|
Gargo
|
 |
July 09, 2014, 07:49:43 AM |
|
do you plan to make a build for mac os?
|
|
|
|
|
|
nicehashdev
|
|
July 09, 2014, 10:08:41 AM |
|
I have proposal for stratum extension to support algorithm change without reconnects. First, we need to normalize name of the algorithms; example: scrypt, nscrypt, x11, x13, x15 Miner subscribes to server that it is capable of switching algorithms. It also sends parameter list. Each parameter consists of 3 parameters: algorithm name, factor and cost. Factor is speed in MH/s (it is only important to be relative to other provided factors of other algorithms), cost is daily cost of rig in USD. Example for 2 algorithms: {"id": X, "method": "mining.algorithm.subscribe", "params": [["scrypt", "1", "2.5"], ["x11", "4.2", "2"]]}\nServer then calculates which is best algorithm for this rig considering provided factors and costs. Before any work is provided and on algorithm switch, server sends (example to switch to x11): {"id": null, "method": "mining.set_algorithm", "params": ["x11"]}\n Immediately after that server sends new difficulty and new work. How about this extension is NOT messed up like extranonce subscription the first time around? Having a miner "subscribe" to calls that a server may or may not support makes little sense. The pool should inform the miner during connect that it supports this extension, and then allow the miner to respond with multiple algorithms if desired. Otherwise, when the miner sends your proposed "subscribe" command to a non-supporting pool, it is going to break pool connectivity (just like extranonce subscribe caused all kinds of problems for users). This one is not problematic at all, because it would be turned on per pool - "multi-algorithm" : true and additional parameters to define supported algorithms, factors and costs. Without this flag, miner does not subscribe to algorithm changes. |
|
|
|
|
|
atomicchaos
|
|
July 09, 2014, 03:11:47 PM |
|
A bit perplexed... I'm a long time miner, with 50 machines, mostly Windows 7 64-bit, and all have 14.6 RC drivers loaded, and are mining fine with a version of SGminer 4.1. I'm using the nicehash compiled versions, and have not compiled myself yet. I went to upgrade to SG5, and I cannot get it to launch at all on all the different rigs I attempted the upgrade on (5+). The error: C:\sgminer-5.0-pre-release-2014-07-08-win32>sgminer -n
[11:04:31] CL Platform vendor: Intel(R) Corporation
[11:04:31] CL Platform name: Intel(R) OpenCL
[11:04:31] CL Platform version: OpenCL 1.1
[11:04:31] Error -1: Getting Device IDs (num)
[b][11:04:31] clDevicesNum returned error, no GPUs usable
[11:04:31] 0 GPU devices max detected[/b]
C:\sgminer-5.0-pre-release-2014-07-08-win32> Yet, same machine, using 4.1 version: C:\sgminer_x11x13mod_01_07_2014>sgminer -n
[11:06:11] CL Platform 0 vendor: Intel(R) Corporation
[11:06:11] CL Platform 0 name: Intel(R) OpenCL
[11:06:11] CL Platform 0 version: OpenCL 1.1
[11:06:11] Error -1: Getting Device IDs (num)
[11:06:11] CL Platform 1 vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
[11:06:11] CL Platform 1 name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
[11:06:11] CL Platform 1 version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1526.3)
[11:06:11] Platform 1 devices: 3
[11:06:11] 0 Tahiti
[11:06:11] 1 Tahiti
[11:06:11] 2 Tahiti
[11:06:11] Number of ADL devices: 3
[11:06:11] ATI ADL Overdrive5 API found.
[11:06:11] ATI ADL Overdrive6 API found.
