some KYC. But still there are many casino that are scammers and that are their sayings that they don't have any KYC but once you are gonna withdraw your winnings then  they are many KYC but still don't have a chance to get.

[LUCKMCFLY]

It does sound unethical when members have fulfilled requirements such as KYC or others, and when they want to make a withdrawal they are advised to reapply for KYC, which seems ridiculous. But on the other hand, those who act as hosts can of course do whatever they want, including asking members to submit their KYC again. Even though it doesn't make sense to the members, when the host is like that then I think the members won't be able to do anything but follow the host's orders.

In a way they make them bow their heads because it is money that they are going to get, so this can be beneficial from the point of view that it will always lead to a better way of doing things, of course, I am one of the people who does not does everything in case I left my KYC, I always try to have my KYC in the casinos that are 100% trustworthy, like stake.com, bitcasino.io, sportsbet.io, where normally you have to complete the KYC once and not They make so much trouble, I know that when there are larger withdrawals they do have a more rigorous KYC but this is within the casino rules, even so they are reliable casinos and that is what gives more security.

You wont really be having that kind of feeling of being discomfort or having that worry about complying any KYC if you are really that indeed dealing up with a platform on which you do know that they are old timers or someone whose really that being known or reputable into this market on which you would be having that kind of confidence and dont mind much about sending out any documents for verification.
Although there would really be still those people who would really be that skeptical in this regard because there are really indeed doesnt really like for their information to be given out no matter
how legit or reputable a site or platform is. This is why crypto gambling had become so much that becomes bigger due to the essence that people could really be able to play anonymously but well
we do know on how regulation becomes that always a problem where these platforms do make out those kind of integration.

Yes, we totally agree with that, but there are people who sometimes, when they are newbies, don't really know which are the platforms that do things well, or those that are very famous and that are legitimate or that are very authentic in which can actually be trusted, some do not know it and give their KYC in a casino that perhaps due to ignorance over time it becomes a scam, I believe that crypto technology should never ask for KYC because it should be anonymous and have the privacy that everyone search, those who want to reveal their identity that is another thing, but it is something that is currently very mandatory in every sense, and that is becoming fashionable, there is very little resistance to no KYC and most or all casinos require it.

[Hamphser]

~~

~

~

Yes, we totally agree with that, but there are people who sometimes, when they are newbies, don't really know which are the platforms that do things well, or those that are very famous and that are legitimate or that are very authentic in which can actually be trusted, some do not know it and give their KYC in a casino that perhaps due to ignorance over time it becomes a scam, I believe that crypto technology should never ask for KYC because it should be anonymous and have the privacy that everyone search, those who want to reveal their identity that is another thing, but it is something that is currently very mandatory in every sense, and that is becoming fashionable, there is very little resistance to no KYC and most or all casinos require it.

We would really be wishing for this to be on this way on which it should be something that will not really be asking for KYC but we do know that these businesses are involved huge amount of money
on which it would really be that impossible that they wont be that becoming that being regulated sooner or later. This is why its not really that shocking that those old non kyc platforms had become that being asking some KYC as of todays on which it is something anticipated or something that being that could really happen in the future. It wont really be that much of an issue if you would really be that
dealing with the right platform but of course you wont really be still be sure on where those informations would really be flying on but well if there's nothing you do hide
then i dont see on why someone would really be that so scared.

[danadc]

At this point we cannot see that this is something to surprise us because we all know that casinos when they are starting out are a complete love, but when the casinos start to add more licenses then the demands are much greater and everything begins to be more difficult, I am clear that winning in a casino is difficult, and one of the things that makes it more difficult is the KYC to withdraw, and I am of the type that when I win I like to withdraw to enjoy my winnings, so it is a thousand Sometimes it is better to choose a good casino, do the KYC and then withdraw and win, that is what has become the best way to avoid tantrums.

[Hatchy]

, so it is a thousand Sometimes it is better to choose a good casino, do the KYC and then withdraw and win, that is what has become the best way to avoid tantrums.

Like I've always said, it better to pass through the stress of kyc upon registeration than going through it when you make a huge win. Some new casinos might act like they barely require the kyc data of the user at first just so, the user feels safe and continues play.njot until he wins a very huge amount will they start making the kyc compulsory. To save one self the trouble, we just have to look for reputable casinos and play there instead just Incase we might be scared of releasing our personal data to some new or random casino that we don't trust with such data. They will ask for the kyc at the very end so avoid being a victim.

[delfastTions]

, so it is a thousand Sometimes it is better to choose a good casino, do the KYC and then withdraw and win, that is what has become the best way to avoid tantrums.

