Unmoderated XC thread

[benthach]

LMAO!!

Actually, I hold a few coins, BTC, LTC Cloak, and even some Darkcoin, although I have been selling my dark and stocking up on cloak for the last 2 weeks.
I don't believe any coin will ever pass BTC as its the one with the 100's of millions flowing into it via VC, traders, investment bankers ect.

BTC is always going to be number one, without a doubt, you can quote this!

I think people still don't fully understand the advantages of masternodes. It's diverting block reward to non-miners. That reward can be tweaked to produce various outcomes.

Btc is guaranteed to lose number one spot as development has virtually halted. And the ecosphere is resistant to any major changes.

So, DRK shills was saying nobody was comparing DRK to btc...

So, let's get that 1000 btc vs 1000 DRK bet on.  Who's setting up the escrow?

there is no reason to take someone serious when comparing other coins to btc in equal ground. darkcoin, vericoin or even xc should worry about bitcoin add-on like dark wallet and blockchain coinjoin. like Greg Maxwell said there is no need for scam darkcoin or other altcoins, bitcoin itself can do all. once blockchain coinjoin or dark wallet is success with their anonymous coding then scam darkcoin is done. at this moment if you use sharedcoin(btc)+TOR then you would have much more anonomous then this scam darkcoin. there is no reason to use other altcoins or scam coins for anonymous transaction and all the smart people know this. i bet most people are here for quick pump and dump for all the altcoins

wrong - masternodes solve issues inherent in Bitcoin such as the incentive to run a node to secure the network. At this point no one cares about running nodes in bitcoin as there is no reward.

The scalability, flexibility and number of modules that could be implemented into darkcoin masternodes is endless.  

there is no need to run masternode or crapnode, blockchain coinjoin and dark wallet itself is the node and it mixing for free. if you want reward, mine it.

[1715626211]

1715626211

[1715626211]

1715626211

[1715626211]

1715626211

[1715626211]

1715626211

[1715626211]

1715626211

[illodin]

there is no need to run masternode or crapnode, blockchain coinjoin and dark wallet itself is the node and it mixing for free. if you want reward, mine it.

Didn't you know bitcoin has to run nodes in order to operate?

[benthach]

there is no need to run masternode or crapnode, blockchain coinjoin and dark wallet itself is the node and it mixing for free. if you want reward, mine it.

Didn't you know bitcoin has to run nodes in order to operate?

should we call these nodes the masterbitcoinminingnodes? mining machines are the nodes.

[illodin]

mining machines are the nodes.

no

[benthach]

there is no need to run masternode or crapnode, blockchain coinjoin and dark wallet itself is the node and it mixing for free. if you want reward, mine it.

Didn't you know bitcoin has to run nodes in order to operate?

should we call these nodes the masterbitcoinminingnodes? mining machines are the nodes.

no

yes

[illodin]

Didn't you know bitcoin has to run nodes in order to operate?

mining machines are the nodes.

no

yes

First result in google:
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-nodes-need/

[stealth923]

there is no need to run masternode or crapnode, blockchain coinjoin and dark wallet itself is the node and it mixing for free. if you want reward, mine it.

Didn't you know bitcoin has to run nodes in order to operate?

should we call these nodes the masterbitcoinminingnodes? mining machines are the nodes.

no

yes

How does it feel to be constantly wrong?


Lack of incentive

Unlike bitcoin mining, where participants are rewarded for confirming transactions, running a bitcoin node does not provide any incentive. The only benefit for someone to run a node is to help protect the network, and based on the Bitnodes data, the number of people interested in supporting the network with a full node is waning.

There could be a number of reasons for that.

For one thing, running a full node utilizes the resources of a machine for basically no monetary return. Plus, the collapse of Mt. Gox has likely left many people with less desire to support the digital currency.

Furthermore, the popularity of the bitcoin core client in China, where it was for a time immensely popular, has tapered off given the contentious regulatory environment there.

[benthach]

Didn't you know bitcoin has to run nodes in order to operate?

mining machines are the nodes.

no

yes

First result in google:
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-nodes-need/

you morons never accepting the true, bitcoin already have nodes. i once setup node and mined with it but never get anything so i quite.

