Hamuki
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 29, 2014, 12:56:53 PM |
|
How can I make a setup with 27 harddrives that cost the least in power?
With 27 tb you would make 0.011 btc pr day.
But it just looks like it will be 14 days max and then it would be mining at a loss :/
|
|
|
|
uray
|
|
October 29, 2014, 12:56:55 PM |
|
Is it worth getting into this kind of mining?
Because it looks like value isnt that high.
I have 27x 1TB harddrives and people around me are currious about this kind of mining..
But we dont want to be mining at a loss..
We know that if we started now we could make 0.011 BTC a day.
What is your suggestions? This is a school project and we wanna do this aslong as its not going to be a loss..
Or is there maybe other coins like this one that I can mine instead and make a little more money on so it will last longer..?
~Hamuki
funny that you ask this in this thread. i think you will get here only one answer: start mining now! yeah start mining now!what were u thinking, you already own those 27x 1TB drive!, it does not look you need to invest something other than your time and effort, mining cost will be ~200 watt / hour (assuming each drive consuming 5 watt, and other pc component about 70watt), for 0.15$/kwh electric cost it would be 0.72$ per day (not even one dollar)
|
|
|
|
Hamuki
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 29, 2014, 01:08:02 PM |
|
Is it worth getting into this kind of mining?
Because it looks like value isnt that high.
I have 27x 1TB harddrives and people around me are currious about this kind of mining..
But we dont want to be mining at a loss..
We know that if we started now we could make 0.011 BTC a day.
What is your suggestions? This is a school project and we wanna do this aslong as its not going to be a loss..
Or is there maybe other coins like this one that I can mine instead and make a little more money on so it will last longer..?
~Hamuki
funny that you ask this in this thread. i think you will get here only one answer: start mining now! yeah start mining now!what were u thinking, you already own those 27x 1TB drive!, it does not look you need to invest something other than your time and effort, mining cost will be ~200 watt / hour (assuming each drive consuming 5 watt, and other pc component about 70watt), for 0.15$/kwh electric cost it would be 0.72$ per day (not even one dollar) How would you connect 27 harddrives to one machine?
|
|
|
|
110110101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1382
Merit: 1002
|
|
October 29, 2014, 01:15:53 PM |
|
You probably don't need them to be connected to one physical PC. Instead, have them plotted in a way that they do not overlap, and have them all using your same BURST-address.
I currently have to boxes mining to the same account, so I cannot see why you couldn't have each machine mining with it's hard drive instead. Of course, the drawback is that you would have multiple boxes and higher electrical costs by doing so.
Another option would be stripping out the drives and connecting as many as possible to your motherboard and/or via USB3 hubs to one or more computers.
|
|
|
|
Hamuki
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 29, 2014, 01:23:45 PM |
|
You probably don't need them to be connected to one physical PC. Instead, have them plotted in a way that they do not overlap, and have them all using your same BURST-address.
I currently have to boxes mining to the same account, so I cannot see why you couldn't have each machine mining with it's hard drive instead. Of course, the drawback is that you would have multiple boxes and higher electrical costs by doing so.
Another option would be stripping out the drives and connecting as many as possible to your motherboard and/or via USB3 hubs to one or more computers.
Hmm, sounds like something I could do. Just looks a bit crazy on the network size. When I checked it 2 hours ago it had about 6100TB. Right now there is 6884TB. Worth getting into? Idk.. But if it does not stop or the value of the coin does not rise a lot so the profit will be the same then its gonna be a bit hard getting into this.
|
|
|
|
mercyground
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
October 29, 2014, 01:43:17 PM |
|
You probably don't need them to be connected to one physical PC. Instead, have them plotted in a way that they do not overlap, and have them all using your same BURST-address.
I currently have to boxes mining to the same account, so I cannot see why you couldn't have each machine mining with it's hard drive instead. Of course, the drawback is that you would have multiple boxes and higher electrical costs by doing so.
Another option would be stripping out the drives and connecting as many as possible to your motherboard and/or via USB3 hubs to one or more computers.