Like I've always said, it better to pass through the stress of kyc upon registeration than going through it when you make a huge win. Some new casinos might act like they barely require the kyc data of the user at first just so, the user feels safe and continues play.njot until he wins a very huge amount will they start making the kyc compulsory. To save one self the trouble, we just have to look for reputable casinos and play there instead just Incase we might be scared of releasing our personal data to some new or random casino that we don't trust with such data. They will ask for the kyc at the very end so avoid being a victim.

By the way, this dilemma is about what kind of stress you need to experience in case of a big win. 
Namely, the stress of providing your personal data to the casino, which does not know how it will then manage it and use this same KYC.  And on the other hand, there is stress from the actual loss of a large win if the player for some reason cannot provide personal data.  In my opinion, all this now creates the greatest discomfort in the entire gambling industry in crypto-casinos and generally has an extremely bad effect on the overall pleasure of the game.  It can be said that the widespread implementation of KYC has completely ruined the gambling industry itself. 
And of course all this needs to be resolved somehow.  However, the general digitalization of civilization does not seem to allow this to be done in the near foreseeable future.  Here we are faced with a serious attack on the human rights to privacy and financial freedom.   And this is the wrong step in the development of the entire civilization. 
These are obvious negative consequences of the development of digital technologies, which, as it turns out, bring not only help and convenience to humanity, but also unpleasant surprises.

[gunhell16]

It does sound unethical when members have fulfilled requirements such as KYC or others, and when they want to make a withdrawal they are advised to reapply for KYC, which seems ridiculous. But on the other hand, those who act as hosts can of course do whatever they want, including asking members to submit their KYC again. Even though it doesn't make sense to the members, when the host is like that then I think the members won't be able to do anything but follow the host's orders.

In a way they make them bow their heads because it is money that they are going to get, so this can be beneficial from the point of view that it will always lead to a better way of doing things, of course, I am one of the people who does not does everything in case I left my KYC, I always try to have my KYC in the casinos that are 100% trustworthy, like stake.com, bitcasino.io, sportsbet.io, where normally you have to complete the KYC once and not They make so much trouble, I know that when there are larger withdrawals they do have a more rigorous KYC but this is within the casino rules, even so they are reliable casinos and that is what gives more security.

Honestly, dude, after all, KYC is not a big deal if the casino has a good reputation and is a long-time player in the crypto space. It's just that there are others who don't want KYC and are sensitive to their data privacy. And that is their right, too.

Now, if they initially registered with the casino because they knew there was no KYC, so they made a deposit and came to the point where they won a large amount of money playing gambling, and suddenly they are required to submit KYC, there is nothing they can do or choose if they have funds in the gambling platform but to still submit. Because they only have two choices: to submit a KYC to release the winning prize to the casino or not to release the winning prize to the casino? That's all easy to do, right?

[betswift]

It does sound unethical when members have fulfilled requirements such as KYC or others, and when they want to make a withdrawal they are advised to reapply for KYC, which seems ridiculous. But on the other hand, those who act as hosts can of course do whatever they want, including asking members to submit their KYC again. Even though it doesn't make sense to the members, when the host is like that then I think the members won't be able to do anything but follow the host's orders.

In a way they make them bow their heads because it is money that they are going to get, so this can be beneficial from the point of view that it will always lead to a better way of doing things, of course, I am one of the people who does not does everything in case I left my KYC, I always try to have my KYC in the casinos that are 100% trustworthy, like stake.com, bitcasino.io, sportsbet.io, where normally you have to complete the KYC once and not They make so much trouble, I know that when there are larger withdrawals they do have a more rigorous KYC but this is within the casino rules, even so they are reliable casinos and that is what gives more security.

Honestly, dude, after all, KYC is not a big deal if the casino has a good reputation and is a long-time player in the crypto space. It's just that there are others who don't want KYC and are sensitive to their data privacy. And that is their right, too.

Now, if they initially registered with the casino because they knew there was no KYC, so they made a deposit and came to the point where they won a large amount of money playing gambling, and suddenly they are required to submit KYC, there is nothing they can do or choose if they have funds in the gambling platform but to still submit. Because they only have two choices: to submit a KYC to release the winning prize to the casino or not to release the winning prize to the casino? That's all easy to do, right?

If you play at a licensed casino, you are obliged to pass the KYC, and you know that you are on the safe side!

[EarnOnVictor]

If KYC is must, I think they mustn't allow users play/use their casino until they fill their details and get accepted rather than let them deposit and play from the very beginning. It may be somewhere in TOS but letting them play/deposit but deny withdrawal asking KYC is totally unfair and somewhat scam/cheating. Then it will be like one way door. One can enter but can't exit.

