Unmoderated XC thread

[adhitthana]

I am not interrested in Dev's challenge.

Dev has refused to acknowledge the existence of hard link.

So, I am not interrested.

I think you were able to link them, or some of them, but I guess it depends what a "hard link" is. That term is not necessarily clear.
I think he wanted "proof" which would be able to be used even with many more transaction.

Do you think your method would have worked with thousands of different transactions rather than a smaller number, even if you had an analysing tool?

[1715591440]

1715591440

[1715591440]

1715591440

[1715591440]

1715591440

[1715591440]

1715591440

[1715591440]

1715591440

[adhitthana]

In RC3, might be possible on changes, not on payment.
In RC4, My method will be useless on both changes and payment.

Excuse my ignoarnce but what is RC3 and RC4?
Thanks again...you are a great help

[chaeplin]

I am not interrested in Dev's challenge.

Dev has refused to acknowledge the existence of hard link.

So, I am not interrested.

I think you were able to link them, or some of them, but I guess it depends what a "hard link" is. That term is not necessarily clear.
I think he wanted "proof" which would be able to be used even with many more transaction.

Do you think your method would have worked with thousands of different transactions rather than a smaller number, even if you had an analysing tool?

Have you heard satoshi spamming ?
I have thouht it's kind of mapping, creating hard link by spent.

Code:

As I write this people with unknown motivations are raining down tiny little payments on old addresses, 
presumably in an effort to get wallets to consume them and create evidence of common address ownership.

It's happening in Bitcoin.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=279249.0



Example.

Anyone heard about Satoshi spamming ?


https://blockchain.info/tx/31ec9a1cea9804c4f0321b4486261af8586f0c930edf0b4fd1f16b06ec583492
https://blockchain.info/tx/31ec9a1cea9804c4f0321b4486261af8586f0c930edf0b4fd1f16b06ec583492?show_adv=true

What for ? Just Advertising ?


I would call it as mapping.
 

1GmFQ13XAfDyMY4QGbXeFgbEWVJ9q5NatE

-->

http://blockr.io/tx/info/b8d06ba404ce860e42fc9e8c37960fd1e31e17941a2750d1556f094737291731

--> 16FgQXGzSLRtdwuwCN7mcaPUtbJ6JFTkVw

Code:

18itQ7vv83AJo7831mwYYkThReKPJtp9mp -0.00243328
1KVe3Ys4aUgnstigRXvk1oEcnLmUBPocvM -0.7747437
1PBm4GtvLT7XVjQtQWuSQoDbBcBQPG5kB2 -87.2034174
1HqnT7EY6JdAm6pQkhp1rMdzvSREFvDV1W -15.42570118
1BSFnvBZzDACnVcs3PkASnA8ky9wCoiJV7 -1e-8
13vuxnEeFaJ8y24KmFYAy1oH58sY8crqje -1e-8
1KkAEQEFZZ6JGaP5eCMnB4geq69D2YXy7j -1e-8
19hdrZw5zHaizHprx84K9ys9aMB2T7QUdH -1e-8
1Ejw88MT7taf5EmTUWBH5nZAkhLrkfHQHY -1e-8
18itQ7vv83AJo7831mwYYkThReKPJtp9mp -1e-8
18GFvPsuYTHTJPfmtkgZVq94SKCEQjdUGZ -1e-8
19WGRTCW8kEfGYjG6XjPu52iUmHnzYA9or -1e-8
1KpxTZ7e9jSBYiFcXxjquYzzqTamqeA1n6 -1e-8
18dZjEboXm9sqmN7ChHQURJRCzCJZ5SN5L -1e-8
18quFyqjJt5qszjgrmNFsphy12U3CHQ7pZ -1e-8
1QJW1EsuXGGshWLTy6WUrS4MHpttYNiAi1 -1e-8
1Aejtjs142HcKJ9GT5nz81xZifUvgCwe9k -1e-8
1FzgLHNoPxazVYSbdezT6LKKGQ7iPRZNi2 -1e-8
1GLB6NTKP6YePC2kY3gyL4PbN9W9QMY81h -1e-8
1GzXvYvF3WicXNk7LjsR8XmM3mC9PD59tf -1e-8
1GmFQ13XAfDyMY4QGbXeFgbEWVJ9q5NatE -1e-8
1PfssmiZFPjg6YpQfKmxCmTVSdCdh386fy -1e-8
1DdUJwtE1kHkEiNc4W98avbfDBPFo4VcoP -1e-8
12sv6DivTjRooxcLBJDp8gvgzbgkzpM3R1 -1e-8
1EDnGiKS9RYTgoXcakyhbKYjrD1EPRVxBg -1e-8
1H8sVSrsxrKUT5282sZAuMcLnUmDAxAXTi -1e-8
1L5vhnbomi8BhMyWPxSSfMCixHvs7c1gbQ -1e-8
15vruUpv1qYSt9D8pDRwH7RsY4GRF925Ze -1e-8

a input(meaning 1 wallet) to 16FgQXGzSLRtdwuwCN7mcaPUtbJ6JFTkVw 103.4062958

[chaeplin]

In RC3, might be possible on changes, not on payment.
In RC4, My method will be useless on both changes and payment.

