Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 04:04:35 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 [192] 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 ... 516 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread  (Read 709798 times)
Phosphorous
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 556
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 03, 2014, 06:55:47 PM
 #3821

Does anyone has any experience with using 2 different psu's (one for each blade) on an S3. I have a couple of corsair CX430's laying around and was hoping i could use 2 to power one S3.
One of those supplies should work fine for one S3 at stock frequencies as consumption is only around 14A per blade. Even overlocked to 250Mhz you'd probably be OK but your supply would be loaded to the max.
1714017875
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714017875

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714017875
Reply with quote  #2

1714017875
Report to moderator
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714017875
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714017875

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714017875
Reply with quote  #2

1714017875
Report to moderator
9600
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 207
Merit: 112


View Profile
August 03, 2014, 07:25:45 PM
 #3822

I'm sure many of you know how much trouble I was having with my S3s from B3 last week.
Since I've been running the cgminer restart every 1/2 hour, these are the results.



S31 is clocked at 218, up from 212.
S32 is clocked at 250, up from 218.

24-hour figures are still on the rise.

I am going to re-torque the heatsink on S31 and clock back up to 250. It holds, but always loses one chip about 10 minutes in.

They KEY here, is the restart the cgminer process whenever your problem miners start losing hash. It seems to be VERY different for each miner. But this has been the answer for me.

It ghash.io stats page. Post your Antminer stats page.
In ghash stats page I get even 800 for single S3, these are not reliable.
Also when restarting average of 30minute even at miners stats is not so real.
I mean sometimes when cgminer us started the avg will just show a high value like 500, 600 sone times it shows actual value.
So, do you have a figure for every 1hr restart? Why you are restarting at 30minutes? Due to chip shutoff?

Those are 5 minute, 15 minute, 1 hour, and 24 hour averages. Its from my pool, they pay me according to accepted shares. This is what I'm most concerned about. cgminer stats on these S3s are veritably useless.

Yes I know I have asic errors, but I don't really care because in 15 minutes, I won't.
My hashrates are up, my payouts show it.

This is it for me. No one ever said it was an elegant solution.






47 minutes and one restart later, no ASIC errors. Same accepted share rate. This works.
allcoinminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 504


View Profile
August 03, 2014, 07:37:16 PM
 #3823

[MG]https://i.imgur.com/MyVl7y5.png[/img]

[MG]https://i.imgur.com/zgaxTrP.png[/img]

47 minutes and one restart later, no ASIC errors. Same accepted share rate. This works.

Have you noticed actual bitcoin payout increase with this?
9600
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 207
Merit: 112


View Profile
August 03, 2014, 07:43:35 PM
 #3824

[MG]https://i.imgur.com/MyVl7y5.png[/img]

[MG]https://i.imgur.com/zgaxTrP.png[/img]

47 minutes and one restart later, no ASIC errors. Same accepted share rate. This works.

Have you noticed actual bitcoin payout increase with this?

That's really hard to say. I run a pretty big farm and the pool luck has been VERY high lately. I'm inclined to say yes but I have no real empirical data.

What I can say for SURE, is that I am seeing more accepted shares from both units.

I use a modified version of this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=222632.0 script to query and store share data in a MongoDB for analysis.
Lowell904
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 119
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 03, 2014, 11:01:49 PM
Last edit: August 03, 2014, 11:25:09 PM by Lowell904
 #3825

Does anyone has any experience with using 2 different psu's (one for each blade) on an S3. I have a couple of corsair CX430's laying around and was hoping i could use 2 to power one S3.

The CX430 should be rated for 32A on the 12+ rail. If you're feeling brave you could probably run a single S3@218 on one power supply. Would definitely work @212.

Also after bitcoin discount the corsair CX430 is only ~$15 from newegg. Very cheap solution for an underclocked S3

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139026

You can't run a S3 on one CX430 because it only has one PCI-E.