[11:06:11] Found 21 ADL adapters
[11:06:11] ADL index 0, id 93288320 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version: 0
15.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] GPU 0 assigned: iAdapterIndex:0 iPresent:1 strUDID:PCI_VEN_1002&DEV_6
798&SUBSYS_3000174B&REV_00_4&10C350E0&0&00E0A iBusNumber:2 iDeviceNumber:0 iFunc
tionNumber:0 iVendorID:1002 name:AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series
[11:06:11] ADL index 1, id 93288320 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version: 0
15.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] ADL index 2, id 93288320 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version: 0
15.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] ADL index 3, id 93288320 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version: 0
15.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] ADL index 4, id 93288320 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version: 0
15.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] ADL index 5, id 93288320 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version: 0
15.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] ADL index 6, id 94101760 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version: 0
15.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] GPU 1 assigned: iAdapterIndex:6 iPresent:1 strUDID:PCI_VEN_1002&DEV_6
798&SUBSYS_3000174B&REV_00_4&15001D53&0&0008A iBusNumber:1 iDeviceNumber:0 iFunc
tionNumber:0 iVendorID:1002 name:AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series
[11:06:11] ADL index 7, id 94101760 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version: 0
15.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] ADL index 8, id 94101760 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version: 0
15.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] ADL index 9, id 94101760 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version: 0
15.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] ADL index 10, id 94101760 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version:
015.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] ADL index 11, id 94101760 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version:
015.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] ADL index 12, id 100127744 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version:
015.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] GPU 2 assigned: iAdapterIndex:12 iPresent:1 strUDID:PCI_VEN_1002&DEV_
6798&SUBSYS_3000174B&REV_00_4&443610C&0&00E6A iBusNumber:7 iDeviceNumber:0 iFunc
tionNumber:0 iVendorID:1002 name:AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series
[11:06:11] ADL index 13, id 100127744 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version:
015.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] ADL index 14, id 100127744 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version:
015.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] ADL index 15, id 100127744 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version:
015.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] ADL index 16, id 100127744 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version:
015.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] ADL index 17, id 100127744 - BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version:
015.025.000.099, date: 2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] ADL index 18, id 100127744 - FAILED to get BIOS info
[11:06:11] Failed to ADL_Adapter_ID_Get. Error -1
[11:06:11] ADL index 19, id 100127744 - FAILED to get BIOS info
[11:06:11] Failed to ADL_Adapter_ID_Get. Error -1
[11:06:11] ADL index 20, id 100127744 - FAILED to get BIOS info
[11:06:11] Failed to ADL_Adapter_ID_Get. Error -1
[11:06:11] GPU 0 AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series hardware monitoring enabled
[11:06:11] ADL GPU 0 is Adapter index 0 and maps to adapter id 93288320
[11:06:11] GPU 0 BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version: 015.025.000.099, date:
2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] GPU 1 AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series hardware monitoring enabled
[11:06:11] ADL GPU 1 is Adapter index 6 and maps to adapter id 94101760
[11:06:11] GPU 1 BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version: 015.025.000.099, date:
2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] GPU 2 AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series hardware monitoring enabled
[11:06:11] ADL GPU 2 is Adapter index 12 and maps to adapter id 100127744
[11:06:11] GPU 2 BIOS partno.: 113-2104XTHY-OB6, version: 015.025.000.099, date:
2012/09/25 23:22
[11:06:11] 3 GPU devices max detected
C:\sgminer_x11x13mod_01_07_2014> I have a bad feeling that I'm missing something very obvious, such as needing to copy files into the SGminer 5 directory from the AMD driver, but I couldn't find anything on that and haven't had to do that for other versions. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated! |
BTC:113mFe2e3oRkZQ5GeqKhoHbGtVw16unnw2
|
|
|
|
atomicchaos
|
|
July 09, 2014, 04:10:07 PM
Last edit: July 09, 2014, 05:03:37 PM by atomicchaos |
|
Ok, follow-up to my above message. It appears that the issue is related to the on-board intel video card in the systems I am mining with. I had to completely remove the device in the control panel for SGminer 5.0 to recognize my AMD cards. I even tried -d options to make it so sgminer didn't look for it, but that didn't work either. Once I disabled it, SGminer 5 worked fine. Why wouldn't SGminer 5 look beyond the intel video card, as other version did?
