Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 08:29:33 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 [124] 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 ... 233 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] sgminer v5 - optimized X11/X13/NeoScrypt/Lyra2RE/etc. kernel-switch miner  (Read 877805 times)
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
December 15, 2014, 08:24:10 AM
 #2461

BTW I got another 10℅, programming on the phone.

I tuned for 290X - you hit 1.6MH/s yet?

I'm on 290@1000/1250, about 1.1 Mh/s.
But income is so low it's not worth working on it.

djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
December 15, 2014, 10:44:46 AM
 #2462

BTW I got another 10℅, programming on the phone.

I tuned for 290X - you hit 1.6MH/s yet?

I'm on 290@1000/1250, about 1.1 Mh/s.
But income is so low it's not worth working on it.
actually I tried to use your groestl kernel yesterday (at least one part... wasn't in the mood to unroll everything  Grin), but I don't see any difference and actually it was a bit slower for me).

Wolf0, can you post your speed with these core/mem 1030/1250 (can't get my card to work at 1500MHz).
My current average speed with my r9 290x and my latest kernel is 1.3MH/s

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
gabrielknight
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 15, 2014, 11:52:05 AM
 #2463

Hey djm34, there's something is wrong with the compiled binary that you post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=404364.msg9817141#msg9817141

When hashing lyra2RE (vtc), the hashrate shown on the miner is indeed faster 5-10% than the metalicjames one, but on pool it will only record half the hashrate.
All stats normal, low rejected shares, no hardware errors that are shown on the miners.
Tested it on two different pools, coinotron and hashlink.eu, still when using your windows binary, only half hashrate will be recorded on the web.
Somehow only half the shares are sent by the miners or accepted by the pool.
And it's not  just estimations only, the coin received is halved for the same time period.
When back on using metalicjames version, the hashrate going back to normal again.

Where's that half hashrate gone??
Could you please recheck the binaries. Thanks.
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
December 15, 2014, 11:52:31 AM
 #2464

actually I tried to use your groestl kernel yesterday (at least one part... wasn't in the mood to unroll everything  Grin), but I don't see any difference and actually it was a bit slower for me).

it is eavily tuned for groestlcoin/diamond.
to use in x11, lyra2re or other multi-algo it need to be tuned differently.

djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
December 15, 2014, 12:08:10 PM
 #2465

Hey djm34, there's something is wrong with the compiled binary that you post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=404364.msg9817141#msg9817141

When hashing lyra2RE (vtc), the hashrate shown on the miner is indeed faster 5-10% than the metalicjames one, but on pool it will only record half the hashrate.
All stats normal, low rejected shares, no hardware errors that are shown on the miners.
Tested it on two different pools, coinotron and hashlink.eu, still when using your windows binary, only half hashrate will be recorded on the web.
Somehow only half the shares are sent by the miners or accepted by the pool.
And it's not  just estimations only, the coin received is halved for the same time period.
When back on using metalicjames version, the hashrate going back to normal again.

Where's that half hashrate gone??
Could you please recheck the binaries. Thanks.
must be related to the difficulty adjustment..., I will re-upload it. In the mean time there is also a difficulty multiplier option in sgminer (it shows as deprecated in the help, however it still works).
Also, I think that several pool are still tuning their hash report things...  Grin

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
December 15, 2014, 12:11:46 PM
 #2466

BTW I got another 10℅, programming on the phone.

I tuned for 290X - you hit 1.6MH/s yet?

I'm on 290@1000/1250, about 1.1 Mh/s.
But income is so low it's not worth working on it.
actually I tried to use your groestl kernel yesterday (at least one part... wasn't in the mood to unroll everything  Grin), but I don't see any difference and actually it was a bit slower for me).

Wolf0, can you post your speed with these core/mem 1030/1250 (can't get my card to work at 1500MHz).
My current average speed with my r9 290x and my latest kernel is 1.3MH/s


1.35 or so, but I don't have your blake fix in.
ok so it isn't that bad  Grin
You won't gain much with the blake fix, blake takes practically no time compared to the rest. It is a lot of pain to put in and sgminer5 dev admin doesn't like it  Grin
(I need to change a few thing before they agree to update)

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
December 15, 2014, 12:31:30 PM
 #2467

1.37 Mh/s R9 290@1000/1250

Bananana
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 481
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
December 15, 2014, 01:11:34 PM
 #2468

1.37 Mh/s R9 290@1000/1250

That is really awesome, mine to let us know the power consumption too? Almost same like mining scrypt?

djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
December 15, 2014, 01:13:16 PM
 #2469

1.37 Mh/s R9 290@1000/1250

That is really awesome, mine to let us know the power consumption too? Almost same like mining scrypt?
hopefully not  Grin

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
December 15, 2014, 01:24:30 PM
 #2470

