[Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners

[sxemini]

Hi Patrike,

can you update Phönixminer to 3.5 in the next release?

[1714815440]

1714815440

[1714815440]

1714815440

[1714815440]

1714815440

[patrike]

Hi Patrike,

can you update Phönixminer to 3.5 in the next release?

Yes. I noticed that is was released today and it will be included in the next update.

[Finnsk3]

Is this ever going to be fixed?

My datalogging and projections have all been ruined for the last 3 weeks.

Hi,

1) Please go to the Options dialog, Online Services, and verify that the field "Nicehash domain matching" is set to the default value "nicehash.com" and nothing else.

2) If you still experience this issue, please contact me by mail and send your configuration file (%appdata%\AwesomeMiner\ConfigData.xml) so I can investigate in more detail why it's failing.

Thanks!

Thanks, I wasn't experiencing this issue with just nicehash, some algos on other pools also reported $0, I posted an earlier screenshot displaying this.

The latest beta release fixed my issue but interestingly I had miningpoolhub.com in that "Nicehash domain matching", I have changed it to nicehash.com

Yesterday I wrote in to my datalogging/management software to calculate profit based on pool api responses instead of awesome miner so I will have to swap all that back

[patrike]

Is this ever going to be fixed?

My datalogging and projections have all been ruined for the last 3 weeks.

Hi,

1) Please go to the Options dialog, Online Services, and verify that the field "Nicehash domain matching" is set to the default value "nicehash.com" and nothing else.

2) If you still experience this issue, please contact me by mail and send your configuration file (%appdata%\AwesomeMiner\ConfigData.xml) so I can investigate in more detail why it's failing.

Thanks!

Thanks, I wasn't experiencing this issue with just nicehash, some algos on other pools also reported $0, I posted an earlier screenshot displaying this.

The latest beta release fixed my issue but interestingly I had miningpoolhub.com in that "Nicehash domain matching", I have changed it to nicehash.com

Yesterday I wrote in to my datalogging/management software to calculate profit based on pool api responses instead of awesome miner so I will have to swap all that back

Thanks for the update. I actually made a small change to the latest development release to handle the scenario if "nicehash.com" was missing from the "Nicehash domain matching" field, Awesome Miner still could match it. At the time, I didn't know if this was the problem in your case, but it was a more fail-safe way of doing it. Great that it's working better now!

[avi2]

Hi Patrike,

Can you add block explorers for wallet balance for coin Metaverse ETP in the next release?

Thanks!

[powerstr]

WildRig Multi 0.11.6 Beta is Becoming Even More Useful Multi-algorithm Miner

[svedr]

Can you make a priority coin ?
This means, that always mine priority coin - ether, only if some other coin in group have xx % higher profit. Now mine xx% in + and -..
I want allways mine ether , only if some other coin have more then 20% more profit.

Example.... i have i group 2 pool, ether and moreno. Profit switch i set to 20%. When i start have ether higher profit so its a start with ether.
Over time monero becomes 20% more profitable, so start mine monero. Profitable of monero falling down, now is profit same monero and ether...monero fall down for more19%
and still mine monero not ehther!!.... me.... and in this scenario you can mine long time.. with 19% minus profit...... I hope you understand

[moppidoo]

Can you make a priority coin ?
This means, that always mine priority coin - ether, only if some other coin in group have xx % higher profit. Now mine xx% in + and -..
I want allways mine ether , only if some other coin have more then 20% more profit.

Example.... i have i group 2 pool, ether and moreno. Profit switch i set to 20%. When i start have ether higher profit so its a start with ether.
Over time monero becomes 20% more profitable, so start mine monero. Profitable of monero falling down, now is profit same monero and ether...monero fall down for more19%
and still mine monero not ehther!!.... me.... and in this scenario you can mine long time.. with 19% minus profit...... I hope you understand

I think in your scenario, you can consider toning down the Profit Switching threshold and then use below instead

Options -> Pools -> (Your Monero Pool) -> Advanced

Profit Factor 0 - 1 (0% to 100%) (for example, 0.85, so Monero has to be at least 15% + profit switching % more profitable than ETH b4 your miner switches to it)

***
PS. Btw, I wouldn't recommend you to try those random miners that popped up in this forum as of late, especially the self moderated newbie miners threads where descriptions are all the same (mountainminer, terracotta, barracuda, moon....etc whatever the name comes up with, hell, someone even trying to impersonate JCE Miner's thread. I commend you for the bravery for trying them, but that is quite risky IMHO.

[MHyza]

Hi,

can you add $BCD - @BitcoinDiamond to coins/algos, please? It is running on Zergpool already.

Thanks a lot for really brilliant support
M.

[Sibtigr]

Is it possible to make a storage of miner programs on the control computer from which to distribute updated miners to the extended clients.
This would greatly simplify the task of updating a large number of miners

It should be possible to configure the path to mining software via the Options dialog, Managed Software section. Instead of a download URL starting with "http", you can specify a Windows file share like "\\somecomputer\Ccminer-something-1.0.zip". The result is that all Remote Agents will use this file share to get the ZIP file.

And if there is a password for access to Windows customers will not be able to get to download the miner?

[zaqwsx]

Hello Patrike,

Can you please provide me a link to "AwesomeMinerRemoteService.msi" version 5.5.1

I've delete it by mistake and cant upgrade / update to the newer version without it.

The "Upgrade remote Agent" function doesn't work.

[sxemini]

Hi Patrike,

how can i start a generic miner with admin privileges? I monitor my Burstminer with Awesomeminer and i can see in the console tab the burstminer console.
But the newest version need admin privileges to start.

I use this verion of Blagominer:
https://github.com/JohnnyFFM/blagominer/releases

I hope it is possible.