I was thinking you could too.
RiseOfTH
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 03, 2014, 11:56:51 PM
 #3826

Does anyone has any experience with using 2 different psu's (one for each blade) on an S3. I have a couple of corsair CX430's laying around and was hoping i could use 2 to power one S3.

The CX430 should be rated for 32A on the 12+ rail. If you're feeling brave you could probably run a single S3@218 on one power supply. Would definitely work @212.

Also after bitcoin discount the corsair CX430 is only ~$15 from newegg. Very cheap solution for an underclocked S3

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139026

You can't run a S3 on one CX430 because it only has one PCI-E.

I was thinking you could too.


Can I run two Bitmain S3 on 950 watt PSU (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003U29C40/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o03_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1)? It has four PCI-e, +12V 83A with max load of 1000W?

I have another 850W seasonic which has two PCI-e. But I have 2-6 pin mole connector to 1-pci-e connector coverter. So, I can make another two PCI-e connectors. Is is safe to use such configuration for two Bitmain S3?

Also, how long it takes to reach US once Bitmain ships the product from China (https://bitmaintech.com/product.htm)?

I have ordered two Bitmain s3 through a Ebay seller.

Thanks,
MoreBloodWine
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1001


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 12:01:14 AM
 #3827

Still no movement on he order page or emails for my two orders of 2 B5 S3's each ;-(

And here I thought they wee shipping before he 7th like they said ;-/

To be decided...
9600
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 207
Merit: 112


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 12:10:11 AM
 #3828

Does anyone has any experience with using 2 different psu's (one for each blade) on an S3. I have a couple of corsair CX430's laying around and was hoping i could use 2 to power one S3.

The CX430 should be rated for 32A on the 12+ rail. If you're feeling brave you could probably run a single S3@218 on one power supply. Would definitely work @212.

Also after bitcoin discount the corsair CX430 is only ~$15 from newegg. Very cheap solution for an underclocked S3

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139026

You can't run a S3 on one CX430 because it only has one PCI-E.

I was thinking you could too.


Depending on your confidence, you could always cut the 8-pin CPU connector and splice in a PCIe connector if you have an extra adapter lying around. All of mine are running on similarly adapted server PSUs.
padrino
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1000


https://www.bitworks.io


View Profile WWW
August 04, 2014, 12:21:50 AM
 #3829

Still no movement on he order page or emails for my two orders of 2 B5 S3's each ;-(

And here I thought they wee shipping before he 7th like they said ;-/

Am I missing something, it's only the 4th right now, still a strong possibility as far as I can tell..

1CPi7VRihoF396gyYYcs2AdTEF8KQG2BCR
https://www.bitworks.io
MoreBloodWine
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1001


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 12:31:43 AM
 #3830

Still no movement on he order page or emails for my two orders of 2 B5 S3's each ;-(

And here I thought they wee shipping before he 7th like they said ;-/

Am I missing something, it's only the 4th right now, still a strong possibility as far as I can tell..
Wishful thinking they ship before the 6th.

To be decided...
buy4crypto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250

freecrypto.top


View Profile WWW
August 04, 2014, 12:51:00 AM
 #3831

Still no movement on he order page or emails for my two orders of 2 B5 S3's each ;-(

And here I thought they wee shipping before he 7th like they said ;-/

Depends when you ordered. Between 4 orders of mine and some friends we have them at all various stages for batch 5. Our first time stamp is in china, while our second order is in ohio already. Our third order is moving along and the fourth order has yet to start the process.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
████ - freecrypto.top - btcinfo.top - DIGITAL CURRENCY DIRECTORIES - freeMonero.comfunbtc.xyz  ████
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
MoreBloodWine
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1001


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 12:53:56 AM
Last edit: June 15, 2017, 10:48:21 PM by MoreBloodWine
 #3832

Still no movement on he order page or emails for my two orders of 2 B5 S3's each ;-(

And here I thought they wee shipping before he 7th like they said ;-/

Depends when you ordered. Between 4 orders of mine and some friends we have them at all various stages for batch 5. Our first time stamp is in china, while our second order is in ohio already. Our third order is moving along and the fourth order has yet to start the process.


