[ANN] [INT] IntelliCoin | 2 WEEKS POW! | IntelliApp | InSign

[ChekaZ]

I really dont like the way this goes.

[Crypton1te]

Basically what they are saying is the current price of INT is 800 sats, the relaunched coin INL will cost 9000 so you can trade 10 INT for 1 INL with the so called ''12.5%'' bonus. But the amount of coins stays the same? LIKE WTF!

[BrandonKBabcock]

These are proven MIT students with a long term plan who need funds to support the endeavor and motivate them to continue to contribute their time efforts towards it on top of their studies. Also, they have legal and civil repercussions looming over them if they don't follow through as promised. Holder's are getting a 12.5% increase because the INL price is set at .00009000 price and the market was currently at .00000800 when this info was posted. It is even less now. That means you can buy more and get an even bigger % increase if you believe in them and are willing to wait to trade them in and support them through their second ICO. I am impatient like many crypto traders, but I understand their logic and reasoning and think that the coin is much more likely to live and bring quicker innovation as well as yield us vastly bigger return on our investment if we go this route. Thanks for the upcoming whitepaper and roadmap guys!  

[Crypton1te]

A big FUCK YOU, and im out!

[Schild_]

Basically what they are saying is the current price of INT is 800 sats, the relaunched coin INL will cost 9000 so you can trade 10 INT for 1 INL with the so called ''12.5%'' bonus. But the amount of coins stays the same? LIKE WTF!

This was NOT clear. The best way to make early investors lose faith and suspect this to be a scam.

[finlon]

I really dont like the way this goes.

You guys are fools. Ok here is what I think about this
1. If you guys invest in altcoins for Pump and Dump  or getting scammed then this is not the coin for you.
2. If you guys understand a coin and its true value, only then you will realize the value of this coin.
I don't see why raising funds is a bad move. Coins like Greenbacks, and CLSTR raised more than 100 BTC and all of them had new devs. Just this Morning DEV of USE coin dumped his premine, and had an IPO without showing a development.
And here you have legit students, who have real identities, and people are backing out. Its funny the way altcoin world works.
I feel if the dev can show development before the ICO ends then they show they are serious and worth investing in.

[gorgo]

bye bye MIT

[loges]

I didn't realize MIT had such a large Jewish student body.

[Schild_]

I really dont like the way this goes.

You guys are fools. Ok here is what I think about this
1. If you guys invest in altcoins for Pump and Dump  or getting scammed then this is not the coin for you.
2. If you guys understand a coin and its true value, only then you will realize the value of this coin.
I don't see why raising funds is a bad move. Coins like Greenbacks, and CLSTR raised more than 100 BTC and all of them had new devs. Just this Morning DEV of USE coin dumped his premine, and had an IPO without showing a development.
And here you have legit students, who have real identities, and people are backing out. Its funny the way altcoin world works.
I feel if the dev can show development before the ICO ends then they show they are serious and worth investing in.

I really had faith in that, but i can see already 2 way how this dev would have make money on us, and this next ICO seems weird.
13BTC of a 500 sat coin makes a lot of growth margin if product are delivered, complaining it's not enough is surrealistic.

[finlon]

I really dont like the way this goes.

You guys are fools. Ok here is what I think about this
1. If you guys invest in altcoins for Pump and Dump  or getting scammed then this is not the coin for you.
2. If you guys understand a coin and its true value, only then you will realize the value of this coin.
I don't see why raising funds is a bad move. Coins like Greenbacks, and CLSTR raised more than 100 BTC and all of them had new devs. Just this Morning DEV of USE coin dumped his premine, and had an IPO without showing a development.
And here you have legit students, who have real identities, and people are backing out. Its funny the way altcoin world works.
I feel if the dev can show development before the ICO ends then they show they are serious and worth investing in.

I really had faith in that, but i can see already 2 way how this dev would have make money on us, and this next ICO seems weird.
13BTC of a 500 sat coin makes a lot of growth margin if product are delivered, complaining it's not enough is surrealistic.

Schild, I get your point. But its a growth margin for only investors. Not for developers and not for Altcoins in terms of development. In general after few days this will die as well, and be replaced by another coin. If you are out, then be out.

[TMoney508]

I really dont like the way this goes.

You guys are fools. Ok here is what I think about this
1. If you guys invest in altcoins for Pump and Dump  or getting scammed then this is not the coin for you.
2. If you guys understand a coin and its true value, only then you will realize the value of this coin.
I don't see why raising funds is a bad move. Coins like Greenbacks, and CLSTR raised more than 100 BTC and all of them had new devs. Just this Morning DEV of USE coin dumped his premine, and had an IPO without showing a development.
And here you have legit students, who have real identities, and people are backing out. Its funny the way altcoin world works.
I feel if the dev can show development before the ICO ends then they show they are serious and worth investing in.

I really had faith in that, but i can see already 2 way how this dev would have make money on us, and this next ICO seems weird.
13BTC of a 500 sat coin makes a lot of growth margin if product are delivered, complaining it's not enough is surrealistic.

