Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 04:55:03 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 ... 86 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [9 TH] Bitparking Pool, DGM 0%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining  (Read 163653 times)
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 12, 2013, 03:23:35 PM
 #641

We need to write algorithm add luck... I choose a really bed time to join...
1710824103
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710824103

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710824103
Reply with quote  #2

1710824103
Report to moderator
1710824103
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710824103

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710824103
Reply with quote  #2

1710824103
Report to moderator
1710824103
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710824103

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710824103
Reply with quote  #2

1710824103
Report to moderator
No Gods or Kings. Only Bitcoin
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 12, 2013, 07:51:16 PM
 #642

Unless 24.6.229.60 is Bitparking we will probably have orphan block... It looks like pool is not weary well connected because it took about 2 minutes for 50BTC to show up after we fond a block and I still don't see Bitparking on Blokchain.info

EDIT: It looks like this time we had IP not name for some reason... Addresses for new coins look like Bitparking...
twobits
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 12, 2013, 08:32:16 PM
 #643

I don't know where it's getting port 52333 from. It should be port 8337. Where did you get the source from? Try:
Code:
ixcoind -addnode=50.116.37.18:8337

I got the Windows "package" from here, I thought it was the closest to the "official" binary.

Now forcing port 8337 didn't seem to do the magic. I think I need another devcoind.exe or compile it myself...


You would have better luck had you gotten the binary from here https://www.box.com/s/1mqfk22gyqq97ytdmifi

█████                █████      ███████             
█████                ███    █████████████       
█████                ██  █████████████████   
█████                █  ██████              ██████ 
█████                    ████                      ████ 
█████████████  █████                        ████
█████████████  █████                        ████
█████████████  █████                        ████
█████                    █████                             
█████                █  ██████              ███████
█████                ██  ███████████    █████ 
█████                ███    █████████    ████   
█████                █████      ███████    ██
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
HyperQuant.net
Platform for Professional Asset Management
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
WhitePaper
One-Pager
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
Telegram 
Facebook
Twitter
Medium
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
█████                █████      ███████             
█████                ███    █████████████       
█████                ██  █████████████████   
█████                █  ██████              ██████ 
█████                    ████                      ████ 
█████████████  █████                        ████
█████████████  █████                        ████
█████████████  █████                        ████
█████                    █████                             
█████                █  ██████              ███████
█████                ██  ███████████    █████ 
█████                ███    █████████    ████   
█████                █████      ███████    ██
doublec (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1005


View Profile
May 12, 2013, 09:19:08 PM
 #644

Unless 24.6.229.60 is Bitparking we will probably have orphan block... It looks like pool is not weary well connected because it took about 2 minutes for 50BTC to show up after we fond a block and I still don't see Bitparking on Blokchain.info

EDIT: It looks like this time we had IP not name for some reason... Addresses for new coins look like Bitparking...
Bitparking pushes the new block out to multiple bitcoin nodes. Depending on which of those broadcasts the block first it gets a different IP address and blockchain.info won't show it as coming from 'Bitparking'.
doublec (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1005


View Profile
May 12, 2013, 10:57:06 PM
 #645

Pool user br*********at ('*' replaces name characters to avoid revealing your user id), you are mining on stratum using an scrypt miner and all your shares are rejecting. You might want to check.
roy7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 12, 2013, 11:48:00 PM
 #646

Unless 24.6.229.60 is Bitparking we will probably have orphan block... It looks like pool is not weary well connected because it took about 2 minutes for 50BTC to show up after we fond a block and I still don't see Bitparking on Blokchain.info

EDIT: It looks like this time we had IP not name for some reason... Addresses for new coins look like Bitparking...

Remember blockchain doesn't actually report the IP that found the block (that info isn't in the chain), rather they report the IP that first sent the block to blockchain's bitcoin server. It won't always be the pool itself since blockchain doesn't keep connections open to every node in the network at once.
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 13, 2013, 08:57:00 AM
 #647

Bitparking pushes the new block out to multiple bitcoin nodes. Depending on which of those broadcasts the block first it gets a different IP address and blockchain.info won't show it as coming from 'Bitparking'.
Didn't know that. I was sure it reports the finder since this is the first time I saw this from the pool I was on. You live and you learn...
doublec (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1005


View Profile
May 13, 2013, 09:11:16 AM
 #648

Didn't know that. I was sure it reports the finder since this is the first time I saw this from the pool I was on. You live and you learn...
You can tell it's from Bitparking anyway since I have "Bitparking" in the coinbase.
osoverflow
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 547
Merit: 105


Bitcoin ya no es el futuro, es el presente


View Profile WWW
May 13, 2013, 06:46:03 PM
 #649

Hi! Do you think it could be possible to merge mine NVC, PPC, TRC and other sha256d coins?

Bienvenidos a la nueva tecnología
Littleshop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1003



View Profile WWW
May 13, 2013, 08:57:59 PM
 #650

Hi! Do you think it could be possible to merge mine NVC, PPC, TRC and other sha256d coins?

