suggsy89
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 12:02:42 AM |
|
Very soon, I'm testing currently.
Just pointed 3kh/s to your pool, is there a way to set static difficulty, i'm getting these error messages. 01/09/17-00:00:10 - SHARE FOUND (target 48127) - (GPU 2 of 4) Share rejected (140 ms)! {"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Lowdifficultyshare"}}
|
|
|
|
Bakery
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 07:57:42 AM |
|
@claymore: Thank you for the many features and other improvements. I appreciate your work and the support you give to the hobby miners like me.
I have issues since I turned my rigs to XMR mining:
Is it a good idea to use CN miner with 16.10.3 ATI drivers or should I "downgrade" to 15.12 or an older 16.x version? I have 6*RX470 ref. 4GB Sapphire cards in my rigs, and I can't stabilize them. I tried with original/factory bios and settings, I also tried lower freq. and voltage, mem.timing mod, etc., but the OS (WIN10) always crashes.
Previously I used your awesome ZCASH miner and the rigs were rock-stable.
@Claymore i can confirm that this error vanishes with miner version 9.5, everyting working stable, could you check somehow and fix it in future release? @ffthomas take 9.5, this doesnt crash so often, only that it doesnt support suprnova login.
|
|
|
|
Cubirez
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 08:12:37 AM |
|
@claymore: Thank you for the many features and other improvements. I appreciate your work and the support you give to the hobby miners like me.
I have issues since I turned my rigs to XMR mining:
Is it a good idea to use CN miner with 16.10.3 ATI drivers or should I "downgrade" to 15.12 or an older 16.x version? I have 6*RX470 ref. 4GB Sapphire cards in my rigs, and I can't stabilize them. I tried with original/factory bios and settings, I also tried lower freq. and voltage, mem.timing mod, etc., but the OS (WIN10) always crashes.
Previously I used your awesome ZCASH miner and the rigs were rock-stable.
@Claymore i can confirm that this error vanishes with miner version 9.5, everyting working stable, could you check somehow and fix it in future release? @ffthomas take 9.5, this doesnt crash so often, only that it doesnt support suprnova login. I've got a 6xRX470 4GB Nitro rig and both 9.7 and 9.6 have been running stable for me other the last days (switched from zec last week). Using 16.11.1 drivers. However i encoutered problems using the tuning options (-cvddc -cclock ...). I'm now using wattool and everything is fine (hashing @ around 4440 h, not fully optimized yet)
|
|
|
|
christiano88
Member

Offline
Activity: 161
Merit: 10
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 08:57:52 AM |
|
Very soon, I'm testing currently.
Just pointed 3kh/s to your pool, is there a way to set static difficulty, i'm getting these error messages. 01/09/17-00:00:10 - SHARE FOUND (target 48127) - (GPU 2 of 4) Share rejected (140 ms)! {"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Lowdifficultyshare"}} You are getting that because of your memory overclock/timing. Lower the clocks.
|
|
|
|
kaese2002
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 10:00:52 AM |
|
Did dwarf pool stoped that crazy error msgs?
Which pool is the best???
Minergate and miningpoolhub seens to bad for me!
I been mining in dwarf for around 5 hours with 0 rejects, it looks like they fixed that problem but now they are getting ddos alot and sometimes i cant connect to the pool. yeah same here...miner runs out of jobs as there are no new ones send by pool
|
|
|
|
suggsy89
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 10:50:47 AM |
|
Very soon, I'm testing currently.
Just pointed 3kh/s to your pool, is there a way to set static difficulty, i'm getting these error messages. 01/09/17-00:00:10 - SHARE FOUND (target 48127) - (GPU 2 of 4) Share rejected (140 ms)! {"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Lowdifficultyshare"}} You are getting that because of your memory overclock/timing. Lower the clocks. Just tried that, lowered by 50MHz seems to have fixed it. Same speed as well which is a bonus.
|
|
|
|
Trimegistus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1565
Merit: 1027
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 11:06:03 AM |
|
Did dwarf pool stoped that crazy error msgs?
Which pool is the best???
Minergate and miningpoolhub seens to bad for me!