1.37 Mh/s R9 290@1000/1250

That is really awesome, mine to let us know the power consumption too? Almost same like mining scrypt?

no it's less, more like X11.

djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
December 15, 2014, 02:49:24 PM
 #2471

ok current longer test on verter pools: -I 19 -g2 -w64 290x at 1030/1250: 1.320MH/s (average still oscillate a bit between 1.318 and 1.322)
(using my latest on  https://github.com/djm34/sgminer )


djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
platinum4
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 547
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 15, 2014, 02:56:46 PM
 #2472

ok current longer test on verter pools: -I 19 -g2 -w64 290x at 1030/1250: 1.320MH/s (average still oscillate a bit between 1.318 and 1.322)
(using my latest on  https://github.com/djm34/sgminer )

Getting 1.5 per on badman74's build, 1040/1500, no hangs for past 6 hours.

algo still hasn't been added to br or mrr so nh is the only place rentable right now, even with f9=# it doesn't switch on port 4342 yet
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
December 15, 2014, 03:20:15 PM
 #2473

ok current longer test on verter pools: -I 19 -g2 -w64 290x at 1030/1250: 1.320MH/s (average still oscillate a bit between 1.318 and 1.322)
(using my latest on  https://github.com/djm34/sgminer )

Getting 1.5 per on badman74's build, 1040/1500, no hangs for past 6 hours.

algo still hasn't been added to br or mrr so nh is the only place rentable right now, even with f9=# it doesn't switch on port 4342 yet
not bad after all  Grin (I am not too ridiculous finally ... ), they both use the same kernel... (I wish I was able to get my card to 1500MH/s...)


djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
December 15, 2014, 03:42:32 PM
 #2474

1.66 Mh/s R9 290@1000/1500

EDIT: still far from profitable

djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
December 15, 2014, 04:29:35 PM
 #2475

1.66 Mh/s R9 290@1000/1500

EDIT: still far from profitable
not enough people sold their gpu's  Grin

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
splat44
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 384
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 15, 2014, 04:32:28 PM
 #2476

I know few are able determine amount of Mh/s based on their GPU but I am unsure how to determine that base on R7 240 seen on following image!



It's be great to know the Mh/s by seeing above image!
Any feedbacks?

About optimized x11 and ect...:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623409.0

Are settings same as v5?
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
December 15, 2014, 04:35:13 PM
 #2477

1.66 Mh/s R9 290@1000/1500

EDIT: still far from profitable
not enough people sold their gpu's  Grin

you're so sadly true :-D

yudhistira
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 347
Merit: 100



View Profile
December 15, 2014, 06:15:14 PM
 #2478

Thank's to Wolf0 for your .bin files

increas from 4.3 to 6.6 MHs
x11 r9 280x



but profit same as it was get 4.3 MHs
maybe diff raise like crazy

hopefully get a special .bin that not make a crazy diff  Wink

WebsiteWhitepaperTelegram   International Blockchain Lottery   FacebookTwitterGitHub
════════☛ FIRELOTTO ☚════════    As simple and understandable as traditional lotteries are    ══════☛ PLAY NOW ☚══════
drr0ss
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 15, 2014, 06:45:58 PM
 #2479

 Here are all the bins getting produced:

  I get this from my output.log:

Code:
[14:07:01] Building binary neoscryptHawaiigw64l4ku0big7hs.bin
[14:07:01] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram)
[14:07:01] "C:\Users\ANIMAL~1\AppData\Local\Temp\OCL4772T27.cl", line 368: warning:
          variable "t" was declared but never referenced
   uint4 t, st[4];
        ^

"C:\Users\ANIMAL~1\AppData\Local\Temp\OCL4772T27.cl", line 495: error:
          identifier "MAX_GLOBAL_THREADS" is undefined
   __global ulong16 *V = (__global ulong16 *)(padcache + (0x8000 * (get_global_id(0) % MAX_GLOBAL_THREADS)));
                                                                                      ^

"C:\Users\ANIMAL~1\AppData\Local\Temp\OCL4772T27.cl", line 513: warning:
          argument of type "__global ulong16 *" is incompatible with parameter
          of type "__global uint16 *"
   SMix(X, V, flag);
          ^

1 error detected in the compilation of "C:\Users\ANIMAL~1\AppData\Local\Temp\OCL4772T27.cl".

Frontend phase failed compilation.

Any ideas?  Could CGWatcher be interfering somehow when bins are made?

You have wrong marucoin-mod.cl.
Try to find right, and replace in ./kernels
fix https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=854257.240
semajjames
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 528
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 15, 2014, 07:06:41 PM
 #2480

I there some issue with 290x on Lyra2RE ,,because i cant get my 290x's to hash as fast as my 290 non x's
Pages: « 1 ... 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 [124] 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 ... 233 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!