🐳 Whale.io - Casino & Sportsbook 💰 Daily Cashbacks 💰

[Lakai01]

Thanks @whale for these contests and the quick add to into my account!

Although I haven't won anything myself in a Whale competition, I try to take part regularly because the chances of winning are not bad. Above all, you can pick 3 slots again if you have posted screenshots of your bets on Whale.io!

@willi has already shared the competition in our German-language forum section. Of course, it would be even better if the prize went to Germany or Austria and whale.io became even better known there

[examplens]

In my opinion, the biggest problem is ensuring that there is no manipulation. Unfortunately, screenshots are very easy to fake these days.

Your ideas all make sense, and yeah, manipulating screenshots is a possible problem in this challenge, if there is a way to detect fake screenshots, then we are all set. There could also be a rule which says that anyone who posts fake screenshots would be given a negative tag, that should dissuade people from doing that, especially when we make only ranks from Full Member and above eligible for the contest.

The negative tag is an interesting idea and will certainly help people take honest screenshots. However, it was necessary to clarify in advance whether tagging is also suitable for such incidents.

We need to take our finger off the trigger a little and not leave negative tags so easily. I understand that cheating should not be allowed in such contests, but in the end, it is necessary to prove such claims. Maybe it is better that the condition is sharing only bet ID. It is easier to check and prevents cheating.

btw, What are these stickers for?

[Fivestar4everMVP]

btw, What are these stickers for?

That's a telegram sticker if I am not mistaken, that is, the sticker can be used on telegram, you can send it to your loved ones as gift for whatever occasion that it suits, or just for fun...

Pavel Durov (the CEO of Telegram) sometime last year announced that the chat messenger is coming to an era where anyone will be able to convert and mint their telegram stickers as nfts which they can hold in their wallet or sell in the nft market to other sticker lovers and traders.

Basically though, I have not seen any real world use for this, other than for internet fun and sensation, you can choose to keep it or sell it off, up to you.

[hd49728]

That's a telegram sticker if I am not mistaken, that is, the sticker can be used on telegram, you can send it to your loved ones as gift for whatever occasion that it suits, or just for fun...

Not for fun at all by your following information.

Pavel Durov (the CEO of Telegram) sometime last year announced that the chat messenger is coming to an era where anyone will be able to convert and mint their telegram stickers as nfts which they can hold in their wallet or sell in the nft market to other sticker lovers and traders.

Basically though, I have not seen any real world use for this, other than for internet fun and sensation, you can choose to keep it or sell it off, up to you.

It's like a lie that those stickers are like for fun while the Telegram CEO planned to develop something that allow users to convert Telegram stickers to NFTs that are sellable. In the end, it's no longer just for fun, but purely for money.

NFTs are useless and "for fun, then turn to for money" Telegram stickers then Telegram NFTs will cause money losses of many users. I don't consider this as a funny development from Telegram.

[Lakai01]

We need to take our finger off the trigger a little and not leave negative tags so easily. I understand that cheating should not be allowed in such contests, but in the end, it is necessary to prove such claims. Maybe it is better that the condition is sharing only bet ID. It is easier to check and prevents cheating.

I completely agree with you, of course. Negative tagging should and may only happen if the fraud is clearly proven.
In such a case, however, the tag is definitely justified. I would not enter into a trade with someone who openly cheats in such games, as there would also be a high probability of being cheated.


As others have already said: The sticker is most likely only applicable in Telegram and can be used there in chats.

[Z-tight]

I completely agree with you, of course. Negative tagging should and may only happen if the fraud is clearly proven.
In such a case, however, the tag is definitely justified. I would not enter into a trade with someone who openly cheats in such games, as there would also be a high probability of being cheated.

Yeah, very true, cheating in such a contest is surely deserving of a negative tag, the only problem is proving it and it would not be good to accuse and tag people wrongly, that's unacceptable. We will see which idea Whale and icopress go with, we have shared our ideas and it is now up to them to decide what the challenge would look like and what the rules would be.