Those coins are not set up for merged mining.  The creators/users of those coins would need to change them to support merged mining. 

doublec (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1005


View Profile
May 14, 2013, 03:59:56 AM
 #651

Pool had a 5 minute restart today to install some updates.
doublec (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1005


View Profile
May 14, 2013, 05:05:42 AM
 #652

Hi! Do you think it could be possible to merge mine NVC, PPC, TRC and other sha256d coins?
The only other coins the pool could merge mine are coiledcoin, groupcoin and some other whose name I forget (by the same creator as groupcoin). These aren't really actively traded though,except on an OpenTransactions server which I don't know much about.
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 14, 2013, 09:05:02 PM
 #653

Come on this luck sucks. Not only for us but for doublec double since DMG increases rewords on long runs... I fill his pain... Last 6 block with 17 hours average, not counting current block... With current difficulty I think that is about 61% luck, but it is even less since difficulty has just increased...
TwinTurbo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 15, 2013, 08:47:01 AM
 #654

First off, thank you DoubleC for the great pool! There's none better, with the low fees and merged mining. Smiley

I do have one request and am wondering what it would take to implement:

I have a lot of miners on your pool. They all mine against the same user / pass and when one of them goes down, I have no idea which one it is. Aside from switching my entire setup to something like BAMT, I have a hard time figuring out which miner is deficient or down since i have to log in to each one. They are on multiple networks as well.

Is there any way to extend the pool such that Username.extension mines against Username and the full list of miners are displayed with at least an active or inactive status? Even better, a rough hash rate?

I wouldn't mind creating separate accounts with your existing interface, just adding .1, .2, .3 or something after each new account if implementation would be easier. Perhaps something more unique like Username!!!1, Usrname!!!2 to identify each one would ensure nobody accidentally gets credited for someone else's work.

I'd be willing to pay extra fees for this feature. Thoughts?
tosku
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 367
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
May 15, 2013, 09:26:18 AM
 #655

First off, thank you DoubleC for the great pool! There's none better, with the low fees and merged mining. Smiley

I do have one request and am wondering what it would take to implement:

I have a lot of miners on your pool. They all mine against the same user / pass and when one of them goes down, I have no idea which one it is. Aside from switching my entire setup to something like BAMT, I have a hard time figuring out which miner is deficient or down since i have to log in to each one. They are on multiple networks as well.

Is there any way to extend the pool such that Username.extension mines against Username and the full list of miners are displayed with at least an active or inactive status? Even better, a rough hash rate?

I wouldn't mind creating separate accounts with your existing interface, just adding .1, .2, .3 or something after each new account if implementation would be easier. Perhaps something more unique like Username!!!1, Usrname!!!2 to identify each one would ensure nobody accidentally gets credited for someone else's work.

I'd be willing to pay extra fees for this feature. Thoughts?

You could solve this all by yourself. Set up separate accounts for all your miners like you said, username.1, username.2 etc. Then set up a php (or whatever) webscraping site that compiles the info from bitparking for all your miners and display it on a single page. You could even do this using a frameset, but it wouldn't look as nice.

Skude.se/BTC - an easier way to request your daily free coins!
pat1900
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 15, 2013, 10:46:11 AM
 #656

You could solve this all by yourself. Set up separate accounts for all your miners like you said, username.1, username.2 etc. Then set up a php (or whatever) webscraping site that compiles the info from bitparking for all your miners and display it on a single page. You could even do this using a frameset, but it wouldn't look as nice.
No need for webscraping. Try json:

http://mmpool.bitparking.com/userstats/xxxxx

replace xxxxx with your username

USD: 0.000 BTC       EUR: 0.000 BTC
kjlimo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086
Merit: 1031


View Profile WWW
May 15, 2013, 01:44:36 PM
 #657

Pat1900, I like your signature!

I'm curious if there's a way to point different BFL miners at different usernames?  I run 7 machines on one host computer right now and my problem is when one goes down, I notice b/c my hashrate drops by about the number that one unit would produce, then I go look at CGMiner and count the devices until I get to the missing number.

I'm thinking there's a better way that I'd be able to just restart the one miner that has stopped rather than confirming one has crashed and then restarting the whole thing.

This doesn't bother me too much, and I call this part of the 'work' of being a miner.  However, I assume there's something more elegant out there that I don't know about.

It's also tough, b/c I'll get hashrate warnings due to fluctuations rather than units actually being down. 

Either way, this is certainly my favorite pool.

Looking forward to a pool with PPC as the main chain and the rest of the merged coins as secondary. 

Also, looking forward to I0coin coming back! ... probably never...

Coinbase for selling BTCs
Fold for spending BTCs
PM me with any questions on these sites/apps!  http://www.montybitcoin.com


or Vircurex for trading alt cryptocurrencies like DOGEs
CoinNinja for exploring the blockchain.
roy7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 15, 2013, 01:55:36 PM
 #658

doublec, at some point I'm going to support passing a worker identifier in the password field. You might consider something like that. Or if you don't allow periods in user names right now, let people connect with "username.1" and log them in with actual 'username' and strip off the .1 as a worker identifier when storing stats?
matt4054
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932
Merit: 1035



View Profile
May 15, 2013, 03:21:58 PM
 #659

In theory, it would be possible for miners to monitor their workers independently from the pool, typically with RPC on mining software, but in a world full of NAT, dynamic IPs (and don't get me started on the lack of IPv6 at mainstream ISPs), it is hard to achieve this.

So yes, I would support any initiative to ease the monitoring of individual workers, so you wouldn't have to check all of them in turn whenever your hashrate goes below its nominal/expected value.
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 16, 2013, 08:37:38 AM
 #660

I have this running on the most stable miner https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=185553.0

It works good. Restarts when something is wrong...
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 ... 86 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!