Bitcoin Forum
December 06, 2016, 02:27:05 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 ... 86 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [9 TH] Bitparking Pool, DGM 0%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining  (Read 151052 times)
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
May 12, 2013, 03:23:35 PM
 #641

We need to write algorithm add luck... I choose a really bed time to join...
1481034425
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481034425

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481034425
Reply with quote  #2

1481034425
Report to moderator
1481034425
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481034425

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481034425
Reply with quote  #2

1481034425
Report to moderator
1481034425
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481034425

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481034425
Reply with quote  #2

1481034425
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481034425
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481034425

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481034425
Reply with quote  #2

1481034425
Report to moderator
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
May 12, 2013, 07:51:16 PM
 #642

Unless 24.6.229.60 is Bitparking we will probably have orphan block... It looks like pool is not weary well connected because it took about 2 minutes for 50BTC to show up after we fond a block and I still don't see Bitparking on Blokchain.info

EDIT: It looks like this time we had IP not name for some reason... Addresses for new coins look like Bitparking...
twobits
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336

Firstbits: 1a6taw


View Profile
May 12, 2013, 08:32:16 PM
 #643

I don't know where it's getting port 52333 from. It should be port 8337. Where did you get the source from? Try:
Code:
ixcoind -addnode=50.116.37.18:8337

I got the Windows "package" from here, I thought it was the closest to the "official" binary.

Now forcing port 8337 didn't seem to do the magic. I think I need another devcoind.exe or compile it myself...


You would have better luck had you gotten the binary from here https://www.box.com/s/1mqfk22gyqq97ytdmifi

doublec
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


View Profile
May 12, 2013, 09:19:08 PM
 #644

Unless 24.6.229.60 is Bitparking we will probably have orphan block... It looks like pool is not weary well connected because it took about 2 minutes for 50BTC to show up after we fond a block and I still don't see Bitparking on Blokchain.info

EDIT: It looks like this time we had IP not name for some reason... Addresses for new coins look like Bitparking...
Bitparking pushes the new block out to multiple bitcoin nodes. Depending on which of those broadcasts the block first it gets a different IP address and blockchain.info won't show it as coming from 'Bitparking'.
doublec
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


View Profile
May 12, 2013, 10:57:06 PM
 #645

Pool user br*********at ('*' replaces name characters to avoid revealing your user id), you are mining on stratum using an scrypt miner and all your shares are rejecting. You might want to check.
roy7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434


View Profile
May 12, 2013, 11:48:00 PM
 #646

Unless 24.6.229.60 is Bitparking we will probably have orphan block... It looks like pool is not weary well connected because it took about 2 minutes for 50BTC to show up after we fond a block and I still don't see Bitparking on Blokchain.info

EDIT: It looks like this time we had IP not name for some reason... Addresses for new coins look like Bitparking...

Remember blockchain doesn't actually report the IP that found the block (that info isn't in the chain), rather they report the IP that first sent the block to blockchain's bitcoin server. It won't always be the pool itself since blockchain doesn't keep connections open to every node in the network at once.

RoyalMiningCo: Pools retired. Was fun!
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
May 13, 2013, 08:57:00 AM
 #647

Bitparking pushes the new block out to multiple bitcoin nodes. Depending on which of those broadcasts the block first it gets a different IP address and blockchain.info won't show it as coming from 'Bitparking'.
Didn't know that. I was sure it reports the finder since this is the first time I saw this from the pool I was on. You live and you learn...
doublec
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


View Profile
May 13, 2013, 09:11:16 AM
 #648

Didn't know that. I was sure it reports the finder since this is the first time I saw this from the pool I was on. You live and you learn...
You can tell it's from Bitparking anyway since I have "Bitparking" in the coinbase.
osoverflow
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 173


Viviendo Linux


View Profile WWW
May 13, 2013, 06:46:03 PM
 #649

Hi! Do you think it could be possible to merge mine NVC, PPC, TRC and other sha256d coins?

Donations: 1BTCMktcVXbDrzBgv8yqgZg1iVRNfajPz8 | LbtcMKTfcFJrjGhSBbEsG2oRtA1fsHkhou | PDqPMLbD8ahJdQrYxSUxx9UZoShbB7H2n4
Visit:
http://opticalcube.com | http://tuminium.com (Bitcoin / Mexican Pesos) | http://pagabitcoin.com (cell phone credit page) | Earn Devcoins by Writing
Littleshop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316



View Profile WWW
May 13, 2013, 08:57:59 PM
 #650

Hi! Do you think it could be possible to merge mine NVC, PPC, TRC and other sha256d coins?

Those coins are not set up for merged mining.  The creators/users of those coins would need to change them to support merged mining. 

doublec
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


View Profile
May 14, 2013, 03:59:56 AM
 #651

Pool had a 5 minute restart today to install some updates.
doublec
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


View Profile
May 14, 2013, 05:05:42 AM
 #652

Hi! Do you think it could be possible to merge mine NVC, PPC, TRC and other sha256d coins?
The only other coins the pool could merge mine are coiledcoin, groupcoin and some other whose name I forget (by the same creator as groupcoin). These aren't really actively traded though,except on an OpenTransactions server which I don't know much about.
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
May 14, 2013, 09:05:02 PM
 #653

Come on this luck sucks. Not only for us but for doublec double since DMG increases rewords on long runs... I fill his pain... Last 6 block with 17 hours average, not counting current block... With current difficulty I think that is about 61% luck, but it is even less since difficulty has just increased...
TwinTurbo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91


View Profile
May 15, 2013, 08:47:01 AM
 #654

First off, thank you DoubleC for the great pool! There's none better, with the low fees and merged mining. Smiley

I do have one request and am wondering what it would take to implement:

I have a lot of miners on your pool. They all mine against the same user / pass and when one of them goes down, I have no idea which one it is. Aside from switching my entire setup to something like BAMT, I have a hard time figuring out which miner is deficient or down since i have to log in to each one. They are on multiple networks as well.