[@Whale]

One Livestream, one opportunity...

🔥 11 UTC - Eli Russ and Purple Cat

 Join the livestream in:
🔥 Whalesocials 🔥 Twitch 🔥 Kick

Don't miss out!💸

[moneystery]

Yeah, very true, cheating in such a contest is surely deserving of a negative tag, the only problem is proving it and it would not be good to accuse and tag people wrongly, that's unacceptable. We will see which idea Whale and icopress go with, we have shared our ideas and it is now up to them to decide what the challenge would look like and what the rules would be.

icopress should have a way to prove whether the screenshot is real or just a fake, because they have communication with whale representatives, and they can check whether it is real or not. this should not be a problem. and even if someone tries to cheat, and it is proven that they did it, I also agree that giving negative trust is very reasonable to them.

[SamReomo]

Yeah, very true, cheating in such a contest is surely deserving of a negative tag, the only problem is proving it and it would not be good to accuse and tag people wrongly, that's unacceptable.

I also agree if someone cheats in such contests then a negative tag is good option to stop such cheaters but I also agree that it's not right to tag someone before it's proven that they have cheated in the contest. Well, still if someone does something like that then at least such a person should get a warning that if they are found with cheating then they will get a negative tag.

[JiiBs]

Yeah, very true, cheating in such a contest is surely deserving of a negative tag, the only problem is proving it and it would not be good to accuse and tag people wrongly, that's unacceptable.

I also agree if someone cheats in such contests then a negative tag is good option to stop such cheaters but I also agree that it's not right to tag someone before it's proven that they have cheated in the contest. Well, still if someone does something like that then at least such a person should get a warning that if they are found with cheating then they will get a negative tag.

The question here is,
Is cheating an offense? I think yes and that’s before society and on the forum. nothing that undermines the efforts of others to be legit and doesn’t play by the rules is cheating and if someone is doing that to put themselves at a more advantageous space compared with others, then that’s cheating and it’s left for those who check these or regulate it by some means to do the needful. Tagging is the way of the forum and it still goes in the likely scenario of any obvious cheating.

[Taskford]

I completely agree with you, of course. Negative tagging should and may only happen if the fraud is clearly proven.
In such a case, however, the tag is definitely justified. I would not enter into a trade with someone who openly cheats in such games, as there would also be a high probability of being cheated.

Yeah, very true, cheating in such a contest is surely deserving of a negative tag, the only problem is proving it and it would not be good to accuse and tag people wrongly, that's unacceptable. We will see which idea Whale and icopress go with, we have shared our ideas and it is now up to them to decide what the challenge would look like and what the rules would be.

If the user is suspected doing that I guess neutral tag must be serve while investigation is ongoing. It maybe remove if the person involve is been cleared for cheating or either the tag will be raised to negative if proven cheating.

But for sure there are ways to know if the user is cheating and people who lead this contest would provably knows it.

That's why its not good for anyone to do this and take advantage on the situation then cheat since they cannot come up clean since for sure that those illegal action they made will immediately busted.

[NotATether]

After like 15/20 minutes playing it I hit the bonus game and the 10 free spins became in the end more than 40 thanks to the coin that continued dropping on the tiles.
At the end of the bonus game I got an awesome 219x win. My lucky day!

Yeah, slots games do that all the time. I got 50x on Le Bandit after losing for like 30 minutes straight. Still was out of pocket $5 after all the bonuses.

Unfortunately shortly after that I lost it all playing on Roulette. Not much, but like $100 or something. The risk/reward was simply too high.

Should've just stuck to Mines and Hi-Lo.

[Lakai01]

[...]
That's why its not good for anyone to do this and take advantage on the situation then cheat since they cannot come up clean since for sure that those illegal action they made will immediately busted.

I don't think cheating itself will be much of an issue as long as you only have people with accounts of a certain rank/merit count/... and not newbie accounts. Nobody will cheat with a higher ranked account for a few dollars and destroy it with a negative tag.

