Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 06:01:00 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 [41] 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 ... 300 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][XC] >> Mandatory Update to new Wallet - The first POS X11 anonymous wallet  (Read 268360 times)
Alisho
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 206
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 22, 2014, 07:02:01 PM
 #801

Guys have some patient.. or GTFO!! So easy!
1715061660
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715061660

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715061660
Reply with quote  #2

1715061660
Report to moderator
1715061660
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715061660

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715061660
Reply with quote  #2

1715061660
Report to moderator
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715061660
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715061660

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715061660
Reply with quote  #2

1715061660
Report to moderator
1715061660
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715061660

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715061660
Reply with quote  #2

1715061660
Report to moderator
dadon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002


Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.


View Profile WWW
May 22, 2014, 07:02:41 PM
 #802

DEV  YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.

damage done!  you have to do something now!


there is NO FUD

Fact 1.  Working linux w/ anon code

Fact 2.  Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria



would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?

Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......

"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
u think he should release something that doesn't work properly, something he has to withdraw, or something that works good and he doesn't....
cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 22, 2014, 07:03:23 PM
 #803

this drama is fully p&D game!

dev you created FUD and disdain the coin.

even you succeed, you lost your reputation.
SpringfieldM1A
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 550



View Profile
May 22, 2014, 07:03:52 PM
 #804


how about letting him work and get it done? the less dumb ass questions he has to answer the quicker the finished product will be here.....ffs


+1 I can't wait for the wallet to be released, but let the guy do his magic. Im excited but sure won't be conned out of my XC by dumpers. Hold tight!
battbot
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 22, 2014, 07:04:10 PM
 #805

Yea.  I am a dev on Cinni.  And we posted deadlines for many projects thus far but almost all have met minor delays and set backs.  But in the end, we delivered as promised.  These type of things are normal.  
sussex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 22, 2014, 07:04:37 PM
 #806

DEV  YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.

damage done!  you have to do something now!


there is NO FUD

Fact 1.  Working linux w/ anon code

Fact 2.  Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria



would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?

Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......

"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
u think he should release something that doesn't work properly, something he has to withdraw, or something that works good and he doesn't....

No, I think he shouldn't have used the word "successfully" - it implies that the code works, which he also said had happened on testnet.

Are you a big bagholder?
atcsecure (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
May 22, 2014, 07:04:46 PM
 #807


Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......

"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "


Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging

(gdb) where
#0  _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1  basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2  CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3  0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4  0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) f
#0  _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
270             : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { }
(gdb) where
#0  _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1  basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2  CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3  0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4  0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) finish
Run till exit from #0  _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366
1366            while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0]))
(gdb) where

Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
dadon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002


Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.


View Profile WWW
May 22, 2014, 07:05:12 PM
 #808

this drama is fully p&D game!

dev you created FUD and disdain the coin.

even you succeed, you lost your reputation.
how? because he would rather release a working product then a product that doesn't DRK DOESN't work no one is complaning about that, bunch of bitches this btc community is.
battbot
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 22, 2014, 07:05:50 PM
 #809

this drama is fully p&D game!

dev you created FUD and disdain the coin.

even you succeed, you lost your reputation.

How did the dev create FUD?  He stated from the onset that the timelines he gave are "estimates."  As we should all be aware of.  The Dev is just reporting to us his minor setbacks.  This is called "transparency" and is a good thing.  I don't see any FUD but yours.
dadon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002


Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.


View Profile WWW
May 22, 2014, 07:06:24 PM
 #810

DEV  YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.

damage done!  you have to do something now!


there is NO FUD

Fact 1.  Working linux w/ anon code

Fact 2.  Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria



would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?

Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......

"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
u think he should release something that doesn't work properly, something he has to withdraw, or something that works good and he doesn't....

No, I think he shouldn't have used the word "successfully" - it implies that the code works, which he also said had happened on testnet.

Are you a big bagholder?
are u a little whinny bitch...wait i know the answer already, never mind
yoo10
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 88
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 22, 2014, 07:07:49 PM
 #811

DEV  YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.

damage done!  you have to do something now!


there is NO FUD

Fact 1.  Working linux w/ anon code

Fact 2.  Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria



would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?

