Unmoderated XC thread

[adhitthana]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7310161#msg7310161

I have completely wrong with the following thought.

Xnode will not reuse output from previous used address for mixing in normal circumstance.
Because Xnode issue a new address to xnode user, and spend it once later.

Address is reused, cause Xnode users send various amount to Xnode.

That address will be used as multiple input.

Thanks Chaeplin. It's not clear what you are saying , to me.
Would you be able to write your point in your first language and we can get someone to translate. Just so there is no misunderstanding.
Thanks

[1715630862]

1715630862

[1715630862]

1715630862

[1715630862]

1715630862

[1715630862]

1715630862

[adhitthana]

Chaeplin doesn't want to create bad publicity for DRK.

Admitting he can't crack XC 1.5 with multipath would be like shooting himself in the foot cos DRK is vulnerable to the pattern matching techniques.

Just wait until word gets out.

Let the word get out - no one wants their coins stolen by the existing solution.

NO ONE CARES ABOUT XC ANYMORE

Thats what they said about Bitcoin

[chaeplin]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7310161#msg7310161

I have completely wrong with the following thought.

Xnode will not reuse output from previous used address for mixing in normal circumstance.
Because Xnode issue a new address to xnode user, and spend it once later.

Address is reused, cause Xnode users send various amount to Xnode.

That address will be used as multiple input.

Thanks Chaeplin. It's not clear what you are saying , to me.
Would you be able to write your point in your first language and we can get someone to translate. Just so there is no misunderstanding.
Thanks

http://tech.eu/features/808/bitcoin-part-one/


Read transaction part.

[mav137]

What about you actually explain what you mean; i can read articles, forum posts, the bible, my dishwasher manual; it all doesnt explain anything in regards to the XC transaction privacy. You keep posting "references" without context.

I'm willing to invest the time to go in depth into what happens. It's actually quite interesting.
You seem to hide behind the language barrier that makes it hard to explain it.
You have even been asked to post it in your native language.

When someone asks details, it is never clear what you point at. It is a very underhanded way of spreading doubt about the underlying technology, especially since you seem so smart to point it out and make thing look obvious without the context.

There is currently a 1BTC bounty out for the rev 1.5 privacy feature of XC (with multipath)
The bounty has been open for at least a day. And the only thing that is asked is the senders ID.

If you or anyone else wants to try to rock the boat, do it in a way that serves everyone and try to beat the technology.
I've seen enough and have stacked up on XC. This coin is the single most undervalued coin in the entire community, but it won't take long.

Rev1.5 will go public today. The bounty on anonymity hasn't been taken. And when V2 will come out (1 week) there will be a massive PR campaign with an even bigger bounty to crack the privacy if XC. Even if it's cracked, it will hardly go down below the current price.
There isn't any sell support anymore. XC has seem so much FUD, all the weak hands have been shaken out many times now.

See you on the flip side

[From Above]

there are far too many troll/fud/low quality posts on Bitcointalk nowaday. The altcoin forum is mess.

[chaeplin]

^^

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7316840#msg7316840

[landcrab]

^^

^^

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7315641#msg7315641

[mr_random]

FUD

Go away. promote your MRO somewhere else, not in here.



Is binary released ?

What a nonsense.


Make a challenge using private Xnode ?

Bullshit.


It's not a riddle.


I am not interested.


화이트 페이퍼나 먼저 좀 내어 놓으시지 ?

I post facts, you post unreadable garbage.

The truth is spreading and the facts show themselves that XC 1.5 has yet to be cracked. I don't see any bounties for cracking DRK.

XC > DRK

[chaeplin]

^^

^^

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7315641#msg7315641

Not interested

[landcrab]

^^

^^

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7315641#msg7315641

...

씹새끼 

[From Above]

This thread is too much drama unfortunatly.

[chaeplin]

Code:

06/15/14 15:37:59 AcceptPendingSyncCheckpoint : sync-checkpoint at dfc0bcfc2ea6ed0b0570f6b97484f697ba9ebcfe24f650cee40fd4ef7211055b

06/15/14 15:39:37 LoadBlockIndex(): hashBestChain=85c4d3901624a80cf963  height=31156  trust=136309179263  date=06/15/14 15:38:08
06/15/14 15:39:37 LoadBlockIndex(): synchronized checkpoint 1d50c6a509e442f496bf8e59bdb226c31d9edae756dcae2619fb42d18dd13443

Oho..  sync-checkpoint

[EmilioMann]

^^

^^

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7315641#msg7315641

Not interested

it's obvious that you are trying and not succeeding

[NewWorldCoiner]

Code:

06/15/14 15:37:59 AcceptPendingSyncCheckpoint : sync-checkpoint at dfc0bcfc2ea6ed0b0570f6b97484f697ba9ebcfe24f650cee40fd4ef7211055b

06/15/14 15:39:37 LoadBlockIndex(): hashBestChain=85c4d3901624a80cf963  height=31156  trust=136309179263  date=06/15/14 15:38:08
06/15/14 15:39:37 LoadBlockIndex(): synchronized checkpoint 1d50c6a509e442f496bf8e59bdb226c31d9edae756dcae2619fb42d18dd13443

Oho..  sync-checkpoint

1 BTC Bounty.

Find the senders address.         https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg7296161#msg7296161

[phosphorush]

all that chaeplin does is failing to address the real point and pointing out irrelevant facts... Pretty much like fallacies in logic/argumentation.

[From Above]

Is XC the same like Litecoin?

[policymaker]

Is XC the same like Litecoin?

what do u mean litecoin? algo? XC is x11 that is now full PoS, the first real anon wallet which is currently addressing bugs and such, you can visit the topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.8120  , this unmoderated topic was made so people can fud freely.

[From Above]

Is XC the same like Litecoin?

what do u mean litecoin? algo? XC is x11 that is now full PoS, the first real anon wallet which is currently addressing bugs and such, you can visit the topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.8120  , this unmoderated topic was made so people can fud freely.

I mean innovation-wise. Cleary not, right? I mean its not as plain as Litecoin right?

[policymaker]

Is XC the same like Litecoin?

what do u mean litecoin? algo? XC is x11 that is now full PoS, the first real anon wallet which is currently addressing bugs and such, you can visit the topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.8120  , this unmoderated topic was made so people can fud freely.

I mean innovation-wise. Cleary not, right? I mean its not as plain as Litecoin right?

lol no dude.

anon wallet rdy(not even final release), PoS coin(works like interest), low supply, and multipool rdy(because PoW phase done). Its nothing like litecoin... litecoin's only value comes for the fact that its old and stable really.

visit main topic and see for urself

[NewWorldCoiner]

wat a load of shit. do ur self a favour and buy nxt . We are superior in every way n i'm tired of everyone saying we are shit

Then a change of attitude and learning to use the English language correctly might see a change in your fortunes.