We will need to understand their own side of view as well because all that matters here is just a business strategy and nothing more, the gambling platforms will prefer seeing that they allow gamblers have the first encounter with their platform and finds it easy to bet without having challenges in doing that, then to later request for kyc in which can be the only reason they can use to hold customers down to their platform for the sake of those that wont be able to provide the requirements for it.

You are right in what you say; it is the right of any casino to require KYC from their users. Even if we say that in the beginning they didn't say that there was anything, that doesn't mean they can't require it. Of course, it's not like that because they make the rules.

No, that is for the KYC casinos only, it is certainly not correct if you are generalizing things here. It is never the right of ALL casinos to request for KYC completion but rather the right of casinos that do not advertise no-KYC. We should often differentiate things to avoid misconceptions for some people. No-KYC casinos do not have the right whatsoever to ask you to complete any KYC, after all, you might have joined the casinos due to that mantra. So why are they requesting and forcing you to complete KYC? And of course, when you register with them, being a no-KYC casino means that they can't have anything to hold you in their terms and conditions, so they do not have any right over you because the terms and conditions will ever be silent about the KYC but will rather embolden you to go on with them without fear.

However, if they later change their mind and want you to provide the KYC, then their terms and conditions must have changed by then which by law requires them to convey it to you and you must also agree to it before you can provide them with the KYC to relinquish your right, and that is subjected to the fact of whether or not you still want to gamble with them. I know many would be forced to complete the KYC by the casino in this case since they may not have any choice, but legally, they do not have any right to force you against what you signed up for. The worst they can do is to tell you to withdraw your money and leave their casino. It is only the KYC casinos and those who clearly wrote it in their terms and conditions that you have to do the KYC that have the right in every sense.

[erep]

Honestly, dude, after all, KYC is not a big deal if the casino has a good reputation and is a long-time player in the crypto space. It's just that there are others who don't want KYC and are sensitive to their data privacy. And that is their right, too.

Now, if they initially registered with the casino because they knew there was no KYC, so they made a deposit and came to the point where they won a large amount of money playing gambling, and suddenly they are required to submit KYC, there is nothing they can do or choose if they have funds in the gambling platform but to still submit. Because they only have two choices: to submit a KYC to release the winning prize to the casino or not to release the winning prize to the casino? That's all easy to do, right?

Some complaints are not because they avoid KYC but the changing casino rules raise suspicion for some gamblers, the rules and conditions page of some casinos does not mention the need for users to complete KYC verification for withdrawal requirements but the rules appear in notifications when gamblers want to request a high withdrawal, but some gamblers It doesn't matter that if this happens at a reputable casino, the gambler will try to complete KYC so that he can request a withdrawal.

[LUCKMCFLY]

It does sound unethical when members have fulfilled requirements such as KYC or others, and when they want to make a withdrawal they are advised to reapply for KYC, which seems ridiculous. But on the other hand, those who act as hosts can of course do whatever they want, including asking members to submit their KYC again. Even though it doesn't make sense to the members, when the host is like that then I think the members won't be able to do anything but follow the host's orders.

In a way they make them bow their heads because it is money that they are going to get, so this can be beneficial from the point of view that it will always lead to a better way of doing things, of course, I am one of the people who does not does everything in case I left my KYC, I always try to have my KYC in the casinos that are 100% trustworthy, like stake.com, bitcasino.io, sportsbet.io, where normally you have to complete the KYC once and not They make so much trouble, I know that when there are larger withdrawals they do have a more rigorous KYC but this is within the casino rules, even so they are reliable casinos and that is what gives more security.

Honestly, dude, after all, KYC is not a big deal if the casino has a good reputation and is a long-time player in the crypto space. It's just that there are others who don't want KYC and are sensitive to their data privacy. And that is their right, too.

Now, if they initially registered with the casino because they knew there was no KYC, so they made a deposit and came to the point where they won a large amount of money playing gambling, and suddenly they are required to submit KYC, there is nothing they can do or choose if they have funds in the gambling platform but to still submit. Because they only have two choices: to submit a KYC to release the winning prize to the casino or not to release the winning prize to the casino? That's all easy to do, right?

Generally speaking yes, you are right about that, that's why when we look for casinos that are similar to doing things better because they have that requirement, I know that KYC is required when withdrawing a large amount of money. We have to respect that the desire to have the money is superior to a KYC, so it is better to comply with the KYC, because as you say, I prefer a KYC to leaving the money in the drawer, but that's how it is. when the caisno has to do it The truth is that before, a few years ago, KYC was not necessary, and they continued paying, things have changed a lot, privacy and anonymity, now it is something that is not a right, and managing it by manipulating the money itself, if there is no KYC then there is no money, but they should do it from the beginning, from the moment of deposit, if there is no KYC there is no deposit, I think so It is more equal.

