Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 10:28:11 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 [160] 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 ... 516 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread  (Read 709800 times)
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7824


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
July 29, 2014, 01:03:17 PM
 #3181

I may end up getting four of these for B5 supposed to ship Aug 7th but am curious about some things first.

1) Under normal clock, what type of PSU is required to safely run 24/7 ?

2) What can this safely OC to while still preforming good / running stable ?

3) Keeping 1 & 2 above in mind, should each unit be on it's own PSU or can one PSU power two units and if so under what requirements for 24/7 operation.

I suspect in the event of 2, that one PSU per unit would be preferable.

this will do 3 stock it will also over clock 2 easy


http://www.amazon.com/EVGA-SuperNOVA-1300G2-ATX12V-120-G2-1300-XR/dp/B00COIZTZM/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1406638914&sr=8-1&keywords=evga+1300


after rebate it is 144 usd quite a good deal

rebate dies on the 32st of july  make that the 31st of july

http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/00/00/55/94/95/67/5594956750._V347453142_.pdf

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
No Gods or Kings. Only Bitcoin
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714645691
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714645691

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714645691
Reply with quote  #2

1714645691
Report to moderator
jamesc760
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 29, 2014, 01:20:47 PM
 #3182

Got the refund this morning BEFORE the physical delivery of the B3's (American Customs and UPS are screwing me violently in the arse). Might (doubtful) show up tomorrow.


Ordering in shipments of 2 units each and using DHL, all of my Bitmain orders have made it from HK to VA, USA in 3 days. Even before they gave the form option, you could always specify DHL in the order comments.
Orders of less than $1000 rarely get stopped by US customs. All of mine have been correctly labeled as BITCOIN ASIC COMPUTER for S1 and S3 shipments.

Just something to consider for the future if you're a US customer.

TLDR: Multiple small orders are less likely to get stopped by US customs. Use DHL.

I have an order with 10 S3's, in batch 4 by UPS, coming to stateside. I had made the order due to time pressure, since then I have made dozens of orders with 2 S3's, for the exact reason given by 9600. I will give an update to what happens to my orders.
BennyTheBall
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 01:28:45 PM
 #3183

Refund Received. Thanks Bitmain!!!
jelin1984
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004



View Profile
July 29, 2014, 01:29:14 PM
 #3184

Anyone sell coupons for s3
Stale
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 0



View Profile
July 29, 2014, 01:35:00 PM
 #3185

Woke up to B4 shipping details, I had ordered within a few minutes of it opening.
Duce
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 175
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 01:37:32 PM
 #3186

I'm also having the issue with the S3 hashrate dropping off.  It generally starts around 435Gh but drops to around 390-400GHs.  I'm at work now and I'm looking at my S3 on Slush's pool and I'm currently showing -

Total average hash rate in last 60 minutes: 381070 Mhash/s  Shocked

Has anyone found a solution to this or had word from BitMain?   

Some units do and some don't, try a lower clock such a 212.5 as others have identified. I have one that runs steady at 218.5 and another that does not like the stock clock but runs fine at 212.5, and is reliable at that speed.
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7824


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
July 29, 2014, 01:50:49 PM
 #3187

I'm also having the issue with the S3 hashrate dropping off.  It generally starts around 435Gh but drops to around 390-400GHs.  I'm at work now and I'm looking at my S3 on Slush's pool and I'm currently showing -

Total average hash rate in last 60 minutes: 381070 Mhash/s  Shocked

Has anyone found a solution to this or had word from BitMain?   

Some units do and some don't, try a lower clock such a 212.5 as others have identified. I have one that runs steady at 218.5 and another that does not like the stock clock but runs fine at 212.5, and is reliable at that speed.

this is the way to go.  my 2 units run at 212.5 very well

look at my charts solid at 430gh and 212.5  Note that dip was a T-storms caused blackout. gear auto -booted back to normal and 430gh


▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
teeGUMES
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1253
Merit: 1203


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 01:59:19 PM
 #3188

Woke up to B4 shipping details, I had ordered within a few minutes of it opening.
Mine also shipped, ordered within minutes of opening.
atledenin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 02:05:00 PM
 #3189

I'm also having the issue with the S3 hashrate dropping off.  It generally starts around 435Gh but drops to around 390-400GHs.  I'm at work now and I'm looking at my S3 on Slush's pool and I'm currently showing -

Total average hash rate in last 60 minutes: 381070 Mhash/s  Shocked

Has anyone found a solution to this or had word from BitMain?   

