[ANN][CRYPT] CryptCoin x11 + PoS | P2P Anonymity | 0% Premine | Commander

[pbremen01]

Notice my $10 Crypt donation to the DEV's in the block explorer and Not linked to My Address=EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca... Brilliant! I know how Crypt will become Anonymous now!
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/crypt/

Address   EhYQd8bicde8M9tRmk2RSUUJ5n1E7rPqht      
Balance   10.0 CRYPT   
Rich List   N/A   
Guesstimated Wallet   none
Received   559.98 CRYPT 3 transactions (3 vins)   in 3 transactions (3 vins)
Sent   549.98 CRYPT   in 2 transactions (2 vouts)
Transactions
Hash   Block   Date/Time   Amount   Balance
afd08cdb7a...   47758   2014-6-27 02:38:06   + 10.0 CRYPT   10.0 CRYPT
2460eebbc4...   44075   2014-6-24 18:47:55   - 500.0 CRYPT   0.0 CRYPT
77f3667f1f...   42011   2014-6-23 10:47:35   + 500.0 CRYPT   500.0 CRYPT
bdb2c2934b...   33183   2014-6-17 22:18:00   - 49.98 CRYPT   0.0 CRYPT
65512b88c2...   31599   2014-6-16 22:49:31   + 49.98 CRYPT   49.98 CRYPT

*************

Address   EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca      
Balance   434.17141241 CRYPT   
Rich List   Rank 481   at block 47523 with 434.0 CRYPT
Guesstimated Wallet   none
Received   434.17141241 CRYPT 11 transactions (11 vins)   in 11 transactions (11 vins)
Sent   0.0 CRYPT   in 0 transactions (0 vouts)
Transactions
Hash   Block   Date/Time   Amount   Balance
51eec6d980...   47523   2014-6-26 23:11:57   + 42.15763737 CRYPT   434.17141241 CRYPT
77625b542f...   45961   2014-6-25 22:59:33   + 0.03897232 CRYPT   392.01377504 CRYPT
fb2217477a...   44428   2014-6-25 00:04:11   + 47.80069275 CRYPT   391.97480272 CRYPT
4e6d5713db...   43560   2014-6-24 10:55:20   + 0.04624909 CRYPT   344.17410997 CRYPT
ddbd5e736a...   41299   2014-6-23 00:00:56   + 0.04433414 CRYPT   344.12786088 CRYPT
74233228d0...   40505   2014-6-22 11:49:14   + 30.31338628 CRYPT   344.08352674 CRYPT
38131f6726...   38579   2014-6-21 06:28:24   + 0.04015694 CRYPT   313.77014046 CRYPT
4cf0b93f3a...   38293   2014-6-21 02:12:49   + 50.80288306 CRYPT   313.72998352 CRYPT
0b6197a4bc...   35335   2014-6-19 05:50:02   + 0.03467647 CRYPT   262.92710046 CRYPT
0f02abec25...   33074   2014-6-17 20:44:01   + 51.83617806 CRYPT   262.89242399 CRYPT
99c8643ce8...   32310   2014-6-17 09:39:40   + 211.05624593 CRYPT   211.05624593 CRYPT

Of course 10 CRYPT donation is not linked to your address EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca   because nothing was actually sent from that address.

As you you can clearly see, there is no transactions that would actually DECREASE amount of CRYPT coins on address EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca. Each transaction only INCREASES number of CRYPT coins.

So you've done something wrong. Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

[1713534641]

1713534641

[1713534641]

1713534641

[1713534641]

1713534641

[1713534641]

1713534641

[WheresMyWallet]

I'm speechless (almost) with the lack of FUD today, looks like the work Mindfox is doing has stumped them.

All the FUDder are in a group meeting at the moment

Looks like their meeting ended, one has resurfaced

[WheresMyWallet]

Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.

[pbremen01]

Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.

Exchanges don't care or check from which addresses the coins come. They are only interested in that they get coins on the address that they control (they have private key).

I guess that there was human error (or multiple errors). You can't expect that the existing wallet will create "anonymous" transactions if this functionality hasn't been finished yet (and of course it cannot even theoretically be compiled in the executable file of the current wallet).

[WheresMyWallet]

Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.

Exchanges don't care or check from which addresses the coins come. They are only interested in that they get coins on the address that they control (they have private key).

I guess that there was human error (or multiple errors). You can't expect that the existing wallet will create "anonymous" transactions if this functionality hasn't been finished yet (and of course it cannot even theoretically be compiled in the executable file of the current wallet).

The exchanges do care very much, they check the addresses vs confirmations all the time for double spends
That's how WC was caught out.