[benthach]

there is no need to run masternode or crapnode, blockchain coinjoin and dark wallet itself is the node and it mixing for free. if you want reward, mine it.

Didn't you know bitcoin has to run nodes in order to operate?

should we call these nodes the masterbitcoinminingnodes? mining machines are the nodes.

no

yes

How does it feel to be constantly wrong?


Lack of incentive

Unlike bitcoin mining, where participants are rewarded for confirming transactions, running a bitcoin node does not provide any incentive. The only benefit for someone to run a node is to help protect the network, and based on the Bitnodes data, the number of people interested in supporting the network with a full node is waning.

There could be a number of reasons for that.

For one thing, running a full node utilizes the resources of a machine for basically no monetary return. Plus, the collapse of Mt. Gox has likely left many people with less desire to support the digital currency.

Furthermore, the popularity of the bitcoin core client in China, where it was for a time immensely popular, has tapered off given the contentious regulatory environment there.

people like you believing the death of bitcoin is 51%(already happen) and less nodes. even with 10 client nodes bitcoin would still work, just a little slow. heck, i can sure put up 10 server nodes right now. i'm the owner of  www.onenetwork.net and still have about 50 servers available. chance there are thousands and thousands bitcoin nodes out there. the less nodes the more miners will go into my clients node(pool) and the more incentives i get but that will never happen anytime as pool setup their own client nodes.

[benthach]

right on the money pot with SuperCoin, did make some BTC here.
I think SuperCoin have the best wallet so far, easy to use and their green/red/orange lights to know if SuperSend is available or busy etc.. the best one so far.

[chaeplin]

I've just completed a test on the multi-path system

Receivers Address --->>>>> XXcJEFKxziaH8trY6DruHx9ap39rnDJbK7 - 0.03 XC's


I am going to put a password zip file online with the details


ATSECURE

it's only fair if you already upload detail somewhere with timestamp before anyone post their answer then release the detail next day. if you don't release the detail then chance the answer is correct but if no answer then chaplin can't find the way to track it.

The file has been uploaded.. And after 24 hours I will release the location and by Sunday the password if nobody has submitted the address

Where is the file and password and address btw ?

[slapper]

Some gems from the "dev"

Such a sudden turn around, now that you may have pissed off someone who was helping your greatly. You should have taken my advice.

You mean the way he help tested DRK RC3 release so that it didn't fork two times?  haha

Really, it doesn't matter if it forks 10, 20 or 50 times. All that matters is the end result. Something so many fail to understand. This is beta software and bugs are to be expected.

Releasing bad code on main-net when peoples investments are stake is a clear example of what separates XC vs DRK.  


XC isn't my only project, imagine how my clients would feel if I deployed new code that broke the system, when they have spent millions on it?  

It is just a clear example of the LACK OF PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

The real scam is the fact that X11 fpga's and potentially ASIC's exist in china...

I just want to remark that since those trolls came into our thread, XC gained 7% in mintpal price. Im not even exaggerating.

Well DARKSEND is nothing more than coinjoin and DRK itself is a 50% premined scam.. the dev and his buddies mined over 1.5Million coins and THEN CHANGED THE ALGO

this is public information and it is sad that people can't see it for what it is

[chesthing]

there is no reason to take someone serious when comparing other coins to btc in equal ground. darkcoin, vericoin or even xc should worry about bitcoin add-on like dark wallet and blockchain coinjoin. like Greg Maxwell said there is no need for scam darkcoin or other altcoins, bitcoin itself can do all. once blockchain coinjoin or dark wallet is success with their anonymous coding then scam darkcoin is done. at this moment if you use sharedcoin(btc)+TOR then you would have much more anonomous then this scam darkcoin. there is no reason to use other altcoins or scam coins for anonymous transaction and all the smart people know this. i bet most people are here for quick pump and dump for all the altcoins
[/quote]

+1. All the idiotic comments about how XC, DRK, VRC, MRO etc are going to overtake BTC are just holders wanting to profit off noobs - either that or they really are that brainwashed.