Some units do and some don't, try a lower clock such a 212.5 as others have identified. I have one that runs steady at 218.5 and another that does not like the stock clock but runs fine at 212.5, and is reliable at that speed.



I'm also having the issue with the S3 hashrate dropping off.  It generally starts around 435Gh but drops to around 390-400GHs.  I'm at work now and I'm looking at my S3 on Slush's pool and I'm currently showing -

Total average hash rate in last 60 minutes: 381070 Mhash/s  Shocked

Has anyone found a solution to this or had word from BitMain?   

Some units do and some don't, try a lower clock such a 212.5 as others have identified. I have one that runs steady at 218.5 and another that does not like the stock clock but runs fine at 212.5, and is reliable at that speed.

this is the way to go.  my 2 units run at 212.5 very well

look at my charts solid at 430gh and 212.5  Note that dip was a T-storms caused blackout. gear auto -booted back to normal and 430gh

http://imagize[Suspicious link removed]ageshack.us/v2/1280x1024q90/745/dtIArs.png

Thanks guys Smiley I'll give that a whirl this evening!
pumaro
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 02:05:44 PM
 #3190

Ok first let me say I got my refund yesterday when the last units I purchased arrived at my home.
 For a bitcoin hardware company bitmain seems to be exceptional in sending equipment when they said they would ship it and at a fair price. Kudos.

Currently the hardware is performing as shown below as per the accepted shares at ELIGIUS:
All are economode 218mhz and only one (ant3 has one x and one -)

all 7 have a 12 hour average of 411GH

ant1      
12 Hours   440.52 Gh/s   4430848
3 Hours   446.52 Gh/s   1122816
22.5 Minutes   427.59 Gh/s   134400



ant2      
12 Hours   394.45 Gh/s   3967488
3 Hours   386.10 Gh/s   970880
22.5 Minutes   399.08 Gh/s   125440


ant4      
12 Hours   434.04 Gh/s   4365696
3 Hours   425.86 Gh/s   1070848
22.5 Minutes   417.00 Gh/s   131072



ant3   (asics have one x and one -)   
12 Hours   383.19 Gh/s   3854208
3 Hours   386.20 Gh/s   971136
22.5 Minutes   364.06 Gh/s   114432



ant5      
12 Hours   376.09 Gh/s   3782784
3 Hours   371.80 Gh/s   934912
22.5 Minutes   378.31 Gh/s   118912



ant6      
12 Hours   409.90 Gh/s   4122880
3 Hours   408.14 Gh/s   1026304
22.5 Minutes   406.41 Gh/s   127744



ant7      
12 Hours   444.21 Gh/s   4467968
3 Hours   457.21 Gh/s   1149696
22.5 Minutes   482.97 Gh/s   151808

ducmami
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 121
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 02:14:47 PM
 #3191

REFUNDS?Huh

I keep asking this as well, but Bitmaintech are very quiet.  I have even sent them a message on my Bitmaintech account, but no reply!!!!!

I was told beginning of this week for the refunds.
hi bobs, do you have s3 for colocation mining?
i order s3 at minersource, start mining on 26th july, but now is 29th
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7824


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
July 29, 2014, 02:17:54 PM
 #3192

Ok first let me say I got my refund yesterday when the last units I purchased arrived at my home.
 For a bitcoin hardware company bitmain seems to be exceptional in sending equipment when they said they would ship it and at a fair price. Kudos.