@zaqwsx

You must delete some files manuel, also in the registry to reinstall the awesomeminer remote agent. I have this Problem 3 times this year.

[bobocrypto]

+1 for sxemini


I use the same software for busrt mining too.
I have to kill the agent and open it has administrator to be fine. I tried with scheduled task and in a shortcurt run as admin and put it in startup but that doesn't work. Must be run it manually if I rebooted the computer.

Thanks

Francis

[trucobit]

Please can someone help me to be able to mine with Progpow, at least to be able to make a benchmark by mining a coin. I have tried BCI with the address of a "walllet" installed.

I have chosen the right miner propgprow nvidia miner. All apparently correct. Both in normal pools and in Suprnova. It gives me a mining error. It does not start, it says that I must choose the right miner, and he is chosen.

I have gone to managed Software and put it as Enabled to propgpow in its miner, although by default it should already be. The error is that neither stops, gives a direct error like that I have not chosen miner. This marking, everything is fine

What am I doing wrong?

[moppidoo]

Please can someone help me to be able to mine with Progpow, at least to be able to make a benchmark by mining a coin. I have tried BCI with the address of a "walllet" installed.

I have chosen the right miner propgprow nvidia miner. All apparently correct. Both in normal pools and in Suprnova. It gives me a mining error. It does not start, it says that I must choose the right miner, and he is chosen.

I have gone to managed Software and put it as Enabled to propgpow in its miner, although by default it should already be. The error is that neither stops, gives a direct error like that I have not chosen miner. This marking, everything is fine

What am I doing wrong?

hard to make of which settings details are wrong on your side, but I have mmine working, and the following are set

pool: stratum+tcp://bci.suprnova.cc:9166
Worker name: username.workername (MPOS like MPH, create a worker on bci.suprnova.cc if needed)
Worker password: (optional I believe, just leave default "x" if you want)
Coin: BCI (I think WhatToMine has it in its API, ID: 245)

Options -> Algorithms -> ProgPow checked

Options -> Managed Software -> ProgPoW Nvidia Miner -> make sure ProgPow is enabled

Profit Profile (Applicable) -> Mining software priority list -> ProgPoW Nvidia Miner Checked

Profit Profile -> Customize -> ProgPow in Algorithm checked

(Optional) Profit Profile -> Algorithm specific settings -> Mining Software -> ProgPoW Nvidia Miner (default Priority via Priority list supposed to be fine but just in case)

I suspect one of the last 3 steps might be incorrect on your end or your settings at the pool needs to be checked.

[edmal]

Please tell me what is better to set the time for the parameter -- Switching interval (minutes). If the farm consists of ASIC S7, S9, D3, L3. Thank you in advance.

[moppidoo]

Please tell me what is better to set the time for the parameter -- Switching interval (minutes). If the farm consists of ASIC S7, S9, D3, L3. Thank you in advance.

it depends on the specs of coins you mine (block time) and the pool payout scheme really, no real "best" nor better answer for that.

for example, you can have them as short as possible on NiceHash as long as the switching is fast and almost instantaneous (I have no idea, never owned an ASIC). because it's PPS, and you get paid for valid shares, but if you are mining specific coins on pools that runs PPLNS, PPLNT scheme, then these ones are probably not suitable for frequent swithching. In those ones, you want to probably have switching interval set to multiples of the average block time as per coin specifications. but it really is just trial and error and see what you find is best for you.

[edmal]

Please tell me what is better to set the time for the parameter -- Switching interval (minutes). If the farm consists of ASIC S7, S9, D3, L3. Thank you in advance.

it depends on the specs of coins you mine (block time) and the pool payout scheme really, no real "best" nor better answer for that.

for example, you can have them as short as possible on NiceHash as long as the switching is fast and almost instantaneous (I have no idea, never owned an ASIC). because it's PPS, and you get paid for valid shares, but if you are mining specific coins on pools that runs PPLNS, PPLNT scheme, then these ones are probably not suitable for frequent swithching. In those ones, you want to probably have switching interval set to multiples of the average block time as per coin specifications. but it really is just trial and error and see what you find is best for you.

I hear you. But I do not take a separate coin, and work for example on zpool, zergpool with conversion to BTC. Then what about time?

[moppidoo]

I hear you. But I do not take a separate coin, and work for example on zpool, zergpool with conversion to BTC. Then what about time?

most Yiimp pools are on PROP scheme, and tbh, since you are mining with ASICs that auto-convert to BTC, then there's no need to switch at all unless you take into account of nicehash and other MPOS pools, if not counting MPOS pools (mostly on PPLNS, PPLNT scheme) then something like 5min between NiceHash and the Yiimps are fine I reckon (of course, adjust the switching threshold to your likings too) if you don't want to miss out buyer spikes on NiceHash. It's pointless IMHO to switch between Yiimps (ie, Zerg/Zpool if doing auto conversion and not because one offer a coin that other doesn't that you really want to mine or hodl). Their payouts are wildly estimates and only spreads your earnings and hence extends payout intervals. Failover is ok, but other than that, just stick with one that you trust that is paying more consistently (personal preference).

[moppidoo]

WildRig Multi 0.11.6 Beta is Becoming Even More Useful Multi-algorithm Miner

Hi Patrike,

+1 for integrating it into AM

The miner is somewhat using compatible commandline + API as XMRig so I could add it to AM as custom software without issue. But reading from the API seemed to have a bit of issue with the hashrate units so far.

eg, mining HMQ1725, API reports hashrate of 5000 kH/s, but AM is reading 5 kH/s FYI.

edit: it applies to tribus, bcd as well (i suspect all) that kH/s are all parsed as H/s