Hmm, sounds like something I could do. Just looks a bit crazy on the network size. When I checked it 2 hours ago it had about 6100TB. Right now there is 6884TB. Worth getting into? Idk.. But if it does not stop or the value of the coin does not rise a lot so the profit will be the same then its gonna be a bit hard getting into this. This is a good thing. More secure network.
|
|
|
|
Nevril
Member
Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
|
|
October 29, 2014, 01:51:08 PM Last edit: November 03, 2014, 04:33:42 PM by Nevril |
|
Burst Long Term Price Support project(BLTPS)I've released the first set of information about the project I've been working on in the last couple of weeks to support Burst. You will find every detail on what it is and how to participate in this thread on BurstForum. I've chosen it to be the official place where to ask questions and where updates will be. Hopefully this will help moving some of the interesting discussions on our official forum. Click Me!
|
|
|
|
mercyground
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
October 29, 2014, 02:02:35 PM |
|
Burst Long Term Price Support project(BLTPS)I've released the first set of information about the project I've been working on in the last couple of weeks to support Burst. You will find every detail on what it is and how to participate in this thread on BurstForum. I've chosen it to be the official place where to ask questions and where updates will be. Hopefully this will help moving some of the interesting discussions on our official forum. Click Me! Link is broken
|
|
|
|
crowetic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1072
https://crowetic.com | https://qortal.org
|
|
October 29, 2014, 02:11:15 PM |
|
Burst Long Term Price Support project(BLTPS)I've released the first set of information about the project I've been working on in the last couple of weeks to support Burst. You will find every detail on what it is and how to participate in this thread on BurstForum. I've chosen it to be the official place where to ask questions and where updates will be. Hopefully this will help moving some of the interesting discussions on our official forum. Click Me! Link is broken Here is the link he's trying to post... https://burstforum.com/index.php?threads/official-thread-burst-long-term-price-support-project-bltps.282/#post-2943
|
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▒▒▒▒▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
| ORTAL
| .⊙.Web and Application hosting. ⊙ decentralized infrastructure .⊙.leveling and voting.
| Founder/current dev group facilitator |
[/td][/tr][/table] [/table]
|
|
|
Nevril
Member
Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
|
|
October 29, 2014, 02:15:04 PM Last edit: November 03, 2014, 04:35:21 PM by Nevril |
|
|
|
|
|
fivebells
|
|
October 29, 2014, 03:11:49 PM |
|
What''s an example where an agent has effectively maintained a price support without controlling the currency or the commodity?
|
|
|
|
unsoindovo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1042
https://locktrip.com/?refId=40964
|
|
October 29, 2014, 03:14:33 PM |
|
You probably don't need them to be connected to one physical PC. Instead, have them plotted in a way that they do not overlap, and have them all using your same BURST-address.
I currently have to boxes mining to the same account, so I cannot see why you couldn't have each machine mining with it's hard drive instead. Of course, the drawback is that you would have multiple boxes and higher electrical costs by doing so.
Another option would be stripping out the drives and connecting as many as possible to your motherboard and/or via USB3 hubs to one or more computers.
Hmm, sounds like something I could do. Just looks a bit crazy on the network size. When I checked it 2 hours ago it had about 6100TB. Right now there is 6884TB. Worth getting into? Idk.. But if it does not stop or the value of the coin does not rise a lot so the profit will be the same then its gonna be a bit hard getting into this. hamuki don't worry.... the difficulty is fluctuating a lot!!! it is not a problem!!!
|
|
|
|
Nevril
Member
Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
|
|
October 29, 2014, 03:25:36 PM |
|
What''s an example where an agent has effectively maintained a price support without controlling the currency or the commodity?