Is there any way to extend the pool such that Username.extension mines against Username and the full list of miners are displayed with at least an active or inactive status? Even better, a rough hash rate?

I wouldn't mind creating separate accounts with your existing interface, just adding .1, .2, .3 or something after each new account if implementation would be easier. Perhaps something more unique like Username!!!1, Usrname!!!2 to identify each one would ensure nobody accidentally gets credited for someone else's work.

I'd be willing to pay extra fees for this feature. Thoughts?
tosku
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 368



View Profile WWW
May 15, 2013, 09:26:18 AM
 #655

First off, thank you DoubleC for the great pool! There's none better, with the low fees and merged mining. Smiley

I do have one request and am wondering what it would take to implement:

I have a lot of miners on your pool. They all mine against the same user / pass and when one of them goes down, I have no idea which one it is. Aside from switching my entire setup to something like BAMT, I have a hard time figuring out which miner is deficient or down since i have to log in to each one. They are on multiple networks as well.

Is there any way to extend the pool such that Username.extension mines against Username and the full list of miners are displayed with at least an active or inactive status? Even better, a rough hash rate?

I wouldn't mind creating separate accounts with your existing interface, just adding .1, .2, .3 or something after each new account if implementation would be easier. Perhaps something more unique like Username!!!1, Usrname!!!2 to identify each one would ensure nobody accidentally gets credited for someone else's work.

I'd be willing to pay extra fees for this feature. Thoughts?

You could solve this all by yourself. Set up separate accounts for all your miners like you said, username.1, username.2 etc. Then set up a php (or whatever) webscraping site that compiles the info from bitparking for all your miners and display it on a single page. You could even do this using a frameset, but it wouldn't look as nice.

Skude.se/BTC - an easier way to request your daily free coins!
pat1900
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 147


View Profile
May 15, 2013, 10:46:11 AM
 #656

You could solve this all by yourself. Set up separate accounts for all your miners like you said, username.1, username.2 etc. Then set up a php (or whatever) webscraping site that compiles the info from bitparking for all your miners and display it on a single page. You could even do this using a frameset, but it wouldn't look as nice.
No need for webscraping. Try json:

http://mmpool.bitparking.com/userstats/xxxxx

replace xxxxx with your username

USD: 0.001 BTC       EUR: 0.001 BTC        Amaz.coin: 0.000 BTC
kjlimo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498


View Profile WWW
May 15, 2013, 01:44:36 PM
 #657

Pat1900, I like your signature!

I'm curious if there's a way to point different BFL miners at different usernames?  I run 7 machines on one host computer right now and my problem is when one goes down, I notice b/c my hashrate drops by about the number that one unit would produce, then I go look at CGMiner and count the devices until I get to the missing number.

I'm thinking there's a better way that I'd be able to just restart the one miner that has stopped rather than confirming one has crashed and then restarting the whole thing.

This doesn't bother me too much, and I call this part of the 'work' of being a miner.  However, I assume there's something more elegant out there that I don't know about.

It's also tough, b/c I'll get hashrate warnings due to fluctuations rather than units actually being down. 

Either way, this is certainly my favorite pool.

Looking forward to a pool with PPC as the main chain and the rest of the merged coins as secondary. 

Also, looking forward to I0coin coming back! ... probably never...

CampBX for buying BTCs, Coinbase for selling BTCs or Vircurex or Cryptsy for trading alternate cryptocurrencies like DOGEs

PM me with any questions on these sites!  Happy to help!

Bitcoin Poker at Seals                  Strike Sapphire Casino  Free games every hour & day!
  Get Free Bitcoins here.

Spondoolies-Tech or KnC Miner for the fastest mining hardware available!

Bitpay to help your business accept bitcoin payments!
roy7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434


View Profile
May 15, 2013, 01:55:36 PM
 #658

doublec, at some point I'm going to support passing a worker identifier in the password field. You might consider something like that. Or if you don't allow periods in user names right now, let people connect with "username.1" and log them in with actual 'username' and strip off the .1 as a worker identifier when storing stats?

RoyalMiningCo: Pools retired. Was fun!
matt4054
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134


BitcoinQueue.com


View Profile WWW
May 15, 2013, 03:21:58 PM
 #659

In theory, it would be possible for miners to monitor their workers independently from the pool, typically with RPC on mining software, but in a world full of NAT, dynamic IPs (and don't get me started on the lack of IPv6 at mainstream ISPs), it is hard to achieve this.

So yes, I would support any initiative to ease the monitoring of individual workers, so you wouldn't have to check all of them in turn whenever your hashrate goes below its nominal/expected value.

★ ⏳ BitcoinQueue.com β ★ 📈 Real-time Bitcoin Unconfirmed Transaction Queue Charts ⏳ ★ Forum Topic
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
May 16, 2013, 08:37:38 AM
 #660

I have this running on the most stable miner https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=185553.0

It works good. Restarts when something is wrong...
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 ... 86 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!