Every altcoin = just a way to get free BTC through trading. The way that happens is through brainwashing other into believing it's going to be worth much more than you paid.

[TsuyokuNaritai]

DRK and XC Communities,

The toxic back and forth between our two communities has reached a level with which neither of us are comfortable or impressed.  The competitive space for our coins lies in the results, and the results will speak for themselves as they are brought online.  Whatever mistakes or provocations were undertaken by either side are in the past, and we would like them to remain there.  We are all interested in one thing: the advancement of anonymous cryptocurrency.   Let go of the tribalism and start thinking of how you can positively contribute to that end.

Evan and Dan

[AlexGR]

10 days ago:

In conclusion I'll say this:

The primary DRK buyer (the one who has a very large stake at DRK) is also the primary XC buyer who diversified into XC. Given that the future of small investors in DRK and XC is intertwined with the trust of the primary buyer to both these coins, it should be best for us (both) if we stopped hurting the primary buyer, and by extension our own investments.

Neither solution is perfect, both will have a long way to go until they solve their problems, so let's wait and see what they do tech-wise in say 2-3 months.

[SushiChef]

DRK and XC Communities,

The toxic back and forth between our two communities has reached a level with which neither of us are comfortable or impressed.  The competitive space for our coins lies in the results, and the results will speak for themselves as they are brought online.  Whatever mistakes or provocations were undertaken by either side are in the past, and we would like them to remain there.  We are all interested in one thing: the advancement of anonymous cryptocurrency.   Let go of the tribalism and start thinking of how you can positively contribute to that end.

Evan and Dan

could not help myself. Damn those logo's look seXC! Probs to georgem (would donate if he had a XCurrency adres)

I think XC girl is much HOTTER then that DRK granny! look at that awfull scar on her ass.. ulgh

[Brilliantrocket]

there is no reason to take someone serious when comparing other coins to btc in equal ground. darkcoin, vericoin or even xc should worry about bitcoin add-on like dark wallet and blockchain coinjoin. like Greg Maxwell said there is no need for scam darkcoin or other altcoins, bitcoin itself can do all. once blockchain coinjoin or dark wallet is success with their anonymous coding then scam darkcoin is done. at this moment if you use sharedcoin(btc)+TOR then you would have much more anonomous then this scam darkcoin. there is no reason to use other altcoins or scam coins for anonymous transaction and all the smart people know this. i bet most people are here for quick pump and dump for all the altcoins

+1. All the idiotic comments about how XC, DRK, VRC, MRO etc are going to overtake BTC are just holders wanting to profit off noobs - either that or they really are that brainwashed.

Every altcoin = just a way to get free BTC through trading. The way that happens is through brainwashing other into believing it's going to be worth much more than you paid.
[/quote]
If you think that BTC will be the only successful cryptocurrency, you're an idiot. Also Darkwallet is a joke. Centralized trash.

[slapper]

If you think that BTC will be the only successful cryptocurrency, you're an idiot. Also Darkwallet is a joke. Centralized trash.

They were thinking along the lines of decentralizing it. It is software and it can be developed, it takes time just like everything else. Please don't represent Darkcoin this way, especially given that Amir Taaki has displayed some support in the past for Darkcoin. This is not a Darkcoin thread either.

[counter]

Really nice to see people starting to grasp that trashing another coin isn't helping in the long term.  Both coins have been fluctuating up and down and the community will pick the best coin when the time is right.  All The fud is just confusing people and scaring away potential investors. This is a problem that needs to be fixed...

-Edit

[LucyLovesCrypto]

XC was made by loljosh(who is paid to make alt coins for BTC), which means atsecure(XC "dev") can't code himself, he pays loljosh to do everything for him. Similar to coingen.io


Pic #1(atsecure leaves loljosh a positive comment for great service, the amount of BTC risked/paid is .7


Pic #2(loljosh lists the price of .8 for x11+PoS, which is relatively the same price atsecure paid loljosh when he left him the positive comment, The day after XC was released..

Conclusion: XC was made by loljosh for .7/.8 BTC from atsecure. It's just another clone/copy coin.

Can someone confirm this please? Is it possible the .7btc payment was for something else?