I been mining in dwarf for around 5 hours with 0 rejects, it looks like they fixed that problem but now they are getting ddos alot and sometimes i cant connect to the pool. yeah same here...miner runs out of jobs as there are no new ones send by pool I totally gave up on dwarf a few days ago...
|
|
|
|
rawbert
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 11:27:34 AM |
|
Did dwarf pool stoped that crazy error msgs?
Which pool is the best???
Minergate and miningpoolhub seens to bad for me!
I been mining in dwarf for around 5 hours with 0 rejects, it looks like they fixed that problem but now they are getting ddos alot and sometimes i cant connect to the pool. yeah same here...miner runs out of jobs as there are no new ones send by pool I totally gave up on dwarf a few days ago... Dwarf works great now.
|
|
|
|
Bakery
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 01:00:58 PM |
|
I've got a 6xRX470 4GB Nitro rig and both 9.7 and 9.6 have been running stable for me other the last days (switched from zec last week). Using 16.11.1 drivers. However i encoutered problems using the tuning options (-cvddc -cclock ...). I'm now using wattool and everything is fine (hashing @ around 4440 h, not fully optimized yet)
Yeah but what windows?
|
|
|
|
Yanakitu Tenatako
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 01:46:54 PM |
|
Did dwarf pool stoped that crazy error msgs?
Which pool is the best???
Minergate and miningpoolhub seens to bad for me!
I been mining in dwarf for around 5 hours with 0 rejects, it looks like they fixed that problem but now they are getting ddos alot and sometimes i cant connect to the pool. yeah same here...miner runs out of jobs as there are no new ones send by pool I totally gave up on dwarf a few days ago... Dwarf works great now. Dwarf was a big disappointment last 30 days mining XMR. Always connection errors, and payment 20-30% less every day. I really enjoyed it in 2014, now... something is wrong. Left pool couple a days ago.
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 01:58:54 PM |
|
i recommend suprnova, im really happy with them 
|
|
|
|
woodaxe
Member

Offline
Activity: 129
Merit: 10
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 02:03:07 PM |
|
i recommend suprnova, im really happy with them  they still havnt sorted out polo payments with id so cannot use them
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 02:16:13 PM |
|
i recommend suprnova, im really happy with them  they still havnt sorted out polo payments with id so cannot use them It's imminent, ocminer is testing for payment ID implementation  you can always disable the autopayout, and wait until it's done to reactivate it.
|
|
|
|
newmz
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 372
Merit: 250
The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 02:20:49 PM |
|
i recommend suprnova, im really happy with them  I have tried at least 5 different XMR pools over the last week and I have to agree - (so far at least) Suprnova seem to be really great. I had a problem with Claymore's new ssl connection causing Suprnova to ban my IP address. I emailed admin@suprnova.cc about it and got a reply withing 15 minutes. They had a bug on their side (and admitted it to me which is unusual and I find admirable) which they fixed and so I was back up on the ssl connection at Suprnova approximately 25 minutes after first realizing I had a problem. They have lots of stats and information and they seem to be doing decent real-time quoting of connected worker's hash-rates. Many other pools have really slow stats or they seem to underquote your hash-rate. If anything Suprnova seem to think I have higher hash rate than I expected. Anyway - my experience with Suprnova so far has been very positive and I recommend them.  If you are one of the ones who really want to be able to mine to an exchange - dude.... just get a mymonero.com account, mine to it and take that extra 2 minutes a day to send from it to poloniex or wherever.