In these terms, probably never existed. But think of BLTPS as this: 1. an agent made of more people (funders, holders, whatever you want to call them) with the interest in supporting that exact currency manipulating those who dump just for quick (and low) profit. Like an anti-whale or market controller. 2. a different mining method that currently works, even if in a slightly different way, for Bitcoin. Specifically all scrypt-x11-whatever miners that focus their hashing power on BTC multipools are actually doing the same as BLTPS proposes to do, but they are doing it for Bitcoin. Multipools dump their mined coins into Bitcoin. And it is quite known that one of the strongest bitcoin buyers are multipools. BLTPS would be doing something extremely similar, the other way around. Bitcoin is "dumped" in Burst. The difference is that Bitcoin is rather stable and way stronger than Burst so its economy wouldn't be affected by BLTPS operations on the market.
|
|
|
|
uray
|
|
October 29, 2014, 03:31:43 PM |
|
the investor who join ur project will want profit at the end (thats why it called investor not supporter), lets say we collected funds of 10 btc, we buy mining hardware, and earning bitcoin, then we use these bitcoins as buy wall, if the wall got eaten, we got burst, and then we distributed these burst to investors, and then investor will dump the burst so they get their btc back. i don't know if this is good idea or bad idea if you want buy support scheme like this, here is my suggestion : 1. we collect BTC as much as possible 2. we buy cloud bitcoin mining automatically, lets say CEX.IO's GHS 3. BTC earned from those GHS will be auto deposited to exchange and buy the burst at whatever the price will be 4. the Burst we received, automatically withdrawn to BURST-2222-2222-2222-22222 (it got destroyed) this scheme will work without human intervention, and all data should be available for public to monitor, so no funds were stolen. and it will work only if we can get #1 (we talk about this later) - about #2, why we need this? its because we need to consistent bitcoin earning and it should last forever, thats why we need bitcoin mining, and it should be cloud mining so no one will hold the physical burst community hardware on his garage, all data on this cloud mining should be open to public for every btc deposit, transaction and withdrawal and those operations should be done without human
- about #3, i dont know which one is better, buy at whatever price or setup the buy wall, but i prefer immediate buy, because there are no guarantee that the bitcoin amount is enough to create a wall
- about #4, why we destroy the burst? because no one owned it and also our target is to increase the price
- lets talk about #1. to get supporter, we need volunteer, so anyone who want burst price rise, can spend their bitcoin to these address, any amount, any time.
another idea is to take "tax" from miner and burst user, every burst transaction we pay at least 1 burst, and it goes to miners, somehow we need to recollect those funds, this could be carried out via pool, pool operator can voluntary send their pool profit to this project. the problem is the funds is still in burst, we need to dump it into BTC before we can buy GHS, but it doesn't matter because the burst we got back from bitcoin mining will ended up being destroyed
this way the funds to destroy the burst is come from burst users itself
|
|
|
|
Nevril
Member
Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
|
|
October 29, 2014, 04:04:18 PM Last edit: November 03, 2014, 04:35:02 PM by Nevril |
|
the investor who join ur project will want profit at the end (thats why it called investor not supporter), lets say we collected funds of 10 btc, we buy mining hardware, and earning bitcoin, then we use these bitcoins as buy wall, if the wall got eaten, we got burst, and then we distributed these burst to investors, and then investor will dump the burst so they get their btc back. i don't know if this is good idea or bad idea if you want buy support scheme like this, here is my suggestion : 1. we collect BTC as much as possible 2. we buy cloud bitcoin mining automatically, lets say CEX.IO's GHS 3. BTC earned from those GHS will be auto deposited to exchange and buy the burst at whatever the price will be 4. the Burst we received, automatically withdrawn to BURST-2222-2222-2222-22222 (it got destroyed) this scheme will work without human intervention, and all data should be available for public to monitor, so no funds were stolen. and it will work only if we can get #1 (we talk about this later) - about #2, why we need this? its because we need to consistent bitcoin earning and it should last forever, thats why we need bitcoin mining, and it should be cloud mining so no one will hold the physical burst community hardware on his garage, all data on this cloud mining should be open to public for every btc deposit, transaction and withdrawal and those operations should be done without human
- about #3, i dont know which one is better, buy at whatever price or setup the buy wall, but i prefer immediate buy, because there are no guarantee that the bitcoin amount is enough to create a wall
- about #4, why we destroy the burst? because no one owned it and also our target is to increase the price
- lets talk about #1. to get supporter, we need volunteer, so anyone who want burst price rise, can spend their bitcoin to these address, any amount, any time.