Edit: The work-around is to add: --gpu-platform 1 to the start of my config line in order for it to ignore the Intel card. No idea what changed and why this is now needed when it never was previously, but I'm thrilled it is working thanks to Tex81 on Github!
|
BTC:113mFe2e3oRkZQ5GeqKhoHbGtVw16unnw2
|
|
|
Ale-x
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
July 09, 2014, 08:01:36 PM
Last edit: July 09, 2014, 08:50:10 PM by Ale-x |
|
are you saying that the x15 kernel from that miner is faster the the one from this one?
i get 3.5 mh/s on 290x with 1000/1250 clock
Yes. It is faster. With this miner speed is same as X13 algo and even more bit faster. Looked in the source; no bitblock.cl What mystery .cl file are you hashing with, or was this a typo? Post a pastebin. Sorry for my mistake. Mix up with djm34 topic. Also I have seen than all changes by aznoboy84 have been merged to official sgminer v5.0 beta. |
|
|
|
|
unityrkjs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
July 10, 2014, 10:49:37 AM |
|
Can anyone recommend me the best driver/sgminer versions to use with my 5970s?
I'm currently on sgminer 4.1 and 14.4 drivers. I've heard that the 14.6 drivers / newer sgminer versions don't affect older cards?
|
|
|
|
|
|
rudarSRB
|
|
July 10, 2014, 01:11:05 PM |
|
Could someone share his config and speeds for 290x cards?
|
|
|
|
|
|
badman74
|
|
July 10, 2014, 02:37:55 PM
Last edit: July 10, 2014, 04:08:24 PM by badman74 |
|
Could someone share his config and speeds for 290x cards?
scrypt : 600kh/s nscrypt : 325kh/s x11 : 5.4mh/s x13 : 4mh/s x15 : 3.5mh/s keccak : 350mh/s nist5 : 16.5mh/s this is with default clocks {
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "NH x13 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4337",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=.01;f0=1.3;f2=.65;f3=10.5;f4=8;f5=700;f6=7;f7=33",
"algorithm" : "marucoin-mod",
"intensity" : "18",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize": "256"
},
{
"name" : "NH x11 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4336",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=.01;f0=1.3;f2=.65;f3=10.5;f4=8;f5=700;f6=7;f7=33",
"algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod",
"intensity" : "17",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize": "128"
},
{
"name" : "NH x15 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4339",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=.01;f0=1.3;f2=.65;f3=10.5;f4=8;f5=700;f6=7;f7=33",
"algorithm" : "bitblock",
"intensity" : "16",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize": "256"
},
{
"name" : "NH NIST5 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4340",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=.01;f0=1.3;f2=.65;f3=10.5;f4=8;f5=700;f6=7;f7=33",
"algorithm" : "talkcoin-mod",
"intensity" : "16",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize": "256"
},
{
"name" : "NH keccak multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4338",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=.01;f0=1.3;f2=.65;f3=10.5;f4=8;f5=700;f6=7;f7=33",
"intensity" : "12",
"worksize" : "256",
"gpu-threads": "4",
"algorithm" : "maxcoin"
},
{
"name" : "NH scrypt multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4333",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=64;f0=1.3;f2=.65;f3=10.5;f4=8;f5=700;f6=7;f7=33",
"intensity" : "16",
"worksize" : "64",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads": "1",
"algorithm" : "alexkarnew",
"nfactor" : "10"
},
{
"name" : "NH nscrypt multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4335",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=64;f0=1.3;f2=.65;f3=10.5;f4=8;f5=700;f6=7;f7=33",
"intensity" : "16",
"worksize" : "64",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads": "2",
"algorithm" : "zuikkis",
"nfactor" : "11"
},
{
"name" : "Xpool Dark Multipool",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://mine.xpool.ca:8888",
"user" : "XvRs67Wnw1n1Kwtq4ihhTpv699DdJpxdnt",
"pass" : "x",
"algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod",
"intensity" : "17",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize": "128"
}
],
"hamsi-expand-big" : "1",
"hamsi-short" : true,
"gpu-map" : "0:1,1:0",
"gpu-fan" : "30-100",
"gpu-engine": "750-1000",
"gpu-memdiff" : "300",
"failover-only" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "96",
"temp-overheat" : "94",
"temp-target" : "90",
"auto-fan" : true,
"auto-gpu" : true,
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "1",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"hotplug" : "5",
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "1",
"temp-hysteresis" : "2",
"shares" : "0",
"no-submit-stale" : true,
"no-restart" : false,
"failover-switch-delay" : "30",
"show-coindiff" : true,
"remove-disabled" : true
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
platinum4
|
|
July 10, 2014, 04:39:57 PM |
|
Could someone share his config and speeds for 290x cards?
