|
Kenta
|
 |
May 31, 2014, 09:43:07 AM |
|
anyone got any more node my wallet been syncing fine for the last few days now stuck at 8942.tired bootstrap and didnt help this time
178.85.62.159 some nodes that are up to date (8948): 107.147.89.61:9429 95.227.77.100:64428 190.249.66.243:64531 188.226.243.136 84.90.159.181:52392 176.181.116.28:54296 68.144.12.249:59474 95.227.77.100:64259 50.155.28.170:56627 84.126.173.229:24241 119.95.154.220:52915 Looks like block explorer also is stuck (8941) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
HunterS
|
|
May 31, 2014, 09:43:19 AM |
|
cheers for the nodes guys but no good still.i have plenty of connection just wont sync.out of the 600 plus wallets i have on my pc this is the only one that does this.i know there is issue with wallet but starting to get tired.wight just close it up and wait for updated wallet.  |
|
|
|
|
kopam
|
|
May 31, 2014, 09:46:15 AM |
|
Cant get past block 7200, added all new nodes, have like 15 connections but thats it. If any one got an idea pls tell me, if not i guess ill just wait for a new wallet  |
|
|
|
|
Nite69
|
|
May 31, 2014, 09:46:35 AM |
|
anyone got any more node my wallet been syncing fine for the last few days now stuck at 8942.tired bootstrap and didnt help this time
178.85.62.159 some nodes that are up to date (8948): 107.147.89.61:9429 95.227.77.100:64428 190.249.66.243:64531 188.226.243.136 84.90.159.181:52392 176.181.116.28:54296 68.144.12.249:59474 95.227.77.100:64259 50.155.28.170:56627 84.126.173.229:24241 119.95.154.220:52915 Looks like block explorer also is stuck (8941) Are you sure all of them will accept incoming and are updated? You can add these: addnode=[2604:180:1::db58:c061]
addnode=[2001:14b8:100:38e::2]
addnode=82.128.238.235
|
Sync: ShiSKnx4W6zrp69YEFQyWk5TkpnfKLA8wx
Bitcoin: 17gNvfoD2FDqTfESUxNEmTukGbGVAiJhXp
Litecoin: LhbDew4s9wbV8xeNkrdFcLK5u78APSGLrR
AuroraCoin: AXVoGgYtSVkPv96JLL7CiwcyVvPxXHXRK9
|
|
|
s0urcec0de
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
May 31, 2014, 09:47:10 AM |
|
out of the 600 plus wallets i have on my pc
Please tell me you backup all the wallet.dats to USB, and have a mirrored hard-drive in case of a disaster? |
|
|
|
|
|
HunterS
|
|
May 31, 2014, 09:48:52 AM |
|
lol i have am backed up on several hard drive and usbs.i have 7 hard drives in my CM STORM tower
|
|
|
|
|
kopam
|
|
May 31, 2014, 09:50:42 AM |
|
So i guess no ideas of how to unstuck my wallet ?
|
|
|
|
|
Moonbyte1984
|
|
May 31, 2014, 09:50:51 AM |
|
The download link is not to the updated wallet.
I still get version v.1.0.0.0
It's updated I dont understand. Its so hard to update version number in wallet code? |
|
|
|
|
|
Kenta
|
|
May 31, 2014, 09:51:44 AM |
|
cheers for the nodes guys but no good still.i have plenty of connection just wont sync.out of the 600 plus wallets i have on my pc this is the only one that does this.i know there is issue with wallet but starting to get tired.wight just close it up and wait for updated wallet. I also had this problem yesterday. What fixed it in the end was only adding nodes that are up to date, then deleting the downloaded chain and peers-file. Must be a small fork somewhere among the official nodes |
|
|
|
TotalPanda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1012
vertex output parameter not completely initialized
|
|
May 31, 2014, 09:54:15 AM |
|
The download link is not to the updated wallet.
I still get version v.1.0.0.0
It's updated I dont understand. Its so hard to update version number in wallet code? |
|
|
|
|
|
Moonbyte1984
|
|
May 31, 2014, 09:58:02 AM |
|
The download link is not to the updated wallet.