|
Crypto currency enthusiast and miner since 2015. Mined approx 200 ETH during 2016 and 2017 and sold it at approximately $US40 each. Then I watched it reach $1000+ each. If anyone bothers to read this stuff pay attention to this: HODL HODL HODL HODL HODL HODL
I started mining with 1 AMD 7950 and 1 R9-280X. Then I gradually built my AMD operation into 12 R9-290s. Awesome ETH hash but ridiculous power consumption and heat. Over the last year I defected to the Nvidia team. I now use GTX 1070s. They were expensive to buy (probably a bargain now) but awesome hash rate vs. power consumption. blah blah blah blah
|
|
|
Cubirez
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 03:00:12 PM |
|
I've got a 6xRX470 4GB Nitro rig and both 9.7 and 9.6 have been running stable for me other the last days (switched from zec last week). Using 16.11.1 drivers. However i encoutered problems using the tuning options (-cvddc -cclock ...). I'm now using wattool and everything is fine (hashing @ around 4440 h, not fully optimized yet)
Yeah but what windows? Win 10 Pro
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 03:26:48 PM |
|
i recommend suprnova, im really happy with them  I have tried at least 5 different XMR pools over the last week and I have to agree - (so far at least) Suprnova seem to be really great. I had a problem with Claymore's new ssl connection causing Suprnova to ban my IP address. I emailed admin@suprnova.cc about it and got a reply withing 15 minutes. They had a bug on their side (and admitted it to me which is unusual and I find admirable) which they fixed and so I was back up on the ssl connection at Suprnova approximately 25 minutes after first realizing I had a problem. They have lots of stats and information and they seem to be doing decent real-time quoting of connected worker's hash-rates. Many other pools have really slow stats or they seem to underquote your hash-rate. If anything Suprnova seem to think I have higher hash rate than I expected. Anyway - my experience with Suprnova so far has been very positive and I recommend them.  If you are one of the ones who really want to be able to mine to an exchange - dude.... just get a mymonero.com account, mine to it and take that extra 2 minutes a day to send from it to poloniex or wherever. tbh i also want to mine to the exchange, is it free to transfer from mymonero.com account to polo ?
|
|
|
|
uninexus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 03:48:03 PM |
|
If you are one of the ones who really want to be able to mine to an exchange - dude.... just get a mymonero.com account, mine to it and take that extra 2 minutes a day to send from it to poloniex or wherever.
tbh i also want to mine to the exchange, is it free to transfer from mymonero.com account to polo ?
There is a fee of between 0.003 and 0.006 and a delay. The fee depends on the level of privacy you select. It works but is annoying. You have to always consider if you have enough funds INCLUDING the fee or your transaction will fail.
|
|
|
|
antantti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 03:51:46 PM Last edit: January 09, 2017, 04:28:10 PM by antantti |
|
If you are one of the ones who really want to be able to mine to an exchange - dude.... just get a mymonero.com account, mine to it and take that extra 2 minutes a day to send from it to poloniex or wherever.
tbh i also want to mine to the exchange, is it free to transfer from mymonero.com account to polo ?
There is a fee of between 0.003 and 0.006 and a delay. The fee depends on the level of privacy you select. It works but is annoying. You have to always consider if you have enough funds INCLUDING the fee or your transaction will fail. Just did a test transfer, 3.5 xmr with minimum privacy level (mixin 3) and the fee was 0.009 xmr. edit: to sum up, 3.5 xmr from webwallet to kraken fee 0.009 xmr 3.5 xmr from kraken to local wallet fee 0.05 xmr 3.5 xmr from local wallet to kraken fee 0.004 xmr
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 03:55:13 PM |
|
If you are one of the ones who really want to be able to mine to an exchange - dude.... just get a mymonero.com account, mine to it and take that extra 2 minutes a day to send from it to poloniex or wherever.
tbh i also want to mine to the exchange, is it free to transfer from mymonero.com account to polo ?
There is a fee of between 0.003 and 0.006 and a delay. The fee depends on the level of privacy you select. It works but is annoying. You have to always consider if you have enough funds INCLUDING the fee or your transaction will fail. Just did a test transfer, 3.5 xmr with minimum privacy level (mixin 3) and the fee was 0.009 xmr. Yeah so even if it's a minimum amount you're still paying a bit of money, so mining to an exchange make sense even if so little  thx for the infos !
|
|
|
|
woodaxe
Member

Offline
Activity: 129
Merit: 10
|
 |
January 09, 2017, 07:09:55 PM |
|
Suprnova im still waiting for yu to add the polo wallet id so i can use your pool any update
Very soon, I'm testing currently. I assume it cannot be done
|
|
|
|
|