Evidence is more helpful than words.
how about letting him work and get it done? the less dumb ass questions he has to answer the quicker the finished product will be here.....ffs

Do not forget dev has a team~ 3 Programmers

publish the whitepaper to review the features, it's really hard to cheat the detail
Coindacioius
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 22, 2014, 07:08:04 PM
 #812

The poloniex trollbox has flocked to this thread.
sussex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 22, 2014, 07:08:08 PM
 #813

DEV  YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.

damage done!  you have to do something now!


there is NO FUD

Fact 1.  Working linux w/ anon code

Fact 2.  Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria



would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?


Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......

"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
u think he should release something that doesn't work properly, something he has to withdraw, or something that works good and he doesn't....

No, I think he shouldn't have used the word "successfully" - it implies that the code works, which he also said had happened on testnet.

Are you a big bagholder?
are u a little whinny bitch...wait i know the answer already, never mind

Well done!! Bravo!!!!  Kiss
evtrmm
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250

So much for "Community"


View Profile
May 22, 2014, 07:08:18 PM
 #814

DEV  YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.

damage done!  you have to do something now!


there is NO FUD

Fact 1.  Working linux w/ anon code

Fact 2.  Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria



would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?

DEV could give a shit about the current coin price.  Nor any marketing.  He did not even promote this coin, and has been here from the beginning giving updates on both successes and setbacks.  

You people that want to make a quick buck are the ones causing issues. At this point, Altsecure wants to be transparent and not famous. maybe you all need to take a look back through this thread and realize what is really going on.  You could go jump on a coin that was over hyped and under developed.
What we do know at this point, the coin has a working wallet that properly stakes. (WOW - much success right Whitecoin?)  And the developer has been here pretty much nonstop giving us updates on everything.  

If I were him, I would keep updating and stay away from answering any questions until the wallet is released.
bobby1776
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 315
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 22, 2014, 07:08:26 PM
 #815

u think he should release something that doesn't work properly, something he has to withdraw, or something that works good and he doesn't....

then why did he launch the coin?  just curious

DIAGON  e S p o r t s       Global decentralize eSports ecosystem
JAP CN SPN RU   WHITEPAPER  ]   ICO ❱ ❱  Nov. 12 th
facebook    TWITTER    reddit     ────   (   B U Y   )   ────
Thrash
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 519
Merit: 253



View Profile
May 22, 2014, 07:09:07 PM
 #816

If he had been wanting to dump coins he would have released a wallet working or not and dumped into the hype. Programming is tedious and hard ot put a timeline to. Anyone that does not like the approach doesn't have to be here. I prefer a solid working wallet to one with problems. This is not cut and paste and devs from somewhere besides these boards is probably a good idea. Less chance of code and ideas leaking to other people. I plan on sticking around for a while.

Keep after it dev!
savagesam
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 22, 2014, 07:09:21 PM
 #817

SERIOUSLY PEOPLE STOP FREAKING OUT AND ATTACKING THE DEV. He is just a regular dude working on something that has NOT BEEN DONE BEFORE. Yes, he did say it would be finished today but shit fucking happens.. Get over it, grow some patience, and maybe a set of balls and a brain while your at it people. Get the fuck over yourselves people
Alisho
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 206
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 22, 2014, 07:09:28 PM
 #818

Guys please don't feed the trolls.. It would be not so good if this thread looks like XLB's Thread..
battbot
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 22, 2014, 07:10:38 PM
 #819

DEV  YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.

damage done!  you have to do something now!


there is NO FUD

Fact 1.  Working linux w/ anon code

Fact 2.  Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria



would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?

DEV could give a shit about the current coin price.  Nor any marketing.  He did not even promote this coin, and has been here from the beginning giving updates on both successes and setbacks.  

You people that want to make a quick buck are the ones causing issues. At this point, Altsecure wants to be transparent and not famous. maybe you all need to take a look back through this thread and realize what is really going on.  You could go jump on a coin that was over hyped and under developed.
What we do know at this point, the coin has a working wallet that properly stakes. (WOW - much success right Whitecoin?)  And the developer has been here pretty much nonstop giving us updates on everything.  

If I were him, I would keep updating and stay away from answering any questions until the wallet is released.

+1, Dev, don't feel like you need to address all the trolls here.  Pick and choose what to address.  You are doing a great job and many of us here have high expectations.
cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 22, 2014, 07:11:05 PM
 #820

i guess this is just a coin collection tactic.

so sad i did't double my holdings in 1 hour.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 [41] 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 ... 300 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!