|
Ezravdb
|
 |
May 22, 2014, 07:29:07 PM |
|
I just wanted to extend my gratitude to all those who panic dumped a while ago,not only have you aided me in increasing my holdings but i now have more BTC to boot too.
To the Dev,ignore the window licking trollboxers and keep up the good work.
Yea sell at 18K buy at 11K haha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
philipvdlinde
|
|
May 22, 2014, 07:31:08 PM |
|
Dumping this coin is the dumbest move you can make, especially when you lose money while dumping. Anyways I support this coin 100% and I am hodling.
|
|
|
|
|
mojun7982
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 269
Merit: 100
The Standard Protocol - Solving Inflation
|
|
May 22, 2014, 07:32:06 PM |
|
Dumping this coin is the dumbest move you can make, especially when you lose money while dumping. Anyways I support this coin 100% and I am hodling.
+1 |
|
|
|
maqa71
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
|
May 22, 2014, 07:33:05 PM |
|
Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......
"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging (gdb) where #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 #1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434 #2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361 #3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160 #4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185 (gdb) f #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 270 : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { } (gdb) where #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 #1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434 #2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361 #3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160 #4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185 (gdb) finish Run till exit from #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366 1366 while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0])) (gdb) where Does this mean only a wallet or also fork  there aint no fork in that man thats debug log Dont wanna be rude but first learn code then comment. bitcoinrpc.cpp If thats beeing updated we need a fork. |
|
|
|
|
|
SpringfieldM1A
|
|
May 22, 2014, 07:35:20 PM |
|
Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......
"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging (gdb) where #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 #1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434 #2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361 #3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160 #4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185 (gdb) f #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 270 : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { } (gdb) where #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 #1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434 #2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361 #3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160 #4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185 (gdb) finish Run till exit from #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366 1366 while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0])) (gdb) where Does this mean only a wallet or also fork there aint no fork in that man thats debug log Dont wanna be rude but first learn code then comment. bitcoinrpc.cpp If thats beeing updated we need a fork. I remember you from the Poloniex trollbox, all you did there was spread FUD regarding XC. It won't work in here. |
|
|
|
|
|
philipvdlinde
|
|
May 22, 2014, 07:39:03 PM |
|
Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......
"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging (gdb) where #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 #1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434 #2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361 #3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160 #4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185 (gdb) f #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 270 : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { } (gdb) where #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 #1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434 #2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361 #3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160 #4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185 (gdb) finish Run till exit from #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366 1366 while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0])) (gdb) where Does this mean only a wallet or also fork there aint no fork in that man thats debug log Dont wanna be rude but first learn code then comment. bitcoinrpc.cpp If thats beeing updated we need a fork. Ik zal je 1 ding zeggen, XC is zeker een goede koop, de developer heeft zo net gewoon bewezen dat ze wel degelijk met de wallet bezig zijn, het is een kwestie van tijd voordat de domme schapen in de trollbox dit ook door hebben. |
|
|
|
|
maqa71
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
|
May 22, 2014, 07:39:18 PM |
|
Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......
"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging (gdb) where #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 #1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434 #2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361 #3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160 #4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185 (gdb) f #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 270 : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { } (gdb) where #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 #1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434 #2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361 #3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160 #4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185 (gdb) finish Run till exit from #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366 1366 while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0])) (gdb) where Does this mean only a wallet or also fork there aint no fork in that man thats debug log Dont wanna be rude but first learn code then comment. bitcoinrpc.cpp If thats beeing updated we need a fork. I remember you from the Poloniex trollbox, all you did there was spread FUD regarding XC. It won't work in here. Chill out dude, you prob. dont even know what fork means. Simply question the dev can answer so we can be prepared. Why the hate  |
|
|
|
|
|
SpringfieldM1A
|
|
May 22, 2014, 07:42:50 PM |
|
Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......
"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging (gdb) where #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 #1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434 #2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361 #3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160 #4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185 (gdb) f #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 270 : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { } (gdb) where #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 #1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434 #2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361 #3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160 #4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185 (gdb) finish Run till exit from #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366 1366 while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0])) (gdb) where Does this mean only a wallet or also fork there aint no fork in that man thats debug log Dont wanna be rude but first learn code then comment. bitcoinrpc.cpp If thats beeing updated we need a fork. I remember you from the Poloniex trollbox, all you did there was spread FUD regarding XC. It won't work in here. Chill out dude, you prob. dont even know what fork means. Simply question the dev can answer so we can be prepared. Why the hate No hate, I think you are kinda cute actually  |
|
|
|
|
maqa71
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
|
May 22, 2014, 07:45:07 PM |
|
Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......