Currently the hardware is performing as shown below as per the accepted shares at ELIGIUS:
All are economode 218mhz and only one (ant3 has one x and one -)

all 7 have a 12 hour average of 411GH

ant1      
12 Hours   440.52 Gh/s   4430848
3 Hours   446.52 Gh/s   1122816
22.5 Minutes   427.59 Gh/s   134400



ant2      
12 Hours   394.45 Gh/s   3967488
3 Hours   386.10 Gh/s   970880
22.5 Minutes   399.08 Gh/s   125440


ant4      
12 Hours   434.04 Gh/s   4365696
3 Hours   425.86 Gh/s   1070848
22.5 Minutes   417.00 Gh/s   131072



ant3   (asics have one x and one -)   
12 Hours   383.19 Gh/s   3854208
3 Hours   386.20 Gh/s   971136
22.5 Minutes   364.06 Gh/s   114432



ant5      
12 Hours   376.09 Gh/s   3782784
3 Hours   371.80 Gh/s   934912
22.5 Minutes   378.31 Gh/s   118912



ant6      
12 Hours   409.90 Gh/s   4122880
3 Hours   408.14 Gh/s   1026304
22.5 Minutes   406.41 Gh/s   127744



ant7      
12 Hours   444.21 Gh/s   4467968
3 Hours   457.21 Gh/s   1149696
22.5 Minutes   482.97 Gh/s   151808


set the low ones to 212.5  that would be number 3 and number 5

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
bobsav2121
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 317
Merit: 104


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 02:19:58 PM
 #3193

Why is everyone still beating this dead horse.?  It's been pretty well established that "HEAT" is NOT the cause of the S3 problems, it poor design and possible sub-par components.
We've already read that some users have put their S3's in front of A/C units and experienced no improvement.
Now we have pages of people trying to put heatsinks on chips that dont need them.
Lets face it , Bitmains first performance figures were "optimistic" and probably thrown out there in a hurry to get the machine to market, and after further testing they realized that they made a mistake.
That's why they gave us money back, not enough but a good gesture, not many companies these days would do that.
If we are into Batch 4 and possibly batch 5 with no hardware changes then I think you can safely assume that it is what it is and probably cannot be fixed.
If there was a fix to be made, I think Bitmain would have done it .
This is not a problem that firmware up grades will fix either.
JMHO
Bob
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7824


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
July 29, 2014, 02:23:27 PM
 #3194

Why is everyone still beating this dead horse.?  It's been pretty well established that "HEAT" is NOT the cause of the S3 problems, it poor design and possible sub-par components.
We've already read that some users have put their S3's in front of A/C units and experienced no improvement.
Now we have pages of people trying to put heatsinks on chips that dont need them.
Lets face it , Bitmains first performance figures were "optimistic" and probably thrown out there in a hurry to get the machine to market, and after further testing they realized that they made a mistake.
That's why they gave us money back, not enough but a good gesture, not many companies these days would do that.
If we are into Batch 4 and possibly batch 5 with no hardware changes then I think you can safely assume that it is what it is and probably cannot be fixed.
If there was a fix to be made, I think Bitmain would have done it .
This is not a problem that firmware up grades will fix either.
JMHO
Bob

  I tend to  agree with you.

 I believe the stock setting should be 212.5 with 430gh and 328 watts on a gold psu.

They now sell them at 218 with 441gh and 340 watts on a gold psu.  >>>>>>>>> I feel this is not stock but a small overclock.



The real mystery is the s-3's that do 480gh or 500gh and freq 237 or freq 250.


▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
aztecminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 29, 2014, 02:24:43 PM
 #3195

Prolimatech PK-3 Nano Aluminium Thermal

-High Thermal Conductivity
-Low Thermal Resistance
-Long-Term Stability
-Low Dry-Out
-Non-CorrosiveElectrically
-Non-Conductive
-No "burn-in" time required



Would anyone recommend this paste?  I would like to clean and replace thermal paste.  What size would I need to do 2 AntMiner s3's


BTCBTC
DoubleDD

I would think this should be enough for one S3

http://www.amazon.com/Arctic-Silver-5-Thermal-Compound/dp/B0002EQU6C/

Or if you have more than 2 you probably want this one

http://www.amazon.com/Arctic-Silver-Large-Size-gram/dp/B001JYVFLY/

Arctic Silver says to not use it where it may come in contact with electricity.  I haven't opened up a S3 yet, but I imagine it is easy to put some on the pins of the chips.  If so, use a carbon based one that is not conductive or capacitive.  Something like mx-4 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B004ULZITS/) would work.  


and after all that here we are circled back to GC-Extreme:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835426020
silverthornne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 148
Merit: 100


SelfPay - ICO PRE SALE - huge Profit !