To be decided...
Bitkoinzz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 218
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 04, 2014, 01:39:29 AM
 #3833

BITMAINTECH.COM OFFLINE. Anyone know what they are doing?
edit.. disregard. back up and no changes

DISCIPLINA — The First Blockchain For HR & Education
From core developers of Cardano, PoS minting, unique Web Of Trust & Privacy algorithms. Be the first, join us!
  WEBSITE  TELEGRAM  ANN  BOUNTY  LINKEDIN  WHITEPAPER  Referral Program 5%
MoreBloodWine
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1001


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 01:41:13 AM
Last edit: June 15, 2017, 10:47:59 PM by MoreBloodWine
 #3834

BITMAINTECH.COM OFFLINE. Anyone know what they are doing?
Running for the hills with this ? lol


To be decided...
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 01:44:23 AM
 #3835

BITMAINTECH.COM OFFLINE. Anyone know what they are doing?

http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/bitmaintech.com

Seems to be working just fine!

squashpile
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 125
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
August 04, 2014, 03:04:50 AM
 #3836

What are the error rates?

I'm sure many of you know how much trouble I was having with my S3s from B3 last week.
Since I've been running the cgminer restart every 1/2 hour, these are the results.



S31 is clocked at 218, up from 212.
S32 is clocked at 250, up from 218.

24-hour figures are still on the rise.

I am going to re-torque the heatsink on S31 and clock back up to 250. It holds, but always loses one chip about 10 minutes in.

They KEY here, is the restart the cgminer process whenever your problem miners start losing hash. It seems to be VERY different for each miner. But this has been the answer for me.

SquashPool - 0% Fee - Dedicated P2Pool VPS - Atlanta, GA - SSD - Gig uplink
-droid-
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1001



View Profile
August 04, 2014, 04:22:44 AM
 #3837

S3 not hashing correctly?

I've got 4 units and only 1 hashes at 440-441 at stock freq, the others get 414-420ish.

In working with bitmain over email I tried re applying thermal paste and swapping psu's around and still nada.  Then they asked me to swap control board from the one good miner to one that is underperforming and lo and behold the underperforming one is now hashing at 440-441 with the other hashing at the lower speed.

I've swapped it on then others and it's the same result.  Since the static IP is saved on the control board it moves from swap to swap with the good control board, so it constantly thinks it's the good unit and hashes at adv. spec
taipo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100

Kia ora!


View Profile WWW
August 04, 2014, 04:48:30 AM
 #3838

Since mine has the same probs as yours, what solution did Bitmain offer to you to rectify the faulty control board.

Support the two platforms essential to protecting the identities of whistleblowers. Both accept bitcoin donations.
https://globaleaks.org - GlobalLeaks ( btc: see http://goo.gl/D5wM0L )
http://goo.gl/sZg2RN  - SecureDrop: whistleblower submission system
-droid-
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1001



View Profile
August 04, 2014, 05:07:00 AM
 #3839

Since mine has the same probs as yours, what solution did Bitmain offer to you to rectify the faulty control board.

Nothing yet , waiting to hear back
9600
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 207
Merit: 112


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 05:12:47 AM
 #3840

What are the error rates?

I'm sure many of you know how much trouble I was having with my S3s from B3 last week.
Since I've been running the cgminer restart every 1/2 hour, these are the results.



S31 is clocked at 218, up from 212.
S32 is clocked at 250, up from 218.

24-hour figures are still on the rise.

I am going to re-torque the heatsink on S31 and clock back up to 250. It holds, but always loses one chip about 10 minutes in.

They KEY here, is the restart the cgminer process whenever your problem miners start losing hash. It seems to be VERY different for each miner. But this has been the answer for me.

Check https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.msg8169759#msg8169759 here.
Pages: « 1 ... 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 [192] 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 ... 516 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!