"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging (gdb) where #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 #1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434 #2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361 #3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160 #4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185 (gdb) f #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 270 : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { } (gdb) where #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 #1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434 #2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361 #3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160 #4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185 (gdb) finish Run till exit from #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366 1366 while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0])) (gdb) where Does this mean only a wallet or also fork there aint no fork in that man thats debug log Dont wanna be rude but first learn code then comment. bitcoinrpc.cpp If thats beeing updated we need a fork. I remember you from the Poloniex trollbox, all you did there was spread FUD regarding XC. It won't work in here. Chill out dude, you prob. dont even know what fork means. Simply question the dev can answer so we can be prepared. Why the hate No hate, I think you are kinda cute actually Group hug and XC to da Moooooooooon |
|
|
|
|
|
sussex
|
|
May 22, 2014, 07:47:18 PM |
|
Get a room!  |
|
|
|
|
cyberhacker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 22, 2014, 07:48:02 PM |
|
Get a room! CONDOM free |
|
|
|
|
|
Ezravdb
|
|
May 22, 2014, 07:49:30 PM |
|
wow this is getting off topic
dev please release wallet or some screenshots
|
|
|
|
|
richardn1987
|
|
May 22, 2014, 07:51:43 PM |
|
wow this is getting off topic
dev please release wallet or some screenshots
How long do you need? A min, an hour, a day, a month? Why not prepare it before launch? |
|
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
May 22, 2014, 07:53:29 PM |
|
wow this is getting off topic
dev please release wallet or some screenshots
How long do you need? A min, an hour, a day, a month? Why not prepare it before launch? Dude, the current wallet has been prepared BEFORE launch, and is working properly. These are things that the DEV has planned to change after launch. |
|
|
|
|
|
richardn1987
|
|
May 22, 2014, 07:54:58 PM |
|
wow this is getting off topic
dev please release wallet or some screenshots
How long do you need? A min, an hour, a day, a month? Why not prepare it before launch? Dude, the current wallet has been prepared BEFORE launch, and is working properly. These are things that the DEV has planned to change after launch. i know he planned it, but why? And how long still? |
|
|
|
|
cyberhacker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 22, 2014, 07:56:07 PM |
|
wow this is getting off topic
dev please release wallet or some screenshots
How long do you need? A min, an hour, a day, a month? Why not prepare it before launch? Dude, the current wallet has been prepared BEFORE launch, and is working properly. These are things that the DEV has planned to change after launch. he is asking for the wallet with anon feature. i think the linux one. |
|
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
May 22, 2014, 07:58:37 PM |
|
I just wanted to extend my gratitude to all those who panic dumped a while ago,not only have you aided me in increasing my holdings but i now have more BTC to boot too.
To the Dev,ignore the window licking trollboxers and keep up the good work.
Yea sell at 18K buy at 11K haha I've been picking up 25%+ on these trades for the last 2 days. My mining time is more than paid for, and now I sit with 15k to toy with.  |
|
|
|
|
|
sacskate
|
|
May 22, 2014, 08:00:00 PM |
|
That code is not from bitcoinrpc.cpp. It is calling something from bitcoinrpc.cpp. Most likely something that whatever this code uses that needs to be updated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ezravdb
|
|
May 22, 2014, 08:01:01 PM |
|
That code is not from bitcoinrpc.cpp. It is calling something from bitcoinrpc.cpp. Most likely something that whatever this code uses that needs to be updated.
good someone that seems to understand code most people on here are clueless |
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
May 22, 2014, 08:04:08 PM |
|
wow this is getting off topic
dev please release wallet or some screenshots
How long do you need? A min, an hour, a day, a month? Why not prepare it before launch? Dude, the current wallet has been prepared BEFORE launch, and is working properly. These are things that the DEV has planned to change after launch. he is asking for the wallet with anon feature. i think the linux one. Yes, but as opposed to all the other coins who have a shit wallet and still launch, we have all known that this is an ongoing process Let him rush it and see what happens to everyone's valuable investments then. Once again, he did not hype or market this, simply had a low key fair launch - which was announced on Altcoincalender, and let everyone know from the beginning that he was working on the features. |
|
|
|
|
|