I agree. Just buy your own coin then keep delivering what you promised. From there you can slowly sell off as the price increases.

[Crypton1te]

MIT i dont give a fuck where they are studying the fact is that they are money donkeys and right now the investors/holders of INT got scammed by a bunch of so called ''MIT'' students.

[BrandonKBabcock]

So much butthurt, anger and unrealistic expectations in here. They're doing us a favor here boys and girls. You just have to be calm and intelligent enough to see it. You have guaranteed profit unless you bought over 800 sats in which case we weren't going to see that until the time of the ICO anyway. Plus, the second ICO will bring in much bigger fish with all the given info there is out there now. This will lead to the price dramatically increasing on launch and delivery of InSign. Plus, quit thinking of yourself and put yourself in their shoes for a minute. You want these busy intelligent kids to work their asses off to make you rich and not even have the support they need to do so? Get real people, get real.

[intellicoin]

I really had faith in that, but i can see already 2 way how this dev would have make money on us, and this next ICO seems weird.
13BTC of a 500 sat coin makes a lot of growth margin if product are delivered, complaining it's not enough is surrealistic.

I agree. Just buy your own coin then keep delivering what you promised. From there you can slowly sell off as the price increases.

I am sorry if you guys think that way. I obviously cannot say anything to defend myself on this , but if we wanted to do this we could have simply invested Bitcoins in the previous presale we had.

[Schild_]

I really dont like the way this goes.

You guys are fools. Ok here is what I think about this
1. If you guys invest in altcoins for Pump and Dump  or getting scammed then this is not the coin for you.
2. If you guys understand a coin and its true value, only then you will realize the value of this coin.
I don't see why raising funds is a bad move. Coins like Greenbacks, and CLSTR raised more than 100 BTC and all of them had new devs. Just this Morning DEV of USE coin dumped his premine, and had an IPO without showing a development.
And here you have legit students, who have real identities, and people are backing out. Its funny the way altcoin world works.
I feel if the dev can show development before the ICO ends then they show they are serious and worth investing in.

I really had faith in that, but i can see already 2 way how this dev would have make money on us, and this next ICO seems weird.
13BTC of a 500 sat coin makes a lot of growth margin if product are delivered, complaining it's not enough is surrealistic.

I agree. Just buy your own coin then keep delivering what you promised. From there you can slowly sell off as the price increases.

They received 13 BTC  for their work, with this, they should buy their coin now and create a development fund.

[Schild_]

I really had faith in that, but i can see already 2 way how this dev would have make money on us, and this next ICO seems weird.
13BTC of a 500 sat coin makes a lot of growth margin if product are delivered, complaining it's not enough is surrealistic.

I agree. Just buy your own coin then keep delivering what you promised. From there you can slowly sell off as the price increases.

I am sorry if you guys think that way. I obviously cannot say anything to defend myself on this , but if we wanted to do this we could have simply invested Bitcoins in the previous presale we had.

 

I'm going back to SDC.

Wish you good luck and sincerely hope you guys aren't scammer for the others, buy i'm not fond of this kind of management.

Good luck devs, if you are legit I guess it must not be a good moment for you guys either, but if you provide some work all this story will be forgotten.

Best wishes...

[finlon]

A big FUCK YOU, and im out!

MIT i dont give a fuck where they are studying the fact is that they are money donkeys and right now the investors/holders of INT got scammed by a bunch of so called ''MIT'' students.

I thought you said you were out. Why come back?

Schild and Cryptonite are the only 2 I see FUDDING here.

[Crypton1te]

I really had faith in that, but i can see already 2 way how this dev would have make money on us, and this next ICO seems weird.
13BTC of a 500 sat coin makes a lot of growth margin if product are delivered, complaining it's not enough is surrealistic.

I agree. Just buy your own coin then keep delivering what you promised. From there you can slowly sell off as the price increases.

I am sorry if you guys think that way. I obviously cannot say anything to defend myself on this , but if we wanted to do this we could have simply invested Bitcoins in the previous presale we had.

You should have thought about this in the first place when you had the first pre-sale that 13 BTC is not going to work out for you guys for long term development. Calling these kids intelligent? Well i don't think so.

[studio1one]

Great way to reward your early supporters huh. Didn't get enough out of them so stitch them up. Fuck this.

[gorgo]

I really had faith in that, but i can see already 2 way how this dev would have make money on us, and this next ICO seems weird.
13BTC of a 500 sat coin makes a lot of growth margin if product are delivered, complaining it's not enough is surrealistic.

I agree. Just buy your own coin then keep delivering what you promised. From there you can slowly sell off as the price increases.

I am sorry if you guys think that way. I obviously cannot say anything to defend myself on this , but if we wanted to do this we could have simply invested Bitcoins in the previous presale we had.

the thing is you have to adjust that exchange rate to 1:1
that way you can still do a 30% ICO/IPO + the about 35% that are already out make 35% for POW