another idea is to take "tax" from miner and burst user, every burst transaction we pay at least 1 burst, and it goes to miners, somehow we need to recollect those funds, this could be carried out via pool, pool operator can voluntary send their pool profit to this project. the problem is the funds is still in burst, we need to dump it into BTC before we can buy GHS, but it doesn't matter because the burst we got back from bitcoin mining will ended up being destroyed
this way the funds to destroy the burst is come from burst users itself
Destroying is something I've thought of. But I don't like that idea too much because you are artificially raising the value. The exactly same effect could be achieved by diminishing the total amount of Bursts or increasing/quicken the mining-reward reduction over time. And this can be achieved in a way more easier method: hard fork. Which... cm'on is really easier than convincing people in "burning" their own money! Said so, let's get to the other 3 points: #1 BLTPS has to collect as much BTC as possible but the best way to do it is providing something in return, and a reward is possible, I'll get a little bit deeper in the schema at the end of this post. #2 Exactly, but still REDACTED #3 Partially, with BLTPS a buy-wall strategy should be the most effective, but this isn't the only one to be adopted. Strategic "quick-buys" and multiple walls can also be adopted to increase the effectiveness. It all depends on point #1. I understand why you "don't know if it is a good or bad idea". It is really tough to predict but take this into account: The investor is investing BTC in a Burst asset. Not BTC for BTC or Burst for Burst. And this should already give a nice idea on the true interest of the investor. If they want to get BTC back from Burst, they dump, it's true. And they can, nobody will stop them. But the gain, if all of them dump their Bursts (extremely unlike to happen), will be 0 up to one specific moment: when mining hardware actually ROIs. When this happens, no matter which currency they choose to keep, they will be getting some profit. The rest is up to the market, sure. Nobody can create a super-whale eating everything else, especially because the currency itself would be totally useless. BLTPS cannot go negative because of your point #2. It can go 0 with extremely low probability. With high probability thou it will increase burst value not only thanks to its own buy walls but also by creating volume movement on exchanges which in turns creates interest in those who aren't even aware of the existence of this coin.
|
|
|
|
hvidgaard
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
October 29, 2014, 06:15:58 PM |
|
USB2 - ~40 mb/s, too slow for large HDDs. Works well for ~1-1.5Tb
That simply isn't true. USB 2.0 is theoretical 35MiB/s, but more realistically 30MiB/s. How fast is that i terms of Burst? We need to read 1/4096 of the plotfile, so with 1TB (~954000MiB) it takes ~7,76 seconds to read a plot. So if you want to stay below 30 seconds to play it safe, you can have 3.86TB, or just round up to 4TB in 31 seconds. Note that some ports share bandwidth, so you can only have 4TB on those ports in total. In other words, USB 2.0 is fine as long as you make sure you aren't using ports that share bandwidth.
|
|
|
|
Yanakitu Tenatako
|
|
October 29, 2014, 08:08:07 PM |
|
I am having difficulty woth speed even with SATA3 drives, lots of things that seens "could work" simply don't. By my experience I would stay away of USB 2.0 drives.
I can't read plots of 32Tb in less than 2 minutes. All on Sata3.
|
|
|
|
kamronk
|
|
October 29, 2014, 08:29:50 PM |
|
Been following this coin for a bit now, and am still very fascinated by it.
I'm going to read into the buy support that is happening, but what else is there to increase upwards pressure or the demand to buy this coin?
|
|
|
|
carlos
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
|
October 29, 2014, 08:50:18 PM |
|
I am having difficulty woth speed even with SATA3 drives, lots of things that seens "could work" simply don't. By my experience I would stay away of USB 2.0 drives.
I can't read plots of 32Tb in less than 2 minutes. All on Sata3.
What stagger size do you use?
|
|
|
|
Nevril
Member
Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
|
|
October 29, 2014, 09:12:58 PM Last edit: November 03, 2014, 04:34:05 PM by Nevril |
|
Been following this coin for a bit now, and am still very fascinated by it.
I'm going to read into the buy support that is happening, but what else is there to increase upwards pressure or the demand to buy this coin?
I've just released info on the (honestly quite ambitious) BLTPS project. Other projects, from other members, are likely to be available. No exclusive here The coin is young, has quite some time to grow in support and be spread out.
|
|
|
|
|