I still get version v.1.0.0.0
It's updated I dont understand. Its so hard to update version number in wallet code?People not understand what version is actual. It does not matter?? So lets remove versions from all softaware. Because its not matter. |
|
|
|
|
TotalPanda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1012
vertex output parameter not completely initialized
|
|
May 31, 2014, 10:01:36 AM |
|
The download link is not to the updated wallet.
I still get version v.1.0.0.0
It's updated I dont understand. Its so hard to update version number in wallet code?People not understand what version is actual. It does not matter?? So lets remove versions from all softaware. Because its not matter. Alpha = sync-qt.zip Beta = sync-qt-flavoured.zip Gamma = sync-qt-v2.zip  |
|
|
|
|
|
raskul
|
|
May 31, 2014, 10:04:00 AM |
|
People not understand what version is actual. It does not matter??
So lets remove versions from all softaware. Because its not matter.
 he's right, 'it not matter' it software, which is, in essence - holding no matter. |
tips 1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
|
|
|
|
Kenta
|
|
May 31, 2014, 10:05:09 AM |
|
The download link is not to the updated wallet.
I still get version v.1.0.0.0
It's updated I dont understand. Its so hard to update version number in wallet code?People not understand what version is actual. It does not matter?? So lets remove versions from all softaware. Because its not matter. Alpha = sync-qt.zip Beta = sync-qt-flavoured.zip Gamma = sync-qt-v2.zip as long as it's exactly 24,376,832 bytes, you'll be fine. Apparently it's a bug in Gitian doing this. But everyone is free to compile their own wallet, Windows or not. The version number is correct in Git! |
|
|
|
|
MystPhysX
|
|
May 31, 2014, 10:08:35 AM |
|
The download link is not to the updated wallet.
I still get version v.1.0.0.0
It's updated I dont understand. Its so hard to update version number in wallet code?People not understand what version is actual. It does not matter?? So lets remove versions from all softaware. Because its not matter. Alpha = sync-qt.zip Beta = sync-qt-flavoured.zip Gamma = sync-qt-v2.zip as long as it's exactly 24,376,832 bytes, you'll be fine. Apparently it's a bug in Gitian doing this. But everyone is free to compile their own wallet, Windows or not. The version number is correct in Git! The mac version clearly states v1.0.1.0 |
|
|
|
|
sebastiebass
|
|
May 31, 2014, 10:09:34 AM |
|
I'm just getting this dark-brownish feeling that the list contains old and obsolete nodes.
|
|
|
|
|
HunterS
|
|
May 31, 2014, 10:11:52 AM |
|
hey guys heres a new one for you.i never had this problem before until now.Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime error.dont know why its doing this now  |
|
|
|
|
raskul
|
|
May 31, 2014, 10:12:47 AM |
|
I'm just getting this dark-brownish feeling that the list contains old and obsolete nodes.
should it really matter though? as long as the list contains active nodes, the inactive ones will not cause any issues? i may be wrong. |
tips 1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
|
|
|
|
Kenta
|
|
May 31, 2014, 10:14:05 AM |
|
I'm just getting this dark-brownish feeling that the list contains old and obsolete nodes.
confirmed, they are. Please try some of these (including port numbers) so we can get more of the network back on track addnode=107.147.89.61:9429 addnode=95.227.77.100:64428 addnode=190.249.66.243:64531 addnode=188.226.243.136 addnode=84.90.159.181:52392 addnode=176.181.116.28:54296 addnode=68.144.12.249:59474 addnode=95.227.77.100:64259 addnode=50.155.28.170:56627 addnode=84.126.173.229:24241 addnode=119.95.154.220:52915 |
|
|
|
|
Kenta
|
|
May 31, 2014, 10:15:13 AM |
|
I'm just getting this dark-brownish feeling that the list contains old and obsolete nodes.
should it really matter though? as long as the list contains active nodes, the inactive ones will not cause any issues? i may be wrong. Problem is, you might sometimes get sidetracked, and if enough people do they will start making their own (forked) chain |
|
|
|
|
Poll