Excuse my ignoarnce but what is RC3 and RC4?
Thanks again...you are a great help

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle

[adhitthana]

In RC3, might be possible on changes, not on payment.
In RC4, My method will be useless on both changes and payment.

Excuse my ignoarnce but what is RC3 and RC4?
Thanks again...you are a great help

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle

Why will you method be useless by then?
And thanks again

[chaeplin]

In RC3, might be possible on changes, not on payment.
In RC4, My method will be useless on both changes and payment.

Excuse my ignoarnce but what is RC3 and RC4?
Thanks again...you are a great help

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle

Why will you method be useless by then?
And thanks again

Currently, Payments are free from linking.
In RC4, changes will be free from linking.

The problems addressed in this were handled hundreds of pages ago.
Darksend isn't finished yet and was never promised to be 100% anonymous unless you use great care.
Plus RC4 will have great improvements to the anonymity offered.

[SushiChef]

I tought this thread was called Unmoderated XC.. could we change the name to DRK promo thread?

[From Above]

I tought this thread was called Unmoderated XC.. could we change the name to DRK promo thread?

lets change it to "XC ridiculous anonymous claims"

[benthach]

My intentions on Unmoderated XC thread:

The right of privacy.

Haha owned this thread in one sentence. Anyonymity. What anonymity. Privacy at best.

are you talking about scam DRK(darkcoin)?

[SushiChef]

I tought this thread was called Unmoderated XC.. could we change the name to DRK promo thread?

lets change it to "XC ridiculous anonymous claims"

could you elaborate a little more on your statement?

[From Above]

I tought this thread was called Unmoderated XC.. could we change the name to DRK promo thread?

lets change it to "XC ridiculous anonymous claims"

could you elaborate a little more on your statement?

lol

[SushiChef]

I tought this thread was called Unmoderated XC.. could we change the name to DRK promo thread?

lets change it to "XC ridiculous anonymous claims"

could you elaborate a little more on your statement?

lol

I see.. no brains in here

[From Above]

I tought this thread was called Unmoderated XC.. could we change the name to DRK promo thread?

lets change it to "XC ridiculous anonymous claims"

could you elaborate a little more on your statement?

lol

I see.. no brains in here

ur brains obviously lack sarcasm detection. ouch. grand fail!

[SushiChef]

Probably because of the 25+ beer and half a bottle of whiskey I drank last night during and after Spain-Netherlands

[roede94105]

Probably because of the 25+ beer and half a bottle of whiskey I drank last night during and after Spain-Netherlands

wow so badass

why don't you tell us about the 2 girls also waiting in your jacuzzi

2edgy4me

[jaft16]

In RC3, might be possible on changes, not on payment.
In RC4, My method will be useless on both changes and payment.

Excuse my ignoarnce but what is RC3 and RC4?
Thanks again...you are a great help

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle

Why will you method be useless by then?
And thanks again

Currently, Payments are free from linking.
In RC4, changes will be free from linking.

The problems addressed in this were handled hundreds of pages ago.
Darksend isn't finished yet and was never promised to be 100% anonymous unless you use great care.
Plus RC4 will have great improvements to the anonymity offered.

Thanks you have helped us loads, you are only here to make us look bad but you actually made us better.
Please do test the last update because if you don't you will just prove that u can't do it ahhaha.
And now you are on defence mode saying that Drk will have amazing features but yet nothing has been released to fix your anon.

[chaeplin]

In RC3, might be possible on changes, not on payment.
In RC4, My method will be useless on both changes and payment.

Excuse my ignoarnce but what is RC3 and RC4?
Thanks again...you are a great help

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle

Why will you method be useless by then?
And thanks again

Currently, Payments are free from linking.
In RC4, changes will be free from linking.

The problems addressed in this were handled hundreds of pages ago.
Darksend isn't finished yet and was never promised to be 100% anonymous unless you use great care.
Plus RC4 will have great improvements to the anonymity offered.

Thanks you have helped us loads, you are only here to make us look bad but you actually made us better.
Please do test the last update because if you don't you will just prove that u can't do it ahhaha.
And now you are on defence mode saying that Drk will have amazing features but yet nothing has been released to fix your anon.

We call it spiritual victory. 정신승리

[jaft16]

 

[mr_random]

So XC now offers greater anonymity protection than DRK, since Chaeplins pattern matching still works against DRK but no longer works against XC after the update to XC multipath.

Sweet  

[AlexGR]

Chaeplin can you try something with XC since you have a wallet installed - and if it's not much trouble..

Script 100 transfers of something like 0.1 XC each to a specific address of yours, to see

1) how many of these transfers made it to the destination to find the reliability % (if 95 go to the destination, it's 95%)

2) check the size caused to the blockchain for these transactions for these blocks

3) report the tx fees paid for these 100 transfers