But otherwise I agree with you: a tag is of course only justified if fraud is definitely proven. Whale certainly has the means to do this.

[notocactus]

I don't think cheating itself will be much of an issue as long as you only have people with accounts of a certain rank/merit count/... and not newbie accounts. Nobody will cheat with a higher ranked account for a few dollars and destroy it with a negative tag.

But otherwise I agree with you: a tag is of course only justified if fraud is definitely proven. Whale certainly has the means to do this.

It's popuarly seen in contests that many newbie accounts joining it, after waking up or very recently registering their accounts in the forum. This example is same with altcoin bounties, airdrops, and promotion bonus campaigns from any company from cryptocurrency industry to gambling industry.

Cheaters that use newbies accounts for cheating in for example bounties will not lose anything. If bounty managers don't add terms to have earned merit for joining, they will continue to abandon tagged newbie accounts to next new registered newbie accounts in future bounties or promotion programs.

It's known fact for years, and it's nothing like a big discovery in 2025. 

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I've been meaning to ask this question here, I've been playing on whale casino for several months now, particularly on or through their telegram mini app since I am very active on telegram and find using their mini app more easy and convenient for me, but recently, i decided to login to my account through their web site, I selected telegram login in their login options and successfully logged in, but ever since then, the mini app stopped working for me, each time I try to open the mini app, I get the error message just as shown in the screenshot below



I don't know what happened but does this mean once one uses his or her whale account on the mini app to login on the site, access to the same account on the mini app is automatically denied? Not just access to the account alone but the mini app entirely?
Or does this mean the casino has terminated their telegram mini app?
Will indeed appreciate any useful information or insight on this.

[hopenotlate]

I'm experiencing the same issue for a while, not sure about the exact date it started thou, for my understanding it is not a whale casino fault but is due to a telegram update to their policy terms : telegram doesn't allow access anymore to whale bot from app downloaded from PlayStore. ( maybe someone with a deeper knowledge might be more precise)
I can still access whale on web by using telegram.web or by accessing directly the casino and logging in via email address.  

[Etranger]

Recently, a new signature campaign dedicated to the Whale casino appeared on a neighboring forum Altcoinstalks. I am very glad that this casino is scaling up its advertising and becoming more recognizable. I wanted to say that similar contests, like those that are regularly held on behalf of the Whale casino here on Bitcointalk, would also be extremely interesting and in demand also there, in Altcoinstalks. I will look forward to being able to participate there too. Good luck, Whale 🐳

[examplens]

Looking back at the Whale contest 🐳 Whale.io | Man City & Liverpool - 23 Feb ⚽️ Yellow Week 🟨 $100
0 (Zero) Yellow cards in this game  I would never expect that.
This is a sufficient indicator of how much desire MC had to win. 0 cards means no aggression even though they were behind for most of the game.

[Z-tight]

0 (Zero) Yellow cards in this game   I would never expect that.
This is a sufficient indicator of how much desire MC had to win. 0 cards means no aggression even though they were behind for most of the game.

Lol, very funny game, City didn't have any desire to win the game, they were just passing the ball around the field with no real threat at Liverpool's goal. As City passed around the field, Liverpool managed the game very well, hence no yellow card, who would have thought about that outcome. I've gone through the contest thread and nobody went for 0 card, lol.

[DaNNy001]

Looking back at the Whale contest 🐳 Whale.io | Man City & Liverpool - 23 Feb ⚽️ Yellow Week 🟨 $100
0 (Zero) Yellow cards in this game  I would never expect that.
This is a sufficient indicator of how much desire MC had to win. 0 cards means no aggression even though they were behind for most of the game.

Like am still very suprised at the performance of Manchester city because they were playing as if there are the ones winning showing no sign of aggressiveness at all and Liverpool too on hand was very cautious of how they marked the Manchester city players and that's why the match ended up with no card at all.  So as it's stand I guess this round of contest will be voided or maybe the whales team will give a winner base on other criteria.