scrypt : 600kh/s nscrypt : 325kh/s x11 : 5.4mh/s x13 : 4mh/s x15 : 3.5mh/s keccak : 350mh/s nist5 : 16.5mh/s this is with default clocks You're coming in sort of low on a few algos, would you mind trying these settings and seeing if they boost performance on certain algos? scrypt: "thread-concurrency" : "16384" HW errors occur for me nscrypt: "thread-concurrency" : "8192" HW errors occur for me keccak: "thread-concurrency" : "32765"
"intensity" : "13" Also, I noticed you're running varying intensities for x11/x13/x15, what happens when you peg them all to 19? |
|
|
|
|
|
badman74
|
|
July 10, 2014, 04:51:10 PM |
|
Could someone share his config and speeds for 290x cards?
scrypt : 600kh/s nscrypt : 325kh/s x11 : 5.4mh/s x13 : 4mh/s x15 : 3.5mh/s keccak : 350mh/s nist5 : 16.5mh/s this is with default clocks You're coming in sort of low on a few algos, would you mind trying these settings and seeing if they boost performance on certain algos? scrypt: "thread-concurrency" : "16384" HW errors occur for me nscrypt: "thread-concurrency" : "8192" HW errors occur for me keccak: "thread-concurrency" : "32765"
"intensity" : "13" Also, I noticed you're running varying intensities for x11/x13/x15, what happens when you peg them all to 19? they ether stays the same or drop if i go above what i had set on intensity TC is only used for scrypt/nscrypt, and it really doesn't matter for me as i cant keep my cards cool enough to tweak them more on scrypt/ncsrypt, also it never switches to them anyway i may get more with keccak but haven't played with it in a while, I 13 actually gave me more rejects so i kept I 12 i did have HW errors on nscrypt that i could never seem to get rid of but as i said i don't ever really mine it anyway |
|
|
|
|
|
platinum4
|
|
July 10, 2014, 04:57:42 PM |
|
I get 460-480MH with those two settings I specified for keccak; I would be interested if you experienced the same, at stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
badman74
|
|
July 10, 2014, 05:24:42 PM |
|
I get 460-480MH with those two settings I specified for keccak; I would be interested if you experienced the same, at stock.
doesn't actually change anything for me other than I 13 makes the hash rate more unstable the best i can do is 375-380mh/s before it throttles my clocks due to overtemp |
|
|
|
|
milospinkfloyd
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
July 10, 2014, 09:59:39 PM |
|
can someone pls write a conf file for keccak algo using sgminer 5? im gona try nicehash keccak multipool but they do not support old 3.7.3 keccak cgminer..
|
|
|
|
|
MysteryX
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
July 10, 2014, 10:03:57 PM
Last edit: July 11, 2014, 01:52:00 AM by MysteryX |
|
Edit: got it working.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hotrock
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
July 11, 2014, 06:47:25 AM |
|
I guess I will give this one last shot.
Anyone have a config for 270s?
I have PMed the two people I have seen mention 270s but no response from them. I seem to be getting rates that are way low based on one person's posts but I don't know if they are exaggerating or not.
