Unmoderated XC thread

[slapper]

FairX11Coin (FXC) ??

[1715564645]

1715564645

[1715564645]

1715564645

[1715564645]

1715564645

[TsuyokuNaritai]

Since no one in the actual XC thread wants to answer...

Is anyone else experiencing slow transfers?  I have one that has been sitting at 1of6 for well over an hour now, wallet is showing the last generated block was 41
mins ago.  

Anyone else having this issue?

It's unlikely to mean the coin is dead. It's had those issues in the past. This was the real cause of the flash crash a couple of days ago that XC tried to blame on a tweet from InternetApe. There was a slow slide with a lot of XC traders were getting worried about the delays, then the confirmation came and everyone's XC came at once, hit sell at once, and started a panic. The price mostly recovered fairly quickly. (Lesson: don't panic sell just as a problem has been fixed!)

[sin242]

Since no one in the actual XC thread wants to answer...

Is anyone else experiencing slow transfers?  I have one that has been sitting at 1of6 for well over an hour now, wallet is showing the last generated block was 41
mins ago.  

Anyone else having this issue?

It's unlikely to mean the coin is dead. It's had those issues in the past. This was the real cause of the flash crash a couple of days ago that XC tried to blame on a tweet from InternetApe. There was a slow slide with a lot of XC traders were getting worried about the delays, then the confirmation came and everyone's XC came at once, hit sell at once, and started a panic. The price mostly recovered fairly quickly. (Lesson: don't panic sell just as a problem has been fixed!)

OR


Sell as soon as the transfer clears and buy back in at a lower point 

[slapper]

Since no one in the actual XC thread wants to answer...

Is anyone else experiencing slow transfers?  I have one that has been sitting at 1of6 for well over an hour now, wallet is showing the last generated block was 41
mins ago.  

Anyone else having this issue?

It's unlikely to mean the coin is dead. It's had those issues in the past. This was the real cause of the flash crash a couple of days ago that XC tried to blame on a tweet from InternetApe. There was a slow slide with a lot of XC traders were getting worried about the delays, then the confirmation came and everyone's XC came at once, hit sell at once, and started a panic. The price mostly recovered fairly quickly. (Lesson: don't panic sell just as a problem has been fixed!)

The XC panic sell started because

1) A code snippet from the first of the 3rd/4th iteration of the source code currently in github(they keep deleting repositories) was found out about Federocoin source being used in XC.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600706.msg7005993#msg7005993

2) A few of us saw when it was first posted, then MoosaNYC (mod at BTC-E) saw it and dumped and announced it in BTC-E trollbox as well as posted in the now locked XC thread.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600706.msg7006106#msg7006106

A lot of Panic Dumps ensued and the Mintpal orderbook was emptied out.

3) 45 mins later MyFarm who was the #1 reason for all the bad blood that ensued in his gimmicky philanthropy showed up (it was concluded that he had vested interest in XC) posted about Ape's tweet (which I don't support too btw).

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600706.msg7006892#msg7006892

Ensuing posts were all furious about the tweet as if that had caused the panic dumping and looked at the scapegoat.


Later the leader behind XC came out and confessed as to why he created XC. This whole XC thing is the most bizarre things in the forums besides maybe some IPO scams.




A lot of pent up anger exists in this forum about DRK and it has been going on since Day 1 and caught a lot of momentum last month as things started getting hotter and DRK rose and exposed the devoid Anon market potential. LTC camps is already very pissed off and now with rumors of finex adding DRK, some are getting more and more vocal.

I discovered in Feb after reading about the negativity and accusations. Then I did my reasearch on Evan, the potential and community having to endure the constant supply of never ending trolls and I chose to support the underdogs.

[ballzdeep]

So you aided to almost kill XC and afterwards its all XCs fault, great logic ! and XC has to prove and show stuff but not darksend ? Hypocrits!

As long as noone talks about you mining so many coins on day 1 and not relaunching ?? Care to answer this basic question also, why not relaunch when you see diff isnt working ?

[roede94105]

So you aided to almost kill XC and afterwards its all XCs fault, great logic ! and XC has to prove and show stuff but not dardsend ? Hypocrits!

As long as noone talks about you mining so many coins on day 1 and not relaunching ?? Care to answer this basic question also, why not relaunch when you see diff isnt working yes ?

I don't think a coin can be killed by fud only, otherwise it's not a very solid one.. I mean dark got its fair share man..

[ballzdeep]

I hold both coin and I always thought of them as the perfect brother, one PoW and one PoS ......

[TsuyokuNaritai]

Comments on the video demo?

PROOF.
http://youtu.be/_uTgnZAFuNU

hopefully this explains enough.

[illodin]

Anyone?

Believe it or not, but I am quite compassionate person (at least compared to some of the narcissist running rampant in these forums), and I fear this will end in tears.

[sin242]

Comments on the video demo?