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 02:54:19 PM
 #3196

I got my batch 1 unit yesterday after some fun at customs and I guess I may have to underclock it as well. It's running at 218.5 and it doesn't like it and dips a lot even though the temps are pretty acceptable (usually between 39 and 42). It runs much cooler than my S1, but the S1 seems to run more stable with a lower reject %. One oddity is it always says its "best share" is 0 and that doesn't seem right but I'll have to wait until tonight to check it again since I don't have access to it while at the office.

9600
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 207
Merit: 112


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 02:55:57 PM
 #3197

Why is everyone still beating this dead horse.?  It's been pretty well established that "HEAT" is NOT the cause of the S3 problems, it poor design and possible sub-par components.
We've already read that some users have put their S3's in front of A/C units and experienced no improvement.
Now we have pages of people trying to put heatsinks on chips that dont need them.
Lets face it , Bitmains first performance figures were "optimistic" and probably thrown out there in a hurry to get the machine to market, and after further testing they realized that they made a mistake.
That's why they gave us money back, not enough but a good gesture, not many companies these days would do that.
If we are into Batch 4 and possibly batch 5 with no hardware changes then I think you can safely assume that it is what it is and probably cannot be fixed.
If there was a fix to be made, I think Bitmain would have done it .
This is not a problem that firmware up grades will fix either.
JMHO
Bob

  I tend to  agree with you.

 I believe the stock setting should be 212.5 with 430gh and 328 watts on a gold psu.

They now sell them at 218 with 441gh and 340 watts on a gold psu.  >>>>>>>>> I feel this is not stock but a small overclock.



The real mystery is the s-3's that do 480gh or 500gh and freq 237 or freq 250.



Or the units that hash at 480-490 for about 45 minutes before dropping off sharply. I think its the variances in performance that is absolutely killing the engineer inside all of us.
contactlight
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 02:59:26 PM
 #3198

Why is everyone still beating this dead horse.?  It's been pretty well established that "HEAT" is NOT the cause of the S3 problems, it poor design and possible sub-par components.
We've already read that some users have put their S3's in front of A/C units and experienced no improvement.
Now we have pages of people trying to put heatsinks on chips that dont need them.
Lets face it , Bitmains first performance figures were "optimistic" and probably thrown out there in a hurry to get the machine to market, and after further testing they realized that they made a mistake.
That's why they gave us money back, not enough but a good gesture, not many companies these days would do that.
If we are into Batch 4 and possibly batch 5 with no hardware changes then I think you can safely assume that it is what it is and probably cannot be fixed.
If there was a fix to be made, I think Bitmain would have done it .
This is not a problem that firmware up grades will fix either.
JMHO
Bob

  I tend to  agree with you.

 I believe the stock setting should be 212.5 with 430gh and 328 watts on a gold psu.

They now sell them at 218 with 441gh and 340 watts on a gold psu.  >>>>>>>>> I feel this is not stock but a small overclock.



The real mystery is the s-3's that do 480gh or 500gh and freq 237 or freq 250.

It is definitely a mystery. My first two from B1 can stably hash at:

480GH/s at freq 237
510GH/s at freq 250

I'm using EVGA Supernova 750w and Corsair CX600 to power them. They reach to temperatures at around 45C.
TR8888
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 525
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 03:00:46 PM
 #3199

All 4 of my Batch 3 units came stock 218.75  and happily sit at 442 after 12 hours, Is it worth bumping it upto 237 or 250 or not worth the hassle?
contactlight
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 03:17:55 PM
 #3200

All 4 of my Batch 3 units came stock 218.75  and happily sit at 442 after 12 hours, Is it worth bumping it upto 237 or 250 or not worth the hassle?

If you are lucky you might have gotten machines that can hash at ~500GH/s on 250, or ~480GH/s on 237. Worth a try.
Pages: « 1 ... 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 [160] 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 ... 516 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!