So far per card I'm getting
x11 = 2mh/s
x13 = 1.5mh/s
x15 = 870kh/s (but locks up on pool switch or q so I don't use it)\
Nist5 = 4.6mh/s
All algos are doing what I can find as best at 1160/1500 with 2 threads at I 17.
|
|
|
|
|
|
rudarSRB
|
|
July 11, 2014, 09:02:00 AM |
|
Could someone share his config and speeds for 290x cards?
scrypt : 600kh/s nscrypt : 325kh/s x11 : 5.4mh/s x13 : 4mh/s x15 : 3.5mh/s keccak : 350mh/s nist5 : 16.5mh/s this is with default clocks {
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "NH x13 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4337",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=.01;f0=1.3;f2=.65;f3=10.5;f4=8;f5=700;f6=7;f7=33",
"algorithm" : "marucoin-mod",
"intensity" : "18",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize": "256"
},
{
"name" : "NH x11 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4336",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=.01;f0=1.3;f2=.65;f3=10.5;f4=8;f5=700;f6=7;f7=33",
"algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod",
"intensity" : "17",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize": "128"
},
{
"name" : "NH x15 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4339",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=.01;f0=1.3;f2=.65;f3=10.5;f4=8;f5=700;f6=7;f7=33",
"algorithm" : "bitblock",
"intensity" : "16",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize": "256"
},
{
"name" : "NH NIST5 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4340",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=.01;f0=1.3;f2=.65;f3=10.5;f4=8;f5=700;f6=7;f7=33",
"algorithm" : "talkcoin-mod",
"intensity" : "16",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize": "256"
},
{
"name" : "NH keccak multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4338",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=.01;f0=1.3;f2=.65;f3=10.5;f4=8;f5=700;f6=7;f7=33",
"intensity" : "12",
"worksize" : "256",
"gpu-threads": "4",
"algorithm" : "maxcoin"
},
{
"name" : "NH scrypt multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4333",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=64;f0=1.3;f2=.65;f3=10.5;f4=8;f5=700;f6=7;f7=33",
"intensity" : "16",
"worksize" : "64",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads": "1",
"algorithm" : "alexkarnew",
"nfactor" : "10"
},
{
"name" : "NH nscrypt multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4335",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=64;f0=1.3;f2=.65;f3=10.5;f4=8;f5=700;f6=7;f7=33",
"intensity" : "16",
"worksize" : "64",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads": "2",
"algorithm" : "zuikkis",
"nfactor" : "11"
},
{
"name" : "Xpool Dark Multipool",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://mine.xpool.ca:8888",
"user" : "XvRs67Wnw1n1Kwtq4ihhTpv699DdJpxdnt",
"pass" : "x",
"algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod",
"intensity" : "17",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize": "128"
}
],
"hamsi-expand-big" : "1",
"hamsi-short" : true,
"gpu-map" : "0:1,1:0",
"gpu-fan" : "30-100",
"gpu-engine": "750-1000",
"gpu-memdiff" : "300",
"failover-only" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "96",
"temp-overheat" : "94",
"temp-target" : "90",
"auto-fan" : true,
"auto-gpu" : true,
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "1",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"hotplug" : "5",
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "1",
"temp-hysteresis" : "2",
"shares" : "0",
"no-submit-stale" : true,
"no-restart" : false,
"failover-switch-delay" : "30",
"show-coindiff" : true,
"remove-disabled" : true
}
Thanks badman74! |
|
|
|
|
guzzzi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
July 11, 2014, 09:47:05 AM |
|
While nist5 is the most profit algo my sgminer doesnt switch to it, still mining x15
f0=0.00 f2=0.00 f3=4.00 f4=3.00 f5=0.00 f6=3.50 f7=12.00
is there something wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.T.Coin
|
|
July 11, 2014, 09:55:18 AM |
|
While nist5 is the most profit algo my sgminer doesnt switch to it, still mining x15
f0=0.00 f2=0.00 f3=4.00 f4=3.00 f5=0.00 f6=3.50 f7=12.00
is there something wrong?
I think your 'f6=3.5' should be more like 'f6=2.6' Keeping it at 3.5 will certainly keep you mining X15 too long. |
A fine is a tax you pay for something you did wrong.
A tax is a fine you pay for something you did right.
|
|
|
|
platinum4
|
|
July 11, 2014, 10:01:07 AM |
|
rabble rabble where's my nightly build for 7/11/2014 rabble rabble
|
|
|
|
|
|
