[ANN] [START] StartCOIN 2.0 - The digital currency for crowdfunding

[Ducky1]

New video with Simon Dixon:

https://twitter.com/SimonDixonTwitt/status/639697659033333760

[Jdj1727]

Good to see Bob in START, it's a coin with a ton of potential. But everyone in here is already aware of that.

[ridery99]

Bob will use his bear bot to run price down, then accumulate

[Bobsurplus]

Bob will use his bear bot to run price down, then accumulate

Shhhh.. Dont tell them.

[Macno]

Welcome to START, Bob. May we all live long and prosper 

Oh, and thanks for the nice arb opportunities after your tweet, whoever that was. Johnny 5 be like nom nom nom. 

[Bobsurplus]

Welcome to START, Bob. May we all live long and prosper 

Oh, and thanks for the nice arb opportunities after your tweet, whoever that was. Johnny 5 be like nom nom nom. 

My pleasure dude. Thanks for the warm welcome. Let's make some action happen over here when the time is right. You down for the cause?

[mind808crime]

Welcome to START, Bob. May we all live long and prosper 

Oh, and thanks for the nice arb opportunities after your tweet, whoever that was. Johnny 5 be like nom nom nom. 

My pleasure dude. Thanks for the warm welcome. Let's make some action happen over here when the time is right. You down for the cause?

So Bob's here, huh?  Glad I've been stocking up Start.

[Sumo]

Bob will use his bear bot to run price down, then accumulate

Shhhh.. Dont tell them.

Run it down Bob,, I need some coins 

[AttentionDisorder]

Bob will use his bear bot to run price down, then accumulate

Shhhh.. Dont tell them.

Run it down Bob,, I need some coins 

Bob won't be needed, the startjoin leaders are making a good job of running it down, no communication with loyal members who go out of their way to help everyone on the platform and spend a lot to make sure projects get fully funded. If these handful of regular start joiners leave, the site is finished and startcoin will be over full stop. I also think the site is pretty basic and needs updating, there have been suggestions made by users and they have been ignored. If only startjoin had someone like Simon Dixon running it then it would be so much better, his Bnktothefuture platform is excellent and you are guaranteed great customer support. So just sit back and watch the price fall people, if the startjoin crew don't pull their socks up soon its going to loose some great backers.
The question i am asking myself right now is what if startjoin was a con all along and we have all been ripped off, its looking that way unless we get some announcements soon. Jamie scott was tweeted to see if he is still the startcoin Dev and he didn't reply just favourited the tweet, why could he not just answer no or yes? I have never met the guy but if he can't give a simple yes or no answer then we can see what sort of a person he is can't we, and he is part of Startjoin, laughable Startjoin doesn't have much of a chance with leaders like this.
 

[AttentionDisorder]

Really annoyed at the way the Startjoin has gone, its so negative all the time people complaining and project promises not being delivered like Mikes silver coins etc. Any new comer to the site would be turned off straight away with all the negativity, i think they should stop all users making comments and only allow project owners to comment and users can direct message each other and projects only, maybe have a separate forum like here for everyone to complain and ask questions. I really want Startjoin to be a success because i have invested in the company and the coins, but i think it is run terribly.
I bought most of my coins between 2k and 6k so i am still in profit, maybe i should sell and get out as i get annoyed too easily. Startjoin could be so good and help so many but its just turning into a farce.

[thoth-Atlantian]

That does seem to be the general consensus at the moment. I also use BTF and it's a fantastic I was actually 'keeping my powder dry' for SCH equity round that was supposed to go up a few weeks ago. The fact it didn't and nothing was mentioned again turned me off it altogether. Max trolling about SC on KR is always amusing but not enough to ensure the success of a coin in an increasingly competitive market.
People want results and updates, without them even the great community that SJ has start to wonder if it's all it's cracked up to be.
I own 2 shares in the SMBS and I'm a bit dubious on that much exposure to SC now TBH
If Bob pumps it I will most likely be liquidating my 50k+ Start, and wait another year or so to see what happens.

When you have the likes of WBB and SPEC with devs showing proof of work being done almost daily and delivering ahead of schedule they seem a better place to park money.
I don't agree with not letting people post on pitches the forum is a good way to communicate and keeps the traffic to the site up.
And as for people not delivering projects I think taking thier firstborn is fair compensation or at least a charge back through Paypal. needs to be some legal insurances.

Having said all this Crypto moves fast and things can change overnight,

Just please no more saying something will happen and it not   

[thoth-Atlantian]

Actually, getting money back off scam projects wouldn't be so hard. if in the terms allowed for SCH to invoice you the raised amount if not delivered.
Can be instantly handed to a debt collector then the funds regained spread back to funders. Could even crowd fund a Crypto debt collector.

[AttentionDisorder]

Actually, getting money back off scam projects wouldn't be so hard. if in the terms allowed for SCH to invoice you the raised amount if not delivered.
Can be instantly handed to a debt collector then the funds regained spread back to funders. Could even crowd fund a Crypto debt collector.

I like this idea a lot, so the project owner would have to agree by contract to promise to for fill their project offerings or at least prove they tried too like if a business failed etc, if not they will get debt collector knocking on the door, excellent way of stopping fraudsters although some might find a way to get around obligations still stop others. But what would happen in the cases when startcoin drops in value and they cannot fund their ideas, maybe then they offer to repay all pledges made or offer too at least.

[AttentionDisorder]

what annoys me is Max is posting on twitter as i write this, why does he not comment on Startjoin and let us know what he is up to and any developments being made on his platform, i bet he has been on there tonight and read all the comments yet he keeps quiet, maybe its true him and Jamie might have had words and there is a fallout, hence no comments from anyone in charge.

[AttentionDisorder]

"A Drunk Mind Speaks A Sober Heart." Goodnight from a lonely old man

[johnp]

Quote from Simon Dixon

You would be forgiven for thinking that things have been quiet over the summer period from StartJOIN management. As an investor in the company the board and other parties have been very busy negotiating a deal to rapidly grow the StartCOIN and SJ community. We are closer to making an announcement.


https://twitter.com/SimonDixonTwitt/status/640364769384378368

[kevinjulio]

Login or JOIN - StartJOIN.com
Get 10 free coins every time you invite a friend. StartCOIN can be used to buy things online or support projects through StartJOIN #freemoney
Where it pays to share

What words above are not valid ?

[thoth-Atlantian]

That's a big call, The whole point of Startcoin is Startjoin. What would set it apart from any other Alt coin? Even if on BTTF you would still stay in BTC to fund things rather than Start. The Crowdfund Idea is a winner it just takes time and loads of work and as finance will become harder to get it will be more appealing. With giving out free coins it isn't really that huge of a payout unless you fund a load of $$ in which case your adding enough o the idea that its worth it and If Jamie isn't in? Easy, find another dev.

Cool if people are bag holding 
 

[johnp]

Typical FUD just look at my post above from one of the Statjoin board ignore all else

[thoth-Atlantian]

Typical FUD just look at my post above from one of the Statjoin board ignore all else

Yes, Sounds much more reasonable