[tylerderden]

I'm guessing human error or payed shill or poor attempt to create something to fud about. 1 of the 3 or something else?

[WheresMyWallet]

I'm guessing human error or payed shill or poor attempt to create something to fud about. 1 of the 3 or something else?

Welcome back! I thought you had left, guess you missed us too much.

[pbremen01]

Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.

Exchanges don't care or check from which addresses the coins come. They are only interested in that they get coins on the address that they control (they have private key).

I guess that there was human error (or multiple errors). You can't expect that the existing wallet will create "anonymous" transactions if this functionality hasn't been finished yet (and of course it cannot even theoretically be compiled in the executable file of the current wallet).

The exchanges do care very much, they check the addresses vs confirmations all the time for double spends
That's how WC was caught out.

I don't know what WC is and what technology it uses.

How can you check "addresses vs confirmations"? Confirmation is a number associated with one transaction. Address doesn't have any such number. Exchanges track confirmations.

It is not the job of an exchange to prevent double spends. They can't prevent or resolve any double spends at all. The network itself (protocol and/or blockchain and/or miners) needs to "resolve" double spends.

If CryptoNick's example is valid, then this actually means that CryptCoin network may actually allow double spends (but I seriously doubt this).

First CryptoNick spent 10 CRYPT for donation, but this probably didn't decrease amount of coins on his address (maybe it decreased number of coins on another address, but we don't know that). So that means that these 10 CRYPT coins may be sent second time to another addess. Voila - double spend.

[WheresMyWallet]

You'll have to ask him pbremen01.
He is probably one of the longest serving FUDders here who was always willing to voice his concern.
A U-turn from him was a surprise out of the blue.

[benthach]

Any new and update with CRYPT? i see lot and lot of people mining CRYPT like crazy but the price is low.

[WheresMyWallet]

Any new and update with CRYPT? i see lot and lot of people mining CRYPT like crazy but the price is low.

Nothing concrete it seems atm, but people seem to have been accumulating coin all day today.

[pbremen01]

i support

Excellent! What do you support? This coin? competing coin? pumpers and whales? the devs? your wife?

[damiano]

Looks like someone doesn't want the price to go up just yet.
My guess is a bit of accumulation going on here before some news.

I'm doing a little accumulating myself... I feel the news is coming, and the current prices @ under 60K is great

The fact that this coin does have a chance to get on btc-e is huge. 

[tylerderden]

I'm guessing human error or payed shill or poor attempt to create something to fud about. 1 of the 3 or something else?

Welcome back! I thought you had left, guess you missed us too much.

Nah man just out making some btc to buy back in eventually but i dont see the point in letting money sit idle or going down do you?

[WheresMyWallet]

I'm guessing human error or payed shill or poor attempt to create something to fud about. 1 of the 3 or something else?

Welcome back! I thought you had left, guess you missed us too much.

Nah man just out making some btc to buy back in eventually but i dont see the point in letting money sit idle or going down do you?

Nope idle money doesn't work for you

[cozk]

If the anon feature and the BTC-e rumors are true this coin will be the next thing.

Devs are relatively credible but there is alot a lot of FUD, lets say chances are 50/50 that the rumors are true.

It has half the coin cap than DRK and DRK is valued at 10$. Crypt could go between 5$-25$ ea.

Looking at it that way its worth a 5-15% of your portfolio investment.

If you win you win big and if you lose you lose little.

/protip

[Waldozaur12]

Crypt have so much potential and this is main reason for massive FUD. But Crypt is strong. There no is bad coins there is only bad people.

[googs84]

Even Cinni is trying to take Mindfox onto their team by offering him 0.25 and raising money.... Why would a competing coin offer a developer of another coin money to join their team... Because they know he is on to something big!

[tristartek]

Done, i'm out. going to ride super. good luck.

roll on the floor laughing, super is an obvious shit coin, crypt anon feature is already being implemented and soon to be officially released.

daydreamer.

Better play Lotto.

Hitler said the same thing.

[tristartek]

Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.

Exchanges don't care or check from which addresses the coins come. They are only interested in that they get coins on the address that they control (they have private key).

I guess that there was human error (or multiple errors). You can't expect that the existing wallet will create "anonymous" transactions if this functionality hasn't been finished yet (and of course it cannot even theoretically be compiled in the executable file of the current wallet).

Super has anon onw.  Why dont you go fud their thread jackass.  Or wait..is it your goal to only fud crypt, that has nothing yet and its in the works still?  Dont bash work that hasnt been created yet paulsnoker.  We should release your phone# so everyone can call you to ask questions.