[bitterguy28]

I would like to recommend Shuffle cryptocasino to you. Because it looks like a legitimate and popular crypto casino, offering a good selection of original games and a VIP program. During registration, of course, you will have to provide additional personal information, but that's what makes it different from other cryptocasinos, because it shows the level of its security for users. It's a pity that the site doesn't have a sports betting section yet, but the presence of a provably fair system and the promise of future developments indicate that there's more to come.

Overall, if you're looking to get into gambling with crypto, Shuffle is the best option for you.

Link - https://shuffleq.com

Yeah right, this is how advertising goes now  as the team is using shill account pretending to be not connected  to the said site but completely promoting the site as if they have won and been playing many years in that casino.

At this point we cannot see that this is something to surprise us because we all know that casinos when they are starting out are a complete love, but when the casinos start to add more licenses then the demands are much greater and everything begins to be more difficult, I am clear that winning in a casino is difficult, and one of the things that makes it more difficult is the KYC to withdraw, and I am of the type that when I win I like to withdraw to enjoy my winnings, so it is a thousand Sometimes it is better to choose a good casino, do the KYC and then withdraw and win, that is what has become the best way to avoid tantrums.

They must be honest from the start not unless their operating country added those security then they have no choice but to comply.but as long as they are not being asked then stay to their rules and not changing just to harass withdrawals .

[bakasabo]

At this point we cannot see that this is something to surprise us because we all know that casinos when they are starting out are a complete love, but when the casinos start to add more licenses then the demands are much greater and everything begins to be more difficult, I am clear that winning in a casino is difficult, and one of the things that makes it more difficult is the KYC to withdraw, and I am of the type that when I win I like to withdraw to enjoy my winnings, so it is a thousand Sometimes it is better to choose a good casino, do the KYC and then withdraw and win, that is what has become the best way to avoid tantrums.

They must be honest from the start not unless their operating country added those security then they have no choice but to comply.but as long as they are not being asked then stay to their rules and not changing just to harass withdrawals .

But they are honest from the start. They never hide that they might ask for verification at some moment. It is gamblers fault that they dont read rules, ToS or FAQ.

I find it simple, dont want to pass KYC, dont gamble. All that anonymity and privacy are excuses most of the time. If we talk about crypto gamblers, then those people have already left a lot of "foot steps", so much private info in the internet during their lifetime, that hiding behind "I dont want to lose privacy" sounds like a joke. Many deposit from wallet address from exchanges they have verified and used credit cards on for fiat exchange, that their "I will never upload my passport to casino" sounds like absurd.

[ultrloa]

At this point we cannot see that this is something to surprise us because we all know that casinos when they are starting out are a complete love, but when the casinos start to add more licenses then the demands are much greater and everything begins to be more difficult, I am clear that winning in a casino is difficult, and one of the things that makes it more difficult is the KYC to withdraw, and I am of the type that when I win I like to withdraw to enjoy my winnings, so it is a thousand Sometimes it is better to choose a good casino, do the KYC and then withdraw and win, that is what has become the best way to avoid tantrums.

They must be honest from the start not unless their operating country added those security then they have no choice but to comply.but as long as they are not being asked then stay to their rules and not changing just to harass withdrawals .

But they are honest from the start. They never hide that they might ask for verification at some moment. It is gamblers fault that they dont read rules, ToS or FAQ.

I find it simple, dont want to pass KYC, dont gamble. All that anonymity and privacy are excuses most of the time. If we talk about crypto gamblers, then those people have already left a lot of "foot steps", so much private info in the internet during their lifetime, that hiding behind "I dont want to lose privacy" sounds like a joke. Many deposit from wallet address from exchanges they have verified and used credit cards on for fiat exchange, that their "I will never upload my passport to casino" sounds like absurd.

Good for casino that didn't say something about that they are not KYC compliant casino and have license since we can assume easily that they would require this KYC requirements to their costumers. But for casino always telling something that they are not a KYC compliant casino and put something about it on the title of their thread that their casino is KYC free.

Then with that we can really have a problem regarding on their implementation since if there's a sudden changes and they asked this especially when we request a withdrawal from their casino then I will think about that casino is fooling us and do some suspicious activity just to delay or trying to do some excuse for us not to get our money from them. We must avoid those casino doing this trapping activities.
People must really know that KYC became a normal requirement and if a gambler want to proceed then comply but if not as you said they better quit and not to gamble anymore since this will just give them discomfort while playing for worrying such requirements might be asked from them.