PROOF.
http://youtu.be/_uTgnZAFuNU

hopefully this explains enough.

well..  not sure what this means exactly.  But i followed the same steps in the release wallet for a transaction i sent to MP that he did for
checking the anon feature.  i copied the gettransaction output from my TXid and pasted it into notepad and searched for
my address (theres only one on the wallet) and i couldn't find it in mine either.


What that means, i dont know.  But this was on the live blockchain, the transaction shows in the block explorer but "gettransaction" output
does not show my wallet addy


...


I really have no idea.

[AlexGR]

Comments on the video demo?

PROOF.
http://youtu.be/_uTgnZAFuNU

hopefully this explains enough.

This is like watching a video with coils that says "ok this is free energy guys" and the battery is hidden somewhere with a tape.

"This is anonymity guys - the address isn't there!!!"

Anonymity is not the part where your money is sent to the mixer. It's about the entire money flow not being pinpointed from sender to recipient.

[coine_smithe]

Comments on the video demo?

PROOF.
http://youtu.be/_uTgnZAFuNU

hopefully this explains enough.

This is like watching a video with coils that says "ok this is free energy guys" and the battery is hidden somewhere with a tape.

"This is anonymity guys - the address isn't there!!!"

Anonymity is not the part where your money is sent to the mixer. It's about the entire money flow not being pinpointed from sender to recipient.

I agree 100%. I hate that I can't comment on this stuff. I am not trying to FUD or troll or anything. Any of these skepticisms are totally reasonable for investors to ask, but now I feel like we'll be censored for just talking about it in their moderated thread. It is creepy in there, a bunch of yes men. It seems to me they are trying to hide the fact that it doesn't work as advertised. Maybe I'll be proven wrong, but I'd rather be proven wrong than lose a bunch of money on another scam.

[adhitthana]

If I'm wrong, I'm sorry. I have been known to be wrong.

WEll as somemone who hold s both coins, I could not see many facts in your post....can you maybe tell us the facts about the situation and link to sources? thnx

[adhitthana]

This thread is funny. Here we are at the cutting edge of a system, a technology and knowledge that could benefit all of mankind, yet we find these childish arguments.
Lets look at the big picture

[Alpharisc]

This thread is funny. Here we are at the cutting edge of a system, a technology and knowledge that could benefit all of mankind, yet we find these childish arguments.
Lets look at the big picture

Let's just look at the evidence instead, and dispense with the grandiose claims. Healthy skepticism is hardly childish when it comes to investing money.

[AlexGR]

There's too much investing going on with people ignorant to evaluate the claims. That's a HUGE problem.

These are not country coins and meme coins where people threw money in the hope of emulating Aurora and DOGE. This is technology and one should be adequately qualified to assess it as such otherwise it's just gambling.

One hears "oh darkcoin is this, that" or "monero this and that" or "xc this and that" and they understand nothing in terms of technical features. People can literally throw in million of dollars by deceiving them that you have a certain technology that you don't really have. It's unsettling. No wonder why Libertycoin wanted "just a basic type of DarkSend" to show for and get the money.

All it takes is the "anonymous" claim and some "demo" that convinces the unqualified-to-determine-the-truth and then the money stream starts arriving. Lol?

[illodin]

Many traders will treat it purely as a money making speculative tool, and they know they can get out before the general credulous population, so for them, fundamentals don't matter.

[coine_smithe]

Many traders will treat it purely as a money making speculative tool, and they know they can get out before the general credulous population, so for them, fundamentals don't matter.

I think that train has left the station at this point as you can see from the stagnating price. There's enough doubt at this point I think.

As for the "anonymous" Xnode stuff, I'm convinced it's fluff. Of course there's no way to prove it, but that's the point.

I almost think Dan Metcalf's linkedin is a well made fake. One thing I noticed is that all of the people who back his credentials are from totally unrelated industries. The main guy that seems to back him could also be a fake. I was reading up on linkedin and there are circles for that sort of thing. It is an issue on the linkedin network.

Finally if atcsecure really is Dan Metcalf and he is really doing what he says he's doing, he's doing a great job of looking really suspicious to savvy traders.

[sin242]

Anyone have a link to the block explorer they were supposed to release for the testnet?

[megges]

so after the insane xc hashrate came up again in the xc topic here some thoughts about it:

- an hashrate that high has never been seen in any other x11 alt (so there are no asics, fpgas or ... - else we would have seen this hashrates at other x11 coins after xc changed to pos)
- nobody could tell us where the hashrate was, all the posted pools together in xc have had a fractal of the hashrate which seems the network has had.
- for example there are exploits for kgw to increase the difficulty/hashrate, my guess is we had something like this with xc, too ...

so whats about an blockchain analyse of xc for the highhash time, there should be ips, which relayed these blocks.

If these hashrates were real, there must be many blocks which got relayed by ips which were not connected to any pools posted, right?

But because the current xc blockexplorer don't log the relayed ip, i guess its to late for such an anlysis, am i right? or is there any source to check this out?